Battle Royale! Ann Coulter vs Rick Sanchez – Subject: Andrew Breitbart & Kiddie Porn

Posted by The Right Scoop The Right Scoop on July 23rd, 2010 in Politics | 46 Comments

Hat tip Anthony (follow him on twitter; he really needs followers):

Oh this is way too entertaining. An aggressive Coulter manages to get in several accusations of Rick watching kiddie porn and Sanchez never responds to her allegations except to say he doesn’t want to talk about it. To which Coulter responds “more evidence!”

This was really about Breitbart, and to be honest, I thought Ann could have given a better defense of Breitbart, noting that he posted the video as an allegation against the NAACP, not Sherrod. He never called for any action against her, especially that she be fired. But Coulter is exactly right to point right back to the White House and the NAACP for making extremely rash decisions with no due diligence, especially when the NAACP had the entire tape.

Either way, this is a must watch:




  • Pingback: Get your Coulter fix « THE BLACK KETTLE

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-D-Dunyan/1373345422 Michael D Dunyan

    I love Ann

  • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo Ozzie Castillo

    Ann always comes out swinging….sometimes she reaches though.

    This was good although I would have liked a stronger response to the question about, “shouldn't Breitbart be completely discredited?” (which is where they are going with this and FNC).

    She should have brought into question all the times other networks perpetrate lies from far left web sites and actually edit their videos (while having the full video) to damage the tea parties and then questioned if their networks should be entirely discredited in the same manner we would agree to discredit Breitbart.

    They are trying to place the blame on the messenger- It's not like she really wasn't a racist- She Was!! and she is still if you hear what she is saying now. She may still treat people like people when it is personal, but give her a little distance and she'll call you a racist with little if any evidence.

    For example: She said she was a racist- but FNC is racist for showing a pre-edited clip from the NAACP. Matter of fact she is saying that FNC is the cause of her damage.

    She is calling FNC racist (more than FNC did to her) and she has no evidence whereas FNC had a video- She, along with the other media, is trying to intentionally damage and discredit those with opposing points of view for airing a video they received from the NAACP- Even though FNC played no role in the resignation or damage to her reputation.

    NAACP and WH made more damning statements about her before the stuff even aired on FNC.

  • gregatisus

    I hope Rick Sanchez gets his kiddie porn problem under control.

  • http://wadingacross.wordpress.com/ WadingAcross

    Ann's acerbic wit is a very good foil against liberal commentary, but she overreaches often, and that does her no good. You can be quick witted and dominate a discussion without having to resort to low tactics. Low tactics are what the left uses, and those with neither facts or quick, pithy responses.

    If she has only allegations and no facts, it's best not to bring it up, especially if it's not germane to the discussion at hand. One day she'll find herself on the other end of a libel suit, and she could lose. As smart as she is, she also comes off a bit prideful.

    There are so many other easy things to peg on Rick Sanchez without resorting to such accusations. Even if she's using it as an example – comparison to charges of racism – there are less touchy sins she could have noted, and still made her point.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Judy-Wick/1135571744 Judy Wick

    I remember this Rick Sanchez guy when he used to host the news in Miami. I'm surprised by his leftist ideology considering he is Cuban – you know the anti-Castro; at least this is what I remembered when I lived in Miami in the 80's. I had lots of Cuban friends who were totally conservative. I guess they get into this wealth and power, and think of us so minuscule.
    As always, Ann chews on them spits them out.

  • Tom

    Man, Ann just ate this guy alive. I love this woman!

  • Pingback: THE RIGHT SCOOP: Ann Coulter v. Rick Sanchez – Fight! | The Right Sphere - Conservative Blogs, Columnists, News and Opinion

  • armyant57

    Rick, what's up with the kiddie porn question, and why didn't you answers?

  • firefirefire

    Hey Rickie,,,you just got your ass whupped by a girl!!

  • xRos

    This isnt a battle royale, this is a bitch slapping. Coulter is brilliant and Sanchez is an ignorant tool. He couldnt win a debate over his manhood against her.

  • veitvet68

    As Curly Bill said, “Someone get this spic on his knees!”

