Well, this is easy to see.
RuPaul supports open homosexuality in the military and Ann C is chummy with the GOProud.
Many times. She wrote several columns including references to "My Gal Hillary" and what she needed to do to get the nomination.
It was probably tongue-in-cheek.
I think her tongue got stuck, though.
Ahmen! There's not a big government program, current, past or future that Newt is not willing to embrace and put that "big brain" of his around.
Newt's favorite president of all times is FDR.
Voting for Ron Paul is for adults, childish folks who need the government to take care of them from craddle to grave can vote for any of the other republicans or Obama, so you have a lot to choose from...
and don't worry if "foreign policy" is your concern, (the 51'st state Israel), then you'll still have Obama to vote for since his foreign policy mimiced GW to the letter.
Has the War Hag Coulter and her legions in the "ahmen corner" thought through another "pre-emptive" War in the Middle East? Even 5th grade bully Bill O'Reilly said it would be a disaster, but of course out the other side of his mouth he parrots the "Ron Paul is a nut on foreign policy" line.
Newt is a flat out liberal. Let's be honest. At least Romney has an idea (or says he does) of the proper spheres of government. Ron Paul actually has a record of standing for that, but I digress. Newt has repeatedly been for federalization of problems and programs. He is a saber rattler when it comes to war. He is simply not worthy of the Republican support.
Her job is to give her opinion. If you don't like it then that is your option. But you all sound like a bunch of leftist wanting her silenced. What happened to debate in this country?
So true. You can't blame sharks for eating the occasional surfer, and you can't blame the Democrats for being Democrats.
If Republicans did what they say they would, Democrats would be out of a job. In stead we get the same old bloated budgets, cronyism, and wars witht he GOP as with the DNC.
Except Ron Paul, of course.
They borrowed from SSI surplusses to "balance" the budget.
Just like when I was a kid, I'd "borrow" from my parents to buy stuff I wanted. Doesn't mean MY budget was balanced, just means the money came from another source.
Waelse1, what you don't mention, and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you don't know this, Ron Paul has also received more donations from military, current and retired, as all the other candidates, including Obama, combined. http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9044-ron-paul-campaign-receive-most-military-donations
As far as your "conspiracy theory" implication who believes that the US government initiated 9-11, see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v60TWZNVgtk&feature=player_embedded. You'll see that Dr. Paul does NOT support this line of thinking, even though he has appeared on the Alex Jones show. He's also appeared on every single major network on the planet and does not necessarily agree to their particular bias either.
Obama has also murdered American citizens overseas - not only a perceived terrorist but a teenage American boy who was not suspected of doing anything wrong. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/u-s-drone-strike-kills-16-year-old-american-citizen/ This is okay with you? If so, what a monster you are!! What if he decided to murder your son or daughter just because he says he can -that would be okay with you too, I suppose - just because he or she may be accused though not convicted of a crime?
Do you even understand what the constitution says about the American justice system? "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Have you even read the Constitution? At the very least, have you read the Bill of Rights?
Given this supreme law of the land, do you really think it's okay to execute your fellow Americans without any semblance of trial?
I don't really give a crap if you respond to me one way or another, but I do hope you and all the other like-minded, non-thinking zombies who have half a brain to read this post, do some serious soul searching and a small amount of research and think about what you are promoting and supporting.
Vote for Newt or vote for Obama - you get the same results either way.
If you think voting is a serious business and not just a beauty contest or a sporting competition, then you ought to at least understand who or what you are voting for.
Normally, a paragon of rational thought, Ann has me confused. I don't see how she can so vigorously oppose Newt while supporting Romney. In fact, it appears she's flipped. She adores Christie because, she has said, of his ability to articulate conservatism. Newt has shown he is supremely adept at precisely the same thing!
