Does this mean that everyone who doesn't read Obamacare legislation (which includes almost everyone) doesn't have to abide by it?
I didn't know that the purpose of prison was to do 'good' for criminals. At least judge Michael Stokes has given him a goal: to become more 'mature' about 'sexual matters'.
Too bad people cannot be put to death for being stupid! If I was that girls father I would kill the rapist and the judge.
If the sheepdip needs sex education, a prison term would have been just the thing to get him up to speed. From what I've heard though, if he was raised Muslim he's already been covered on that end.
Uh, yea. Smart enough to get on the internet and troll young girls but not smart enough to understand right and wrong and control his jungle urges.
Does anyone go to Russia and pretend not to understand Russian laws? I didn't think so. Those that try don't come home.
He is NOT British! He is a muslim invader!
STOP White GeNOcide http://youtu.be/QAebOPGpp0k
As Pamela Geller observed on this news:
Meanwhile Tommy Robinson has languished in prison in inhuman conditions for a far less serious offense -- and people still deny that he is a political prisoner.
If you've not followed the story of our global regimes' political prisoner in the UK, I put some links here: http://www.therightscoop.com/friday-night-open-thread-are-you-smarter-than-a-kitty-cat/#comment-778498289
King Richard the Lionheart must be spinning in his grave. The liberals have lead the Moors right into his own house.
What a waste of effort and lives.
I guess that judge thinks girls are "worthless" too. When did ignorance of the law become a defense?
As the father of four in which 2 are girls, he would have not had to worry about the judge or the possibility of jail.
Other dads know where I'm coming from.
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense. The judge is an idiot. He just gave Muslims the tool they need to do whatever crime against women they desire. Sorry, judge....I didn't know.
So let me see if I can paraphrase Judge Michael Stoke's argument - "Because you commited a crime that no decent human being would ever commit, you must by definition have psychological problems and are therefore a victim and should not be punished".
Judge Michael Stokes needs to be punished for negligance and public endangerment.
Evil pos. I hope someone castrates the ba$tard... but then again, the hero who'd do such a thing would probably be locked up and the key thrown away. God please save these little girls.
There is a man named Donald Blom in MN. The only thing left of his victim was a tooth. There are ways to rid the Earth of this disgusting slime.
The British judicial system is becoming a joke; I remember when there used to be "Ignorantia juris non excusat".
The Judge says he was "naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters"
A Birmingham resident and user of social media and digital technology??? naive? ...LOL
I doubt that another religion would be given the same privilege.
The judge also stated that because the perputrator was "passive and lacking in assertiveness, prison would do him more harm than good". What an jackass! This dirtbag apparantly thinks the purpose of the crimminal courts is to determine what's best for the crimminal, not what's best for society or the victims.
If the British people don't stand up on their hind legs like they got a pair and fight back, they will end up the second coming of the Islamic conquest into parts of Europe during the Middle Ages.
No wonder the Muslims are taking over Britain. This crime goes beyond religious beliefs but it is no beyond God's law. Disgraceful!
Regardless, we are held accountable ignorance the law is not a legal excuse. The administration branch of government cannot wait to start collecting fines.
This ruling sets a dangerous precedent. This will become known as the 'Naivety' exemption and will be used by plaintiff lawyers, making it easy to defend those who lure young girls online for the purpose of sex.
Evidently this young girl was willing, but she was too young to legally give consent. Both she and the young man knew they were committing a crime. The judge just gave them both a pass.
I agree... Do you ever remember those days when "ignorance of the law is no defense"? I seem to have read that a long time ago in some dusty old book in the days before Political Correctness... Ah... Those were the days.
Un-fuggin-believeable. The same politically correct liberal establishment proudly proclaims women's rights, but I wonder where they would stand were this to happen here. I'm pretty sure I know where.
So much for the separation of Religion & State hunh??
BAASTARD!.....hope the girls' parents or brothers take him out & cut off his gonads....to make an offering to Moohamad.....
True... Now if the guy had been a Christian... He'd already be in jail for the max...
If he was a jew, they' probably try to hang him.... :-(
But Muzzies... Complete pass... Sickening to the pit of my stomach.
I hate to say it, but I don't think liberal parents would care that their daughter got seduced by a predator. After all, he did use a condom, did't he?
If he was unwilling to have sex until she "seduced" him, why were they meeting at a hotel? This judge needs to be imprisoned alongside this young man.
The libs better wake up, especially those with young daughters because they are moooslim bate. And I don't want to hear a single lib parent whine about it either. Their children deserve the best protection and with the # of single parents and the easy online access and cell phones....well I'm going to stop there