DOJ issued mandate that condones Voter Fraud

http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-gall…

U.S. Justice Department rejects Georgia voter screening

9:41 am June 1, 2009, by Jim Galloway

Update in bold below, at 5:25 p.m.

The U.S. Justice Department has rejected a program put together by Secretary of State Karen Handel to comb through state databases to detect ineligible voters who may not be U.S. citizens, calling it both inaccurate and discriminatory.

The system was used last year, in the months before the 2008 general election.

Exactly as stated. It's inaccurate and discriminatory. They have no accurate way to verify the information they're using to purge the rolls. In Florida, the elections of 2000 and 2004 were rife with instances of thousands of people who had illegally been purged from the rolls, allegedly on the instruction of former Sec of State Katherine Harris, who had told them to also purge anyone whose name and address was similar. But apparently, Hispanic names and registered Republicans only minimally targeted. I understand the same thing happened in Ohio. In both states, I believe, the Sec of State at the time also happened to be the GOP candidate's campaign chair for that state.

So the DOJ issued a mandate that since there isn't accurate information to prosecute these cases… don't file them.

Here's a URL to a CNN story showing that Karen Handel's program was yielding similar results:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/26/voter.su…

An excerpt from it:

“(Kyla) Berry is one of more than 50,000 registered Georgia voters who have been 'flagged' because of a computer mismatch in their personal identification information. At least 4,500 of those people are having their citizenship questioned and the burden is on them to prove eligibility to vote.

Experts say lists of people with mismatches are often systematically cut, or “purged,” from voter rolls.

It's a scenario that's being repeated all across the country, with cases like Berry's raising fears of potential vote suppression in crucial swing states.

“What most people don't know is that every year, elections officials strike millions of names from the voter rolls using processes that are secret, prone to error and vulnerable to manipulation,” said Wendy Weiser, an elections expert with New York University's Brennan Center for Justice. “

This would explain why the DOJ is reluctant to prosecute such cases. But J. Christian Adams should know this, right? It isn't exactly a secret. Yet he wants to use DOJ lawyers to go after all this? And who does the legwork on all these thousands of cases? Who pays to do the legwork? Remember, this is 50,000 cases just in Georgia. Even if only 10% are prosecuted… that's 5.000 cases, most of which may be totally bogus.

Why would he want to do that? Well…. it would certainly get a lot of people pissed off at the Administration, wouldn't it?

Coincidentally, after trying to purge based on who-knows-what criteria (obviously nothing they should have been using) she's running for governor.

Mr. Adams better watch his back. The progressives are coming for him, count on it.

Generally, these programs use a “matching” process, which demands that the name on one record exactly match that on another, added perhaps years later. It's been found that these records are full of typos, names reported differently (one with a middle name and the other without or with just the initial, one using a full name and the other a nickname, etc.) and they're often off by as much as 20%. With millions of names, that's a huge number. There's often not enough time to correct the record because the huge volume of corrections crashes the system, and it generally can't be done by election day. In the case of the article I linked to, the letter was postmarked a week after it was dated, and it arrived on the deadline date.

Nothing New Here…. Look at Obama's Voting Fraud History here:

http://www.commieblaster.com/acorn/