Gawker has published a list of (a-hole) New Yorkers who own guns, by name and type of license. It would contain the address however NYPD doesn’t provide addresses on their list:

Last month, the Journal News sparked a firestorm of protest when it published a mappable database of every licensed gun owner in Westchester and Rockland counties, north of New York City. The paper obtained the data—which New York state law explicitly and unambiguously demands be made public—through open records requests. The reaction was swift and furious—gun rights and privacy advocates published the names and addresses of the paper’s editors in retaliation, and the paper (ironically) hired armed guards to protect against threats.

One weird reaction came from TV wraith Ann Coulter, who told Fox News’ Sean Hannity last week: “If we’re producing lists of gun permit owners, I want them for Manhattan. I want to know how many rich liberals with their body guards have gun permits.” You’re in luck, Ann. I happened to have just such a list in my filing cabinet. Here it is.

Below is a 446-page list of every licensed gun owner in New York City. I obtained it from the NYPD two-and-a-half years ago via a Freedom of Information Law request. Because the NYPD is more interested in raping and/or eating ladies and spying on Muslims than it is in honoring public records law, the list contains only the names, and not the addresses, of the licensees.

They even provide a link to a mirror of a 2010 website that contained address of people who owned pistols. Ugh. They seem to be out to vilify people who own guns just like the Journal News. The intimidation campaign continues.




Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

111 comments
kong1967
kong1967

Yet, no one went after the journalists violently. The gun owners are such a-holes that the journalists weren't afraid to publish their names, even though they are equating them to the Sandy Hook shooter. If that were true, they would have been too afraid to publish the names.

juli222
juli222

This is brilliant then those who love to BREAK the law will have a list of names to work from and breal in and steal their guns........

mikeinidaho
mikeinidaho

The last refuge of scoundrels! When you can't argue the merits, call the opposition some schoolboy name! I can't wait till this punk is faced with a gun-toting criminal. He'll crap his pants and cry like a little girl.

Rick J Black, Sr.
Rick J Black, Sr.

Publish them. I'll be ready with my trusty rifle for any Prog that shows up at my door. And God help the criminal that happens to be in the neighborhood casing my house.

deTocqueville1
deTocqueville1

Ah, the new age of yellow journalism unfolds before our eyes!

JungleCogs
JungleCogs

You want to stop this stuff? Just publish the Democrat's names, addresses, their children's names, ages, the schools their kids attend and when. The dirtbags will quit this crap in a heartbeat.

Richard
Richard

What is a Gawker? Never heard of this publication. Did you give them the free publicity they so desire?

Richard
Richard

This will encourage more to purchase weapons for protection. Why didn't I buy some gun maker stocks?

NCHokie02
NCHokie02

One way to look it at it though is to say thanks....the criminals who now have these addresses now know which people not to rob.

How ironic it was though that once the Journal's editors addresses were published they hired armed guards yet ordinary citizens can't skip the guard and arm themselves. Ah the hypocrisy. Laughable.

Jay
Jay

Just on the first page it seemed like there were a lot of Middle Eastern sounding names. Makes me wonder.

AmericanDream12
AmericanDream12

This is really getting awful

I was born in France few years after the war at a time when everybody - my parents - were still talking about the war constantly. Talking about all the traitors denouncing the jews to the german and the terrible family stories that came from that practice.

It is starting to look like this. Only here people don't know what it means - to denounce so they do it easily it seems.

This is really really a bad move. An awfully slippery slope that may lead to a war. Neighbors denouncing neighbors to the enemy - that's what happened in France during WWII.

ned pina
ned pina

Please someone help try and find and publish this guy's address.

Jazzee
Jazzee

someone smarter than I am needs to publish all illegals and welfare takers.....or better yet post all homes without weapons............

SineWaveII
SineWaveII

Way to go. Now we have proof that the compromise that gun-owners made with the left on gun-registration was a huge mistake.

Now we have all the reason to be COMPLETELY OPPOSED to gun registration for any reason.

The left have proven that the information is not safe and will be abused. The NRA and the other 2nd amendment groups need to begin to push for the repeal of all gun-registration laws and to stop any more from being passed.

Message for the republicans: Now do you see why you NEVER compromise with the left, ever, under any circumstances?

Larchmonter
Larchmonter

Gays (Gawker) love to "Out" their own, so what's new? They get a special tingle ratting out, squealing, dropping dimes, "gossiping" and whispering in the other "girls" ears.

At some point, a high velocity round will pierce the leakers' sanctimony.

