- http://twitter.com/CharlieZangelQQ DaMz
I was waiting for this one.
Saw it earlier. How much you want to bet they brush this under the rug too?ROMBO can do no wrong in their eyes
“They” being Media,establishment and mushy scared repubs
- Sober_Thinking
Maobama lite…
- mjs_pa
may i suggest you send this story to everyone you know. there are ways around the media blockade.
- TPDanbo
This and many other reasons are why If Obama wins it’s time to either kick out the GOP ELITES or start a new Conservative Party, afterall the only ones hurt by it are the Republicans!
- retired05
The trick is to find a way of getting money back into the treasury without being unkind to the older folk. I like Romney’s good looks, but I think I’ll stick with that Libertarian fella.
- Sober_Thinking
Romney looks like an undertaker… which is appropriate because he may preside over a dead nation even if he wins.
- Rightstuff1
If by “that Libertarian fella” you mean Ron Paul then you are deluding yourself. Ron Paul is in cahoots with Mitt Romney as has been asserted and proved by Rush, Mark Levin. It is so obvious even the LSM are now commenting on it.
How do you Ron Paul fans go on supporting a guy that is using your contributions to bash the conservative of the day that threatens Mitt Romney?
- retired05
Ooh baby. I bet you do have the right stuff! Anyway, so much for that. No, I am thinking of that truly Libertarian guy who used to be the Gov. of New Mexico or something and likes to smoke weed. Hey, as long as he doesn’t do it in the WH – I guess it’s o.k. I just want to hang on to my cigarillos and cocktails! That’s what this old broad is talkin’ about.
- Sober_Thinking
And how is he different than that today?
He’s as much if not more of an insider imo.
The grease in his hair is oil-logging his brain.
- Rightstuff1
Romney is a pure and simple liar. He has taken lying to an art form and he is plays politics like a liberal.
- WordsFailMe
Romney will be exposed. Santorum couldn’t be more obvious. OBAMA forgive us.
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez
I just seen that Ted Nugent Endorsed Mitt Romney.
another bites the dust… I thought he would endorse Newt, Ted seems like a Newt guy, not really a Mitt guy
- c4pfan
I wouldn’t want his lame endorsement.
- nibblesyble
I am puzzled by that as well, considering Nugent is all about guns, and the most Romney can say about being pro-gun is that he shot some critters!
- Nukeman60
Seems a bit puzzling, since he was sooo much against McCain in ’08. I’m surprised, but I was kind of expecting it as he may have been spending way too much time with Glenn Beck lately. He may have been swayed about Newt from Glenn (who absolutely abhors Newt). Sad.
- sjmom
What a liberal! How does he get the votes? I don’t understand it.
- c4pfan
Because, people that support Mitt know he’s not conservative or that he’s just going to do what’s already going on in DC. He’s not going to reform anything and they like that.
Also, they are the ones that HATE social conservatives with a passion. They would rather this country go bankcrupt.
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/2GR77FIJZ2A2ZBKZFGRXYG7QY4 kim
Government is a reflection of the people. I know that is a bitter pill to swallow but that is where we are. You gotta fix the people if you want better candidates.
- Trust1TG
He got the largest ever bail-out for the Salt Lake City Olympics:
“Most U.S. tax dollars per athlete. Federal spending for the Salt Lake City Games will average $625,000 for each of the 2,400 athletes who will compete. (Not a penny of it will go to the athletes.) That’s a 996% increase from the $57,000 average for the 1996 Atlanta Olympics. It’s a staggering 5,582% jump from the $11,000 average for the 1984 Summer Games in Los Angeles.”