I have always liked Ann Coulter's acerbic wit vs. the neo-liberals or those of that ilk,but recently I have got to say as a Conservative myself,that her 'conservatism' is a type only Ann knows. I won't mention anything about her ideas,because she obviously has something(including myself) that keeps conservatives buying her books and listening to her opinions.I know I did.I thought for myself and since I am 15 years older than Ann ,I started earlier following conservatism.When Bill Buckley ran for mayor of NY and then his brother Jim ran and won,if I'm not mistaken the Senate seat from NY.So,I have been through all types of conservatism,Buckleys,Newt's and say Kristol's.They are generally conservative on issues(though I wonder about Newt).Ann,is well Ann. Only time and sales will tell if she has a backlash,but I'll be honest,I don't think I could buy another book by her because I don't know which way she is heading.Maybe Newt is that bad or maybe,when she was pushing Cain,her thinking is not working as fast as her lips.So,quiet down Ann and keep your followers,before you turn into another David Brock.
yeah, it sure is "crazy" to be anti unsustainable war, or to be pro civil liberties.
Liking Ron Paul is not crazy, but disagreeing with him on most of the issues is. Unless you are a wall street banker, or a military industrial complex goon, in which case you should be very anti Ron Paul.
Well no kidding. It was to show how the Federal Government went out of it's way to deem alcohol as a drug at one point as well. I am pointing out to David the point of legal marijuana. I honestly don't care if it is legal or not. I don't think it is much worse than alcohol, and, I don't hear of the NUMBER of cases where the guy behind the wheel was so stoned he killed an entire family on the news each day. I can say that is linked to alcohol, not pot.
Nice to see that everyone agrees that Ron Paul's domestic program of Small Constitutional Government is good. If only the other candidates would endorse them too. As for his foreign Non-Interventionist policy, it has yet to sink in. Call it: Mind Your Own Business. Isn't this what our parents taught us? You stick your nose in where it doesn't belong and you are gonna get your ass kicked! Which is exactly what is happening to the USA. Ron Paul is simply obeying the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.
Hey, crazy aunt: GTF back in the damned basement, and STFU. You're embarrassing us, again. I'll send your plate down, when its time to eat.
Face the facts: It's Ron Paul, or four more of Obama
LOL! You people are so funny! If somebody veers a little ways off the plantation you all scream for blood. As a matter of fact, you're all blood thirsty vampires - starting with darlin' Newt the Impaler.
Oh sh1t, where am I, it feels like I've stumbled into bizarro huffpo! Or possibly the gathering place of neocon trolls to get the latest digs in at Ron Paul. And to think the GOP expects Ron Paul supporters to fall in line when they manipulate the nomination away from him. From the point of view of a formerly 25 year registered indie, now repub, he's the only candidate that differs from any of the remaining contenders including Obama.
Hit by a car?? I think it was run over by a steamroller that was resurfacing the road!!!
Ann Coulter has really lost it......I know she is a partican Romney hack but her comments are really bordering on the completely insane.
You must be one of those people who line up to by books by Morris, Rove, Hannity, O'Reilly, and the rest of the "echo chamber".
But, don't worry if Paul were to win the Republican nomination, you'll still have Obama to vote for, his "foreign policy" has followed GW Bush's.
No more country left to govern? LMFAO. You think bringing our troops home and using them to defend the southern border is gonna destroy the country? You really are a neo-conservative piece of lying trash, aren't you!
Netanyahu, disagrees with you. He just recently said that they don't need the US in order to defend themselves, and they don't.
Also, it is not our job to be the policeman of the world, it makes us less safe as US citizens. Who do terrorists like to kill? Canadians? Swiss? New Zealanders? NO, they look for US passports and kill Americans. Why? Because our government has been killing their civilians for years now. They don't hate us because of blue jeans and cheeseburgers. They hate what our government is doing to them and many are motivated to kill because of it.
So our policy only encites the very responses we don't want. You don't see terrorists blowing up towers in Switzerland do you? NO.
