- Anonymous
Hindsight is 20/20
- Anonymous
And 20/20 only airs on ABC … so there ya go.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
“They go on to say that the housing collapse caused him to look at it with a “fresh set of eyes”. Yeah, no kidding” That last line made me fall out of my chair! So poignant! That is exactly what we’ve ALL been thinking, and it’s like you said it at the same time! Very cool!
Besides that, I’m going to have to defer to the rest of you all on this issue. I haven’t been around long enough to really understand all of this GSE stuff. I tried, but there’s a LOT to it. Hell, I’ve never even owned/rented a house (just an apartment)! So, that being said, if anyone thinks they can educate me on these GSE thingy’s without politics, to such a degree where I can educate MYSELF on the politics, that would be great! Otherwise…not much I can do.
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
I’ve been learning every day Brian. It’s a never ending process- but some of this stuff comes up so fast, it’s hard to get it all at once, so I hear ya on this.
Off topic, how did your finals go? Are you done?
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Well, I just did my speech today on Cutting down our National Debt (went really well…Flaming Liberal “professor”), my Chem test was today (probably not too well), tomorrow is my Chem Lab Final (studying now), Monday is Computer Programming Final, Tuesday is Chem. Final, Thursday is “Impromptu speech” in Communications! Pretty busy these days! Thanks for asking though!
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
Flaming Lib huh! Good! You’ll do fine. I’ll keep the prayers going then!

- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Hahaha! I had MANY people in my class tell me they really enjoyed the speech! It was actually attacking Republicans AND Democrats, and showed that Obama will spend in 4 years on Welfare what Bush spent in 4 years on Defense, and they’re both the same amount of money (but Bush had 9/11, and the War on Terror). It was a real eye-opener, and I had more than one Democrat tell me after class that this was the first time they’d heard that (I am in SoCal, so that’s probably why…)!
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
I wish I could have been a fly on that wall! I would have enjoyed that immensely. I think a lot of liberals don’t know what to do when a conservative goes off on both parties. They’re so used to following blindly someone with a D after them, and would never EVER say anything against their own guy even when they know they’re wrong. Well that and a common sense, well informed, chalk full of facts kind of presentation
I’m sure you were an enlightenment for a few! - Anonymous
What do you wanna know about the GSEs? I worked inside the mortgage industry for just over four years, so I can give you the ‘basics’ but that in itself can be a lot.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Anything you can tell me will be more than I already know!!! Seriously…anything!
- Anonymous
Shortest possible explanation is that GSE are e-s-s-e-n-t-i-a-l-l-y extensions of the federal govt DESPITE what the govt will tell you. They’re guaranteed fiscally by the govt so that means IF (and when) a mortgage-payer defaults the govt will still guarantee the paperwork (meaing the $$$). FannieMae & FreddieMac claim to “back” the mortgage, but, for all practical intents & purposes, THAT responsibility is what they surrender to the US govt BECAUSE the govt is the entity that sets the rules. Consequently, the govt was pressing for these subprime mortgages (all guaranteed by FannieMae & FreddieMac) to be packaged and sold alongside mortgages of varying degrees of risk to investors and/or investment groups so that those companies could share in the mgmt of the risk. Therein lies to problem: once these financial groups realized what they had, they resold them elsewhere. Trust me when I say that it was extremely difficult to make sense of some of these mortgage files to determine who actually “owned the loan” when these contracts went belly-up. Anyone with half-a-brain inside the mortgage industry could’ve told you this was destined for HUGE failure, as it was.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Thanks! I’m going to have to study your response for a while to understand, but I’ll get it! I do remember my mom saying something about the mortgage thing…she was notified that their home mortgage was now owned by someone else, and I think they ended up selling it to someone else, and so on…so now my mom can’t pay the mortgage online anymore since the NEW company doesn’t accept online payments. Something along those lines!
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WVUHZKSQJ4WMHDGZYTFIKICHKI E. Lee
Yes, that definitely relates to it. Once you understand the basics of a mortgage, then it’s easy to see how the system was gamed (and gamed and gamed) until it collapsed. Here’s a video link to Thomas Sowell that can help …
He wrote a book called “Housing Boom & Bust” that really helps clarify quite a bit of it. If you’re all that interested, you can probably pick up one second hand pretty cheap these days thru an Amazon.com retailer.