  • Elraphbo

    >>>>>>>>”I thought Ann could have given a better defense of Breitbart”

    Ann was briliant because she didn't let the Liberal frame the argument!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/robert.mahoney Robert Mahoney

    Don't get him to riled up Ann. You will send him off on a bender and cause him to create more human speed bumps.

  • proudconservative95020

    Ann Coulter is so witty. Sometimes over the top. But witty nonetheless.

  • FreakyBoy

    Then shouldn't CNN be “completely discredited” for cropping a picture of a black tea party member that was carrying a gun so you could not see his race and use to run with a story on racism and violence in the tea party?

  • MaureenTabor

    I thought he said “for those of us who practice this crap” but he said “for those of us who practice this craft.”

    I want to write a brief book entitled, “I Used to Hate Ann Coulter – and Then I Started Listening to Her.”

  • Cemartinez

    Rick Sanchez is a Cuban-American though unlike most Cuban-Americans he is a leftist. A lot of his stance may have to do with the fact during the mid-nineties when the then new Fox News Channel was trying to bring in journalists, they interviewed at the Miami Fox Affiliate WSVN where then Sanchez was the lead news anchor, Sanchez interviewed but did not get the job, instead the job went to a co-worker and field reporter Shepherd Smith who's been with Fox News ever since. A lot of it is Sanchez' jealousy issues with losing the Fox gig to a guy lower on the ladder. I'm Cuban American, most of us can't stand Sanchez

  • Mike

    I live in Miami too and married a Cuban. The Cubans under 35(like my wife) are abandoning the Republican party. I'm not sure why. My wife voted for Bush and then Obama. Go figure.

  • Jaynie59

    Sanchez is a perfect example of liberal stupidity when trying to use analogies to back up their arguments. He tried to “get” Coulter with her quote about Dan Rather's source. Rather deliberately propagated forgeries, which he still to this day refuses to admit were not credible, in a blatant attempt to influence a presidential election. If it weren't for the internet he may have succeeded.

    Brietbart posted a excerpt of a speech that didn't have the setup of Shirley Sherrod's life story, which explains why she's a racist. The full speech does not show that Shirley Sherrod overcame her racism, it's just been tempered in the context of her getting to know poor white people as people.

    Ann's analogy of the black man with the gun being edited so as to not show he was black was better, but that was MSNBC not CNN. So, of course, Sanchez would just not recognize that because it had nothing to do with him. The John Lewis story was even better, but got sidetracked over the reward business. She should have asked why they won't show the 5 videos that prove it was a lie, but you can't think of everything live.

    The kiddie porn thing went right over my head. I've read about Sanchez' accident where he killed someone, but I've never read anything about him being tied up with child pornography.

  • Jaynie59

    I used to post Ann Coulter columns on a liberal message board when I was bored. It was always good for a laugh. Liberals hate her with such venom that I could predict who the first five replies would be from and exactly what they'd say.

    I once posted a column of hers but I put somone else's name on it. I linked to her, but I know that most people don't click on links. It got a couple of dozen reasonable replies and then somebody must have hit the link because they went ballistic after that. It was hysterical.

  • Jaynie59

    That happened on MSNBC.

  • Don17000

    Maybe she just didn't like McCain?

  • fdanconia

    rick sanchez is literally too stupid to insult….wow….way to go ann i loved it, but i dont even think he figured it out or literally has a problem with kiddy porn

  • Demoncrat

    Did rick get a new toupee? It looks a little thicker.

  • Momo

    Anne is PERFECT!! never change!

  • ColAttilla

    Ann Coulter is brilliant. I love the way she not only stands her ground but counter-attacks her liberal opponents. I also love the way liberals always try to defend the indefensible–it's like facts and logic do not count; it's all about idiology to them.

  • ColAttilla

    I'm sure Rick was doing “research” for a CNN project.

  • The Fop

    Breitbart understands that he'll be demonized by liberals no matter what, so why not throw caution to the wind. So far, this “post-racial” administration has found itself in the crosshairs of several race oriented controversies.

    First there was the Henry “Skip is a friend of mine” Gates, “the cops acted stupidly” controversy. Then there was the Congressional Black Caucus falsely accusing Tea Partiers of hurling the N-word at them. Then came J. Christian Adams giving his testimony about the New Black Panthers getting a free ride from Eric Holder. Then comes the NAACP drafting a resolution calling the Tea Party racist.