She is starting to think straight. Do we really prefer someone who was tossed out of Congress on ethics violations over someone who has served honorably and honestly for over 30 years and is known for his honesty and truthfulness? Not me, Newt is a disgrace to our party and Paul is the true conservative in this race. The other two are socialists in disguise.
Paul is not a Conservative. He's an anarcho-libertarian.
He can't win the nomination, he can't hijack the Republican party, and he can't seem to stop making an a$$ out of himself.
Lorin Chane Partain - you're right. I think that the moral compass in some of these people has gone haywire. Newt cheats on his bedridden wife, gets busted for ethics violations and Ron Paul and his supporters are the kooks?
Fortunately for all of us, Newt will not be the candidate so Coulter's threat is hollow at best.
Newt's "great debater" badge seemed to be missing in the last Iowa debate. After the debate his poll numbers...collapsed.
Gingrich less than 2 weeks ago had a double digit lead in the polls.
CNN: Gingrich 28, Romney 28, Paul 14, Bachmann 8
The "Anybody but Romney" hysteria is driving bewildered voters into the arms of Crazy Uncle Ron.
Insider Advantage: Paul 24, Romney 18, Perry 16, Gingrich 13
And of course there's the evil Left wing shill Fox News:
"DEAD HEAT POLL: Gingrich Lead over Romney Collapses"
Coulture is part of the Political Entertainment Industry and is fulfilling her job description.
Perry/Rubio 2012 because the pre-game show is over, the clowns have entertained us and now it's time for the main event.
"Crazy Uncle Ron" I don't know if you remember but the called Reagan crazy in 76. Said he wasn't mainstream enough, his views were a bit nuts and so on. Sound familiar? Exactly what is crazy about Paul anyway. He is right about everything and is the real conservative in this race. The others are fake.
Oooooops... that reminds me Ron Paul is crazy and a racist and a 9-11 truther.
ANYONE save Ron paul will get obama elected.
if romney,perry or gingrich get the nomination :none of the ron paul supporters will vote for them.they dont see these d-bags as any different than the marxist in whitehouse today.
so,if any of you fellows want obama out ,hold your noses and vote ron paul.end of story.otherwise its all downhill from here for y'all
News is literally a new world order, globalist, third way, Illuminati guy.
I mean what he wrote on some books or forwards to books is really dangerous.
Romney is just an empty suit just like Obama is who can be manipulated and told what to do.
Ron Paul is the only honest and not bough and paid for candidate by the big banks.
Romney top donors are all banks from jp morgan, bank of america, wells fargo, etc... Ron paul top donors on the other hand are army, navy and airforce!
What all of these talking heads should be doing is using every last breath they have on air to promote a run by Palin...but none of them had the guts to get behind her before so why would they now even thought the GOP is going to lose to Obama with the horrible field they have running.
Wow. Where to begin.
1. He is not for free marijuana. He just wants the government to stop spending a fortune fighting something that should be legal to use in the privacy of one's home.
2. He's been pretty clear that he's an Evangelical and that has shaped his positions.
3. His views on Israel are no different that Reagan's were: we will elp defend you, but will not pay for your defense.
Again, logic fail or intentional distortion of the facts. Which are you doing, Kessi?
One clarification on the Marijuana, Paul is for the FEDERAL government to get out of the drug WAR, HE's never said he would dictate to the states what they choose to be legal or illegal. Paul has this idea we should follow the US Constitution...I know that's one of his "nutty" ideas, especially for the republican "punditry" and their legions of "book buying" followers.
1. It's a state issue, not a federal issue.
2. Raised Lutheran, cureently attends Baptist.
3. His views on how the US should treat Israel are EXACTLY the same as Benjamin Netantahu's view on how the US should treat Israel.
Christians like me follow the Prince of Peace. Not the prince of bomb-everyone-that-doesn't-agree-to-give-us-their-oil-and-worship-at-the-alter-of-Israel's-government. Love your neighbor, remember? Or better yet, love your ENEMY.