One must understand that obama is not a rational he is mentally disturbed as are all that believe in him... obama does not care for one second what made america once great or what should be done to keep this country from self destruction.. As for the congress 75% of them in both parties are delusionally Insane....
And all politicians that are republican or conservative need to stop using PC words like "I don't think it will work" that leaves it open for debate and one can say it just might work!! when it's so beyond obvious "It Will Not Work"....
Congress had been corrupted for 30 plus years by democrat rule and democrat rule making... The congress of today is a result of 30 plus years of democrat reign and
a republican lack of understanding the democrat party once out of power and the republican spineless attitude toward running a congress...
The united states fate is most likely doomed because of the over whelming dumbed down american people that opened the door twice to the self destruction we are now faced with...
One must understand that obama is not a rational he is mentally disturbed as are all that believe in him... obama does not care for one second what made america once great or what should be done to keep this country from self destruction.. As for the congress 75% of them in both parties are delusionally Insane....
And all politicians that are republican or conservative need to stop using PC words like "I don't think it will work" that leaves it open for debate and one can say it just might work!! when it's so beyond obvious "It Will Not Work"....
Congress had been corrupted for 30 plus years by democrat rule and democrat rule making... The congress of today is a result of 30 plus years of democrat reign and
a republican lack of understanding the democrat party once out of power and the republican spineless attitude toward running a congress...
The united states fate is most likely doomed because of the over whelming dumbed down american people that opened the door twice to the self destruction we are now faced with...
Can't we just say it "OBAMA IS A CENTRAL PLANNER -- A COMMUNIST"
That's what he is, that's what he's advocating, it doesn't work. Never has, never will - why doesn't he get it yet? Is he stupid or what? Fair question!
Seems like Rand Paul is the ONLY one in congress that is willing to speak the truth.
Great content. I'd like to see a little more passion out of him... but a fine rebuttal.
I like a lot, but not all, of what he has to say.
Problem is he is virtually alone in Congress, thus powerless to affect change.
Rand has such command of the facts and is not afraid to speak the truth....I like him more and more all the time. I think he really blew Rubio out of the water.
Neither can compare to Obama who is in a totally different catagory.....I call it the "In your face lying fantasy bull$*!t" catagory.
I have always liked Rand Paul. He is his own person and furthermore, the sins of the father should never be visited on their sons. Not that I don't like his father. If not for his wacky stand on Israel, Ron Paul's opinions on everything else are A+.
You guys need a third party like a lost man in the Sahara desert needs water...even a drop of it. We have three parties here in Canada and it works just beautifully for us.
Well I've listen to Rubio and Paul, and I read Palin's tweets.
Rubio is clearly an establishment republican arguing at the margins. He wants to manage our decline, but offers no bold ideas.
I certainly hope he does not seek the Republican nomination.
clapping like a crazy! I just loved it. Plain spoken even a liberal can understand this. Still clapping.
I sure hope the fat man from New Jersey and Rubio both get in the race so we can see the moderates fight it out for once. While the conservatives unite behind a solid candidate.
"We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities." Well Sen Paul, I'd like to see which of Reagan's illegals that he granted amnesty too are now on the public welfare and food stamp programs. They are a LIABILITY to American taxpayers!
That gave me a pain to. Especially with the ramp up coming of Muslim immigration besides the GOP has nothing against immigration it's illegal immigration. He made it sound like we have to apologize which I'm sick to death of. Never let the left frame the question which this does. Republicans hate immigration. No we don't. Yes you do. No we don't.
This one will really give you a pain. 800,000 ordered for deportation not deported, some with serious criminal records. http://cowboybyte.com/16528/dhs-errors-let-800k-deported-illegal-aliens-stay-in-us-some-receiving-welfare-benefits/
This is a nice write up of the amnesty too. http://www.examiner.com/article/amnesty-push-immigration-reform-or-political-pandering-1
DHS admits they are not tracking immigrants welfare. http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/13/dhs-only-makes-one-public-charge-deportation-in-last-fiscal-year-admits-inadequate-recordkeeping/
And ICE is prohibited from deporting "immigrants" on welfare (which is illegal). http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/13/ice-union-head-on-deporting-welfare-dependents-we-are-not-permitted-to-enforce-that-statute-period/
Senator Paul has a huge uphill battle before him. I appreciate his efforts and will support him. While we need to hold Paul's feet to the fire, just like any other politician, let's not shoot ourselves in the feet by being overly critical and giving the lefties opportunities they don't deserve.
