- Anonymous
Quantitative Easing Explained
- http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop
it’s also explained in the video above, just fyi.
- Anonymous
I agree it’s explained on Freedom Watch. The link I provided is the one shown in background on Beck show. The cartoon.FYI, Freedom Watch complete is available on You tube. Downloading it now.
- Anonymous
What does “new” mean? Freedom Watch is already running for weeks if not months. Am I missing something or are we simply using different dictionaries?
- Anonymous
It’s now a daily show.
- Tyler
Scoop forgot to mention that, but that’s alright.
- Anonymous
Not being a sexist, but she is a beautiful woman, and I really think that is 95% of the left’s problem with her. If she was a dog, like say, Hilary Clinton, she would be left alone.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
Maybe I’m weird but I was more taken with her looking more casual-ish than I ever was with her all done up. She’s putting out a lot more substance, she’s a compelling force in the upcoming cycle.
- Tyler
One thing I can say I do like about Palin is that she’s actually taken on corruption in politics. How many other candidates have such records to run on?
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
She’s taken on and played with corrupt characters. I’m on the fence, but it’s undeniable that she’s a force to be reckoned with.
- Paulchri
She presents herself as a moral woman, and the left hates her for that. The low cut top was a little distracting. The left can’t stand a woman who wouldn’t kill her baby.
- John
@hilltoppeer
Though I agree with you that the Left has an issue with her being attractive (and also her being female), I think it mainly comes down to how she speaks.
Now what could test my hypothesis? I think Kristi Noem. She recently won election in South Dakota and is very attractive and conservative but also speaks very coherently. The test will be how the Left treats her.
- Giddyup333
Sarah, you look nice in that dress but it is not appropriate for someone in your position to show so much skin on a news show. It cheapens you, take away from your stature.
- Giddyup333
Sarah, you look nice in that dress but it is not appropriate for someone in your position to show so much skin on a news show. It cheapens you, take away from your stature.
- Sybilll
You never saw how Jackie O dressed, often sleeveless, 40 years ago? FFS, Obama has been seen in what resembled a wifebeater to play ball.
- Anonymous
If Moochelle had one tenth the good, natural looks as Sarah Palin; the media would be crowning her America’s Cleopatra…
- Paulchri
Looks like she got a spray on tan. Maybe she doesn’t really care about a run in 12.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
That’s not a spray tan, I live in Florida, there’s more than a few spray tans, tanning beds and natural tans to learn the difference.
- http://twitter.com/MooseOfReason MooseOfReason
Slamming the nanny state, going after the Fed… If her foreign policy were more judicious, I could support her in 2012.
- Paulchri
She has a long way to go to prove anything she says. The judge has said “get rid of the fed”. She didn’t go there. I can’t take her too seriously. She needs to drop the momma bear persona and get serious before I could even start. Reminds me too much of “down to earthy Bush” talkin straight with da people. Bad memories. Sorry.
- Tyler
I said what I like about her, but your point reminds me of what I don’t like about her.
- Anonymous
Guess you boys haven’t read or listened to any of her speeches or Facebook Notes on foreign policy issues.
Did you read her National Review article “The Way Forward,” which came out the day after the midterms?
Did you read her Open Letter to the Incoming Freshman on her Facebook?
…
I didn’t think so.
Sorry but your uninformed opinions means about as much as we’ve paid for it. So why do you keep spreading it around?
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
I get her facebook notes and I’m still not a fan. I can appreciate her influence and that she’s been underestimated but that doesn’t mean I’m in her corner.
Don’t make the same mistake as the “other side.” People can be just as informed and come to a different conclusion or different opinion. Just because someone has a different take does not make them stupid or ignorant or evil.
- Paulchri
I just hate to see people get sucked in by “words”. The only guy I know who has proven his words is Ron Paul. For thirty plus years he has never taken an earmark, never voted for a budget that wasn’t balanced, and voted against the unconstitutional wars. He wants the fed res gone, and literally would cut out 2/3 of the federal gvnmt. The point is that he has proven himself. Sarah Palin doesn’t even get down and dirty with her words, and hasn’t proven anything. Otherwise, sure, she is likable as a mother and so on.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
Ron Paul has taken earmarks, I believe one of them was in the healthcare bill or one of the stimuli.
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/earmarks.php?cid=n00005906 - Paulchri
The heading on this page says that he took earmarks, but on the list of all who did, he isn’t on it. Other people in Texas did, but not him. I went back and searched through all of the other data and couldn’t find where they specifically link him to earmarks. The use the terms sponsored or co-sponsored. But then don’t put his name on anything specific that I could find. If he did, I would want to know. Some of the other data showed that the overwhelming majority of his contributions were small donations, and only 8% were in the category of “others” over his career.
If he did take earmarks, I would still say that he is one of two that I know that voted against the wars on a constitutional basis. He has been exposing the Fed Res for a long time.
- http://twitter.com/MooseOfReason MooseOfReason
Palin doesn’t mention foreign policy in the National Review article. The closest she comes to talking about war, is when she cites Joe Miller as a decorated war hero. Or later on when she says “boots on the ground” for get-out-the-vote operations in 2012.