Karma will smoke the Gawk geeks.

fishmonster
fishmonster

Love to see them try that bullshit in Texas. Love to see obama try to redo the Constitution but the little socialist can't and he knows it. To us the liberal left was what smallpox was to the Mayans. What part of "shall not be infringed" do they not understand?

K-Bob
K-Bob

The comments over at "Gwacker" seem to be of a majority against the idiot who wrote the article. I'm guessing his name and address are already posted online somewhere.

However, there are many gun-grabbing totalitarians there, as well. If they had a decent comment system, I'd go blast 'em. But it looks like a liberal-dominated website that isn't interested in what YOU think.

DCGere
DCGere

This "outing" of legal gun ownership is downright frightening. I live in a very liberal area and am scared to death one of our local papers might do the same thing.

Time for lawsuits for these so-called journalists. They are pulling an Alinsky on steriods now.

answer1776
answer1776

They would never, never publish a list of pedophiles or rapists.

Godisright
Godisright

That's because they are not allowed to have guns. LOL!

Biggbear52
Biggbear52

in the last 24 hours an additional 4892 laws and 3922 regulations were made all without the people knowing. Much less being a part of. This is un-natural and I am quite sure in some way, unlawful. But then we are under the guise of the most UN-LAWFUL group ever known in the U.S. Heck third world leaders are know joking about how slack our leaders are. Know that friends and neighbors is freaking scary

answer1776
answer1776

Regulation Without Representation. Yeah, I'm not happy about it.

VirusX
VirusX

I'd publish their names, addresses, all known phone numbers and email addresses, tax information, education transcripts and credit histories of everyone that worked for that rag. I'd follow that with this message:

"Now that you know I'm strapped, coming around my place isn't worth your life. However, the people I just described DON'T have weapons, and are willing to wait out police response times."

K-Bob
K-Bob

This attempt at intimidation is kind of like the "skinhead" movement in Europe a few years ago. When you get all skinheaded up (and I don't just refer to the haircut, which is exactly the kind of haircut I have these days), you think it looks intimidating. Oooh, Scary!

The reality is it's like hanging a big, fat, "loser" sign around your neck, making you unemployable, marking you as untrustworthy, and causing people to avoid you.

Same with these "let's 'out' the gun owners" idiots. They've hung big, fat, "loser" signs around their necks. It says, for one thing, "please sue me out of house and home." And they will be sued. First person on that list who's house is broken into, or who is attacked, and the lawsuits will begin.

And make no mistake: these people are doing this "outing" with a clear, malicious intent. So they will be sued clear thru bankruptcy, into homelessness, and it needs to happen without mercy, or someone else will try to do it again.

stage9
stage9

That's why the 60's radicals shed the terrorist persona and robed themselves in suits and ties. They're still terrorists underneath, wolves in sheep's clothing, but they just look deceptively respectable now.

K-Bob
K-Bob

yep: Van Jones

Sober_Thinking
Sober_Thinking

I despise frivolous lawsuits big time. But it's time to load up the courts on these people for doing this. It doesn't matter if you win or not... they wanna bump, let's bump back.

And wait for the crimes to begin on this gun-owners homes... even if it's just vandalism.

stage9
stage9

What you should do is continue posting their information to the internet -- where they live, when they're home, where they shop, what they drive.

Until radicals are served the same medicine they dish out -- until you put them down and keep them down -- they're going to continue to act like criminals.

Sober_Thinking
Sober_Thinking

I agree with you 100%.

The sad thing is the media would actually report that story though - further painting conservatives, the Tea Party or gun owners as a menace.

But I am all for that... they need to feel hunted and ridiculed for a change. When bullies are bullied, they usually bully less.

Joe
Joe

I believe there are some attorneys on that list

This should be fun!

Watchman74
Watchman74

The left always project there own worst traits onto others. Everyone else is always a racist or ahole but never them.

sDee
sDee

Two farm kids with a couple of Ruger 10/22's explain what a farce this "assault weapon" moniker is, and just how gullible a sheep nation we have become.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsDjdpmou74

AmericanborninCanada
AmericanborninCanada

Hey sDee- I've missed you. Off topic, but here's the latest one I've been working on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zpg16h_F1qI

Let me know what you think please? Thanks!!

Nukeman60
Nukeman60

I just watched it, Duckie. It was OUTstanding. I loved your choices in music, especially the Dire Straits song. Very apropos and spot on. This was very professionally done. I think you should submit it to Scoop for it's own thread, perhaps an open thread.