Rand Paul may very well be our best opportunity. If we stick together anywhere near as well as the left, we'll succeed.
The left doesn't need any opportunities given to them. Every post here could have been high praise. Every blog could have been cheering. None of it matters. If Rand or anyone says anything that makes sense and is in opposition to Obama they will be attacked. The time for vetting and opinion is now, so I say have at it.
"For those who are struggling we want to you to have something infinitely more valuable than a free phone, we want you to have a job and pathway to success."
What a concept! How far we have fallen............
This was a better response overall with the exception of his immigration response.
Listen up GOP: If you want us to support immigration reform stop accusing us of being anti-immigrant! I have heard no one be anti-immigrant but pro rule of law. Demonizing us, brow beating us, will not get the support you seek and will only breed resentment and contempt.
I agree, here is my response to armyvet posted below:
Good post.
As for immigration, I think Rand will kind of go along with this amnesty type nonsense with the caveat that every few years the issue will be required to be re-voted on based on border security. In other words he's ok with some of the illegals undergoing a naturalization process but if the border security isn't happening than the natuaralization has to stop. I just listend to Rand on Beck and I think that was the gist of what he said. Not ideal for me but pretty much the whole GOP sucks on illegal immigration, at least with re-voting based on border security it's better than most of the garbage out there.
Unfortunately I think Rand is alot like his daddy on foreign policy but not maybe quite as crazy. I don't think containment works, especially with radical Islam. I thought about being done with Rand after I read 911infidel's post about this over the weekend HOWEVER:
compare the Rand giving the Tea Party response to Rubio giving the GOPe response:
Rand: 5 year plan to balance the budget by cutting corporate income tax in half, 17% flat tax, and cutting regulations
Rubio: 10 year plan of growing economy at 4 % that may work over 10 years. ---so if a 2 term president is term limited the next president can just change everything.
So while Rand is not my ideal candidate I'd much rather have a Tea Party guy making some serious reform instead of the same old GOPe nonsense.
Here's Rand Paul on "undocumented citizens" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/11/from-illegals-to-taxpayers/#.URlN6nKz8e0.twitter
Trouble is revisiting the issue every few years won't happen and really shows where Rand is new. There is politics and governing. Politics is what you have to play to govern...unfortunately. Politics will never ever allow that issue to be revisited by either party. Not in a million years.
The speech was very good...but I have become so distrusting of politicians. So many go to Washington, hat in hand, to do service for their constituents and next we see them...no hands to be seen because they're under the table...
100% unadulterated truth, reason, logic and conservative foundational thought backed up by evidence.
The media won't get it, will try to mock, deride and distort it.
It is funny that he says "For the first time in history, men and women were guaranteed a chance to succeed based NOT on who your parents were but on your own initiative and desire to work." when he owes all his success to who his father is... Typical Republican double-talk.
You do understand that he was making the point that the United States was a country that would not have hereditary titles, nobility, royalty, aristocracy, peers, etc.
This is a country where rich people children can fail.
Seriously?
So no one can ever get any credit for doing things the right way and working hard if they have a successful parent?
I think Rand is alot like his dad in terms of being a paleocon like 911infidel wrote over the weekend. Rand is just more well spoke and doesn't let all the crazy talk come out his mouth like RuPaul does.
That being said right now I'd still support Rand over Rubio.
Look at their speeches from last night:
Rubio is taking in general terms, sounds like Romney and McCain from the last 2 elections.
Rand Paul is talking about some real cuts like a 17% flat tax and reducing the corporate tax.
So despite Rand's uneasy foreign policy and talking about containment last week, we need someone to make some serious cuts instead of the the sugarcoated business as usual GOPe talk. Just look at the start of Rubio's speech saying how he's not concerned about the rich, but the middle class -- standard GOPe buying into the class warfare garbage.