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
“Mr. DeSantis said that Mr. Gingrich now advocates a more aggressive overhaul of Fannie and Freddie. “The total collapse of the global financial system has a tendency to make one look at a situation with a fresh set of eyes,” he said.”
Other republicans knew a housing collapse was coming. So did a lot of people. My husband used to work construction, heavy equipment, tie beams and other housing construction type of work, and we talked about the bubble bursting often. We knew it wouldn’t last and was bound to collapse soon, which is why we saved every penny he made. We knew it wouldn’t last, and I’m glad we never spent it because it was our savings which paid our bills these past 3 and a half unemployed years.
Hindsight yes, but if average working joes can see the handwriting on the wall, why couldn’t someone who is brilliant and in the center of it see it? - Anonymous
Well, technically, Newt was ‘consulting’ for FannieMae and FreddieMac; so, if he was seeing the same internal paperwork that was justifying GSE bonuses and operating revenues, he may have been mildly blindsighted. You’re right in the doesn’t excuse the grim reality that anyone with half-a-brain looking at the mortgage industry could’ve easily predicted this was destined for explosive failure, and, on that point, it’s hard to accept Newt’s answer.
- Anonymous
Gingrich is a lying immoral pig and has the arrogance and ego of Richard M. Nixon. This man is bad news for the GOP!
- Anonymous
Meh. He’s no better or worse than any other closeted Conservative.
- http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn
WTF does that mean? There’s some type of ‘closeted Conservative’ doctrine now?
- http://twitter.com/torquepilot TORQUEPILOT
Agree completely! Obummer has the MSM in his pocket! If newrich is GOP nominee there will be literally daily crucifixion of him, all networks, 24-7, not only political history but personal history! Forget the debates! All the moderator has to ask are personal questions! Bad news!
- Is_Sense_Common
It doesn’t matter who the GOP nominee is Pilot… MSM will crucify him/her daily 24/7. Gingrich, Mittens, Cain, Bachmann, Paul, Santorum – whoever. They don’t care. It really doesn’t matter. They’ve got their playbook written (ref: Alinsky) and they’ll stick to it. We’ve got to be strong & make sure the hypocrites in the MSM are exposed with their pants down every single day, no matter who our nominee is.
- Anonymous
The fact is that the MSM will be telling the truth when it comes to Gingrich…they won’t have to make anything up! His lack of ethics,tawdry sex life,pay offs and questionable business practices and political cronyism will speak for itself.
- Is_Sense_Common
This is all part of Newt’s mental gymnastics that he performs just to entertain his brain. He’s a damn good debater & knows something about everything so just for fun, he makes a valid argument for every side of any issue. This is why he’s difficult to trust. No one really knows what’s in his heart!
- deo heerai
Here is my mental gymnastics if it comes down to Gingrench Or Mitt Rino Romney I will be voting for ROMNEY and I encourage all to do so also
- http://twitter.com/torquepilot TORQUEPILOT
Agree! Newrich reminds me of Professor Irwin Corey, if anybody is old enough to remember his comedy act!?
- Anonymous
Will it happen again, another Republican rises to top tier and then crashes and burns, leaving Romney to sweep it all up? Sad day for America if Obama wins, his gloves will be off, I believe our heads will spin, GOD help us, ” without vision my people perish” Proverbs 29:18. ABO!
- Anonymous
These are facts.
Facts that show that Newt isn’t who he campaigns to be. That us how we got burned on Obama. He ran as a moderate, governed as a Marxist.
- deo heerai
What Republican?? Gingrench is a PROGRESSIVE and his supporters are too if they ignore all the facts
- Anonymous
I completely agree and if people think we are making this up they need to read Tofler’s books where Gingrich wrote the forward. They need to see what Tofler’s vision was and then consider that this is the man Gingrich idolizes.
- http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html Unicon
And yet… lets not forget….he endorsed all their checks, prior to cashing them, utilizing his “old set of eyes” apparently.
- Anonymous
I will not forget Dede!
I encourage others to do the same.
- deo heerai
With congress approval 7% we are supposed to nominate a former house speaker who was for an individual mandate, supported cap and trade, and thinks the Ryan plan is right wing social engineering. was a lobby csar ,and has more personal baggage than anyone to ever run for president . AND THIS IS OUR SAVIOR?? all you gingrich loons are nuts if it comes down to gingrich or Romney I will be voting for Romney because Romney has an excuse ..look where he came from.. what is gingrench’s excuse
- http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html Unicon
A little too intense on your part… but I agree with your basic premise

- deo heerai
Agree about too intense but this guy is dangerous and trecherous and to make things worse tHIS is the guy Obummer most wants to run against ..Why ??