The opening line summed up what we all feel and should be the banner of everything we do:

'The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.' - Thomas Jefferson

AmericanborninCanada
AmericanborninCanada

Maybe. I just sent it to him. I did tweet it today and a few re tweeted it for me. I hope people can see this- especially those who haven't a clue about it. I'm going to start working on part II tonight. Getting more pictures right now.

Nukeman60
Nukeman60

Seriously, I think it would go viral. Scoop would love it. I can't wait for part II.

AmericanborninCanada
AmericanborninCanada

Thank you Nuke! I don't know about Scoop putting it up. I guess I could try. I would like as many people to see it as possible- I just want people to know and never forget. I love the Jefferson quote too- thought it was perfect for it. Thank you for your encouragement dear friend- it means SO much more than you know.

mjs_28s
mjs_28s

Interesting that those that own guns on that list are supposedly a-holes but wouldn't the a-holes be the ones not on the list that own their gun(s) illegally? What about the gang bangers? Street thugs? Underground criminals?

So, if you don't want to be an a-hole then buy or steal, a gun that is not legal to have and don't register it.

Lady Penquin
Lady Penquin

Better yet, Gawker is likely one of those who has bodyguards with guns, since he wouldn't dare get his own lily white, sanctimonious hands dirty.

physicsnut
physicsnut

same tactics as Stalin used against the Kulaks. Of course, Feinstein's bill is just warmed over Hitler gun control act of 1938.

3seven77
3seven77

"Because the NYPD is more interested in raping and/or eating ladies and spying on Muslims than it is in honoring public records law, the list contains only the names, and not the addresses, of the licensees."

Hmmmm. Seems I wasn't aware that it was the NYPD's job to publish the names of LEGAL gun owners. Maybe the officers don't have the time to get the list to the publishers because they are too busy taking salt shakers off restaurant tables and arresting people for buying large sodas.

WhiteGuy2
WhiteGuy2

The liberal mind is so warped and twisted it defies the laws of the universe.

Legal gun ownership = A-hole

Illegal gun ownership= pretend it doesn't exist

Legal immigration = so what

Illegal immigration = the backbone of the nation

Traditional marriage = family values suck

Gay marriage = isn't it wonderful

Military veteran = baby killer

Terrorist = freedom fighter

Terrorist attack = man caused disaster/workplace violence

Law abiding working man = raise his taxes

Criminal = he just needs help and compassion

I could go on and on but you get the point.

aposematic
aposematic

A good start on the exposed tip of the liberal iceberg.

nibblesyble
nibblesyble

In that case they should also publish the liberal a**hole's addresses that employ people who use guns to defend their smarmy behinds. I somehow think that list will not be coming.

notebene
notebene

Somebody needs to publish the names, addresses, and phone numbers of all journalists abusing their job! They need to be stalked for the filth that they are! Oh yeah...they have ARMED security! It is time to declare war on the lamestream media and take away their privacy. Law- abiding American citizens, who are responsible and register their weapons should not be being abused like this! Let's call this garbage what it is...bullying from the left wing propaganda pushers. We need to start using their tactics on them. Publish their private lives for the world to see. Let's see what the holier than thou journalist that wrote this filth and endangered law-abiding citizens does off the job. Who does he hang out with? Does he have a family? Publish untruths or any perverted truth about him and let's see how brave he really is!

tinlizzieowner
tinlizzieowner

In other words, do to them what they did to Sarah Palin.

notebene
notebene

Absolutely! Use their tactics on their evil, low class behinds! Bullies can't stand to have their methods used on them...they run like the cowards they are!

tinlizzieowner
tinlizzieowner

Exactly. The mantra of the left a decade ago was "Question Authority". Now that they are 'the authority', we're being told that questioning authority (namely the Obama administration), is 'unpatriotic'.

Use their situational hypocrisy against them, there's plenty of it to go around.

notebene
notebene

I'm with you...the only way to deal with a bully is to give him a bloody nose and send him running! It is the only way this will stop! Use their tactics...publish their dirt and watch them change their tune about privacy rights!

tinlizzieowner
tinlizzieowner

I keep hearing well meaning conservatives say "we're more principled than that". Well, I'm not. Where did being 'principled' get us in this last election? I did a stretch in Viet Nam, I know all about the 'rules of engagement' that got a lot of my Air Force 'Brothers' shot down and are getting a lot of my young 'Brothers and Sisters' killed and maimed, playing 'politically correct' games in Afghanistan right now.

This is a war and as far as I'm concerned there ain't no rules. There's winning and there is loosing, I'm not a big fan of loosing.