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1024516/index.htm“And for the upcoming 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, the estimated cost to American taxpayers is 1.3 billion dollars. That’s outrageous Mr. President. And it’s a disgrace,” McCain said. (2001)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/09/whos-the-biggest-earmarker-of-them-all/?hpt=hp_bn3Romney has a history of surviving poor decision-making by gulping down federal largesse. He’s built up an impressive mythology about someone who makes things work.”
http://bluemassgroup.com/2012/01/bailout-mitt-salt-lake-city-edition/BAIN – Bain Capital was also beneficiary of US taxpayer dollar BAILOUT – http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10538-romneys-skeletons-his-bain-capital-received-millions-in-bailouts
ROMNEY STEEL COMPANY PROFITS COST TAXPAYER – As this report says, Romney does have a skeleton in the closet, and it involves federal funds.
“What’s more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company’s underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/06/us-campaign-romney-bailout-idUSTRE8050LL20120106“Mitt Romney says he saved Bain & Company, but he didn’t tell you that on the day he took over, he had his predecessor fire hundreds of employees, or that the way the company was rescued was with a federal bailout of $10 million,” notes the narrator in Sen. Kennedy’s unreleased ad as pictures of newspaper articles fill the screen. “He and others made $4 million in this deal which cost ordinary people $10 million.”
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10538-romneys-skeletons-his-bain-capital-received-millions-in-bailouts
Romney came from Bain & Co. to create Bain Capital. Bain Capital, in turn, pulled a ‘leveraged buyout’ of Bain & Co. — the monster child turning on its mother and eating its own.
Here’s an interview with a Venture Capitalist discussing Bain … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmrEUHdwAwQ&feature=youtu.be
The interviewee was chairman of the Texas Workforce Commission and head of the Republican Party of Texas. He was in the venture capital business for 6 years after leaving the Reagan administration.
He very clearly explains why Mitt Romney is *not* a job creator, but that what Bain did actually killed jobs, and the difference between venture capital and leveraged buyout companies like Bain, Michael Milken, and Steve Schwartzman. It is not complicated and is easy to understand.Romney will get crushed by the MSM over Bain. He is the founding father of the “private equity” Wall Street scam. They take over a company and inflate its short-term profits by laying off workers, cutting pensions and selling assets. They then take out huge loans in the acquired firm’s name and immediately transfer the money as “dividends” and “fees” to Bain capital. If the now deeply debt-ridden acquired firm goes bankrupt, Bain gets to keep all that money as it is untouchable in bankruptcy proceedings. Bain socializes their losses to banks, pension insurers, etc. and privatizes their gains in the same kind of Wall Street con job that led to the mortgage crisis. Bain donates to Democrats and keeps the laws in place to allow this to go on. Nominate Romney and you will see all of this exposed by the liberal media in the fall. He is a classic Wall Street crook and will become unelectable. If he did win, you can only expect the collusion between big government and Wall Street to become deeper and more endemic, driving the nation further into bankruptcy.
TRUTH ABOUT BAIN AND JOBS – http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204409004577158704283934684.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
BAIN – http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/01/bain-capital-a-users-guide.html#ixzz1l7BXgqUPMore: FTD deal (1994-95) that was essentially a hostile buyout forced on the 20,000 members in writing as a “MERGER” but was actually and legally a SECRETLY held Public Auction that ripped off its members, and was a very questionable legal transaction that was not tested in the courts but was DEFINITELY, morally and ethically, of the lowest caliber. Mitt’s knowledge, participation, and or influence, needs an explanation, with NO platitudes or non sequiturs. The first dots to connect are Meg Whitman and Perry Capital NY. The dots will lead to the money, hundreds of millions.
There is more, much more….Medicare fraud, the largest on record.
Then there is the lying… about being a conservative when he governed left of Ted Kennedy and most Democrats. Lies on stage in front of millions of viewers in the debates. Lies in ads. Nasty smears… dirty politics… 2008 was as bad as 2012.
The only use for Romney in a conservative Republican administration would be as a ruthless government agency down-sizer, because he is very experienced in shutting down and gutting businesses and as he says, he loves to fire people.
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU TJ
Sure sounds like Romney got some inside connections with Washington somehow! Even using department of education funds when, if so desired, it seems to me kids could have watched the olympics on a tv screen!