No one is perfect, but I stand with Rand over Rubio. I mean Rand is giving the Tea Party response and Rubio is giving the GOPe response. That should really tell you all you need to know.
I agree. Cruz seems great. I'd also love for Sarah to run but I don't think she will.
The only thing I don't like about Rand is I think he's alot more similar to Ron on foreign policy than he will admit.
However given a choice between Rand and the GOPe Rubio: I'm going with Rand and I'll knock on doors for him in the primary to beat the GOPe.
Do you like our current foreign policy?
I think the current policy is a consistent policy from Bush 1 through Obama. We need a course change. We need a post Cold War foreign policy that does not break our back.
Okay, so in his speech he brings up DuhOne's "recess appointments" as having been ruled unconstitutional. So What? Has anything changed? Have those people consequently lost their jobs? Have all the regulations they instituted been rescinded? I haven't heard anything about it. So what they actually saying is, "That action was unconstitutional, we just want you to know that. We're not going to change anything but try real hard not to do it again, okay?" What a crock!
Exactly! Maybe I missed it but I didn't see anything in either Rubio or Paul's speeches about giving Obama an unlimited credit card by lifting the debt ceiling for months.
The leftist freaks hate Rand Paul because if they actually listen to him, they know he speaks the truth. And leftist freaks despise the truth because it does not work toward supporting their cause of converting America into a socialist utopia. To convince people to give up their freedoms and liberties for security requires, by definition, that they be lied to. Unfortunately, there are too many Americans that have bought the lies. And many are too stupid to recognize it. And there are already too many mendicants that vote for a living to alter the direction of this ship.
Have a nice day!
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency...Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president." - Czech Republic newspaper Prager Zeitung
Even the Russians are appalled by Obama's destructive policies and have bought 570 tons of GOLD to offset the destruction of the dollar by Obama and the FED.
Excellent speech, Mr Paul's response to the problem is right on.
Thanks Tea Party Express, Rep. Paul, and Right Scoop.
Our surrender as is not an option if we Americans are going to defend our freedom and liberty.
Tea Party Patriot
Sarah = reality .. her responses packed more punch than both Rino Rubio, fake Tea Party Paul .. when are men going to be men again ?
In an effort to achieve full disclosure on this thread topic, let me first say that I didn't watch the State of the Union Address. For personal reasons that I won't go into, I refuse to watch the pomp and circumstance of a politician / celebrity wanna be. Now to Rand Paul.
I listened to the entire video clip and was disappointed that questions either weren't entertained (I dislike this term) There are some clarifications that I need to hear. Having said this, it doesn't mean I wouldn't support Mr. Paul, but I need a better understanding of a couple of issues.
The first is the immigration issue. I am all for immigration reform, but not at accepting a default citizen approach that rewards those that have cheated their way in. This is in essence rewarding people for breaking the law. In the effort to reform immigration, I believe a more stern effort in documentation must happen as well. Of course the current administration doesn't even want to enforce legal ID for voting, so I am not sure how Mr. Paul would calm these concerns for me.
Second is exactly how isolated, or how much of an isolationism approach is Mr. Paul suggesting. We do not need to wait until we have to sacrifice 29,000 + soldiers storming a beach because it "wasn't our problem" just so an evil regime can build a defense that would invoke this kind of sacrifice to get a foot hold and then move forward to take down someone like Hitler. Contrasting this to the Iraq war; approximately 4800 American military have died in the Iraq war. This is over a period of 5 years or more. The D-day invasion lasted 1 day. My mother once taught me that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. I do believe we must be more cautious in our decisions of using military force, but we must never allow evil to prevail against us. (that being the U.S.)
As for the rest, I agree with almost everything Mr. Paul said, especially about the balanced budget and the transparency. As far as his ability to be smooth while on the podium, well we don’t need a polished sales man like the President, we need an honest person regardless of how flashy or un-flashy they may be.
Great post and I agree with everything you outlined!
Here's a recent Washington Post article where Paul identifies illegals as "undocumented citizens" (paragraph 5). Sums up his immigration thoughts for me. Cheaters win, taxpayers pay.