    With Obama's approval rating dropping like a lead balloon, the last thing that he and the Democrats need is another “he said/she said” argument about racism. Don't believe for a minute that Breitbart got suckered. He's jumping into this food fight with a carton full of custard pies. He understands that liberals have been using racism as weapon against conservatives for decades, and that if conservatives are proactive instead of reactive, they can use that weapon to their own advangtage by creating a narrative and drawing liberals into a fight that was not of their own making.

  • JM

    Love hearing the MSM talk about truth, credibility, and integrity. Sweet irony

  • Mike

    She didn't like Palin. Nor did all her younger Cuban friends/family.

  • canthisbe

    Shouldn't there be a referee when Ann debates liberals to step in a stop the fight once they are beaten into a post-blabbering state (I originally said a blabbering state, but they start out there) so that they don't keep going and get whipped even worse?

  • Don17000

    I can understand that. A lot of people thought choosing Palin was probably the worst campaign misstep he made, and might have voted for McCain if he'd chosen someone more mainstream. I voted for McCain in the primary, but only because I thought he was the best choice of an unsuitable field.

    I live in Miami too. For the last 35 years. I've been registered Republican since Nixon was President, but think more as an independent, and vote for candidates, not parties.

  • carkrueger

    What I don't get is that you claim Coulter did not represent Andrew in a way you would like. Did you think Beck did? Beck threw Andrew under the bus on his show by acting like he is the GOD of ” Context “. Beck never had a problem using any of Andrew's tapes in the past from Acorn down to Van Jones.

    I saw the posters comments earlier today and it's been itching me all day. I just don't get how you can ask Ann to do more when Glenn turned out to be a fair weather friend. I would be shocked if Andrew remains friends with Glenn after this.

  • Thetirestore

    Kiddie porn? Really? That's all this lesbian has to offer? Way to go Rick! Made her look like a complete idiot! lol

  • http://twitter.com/ConserValidity Cris Angelini

    You must educate your wife Mike. No one, with a firm grasp on Political theory would have ever voted for Obama.

  • Don17000

    Regarding half of your list of controversies…

    The Skip Gates affair. Obama said the cops acted stupidly. In this case, the man was arrested for “disorderly conduct” on his own property, and even had it been done in public, the conduct he was engaged in did not meet the standard set by the Massachusetts courts for “disorderly conduct.” The Appellate court had ruled in a case a few years prior that mere words and gesticulation, no matter how provocative or foul-mouthed, do not transcend the statute.

    The NBPP had already been given the free ride by Mukasey. Holder had asked for time to review the case, and then decided to let Mukasey's action stand as it was. I think it's suggestive that Adams did not resign in protest when his former boss made the original decision, only when his new boss agreed with it.

    I think the “race card” has been played in this continent not just for decades, but for centuries. But it's only in the last few decades that anyone other than white people could use it to their advantage.

    By this, I mean that we used it from the 1620's onward as all the justification we needed to justify enslaving blacks in the east and south, working Chinese to death and keeping them in substandard conditions in the west, and killing Indians from one end of the country to the other.

    I argue that it's only since the era of Plessey v Ferguson, stepped up by Brown v Board, that it became advantageous for anyone other than a white to play the race card.

  • http://arttelles.com/stop-islamization-of-america/ Art Telles

    What's the point…

    Finally, Don17000, you have honestly and concisely revealed your point… thanks.

    You're against common sense Conservative Sarah Palin and you are for statist Progressive John McCain.

    See, it's easy to understand my point, and this is the kind of clarity I have been asking you for in previous threads and comments.

    What's MY point for phrasing it that way?

    My point is that it is cool to be for McCain and against Palin… at least, NOW we know “what's the point” of 99% of your comments here on TheRightScoop.com over the past few weeks.

    Thanks for the clarity.

    You “… vote for candidates, not parties”…

    - You vote for McCain as “the best choice…” and you also bash Sarah Palin (… in this post by obvious implication).