- Been_There_BT
Guess we won’t be seeing this video with a headline and an unbecoming photo of Mitt splashed on Drudge the day before Super Tuesday.
- mjs_pa
THE STORY MATT DRUDGE IS AFRAID TO REPORT
- Asian_chic
He is so dull on the campaign trail but when it comes to the taxpayer’s money, can you see the excitement and animation in his eyes? “Yippee! We just hit the motherload!”
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/2GR77FIJZ2A2ZBKZFGRXYG7QY4 kim
So true.
- Been_There_BT
After watching the Mitt video, you might want to cheer yourself up with some contrast:
This Newt speech is great – I really like the way he defended our military and the crowd went crazy cheering about mid way through the speech:
http://electad.com/videos/newt-gingrich-campaign-rally-macon-georgia-march-1-2012-partial-video/
Newt 2012 – The man with the plan
- nibblesyble
I want to know why this man is not 20 points ahead of both Santorum and especially Romney?! I cannot believe that he is trailing when he nails every statement, every policy, every idea. People wake up! Rant finished.
- c4pfan
Because, he wasted his time focusing on Bain capital and didn’t go after Mitt for Romneycare due to he’s for mandates himself. Plus, people don’t care about miltary matters until it affects them. All they care about is who’s going to give them money or benefit.
- nibblesyble
I think it was Maxine that posted a youtube vid of the Bain thing(I wish I had it) that blows the whole thing out of the water. I hope she sees this so she can link it for you. I think that Newt was right, but wasn’t getting the support he needed on it at the time. Besides he isn’t just talking about the Military, he is talking about all the issues, and being on them far ahead of the so-called front-runners.
- MaxineCA
Sorry for the delay, but I just got home. I don’t recall specifically the link I posted, but Trust1TG posted some links below that might be what you’re requesting.
- Been_There_BT
Apparently the crony capitalism video of Mitt wanting all the government money he could get his hands on was lost on you. Newt was right about Mitt and Bain.
- Been_There_BT
I hear Newt is getting huge, enthusiastic crowds at his campaign stops. That’s a good sign.
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU TJ
supported cap and trade mandate:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/interviews/gingrich.html
(please see toward bottom of page)though reluctantly, agreed with the wallstreet bailout:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/09/gingrich-now-ba/believes so called “gay marriage” state by state should be allowed to advance, if the state’s majority want it, even though he personally is opposed- another words, won’t fight to protect marriage:
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2012/02/24/gingrich-least-states-are-using-bills-not-judges-legalize-same-sex-marriagesupported individual health care mandating for many years and until quite recently:
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-health-care-insurance/2011/05/15/id/396426Tom Coburn’s opinion:
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/12/04/coburn-gingrich-brilliant-lacking-leadershipAnd a lot are concerned, though now professing repentance, about his past marital infidelity- not ideal roll model.
- nibblesyble
I don’t want a role model Tj…I want a leader. Santorum has his issues, Romney certainly has his…I satisfy myself in knowing that Newt reformed Gov’t before and nobody has since. As for Tom Coburn, all I have to point out is he said at a Townhall that Nancy Pelosi was nice and not to believe everything you hear on Fox news. Besides there is a youtube video out there that has (Sen. Graham who helped to oust Newt out of congress) wondering if perhaps they were not too hasty in doing so considering they have not been able to do anything significant since Newt left. Finally, getting to my original point/rant I wonder why he is not doing gangbusters now because everything he is saying is timely and put in a way that even a kid could understand. Santorum is spending his time walking back everything he said in the last week and Romney is being Romney(lying thru his teeth) Newt should be on top. Nuff said.
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU TJ
A leader ideally should be a good role model of fine character and repute. Now since man is fallen, no one here could meet up to being a perfect role model. Still, it is important to a lot of conservative voters.
As for Tom Coburn, I heard him myself as I watched him on the one show that is shown on a local Fox station that comes from cable- Fox News Sunday. He did not seem eager to share his opinon to me, but Fox news didn’t make him say exactly what he did- it came from his own opinion. I didn’t get the context of the Nancy Pelosi being nice comment- was he saying as a woman? I doubt he likes her politics!