- Anonymous
We have two options here: 1) focus on the past, or 2) focus on the future.
Nevertheless, I think the results of Newt’s last Contract with America speaks for itself. He lived up to his pledge, unlike the Boehner-Cantor-Ryan House today (Sorry, I love Paul Ryan but he has shown no “clear” ability to breakaway from Boehner).
Newt has a Contract with America for 2012. Read it. Understand it. If you don’t like it, then don’t vote for him. But, to focus on the past is non-sensical. He was a private citizen at the time. Focus on what he did in office, and what he is claiming to do if elected in 2012.
Only one man in this race had a Contract with America that he lived up to!
Facts can be stubborn things ladies and gentleman!
- deo heerai
Yeah he also had a contract with fannie mae a contract with Freddi Mac a contract with Lobbists a contact with nancy pelosi on a couch a contract with Al Sharpton a contract with Dede scozafava and the list goes on and on. Need i tell you where he can stick his contracts
- Anonymous
Did he live up to his last Contract with America? What do you not like about this one? He has already said that Fannie and Freddie will be returned to private entities. What more do you want?
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
Your facts are sooo scewed is it unbelievable…..Your post is worthless. You need to get your facts correct before you post because what you posted is not correct. Post the whole story then make an opinion.
- Anonymous
Contract with America was Hunter’s thing, not Newt’s. Newt helped, but doesn’t deserve all the credit.
- Anonymous
Did it work?
Did Newt lived up to it?
I will await your answers.
- Anonymous
Did Newt come up with? Did they actually balance the budget?
(the answer is NO)
- Anonymous
For god’s sake, Obama is the enemy here. Not Newt!
- Anonymous
Actually to me Newt is the enemy, because Newt personifies what is wrong with Washington. Washington is so corrupt because of pigs like Gingrich who sell out to the highest bidder. I would have never in a million years thought the GOP would be stupid enough to nominate a career crony politician who has spent his life profiting from Big Government. Who also was penalized as Speaker of the House with one of the largest fines in House history of $300,000 and was forced to step down due to ethics violations. The Democrats will have so much fun with this if Gingrich is the nominee.
- deo heerai
Another Gingrich Press release from just a while ago MUST SEE
- Anonymous
Nooo, please, lets not reduce ourselves to using comedy shows for a news source or as the arbitrator of facts.
- deo heerai
That was Verbatim of his press release that clip just shows the arrogance of the man and the absurdity of his of his words
- Anonymous
Anyone who defends Herman Cain has no credibility on any subject, much less the judgment of other candidates.
- Anonymous
Anyone who defends whoever Jaynie59 likes has no credibility on any subject, much less the judgment of other candidates.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
I’m rubber, you’re glue…
Hahaha! Just playin’! - http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
”Sticks and Stone may break my bones but my foot up your butt will really hurt.”

lol.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
That’s a new one! Hahahaha! :-p LOL!
- Anonymous
Newt MakeMErich is a RINO period. Amazing how these clowns have an awakening after the fact which is the same ole same ole. Anyone who is plugged into politics can see how these yahoos just give us lip service.
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
If that is so TJinNJ then please explain how Newt can be considered an ardent conservatives who still today holds a 95% Conservative rating by the Democratic Conservative Union and has a high conservative index rating by the New American both well respected Conservative Ratings firms?? (kinda like the Moodys of Conservative Politics)
That’s the facts and you don’t have to belive me you can look those up for yourself. Newt Gingrich is definitely CONSERVATIVE.
- Anonymous
You might need someone to tell you what to think which has been the problem with voters over the last 50 years in that no one can diseminate information. Facts I have shows he’s a BIG GOV Lib. You might want to do some research.
Newt’s Record – His Recent Conservatism doesn’t match the Record
04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine
10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/–/1993 – He Voted for sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia.
11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
08/27/1995 – He suggests that drug smuggling should carry a death sentence.
04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion)
04/10/1995 – He supported Federal taxdollars being spent on abortions.
06/01/1996 – He helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat constitutionalist Ron Paul in the 1996 election.
09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
11/29/2006 – He called for a “Geneva Convention for terrorists” so it would be clear who the Constitution need not apply to.
02/15/2007 – He supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
07/30/2010 – Says that Iraq was just step one in defeating the “Axis of Evil”.