Rand Paul “undocumented citizens” http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/11/from-illegals-to-taxpayers/#.URlN6nKz8e0.twitter
That looks like an error. In the same paragraph he also writes undocumented persons. He uses the phrase undocumented persons again, but not undocumented citizens. Plus since he explains there path to citizenship it seems clear he does not already view them as citizens.
"I would normalize them at a rate of about 2 million per year. I would start with Dream Act kids, children brought here illegally as minors. Normalization would get them a temporary visa, but would not put them ahead of anyone already waiting to enter the country. These undocumented persons would now be documented, but they would still have to wait in line like everyone else. Their path to permanent legal status would be no faster than those currently waiting in line."
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
I don't believe it is an error at all. His "pathway to citizenship" confirms he views them as citizens who are undocumented. Rewarding illegal behavior is reprehensible. He's another politician looking for the minority vote while Americans and legal immigrants continue to pay for them. Heritage estimates the cost at $2.6 Trillion + $2 Trillion more for their ObamaCare.
We have 23 million American unemployed that are costing taxpayers trillions to support through food stamps, welfare, unemployment. We need to deport 100% and hire Americans.
And Rubio was outed by the Daily Caller on his con job. http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/13/rubios-anti-sotu-dissembles-on-amnesty/
Checkout Senator Rand Paul: Restoring the Founders' Vision of Foreign Policy - Heritage Foundation 2/6/2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dxmH3MW8zA
He is not an isolationist. His speech explains his approach to foreign policy.
1st let me clarify what I said. I never stated he was an isolationist, but asked the question how isolated does he propose we should be. I did go to the you tube web site you provided and listened to the entire 23 min 59 sec video and while Mr. Paul said some inspiring words pertaining to Radical Islam, and pointed to the Containment policy used against the former Soviet Union, the point of when to turn from Diplomacy to harsher methods was not addressed. Mr. Paul did state that a military option should never be taken off the table, but didn't put into detail exactly as to what point this should happen. I do disagree with Mr. Paul's position on Israel and our providing military assets to help them defend themselves. Israel has their own unique issues, both good and bad, but the position they are in at this time warrants help against those that are actively seeking their destruction, mainly Iran. Towards the end Mr. Paul casts doubts to Iran's current nuclear capabilities. With this being said, we also are now facing a hostile would be Hitler in North Korea. Mr. Paul did fail to recognize that during the cold war against the former Soviet Union we had help in putting pressure on the USSR via China. This has all changed and now China and the former Soviet Union are working together to further weaken the United States. So my question at this point would be with the exception of economic sanctions against Iran, knowing we will get no support from China, Russia or the UN, how does Mr. Paul suggest we deal with countries like Iran? I do not think he answered this very well.
I agree with you questions remain. Still I thought his speech was thoughtful and laid some new ground. I look forward to him give more speeches and more op'eds to explain his positions.
I do think it is nice that he is putting out serious positions.
Good post.
As for immigration, I think Rand will kind of go along with this amnesty type nonsense with the caveat that every few years the issue will be required to be re-voted on based on border security. In other words he's ok with some of the illegals undergoing a naturalization process but if the border security isn't happening than the natuaralization has to stop. I just listend to Rand on Beck and I think that was the gist of what he said. Not ideal for me but pretty much the whole GOP sucks on illegal immigration, at least with re-voting based on border security it's better than most of the garbage out there.
Unfortunately I think Rand is alot like his daddy on foreign policy but not maybe quite as crazy. I don't think containment works, especially with radical Islam. I thought about being done with Rand after I read 911infidel's post about this over the weekend HOWEVER:
compare the Rand giving the Tea Party response to Rubio giving the GOPe response:
Rand: 5 year plan to balance the budget by cutting corporate income tax in half, 17% flat tax, and cutting regulations
Rubio: 10 year plan of growing economy at 4 % that may work over 10 years. ---so if a 2 term president is term limited the next president can just change everything.
So while Rand is not my ideal candidate I'd much rather have a Tea Party guy making some serious reform instead of the same old GOPe nonsense.

The Right Scoop






Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.