Senator Graham I think is leaning towards moderatism- I respect the fact J.C. Watts got behind Newt- carries more weight with me. Still does not address all the issues with Newt for me. The reason Newt is able to me more free in getting his message out, I believe, is because he for now at least, is not in the front runner hot seat. Rick Santorum is getting his message out at the grass roots as he travels about… and it is resonating with the voters. He also got his message out quite well in a number of debates.
We disagree who should be on top- my top concern about Newt versus Rick (though it looks like Newt would have a tougher time contrasting sharply with the President on issues like health care mandate (story above), cap and trade mandating (story above), and bailing out wallstreet (though reluctant- story above) because of a track record and I don’t think he would serve as the best role model on fidelity in marriage), is Newt’s position on his apparent unwillingness to fight for marriage between a man and a woman in this country (story above).
- Patriot077
Two of the biggest advantages the R’s have is health care and unbridled spending. So we are supposed to elect the one least able to distance himself from either.
Praying Rick and Newt keep getting their message out.
- NoToTyrants
/Mittwitt on
But Willard “The Electable” is so “electable”, as he is “the business man” and has the magnificent locks. Only Willard [who last election lost to the guy who went on to lose to Maobama] can defeat Maobama.
/Mittwitt off - Trust1TG
No, He’s not all that electable. His support is down from 2008.
Romney having trouble holding onto 2008 supporters: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/19/romney-shows-trouble-keeping-supporters-from-2008/
Look at Maine: Ron Paul DOUBLED his share of the people voting for him, and Romney LOST ground.
–In 2008, Paul took 18% of the vote, and Romney took 51%.
–In 2012, Paul took 36% of the vote, and Romney took 39%.Look what happened in Michigan – he barely scraped by.
Every county in FL where Romney won, the vote count was way down. Every county in FL that Newt won, the vote count was up.
Every state Romney wins the vote count is down.An active Republican Party worker in Virginia, has said that Romney and his people have estranged Republicans in Virginia WITH THE SAME TACTICS we have seen in Florida and nationally:
http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/01/29/republican-establishment-out-to-get-allen-west/comment-page-1/#comment-884413 - RosiesSeeingRed
Perry took a lot of flack for taking the stimulus money, even though as a governor of a state that paid more than their fair share of it because of their relatively better economy, he would’ve been derelict in his duties if he hadn’t. The system is messed up, period. It needs to be changed.
So it’s not so much that Mitt got the money any way he knew how, or played the game that everyone else had been playing, it’s the fact that he’s so DISHONEST in how he portrays himself that gets me! The man is so two-faced and untrustworthy. He keeps proving himself to be an outright liar. I cannot understand why people cannot see this.
Maybe the fact that this is an ABC story will get it a lot more attention than if it were simply circulating around conservative blogs. I truly hope so.
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez
Check it out: Mitt Romney wrote an op-ed USA Today in July 2009 telling the President to use the individual mandate. http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/mitt-romneys-advice-for-obamacare-look-at-romney
- c4pfan
Yeah, that should be a post about that here! I mean, that’s a smoking gun!
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU TJ
Have you seen this article on Newt Gingrich from May, 2011?
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-health-care-insurance/2011/05/15/id/396426 - http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez
Ouch, I haven’t seen that one… That’s one of the reason why I feel like Santorum is the stronger candidate right now, because he’s not handicapped by supporting individual mandate, and can attack obamacare head on!
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU TJ
It’s one of them! Glad you are rooting for Santorum!
- PFFV
Romney is an opportunist that will say and do anything to gratify himself and his personal wealth, but the Romneybots dismiss his being on both sides of every issue. The majority of people in this nation disappoint me over and over. The polls say Romney is surging when we have repeated proof of him being just another political Fat-Cat. He won’t reverse course or repeal ObamaCare either. I am so sick of this Manikin BS…Grrrrrrrr!