08/03/2010 – Advocates attacks on Iran & North Korea.
08/16/2010 – Opposes property rights of the mosque owner in NYC.
11/15/2010 – He defended Romneycare
12/05/2010 – He said that a website owner should be considered an enemy combatant, hunted down and executed, for publishing leaked government memos.
01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 – He criticized Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
03/09/2011 – He blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability)
03/23/2011 – He completely flip-flopped on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
03/25/2011 – He plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
04/25/2011 – He’s a paid lobbyist for Federal ethanol subsidies.
05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
06/09/2011 – His own campaign staff resigned en masse.
07/15/2011 – His poorly managed campaign is over $1 Million in debt.
08/01/2011 – He hired a company to create fake Twitter to appear as if he had a following.
10/07/2011 – He said he’d ignore the Supreme Court if need be.
11/16/2011 – Was revealed he actually received 1.6 million from Freddie Mac, vs. his previously stated $300,000- Gingrich voted for an increase in the debt ceiling in 1979, 1980, 1981, and 1984
- Gingrich voted to permit the Federal Reserve to purchase Treasury Debt
- Bailed out savings and loan institutions in 1991. $40B Bank bailout
- Gingrich voted to strengthen the federal home loan agencies
- Gingrich voted for increased powers to the FDIC to bail out struggling savings and loans through reorganization, purchase of bad assets, or recapitalization.
- Gingrich voted in favor of the Chrysler Bailout in 1979
- Gingrich voted for an oil windfall profits tax in 1979, which was signed by Jimmy Carter.
- Urged the House to repeal the War Powers Act and give the Presidency more power.
- Urged Clinton to expand military presence in Bosnia.
- Gingrich voted against a provision requiring congressional approval prior to deployment of U.S. troops into Central America in 1983.
- Gingrich voted to increase CIA secrecy and against any requirement that the President report covert activity to congress before it is initiated.
- Gingrich voted for Jimmy Carter’s “Energy Mobilization Board.”
- Gingrich voted for an increase in taxes on coal producers in 1981
- Gingrich voted for a 5-cent increase in the gas tax to fund highway and other mass-transit projects.
- Gingrich was one of the few who voted against the 1984 bill requiring the President and Congress to submit a balanced budget
- Gingrich voted for a congressional pay raise
- Gingrich voted against a bipartisan 1% cut to the Department of Defense budget for 1983
- He was a draft-dodger during the Vietnam War, yet pushed aggressive foreign interventionism his entire political career, and did say that Vietnam was the “right battlefield at the right time.” - Anonymous
Three Words: Contract with America
That should be Newt’s ONLY response here.
P.S. Newt has said that Fannie and Freddie should no longer be GSEs. That is enough for me.
- Anonymous
Please research the history of Contract with America….Newt was not the major force behind it.
- Anonymous
I agree completely. Gingrich just knows how to position himself to receive all of the credit. If Gingrich was so instrumental to the Contract with America…I wonder why he was forced to step down. Gingrich lacks the discipline and the moral integrity to be president of the U.S.A..
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
So let me get this straight. Newt Gingrich as a private citizen does work for a private organizaition….That’s right Freddie and Fannie are private just like the FED…. signs a contract to do work for an agreed amount that the Client thought was a fair amount to pay…. Newt’s firm makes sure with many lawyers that there is no conflict of interest or illlegality…..Now people are getting their underwear in a twist because he made money????
I do not see the relevance of this and there is no issue here. Are we saying that people who serve in government are now no longer afforded Constitutional rights and are free to pursue happiness (i.e. make money) thoough legal means???
This sould like hypocracy to me. I do not see the problem. I know TheRightStuff’s opinion is different but from what I have read this is above board open and legal.
I say….nothing to see here….lets get on to more important issues and this petty crap. Obama should be the target and this just takes the aim off the real problems of the USA and that is DEFEAT the OBAMA!!!!
- http://twitter.com/rmccorkle Ross McCorkle
Advocating for Fannie when many (even McCain warned!) had the prescience to see what was coming does not make Newt look good. Of course he did nothing wrong taking $ from Fannie and advocating for them – all above board. But if the thing you’re pitching (fundamentally no change to Fannie) turns out to be a primary cause of global economic collapse, then this should of course be ding on your presidential resume.