    And previously you have bashed…

    - Mark Levin and his book “Liberty and Tyranny” (remember… yesterday)…

    - Glenn Beck (… remember your comment that Glenn has a view of “separation of church and state” that you disagree with)…

    - Thomas Jefferson (…and Jefferson's “separation of church and state” letter to the Danbury Baptists and your unwillingness to accept Jefferson's “original intent” comments to the Danbury Baptists who were concerned about their freedom of religion, i.e., the separation of church and state)…

    And, well, many more comments… but you get MY point, I'm sure.

    So, thanks for the clarity. Now we all know “what's the point” of your 99% out-of-left field comments.

    Please continue posting here, you truly are welcome here… 'cause you are very cordial in the way you comment, although usually we don't know “what'st the point” of your drive-by comments… but now we do know “what's the point.”

    Art
    [It is very easy to understand my point... just click on my name for my site STOP! Islamization Of Ameica]

  • http://arttelles.com/stop-islamization-of-america/ Art Telles

    What's the point…

    Say what?

    So, are you basing lesbians on TheRightScoop, or is the use of the “L” word simply a rhetorical device you are using to bash Ann Coulter with drive-by blather and “innuendo without substance?”

    Just askin'… what's the point.

    Art
    [... click on my name to understand the point of my site STOP! Islamization Of America]

  • KeninMontana

    What got Professor Gates arrested was his continued agitation and antagonizing of the Law Enforcement Officers that responded to a call. The charge of Disorderly Conduct was the charge that was settled on by the D.A.'s office.He could have been charged for interfering with Officers in the performance of their duty or impeding an investigation,both legitimate charges. When officers respond to a call for assistance they have an investigation they are required by law to complete,it does not end when the homeowner establishes his or her identity.Gates got himself arrested when he followed officers outside while continuing to hurl racial accusations at them loudly,when he could have easily answered a few more questions and it would have been over and done with. To put it simply Gates decided to “play the race card” and it blew up in his face. Here's a link and its not even FNC; http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/07/21/massachuset…> Playing the race card shows a number of things about an individual;
    1.They do not have a fact-based response and lack the mental capacity to form a coherent reasoned counterpoint.
    2. They are desperate and backed into a corner by overwhelming facts.
    Those are a couple there are many others,but I'm sure you get the point. Myself,I look at the terms “racist” and “racism” as terms used in error,as we are all of the same race,the human race.A more accurate term would be ethnically biased.
    As for the NBPP,case if in fact the Mukasey D.O.J. had dropped the case why did he as A.G. continue to let his prosecutors continue to pursue it. The facts stand that Holder was in charge when D.O.J. dropped the case.
    Everyone here I'm sure is aware of the evils of slavery and the persecution of minorities the world over. I do however find your statement and over-simplification of “and killing Indians from one end of the country to the other.” insulting and misleading. As well as being beneath any intelligent individual with any education,on this point I am speaking as one who has an ancestry of tribal heritage and one who has and does live among them.
    In closing Playing the Race Card is advantageous to no one.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/4OOX5UUEVSFLV4FYNR66MYXCFM Mike M

    It wasn't 'edited', it WAS an excerpt taken out of context. 60 minutes was notorious for edited hatchet pieces going as far as to substitute a interview answer from some other un-aired question. The EXCERPT that Breitbart played was UNEDITED – true or false?

  • Tracycolorado

    sanchez is a schumck , who needs to go back to the liberial socialist ran education system , so this clown will know where the Gallopagos islands really are . And that it can be cold outside to have a vulcano erruption . This clown is a typical liberial socialist : Selective memory and no sence of reality , and no common sence

  • Don17000

    His continued agitation, on his own property, was not a crime. Antagonizing the law enforcement officers who were still on his property after they'd determined there was no break-in, was not a crime. The officer stated disorderly conduct as the reason for the arrest. The DA didn't prosecute, and dropped the charges a few days later. (I tried your link, CNN didn't have it up anymore. Here's one from Bloomberg http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarch… )

    If you're against “big government” I would think you would support that if a cop shows up at your door and you don't like his attitude towards you, you are under no obligHis continued agitation, on his own property, was not a crime. Antagonizing the law enforcement officers who were still on his property after they'd determined there was no break-in, was not a crime. The officer stated disorderly conduct as the reason for the arrest. The DA didn't prosecute, and dropped the charges a few days later. (I tried your link, CNN didn't have it up anymore. Here's one from Bloomberg http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarch… )