- Reckoner_3
DC INSIDERRRRRRR
That DC money was used to pay off Michigan , Florida, and IOWA…and probably every da#n state Romney had traction in …..to grease for Open Primaries, and strong arm people….. Maybe he used it to donate to Nikki Haley etc..
Game Over
Bill Paxson
We’re Not in the Mushroom Kingdom , Anymore Mario
Game Over Lil Flip
I know Super Tuesday hasn’t happened yet. But I want ROMNEY to GTFO
Hope there are more videos of Romney surfacing over the weekend!!!
- PAWatcher
So sick of romney! He’s a snake in the grass.
- BankGuy
Gosh folks!!! This is like the Fractured Fairytales cartoon when Mr. Peabody opens his closet door and everything just spills out in a heap. Where is all this coming from? Is it opposition research coming from the conservative side or is this dirt dug up and fed by Obama’s people? All of a sudden, it appears to be a cornucopia of dirt about Romney precisely at the right time prior to Super Tuesday. Think it’s probably us as Obama would like to keep some of his powder dry if Romney is nominated.
- http://profile.yahoo.com/EPNKCLUJ4F2PBVGOB7MU7O56ZA W.
duplicate
In short, Romney has accused Santorum and Newt of being Washington insiders addicted to federal spending and earmarks. Yet in 2002 he was touting in his own DC connections and saying that he was big believer in getting money from the federal government: “I am big believer in getting money where the money is. The money is in Washington.”
Here’s the video and report from ABC News:
In a long-forgotten tape from the 2002 Massachusetts governor’s race obtained by ABC News, Mitt Romney is seen touting his Washington connections and his ability to get millions of taxpayer dollars from the federal government.
“I am big believer in getting money where the money is,” Romney says on the video, “The money is in Washington.”The video, which was surreptitiously shot by Democratic opponents of Romney on Oct. 16, 2002, shows him addressing a group called the New Bedford Industrial Foundation. The Power Point presentation he uses lists ways to improve economic development in Massachusetts, including “boost federal involvement.”
“I want to go after every grant, every project, every department in Washington to assure that we are taking advantage of economic development opportunities,” Romney tells the group.
And while Romney now often criticizes his opponents for being Washington insiders, in this video he touts his Washington connections.“I have learned from my Olympic experience that if you have people who really understand how Washington works and have personal associations there you can get money to help build economic development opportunities,” Romney says.
Romney has frequently criticized Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum for their roles in getting federal money — so-called earmarks — to fund special projects in their states while they were in Congress. The Romney campaign, however, says this is different.“Every state budget in the country is dependent on federal funding, and every governor in the country makes requests for funding, but governors do not get to decide how Congress appropriates money,” said Romney spokesman Andrea Saul. “Governor Romney supports a permanent ban on earmarks, which are symbols of what’s wrong with Washington.”
As for his experience running the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics, Romney says, “”the whole winter games was a combination of the federal, state and local governments along with private enterprise.”
“We actually received over $410 million from the federal government for the Olympic games. That is a huge increase over anything ever done before and we did that by going after every agency of government,” he says.
He even cites money one his colleagues managed to get for the Olympics from the Department of Education.“She said, ‘Why don’t I get the Department of Education to buy tickets to the Paralympics so that high school and grade school kids can go to the Paralympics?’ She literally got, I believe the number was over $1 million from the Department of Education, funding to buy tickets for kids,” Romney said. “This way we got kids there and we also got additional revenues that we wouldn’t have had. That kind of creativity I want to bring to everything we do.”
- http://twitter.com/CharlieZangelQQ
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/2GR77FIJZ2A2ZBKZFGRXYG7QY4
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/2GR77FIJZ2A2ZBKZFGRXYG7QY4
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704
- http://profile.yahoo.com/VNYSALCJWXWHB4TV2AXW5VFYBU
- http://profile.yahoo.com/EPNKCLUJ4F2PBVGOB7MU7O56ZA

The Right Scoop
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.