If you read this Facebook “note,” she’s for cutting every department except defense:
http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/peace-through-strength-and-american-pride-vs-enemy-centric-policy/403777543434Would we really lose “exceptionalism” if we spend any less in the defense budget? Politifact says we’re spending almost $1 trillion per year:
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/jul/15/ron-paul/ron-paul-says-us-spends-1-trillion-foreign-policy/ - Paulchri
I’ve been fooled too many times by neo-cons. Now that I know the real agenda, they can’t fool me as easily. McCain is who she is supposed to oppose in her own party. She doesn’t. Gonna be hard to get past that one. Lets let our defense budget kill the country. That makes sense. Why not take out some more countries and expand it some more. Oh yeah, they want to. Can anyone say “Iran”. Who’s next. Syria, Lebanon? Whatever, lets kill them all no matter how much it costs. Ugggggggh!
- Anonymous
Inflation is THEFT! Inflation is mixing tin into the silver and expecting the silver to be valued the same. It’s THEFT!It’s unjust weights & balances that God detests. And the reason He detests it so is because it hurts the poor in a stealth manner, without the poor even knowing what is happening.
The first call of the church is to aid & protect the poor.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
All taxation is theft, period.
- KeninMontana
Well said.
- Idahoser
no it isn’t.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
I don’t make a distinction between two different groups pointing a gun at me and demanding my money. Whether it’s an inner-city gang or some D.C/IRS bureaucrat, it’s still theft and they don’t get to call it something else just because they’re the government.
“Consent of the governed,” my foot.
- Paulchri
First of all, our money is not real. It is what is called “fiat” currency. The fed was designed to manipulate, control, and destroy our currency in the end. Without the fed, we couldn’t fight wars or have the military industrial complex. Although we do have something to back our currency. It is called real property. As of right now, the world banks own most of it. These debts will be called in, but not before values drop severely. The point of derivative based mortgages was to inflate the values through loose lending while investors raped the mortgages until they are worthless. The government bails them out, and leaves us with a weak dollar and our worthless properties loaded with unpayable debt. There will be an economic collapse because of this. In that collapse there will be panic. In that panic, there will probably be martial law. If we don’t get it due to a dirty bomb going off or something. The only way to stop the whole thing is to get rid of the fed res, pull out of the IMF, NAFTA and GATT, and open up our natural resources for industrial use. Then we need to protect our markets with tariffs to even the competition. All of these things were put into place to destroy this country for a world controlled system.
Have a good day, while you can.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
I have a book that you might find interesting and might give a silver lining to that great big NWO cloud hanging over you.
Agorist Class Theory.
- Paulchri
I read wikipedia on this and found that quite intriguing. It calls out to the anarchist in me. Not that I am a pure anarchist in the original sense, meaning that the Native Americans were essentially anarchists. I like the idea of small groups governing themselves, and if you don’t like their rules, then you move on. I believe that was what the founders had in mind, with the addition of a federal border protectorate which had limited enumerated powers separated in three branches. This was only needed due to the threat of outside powers invading. Otherwise we could have had a system more like the Agorists.
I just don’t see an underground or black market surviving in today’s world. People are too dependent, and the control grid is too extensive. Now that government owns all land, we can’t utilize land for any market activity outside of gvnmt control. When they establish the new currency it will largely, if not completely, be electronic. Not enough people own gold and silver to use as currency. Even then they may become illegal to own again.
I personally have started my own backup system of bartering items. Mostly food. If they take my land, I’m screwed. My sister just found out how corrupt they are concerning property taxes. When values are dropping, they just increased her property value by over a third for the revenue. (California) When counties are broke, the feds will bail them out and take over the process. When the real crash comes, this will be easy for them. Paid off or not, they will own it fully.
I live in the countryside. I have no debt, and eat my own food except for butter and organic greens. If I lose my job and they keep raising my taxes, I will lose my property. Plain and simple. Without private property, we can’t do it. We will literally be in the same position as Cuba and many others. Regardless of how we got there. I am better off than many living in urban areas.
I just don’t see the Sarah Palins of the world saving us. We are too close to this to be screwing around.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
Black markets always survive because so long as there are prohibitions on goods, there will always be people trading them.
The grey market will always be as well, it could be as simple as you doing a job for someone, get paid in cash and not paying taxes on the income.
So long as there is a government there will always be all 4
Red Market (government business, war, military, police, government schools)
White Market (Government allowed goods to be taxed to fund the Red)
Grey Market (Legal goods traded illegally)
Black Market (Illegal goods)The fun part about it is that the more the government stretches it’s fingers out the more people react and seek out ultimately counter-economic activities. Further starving the Government for that lusted revenue which makes them expand further or crack down harder. We see this with income taxes, higher taxes = rich leave or find tax havens.
The only way those market distinctions vanish is when the state withers away and there are no more legalities to divide them, leaving you with a truly free market, Agora.