    If you're against “big government” I would think you would support that if a cop shows up at your door and you don't like his attitude towards you, you are under no obligation to treat him civilly.His continued agitation, on his own property, was not a crime. Antagonizing the law enforcement officers who were still on his property after they'd determined there was no break-in, was not a crime. The officer stated disorderly conduct as the reason for the arrest. The DA didn't prosecute, and dropped the charges a few days later. (I tried your link, CNN didn't have it up anymore. Here's one from Bloomberg http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarch… )

    If you're against “big government” I would think you would support that if a cop shows up at your door and you don't like his attitude towards you, you are under no obligation to treat him civilly.

    As for “we're all the human race,” that does not appear to be the way poster I was responding to phrased the comment, and that's what I responded to. If you feel there is only one race, you doubtless wouldn't have mentioned playing the race card… right?

    The Mukasey DOJ hadn't dropped the case, they'd chosen to pursue it in civil court rather than criminal. When Holder came in,there was still time to change that, so an extension was applied for, and granted, giving them time to review. After the review, they decided to stay with criminal court. If, as you imply, Holder had no intention of filing criminal charges against the NBPP, why go through the charade of applying for the extension, when they could just point let the matter remain Mukasey's, and Holder would have had nothing to do with it. There would have been nothing for him to drop. The case would have been closed before he took office. So, are you then faulting Holder for merely agreeing with Mukasey? If so, then why aren't you faulting Mukasey for not taking it to criminal court in the first place?

    It looks like you're agreeing with the decision a white prosecutor made in a case, but criticizing the exact same decision made in the exact same case, with the exact same evidence, by a black prosecutor.
    No wonder you don't want anyone to think about race.

    As to my comment about killing Indians from one end to the other… that's what we did. We chased them off their lands in the Carolinas and marched them west to Oklahoma, under Jackson… the Trail of Tears. Others were always at our frontier, and that was their land. We signed treaties with them, then broke those treaties, sometimes shooting them when they came, with treaty in hand. We would not have done that to white people, would we? Can you tell me of an occasion when we did? I'm not talking about a war between Britain and France now, like the French and Indian War, Fort Duquesne, etc. I'm talking about United States history. White people often gave themselves the exclusive advantage, because they ran the courts, law enforcement, the army, everything. After certain SCOTUS decisions, that ended.

    And in closing, playing the race card, in the real world, is often advantageous.

  • KeninMontana

    Gates was not arrested until he followed the LEO's out the door. If you think you can behave like that to an officer who is doing his job,be my guest. I've seen it before and in every instance the offender ended up in handcuffs. Being against big government has nothing to do with it it has everything to do with the rule of law, you realize that small government and the rule of law are not mutually exclusive of each other. If you don't than you're not as smart as I gave you credit for. As for the tragedy of the early tribal societies at the hands of the Europeans and subsequently the Americans. I am well aware of that history,however I am also aware of the savagery of the warfare between tribes prior to the coming of the Europeans. As for white on white violence you only have to look to the Civil War and the border wars between Kansas and Missouri, many of the texts do not do it justice for its merciless ferocity and savagery. None of this is to be seen as an excuse for past human sins, as I have said in past posts I have seen the nature of the beast that is man, up close and personal. If you have never been there its not someplace I recommend.
    The statute that was violated in the Panther Case is a Civil Rights Violation( as I pointed out to you in previous threads)which is why it was pursued as a civil case, that is how it is prosecuted,Mukasey deferred to state and local authorities to pursue criminal charges if they desired,something else we have been over before.
    I mentioned the race card because you brought it up I don't play it,never have never will. You assume too much that is not said and you need to work on that. Playing the race card only makes an individual who plays it look like an idiot Don.

  • Voice of Reason

    I thought his screen name was Thetiresome and ignored his crap.

    Don't you know Art, any woman who won't sleep with him is a lesbian…….

  • ulysses

    This was just too easy for Ann. But then Rick Sanchez is about as smart as liberals get nowadays.

awesome meter

subscribe to us


Places of Interest

Admin

archives

required viewing

Islam: What the West Needs to Know (98 min)