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
I believe if you go back and do some research you will find that the true cause of the USA economic collapse all started when the Democrats in 1978 under Jimmy Carter began with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1978. From there it grew into a legistative monster (via Barney ”Sweety Pie” Franks and Chris ”I need a sweetheart loan” Dodd) that forced banks to give out bad loans by forcing banks to loan to low income individuals that normally would never have received a loan because they have no way to repay it.
So, Newt doing some consulting work for ”the Macs” really had no impact nor should it have any impact on his bid for the Presidency.
- Anonymous
Not only did (do) they loan money to people who can’t afford the houses, currently, right now, this act is giving a homeowner $70k as a silent second to buy a house. If they live in it for 10 or 15 years (depends on the amount) it goes away. That, plus the Wish Funds of $15k for their down payment, we the people are giving them $85k to buy a house. This is a fact!
- Anonymous
This is not Petty Crap!!!!! Newt and politicians and Washington insiders like Newt are too busy gaming the system and selling access to even be concerned with the best interests of this country. If Newt wants the politicians to go to jail for Fannie and Freddie then Newt should also receive the same fate since i would find him guilty of conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and the American people by persuading politicians to look the other way when it comes to Fannie and Freddie.
- http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn
How about this, let’s stop tearing down Gingrich until:
* Obama reveals his grades
* Obama reveals his thesis
* The media admits Obama started his campaign with help from domestic terrorists
* The media goes through Obama’s emails like they did Sarah Palin’sOh, wait. That will never happen… OK, back to tearing down Newt.
- Anonymous
Obama is not a candidate for the GOP nomination.
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Poncy/1339730989 Jeremy Poncy
“It’s not a point of view libertarians would embrace, but I am more in the Alexander Hamilton-Teddy Roosevelt tradition of conservatism,” he said.
This should bother any true conservative. He is clearly a big government Republicrat.
Politics has changed Mr. Gingrich over the past decade. He’s a snake and can’t be trusted. - Anonymous
Because u support public private partnerships does not make u any less conservative
- Anonymous
I agree and Gingrich is even on record stating he admired such presidents as FDR and Woodrow Wilson…now if that doesn’t send chills up a conservatives spine..I don’t know what will.
- Anonymous
It is interesting that when it comes to Cain folks want the evidence before passing judgement and yet when it comes to newt the same folks are quick to pass judgement on whether he stopped reforms or not when he clearly said that fanniefreddie should be regulated…kind of strange statement to make if he was lobbying for them
- Anonymous
Everything “bad” about Newt is factual and is based upon his words, policies, speeches, and actions.
- Anonymous
First of all u cannot cite any evidence that he stopped reform as for the bad stuff newt said or did, he has changed his mind on as many of us have since the ego got elected and since the economic crisis….even some radiotalk show hosts have become more libertarian now, if it is ok for us to change then why not the politicians….question is what causes the change…I believe newt is more conservative now than earlier
- Anonymous
If what you say is true, why shouldn’t we all just vote for Romney then?
Romney has all the same attributes you mention about Newt except he never was run out of Congress, he never funneled money through a children’s fund for his own benefit, he didn’t try to sabotage the Tea Party by backing leftist posing as Republicans, and he never decried “right-wing social engineering.”
- Anonymous
If Mitt had a 90% conservative voting record over 20 years and nearly 8000 votes and had done for conservatism what newt has over the the past 30 yes I would forgive him too
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
Very well said. But don’t worry odin147 CPAguy is a diehard Cain fan and will attack anything you say.
As you said; idealogues rarely change their minds and CPAguy mind is definitley on one track.
- Anonymous
STUCK ON STUPID
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Thursday, 01 December 2011Up until election day in 2008, I could not make myself believe that a majority of American voters were suicidally stupid enough to elect a Hate America Empty Suit (O=Zero, June 2008) as their president.
The choice between him and an obnoxious Rino jerk like McCain was ridiculous. It was nonetheless a no-brainer, as McCain was for all his flaws a patriotic American with no intention to harm and impoverish his country on purpose. Ever since, I chalked up their choice three long years ago to a spasm of temporary insanity. Until now.
Surely, the American people will come to their senses, I was convinced. Now I am wondering, what if they no longer have any senses to come back to? Did they shoot their bolt of rationality with the congressional and state elections in 2010, then lapse into political derangement as before?
The Real Clear Politics polling average shows a consistent approval rating for Zero at around 43%. They comprise the Moocher Class, public workers and other parasites living off the Producer Class. Zero’s goal is to expand the Moocher Class into a majority of voters, and he’s well on his way.