What is needed for the grand finale is enough people starving the government to wither it or resist the government effectively with black market armaments.
But that isn’t necessary for individuals to instantly liberate themselves personally.
New Libertarian Manifesto
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_07v1QhQ9Gs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdpBLaFZSek
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMyNUaNvzwo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POn43-I_exU
Agorist Class Theory
http://www.youtube.com/user/PeteEyre#p/c/669822A628FFACFA - Paulchri
I like the basic premise’ of what these links explain. My evaluation of human behavior doesn’t support a practical hope in them. If you were able to get a large enough group of people to subscribe to these ideas without a mass persecution from the State, you may have an effect. People in general have been trained for a generation to be emotionally reactive. If you can properly manipulate the emotions of the masses and train them to be reactive to the stimuli that you put before them, you can control them almost absolutely. If you master the art of distraction, you can control even those that think they are opposing you by offering up false choices. In this country we have the left/right paradigm that fills the controllers need for distraction. They have been successful in doing many things that the majority opposes without deterring them from the real agendas. Tribalism through Nationalism has a grip on the American psychi that is very hard to break. Our system gives us two false choices to divide us within while we are being conquered from within and without.
The point is that getting a large group of people to break out of this psychology will likely require emotional stimuli of great magnitude. If 70% of the population believe that our gvnmt was involved in 911, we still don’t act. The controllers know this and are very arrogant about it. We have parents holding their children up kicking and screaming when TSA is touching their privates and we do it for the safety of our country. Some protest, and it keeps getting worse.
What I am saying is that we have lost our ability to discern what is inherently right and wrong, as the Libertarian manifesto speaks about. Getting sheep to attack the wolf on any level is extremely difficult if not impossible. The American people are like a scared horse. I know from experience that a scared horse can learn nothing. Our gvnmt through terror tactics is keeping us perpetually scared. We don’t think, we just react. We accept the reactions of the State as reasonable because of this.
I quit thinking that a lot of people think like I do. I started realizing that when people are calmly given facts that are not commonly accepted, they will not respond regardless of the implications. If you give those facts in such a way that scares them into an emotional response that leads to indignation, that they might change their mind. Even if they do change their mind, they quickly forget about it, or ultimately deny it because of the difficulties that lie within it.
I believe that the State will be able to control the populations with these tactics right into proverbial gas chambers. There may be a remnant that survives which could ultimately have an effect on the States control, but many years down the road. I don’t make the mistake of thinking that we have time to undermine the State, in the ways presented, before catyclismic events take place that continue to scare people into submission to the point of total control by the State. Once we are in the “total control” state of events, many things can take place. But not without mass death from starvation and disease. There will be no free part of society left to manipulate resources in such a way that could undermine the power of the state and its expanded control grid using world military resources. Most other countries polled have said that they would not have a problem persecuting Americans on our own soil.
Our leaders will have sold us out to those powers. Clinton put US troops in direct command of the UN. Obama wants a treaty to put us under UN law concerning child raising. Our currency will be controlled by the IMF. We are already legally bound to pay a certain percentage. Our system won’t collapse completely, it will just transform into a world gvnmt controlled system. This world system wants massive reductions in populations. It will achieve it by spreading disease and killing through the cures. Denying health care to the elderly and infirm. Drugging of the water supply. Raising cancer rates with massive chemical buildup in the food supply. Why do they continue raising money for cancer research, and for 40 years plus have made no progress toward a cure? They want to keep hope alive until the cancer rates are high enough, then pull the plug on treatment.
All the suckers said “what”? “That’s insane”. I quit drinking fluoride water, eating GMOs and non-organics. I’m having all of the mercury taken out of my teeth. I don’t get flue vaccines with thimerisol mercury in them. I won’t take any vaccine that gvnmt promotes. I don’t listen when they tell me to save money, or spend money to help the economy. Why save what will be of no value, and why spend money on anything that isn’t sustainable long term.
One day they will require you to get vaccines or they will quarantine you in a camp. Just as they will grab your privates if you don’t get irradiated. They will be able to do it.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504624590 Chris G.
I doubt if the GOP Establishment will let Rep. Paul Chair the Subcommittee once they become the majority in the next Congress. I don’t trust Boehner one bit.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455 Daniel Tumser
Of course they won’t, because Ron Paul argues against their excessive power as well as the rest of the Government.
- Paulchri
With you on that one. They know Ron will do it.
- Tyler
Just another side to the same old coin. That’s why I didn’t have the mindless sheepish cheer that so many others had during this election.
- Dee
If she bent over a bit more we would have seen the pistols. But I love her and she looks frickin fab as usual.
- Harrymday
all the left has is attacking her character (their usual method) and a few gaffes that are highly trumped up b/c if you break them down, they really arent gaffes, unlike Joe my-shoe-tastes-fine Biden the VP for chris’ sakes
- http://www.therightscoop.com/
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://twitter.com/MooseOfReason
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://twitter.com/MooseOfReason
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504624590
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770715455

The Right Scoop
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.