Yet they are not the ones stuck on stupid. They are stuck on mooching, which isn’t the same thing. The ones stuck on stupid are those who continue to pay the moochers, who agree to be sacrificial lambs – and who insist on getting excited about alternatives to Zero as absurd as John McCain.
I am, of course, talking about Newt Gingrich. I am, quite frankly, in a state of shock at the stupidity of support for him. He is a mean, insufferable, arrogant, pompous Rockefeller Republican, an ethanol-subsidizing global-warming crony-capitalist ludicrously hypocritical pretend conservative.
Here is just the start, just a hint, of his anti-conservative actions (provided by a friend):
04/02/1987 – cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine
10/22/1991 – voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/–/1993 – voted for sending $1.6 billion in foreign aid to Russia.
1/27/1994 – supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
08/27/1995 – suggests that drug smuggling should carry a death sentence.
04/25/1996 – voted for the then single largest increase on federal education spending ($3.5 billion)
04/10/1995 – supported federal taxdollars being spent on abortions.
06/01/1996 – helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat constitutionalist Ron Paul in the 1996 election.
09/25/1996 – introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 – said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism, called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
02/15/2007 – supports Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 – says if in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
09/30/2008 – releases his book A Contract with the Earth which embraces man-made global warming.
12/08/2008 – paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 – says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
11/15/2010 – defends Romneycare
01/30/2011 – lobbies for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 – suggests that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 – criticizes Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
03/09/2011 – blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
03/15/2011 – says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 – has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (now $7.2T unfunded liability)
03/23/2011 – completely flip-flops on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
03/25/2011 – plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
04/25/2011 – admits he is a paid lobbyist for federal ethanol subsidies.
07/15/2011 – his poorly managed campaign is over $1 million in debt.
08/01/2011 – hires a company to create fake Twitters to appear as if had a following.
11/16/2011 – revealed he actually received $1.6 million lobbying for Freddie Mac, vs. his previously stated $300,000This list could go on and on. Here’s more. Further, he has no executive or private business experience whatever. Until he cashed in with lobbying contracts after he resigned from Congress in 1999, he never worked a day in the private sector. Like Zero, he taught at a state school (University of West Georgia) until becoming a professional politician (Congressman from Georgia 1979-1999). He is an ultimate Washington insider.
Yet, as reported today in the Weekly Standard, Gingrich has a 30 point lead over Romney in Florida: 47% to 17% for Romney, 15% for Herman Cain, 5% for Ron Paul, 4% for Michele Bachmann, 3% for Jon Huntsman, 2% for Rick Perry, 1% for Rick Santorum, and 0% for Gary Johnson – and he’s appealing to “every segment of the Republican electorate,” the Tea Party in particular.
This is nuts. As in certifiably insane. We are witnessing 2008 all over again only worse, with no excuses whatever. Whatever part of their brains Tea Partiers are using to support Gingrich, it’s not the prefrontal cortex (responsible for rational thought and judgment). Their limbic system is running the show and turned their minds into mush.
It’s time for a confession. I have been begging – begging – Sarah Palin to endorse Rick Perry. He is far and away the most successful governor in America, and the longest serving (2000 to present) – thanks to his last reelection (2010) made possible by Sarah’s endorsement of him over Kay Bailey Hutchinson.
The presidency requires executive experience – and no one has more of it, and has been better at it, of all the Pub candidates than Perry. This eliminates Paul, Bachmann, and Santorum who have zero.
Cain has it in business. Romney, Huntsman, and Johnson have it in both business and as governors – Johnson with two terms, Romney and Huntsman only one (Hunstman was reelected but soon resigned to be Zero’s Ambassador to China; I must admit to a fondness for Johnson as he climbed Mount Everest).
It’s Perry’s superior executive success combined with his solid conservative values and dedication to the 10th Amendment – the only mechanism that will dismantle unconstitutional government – that causes me to beg Sarah. The only answer I get is that she is “praying hard” about it daily and is sharing her thoughts with no one.
That said, the failure of Tea Partiers and other Republicans to get behind the candidate of my choice certainly does not make them stupid. Of course not. But a limbic desperation to embrace an “anti-Romney” who is the antithesis of all they claim to politically and morally stand for does make them dumb as mud.
This is the Ball Game, folks. 2012 is the Big Enchilada. Our country lives or dies with the choice voters make next year, and ABO is not sufficient. Read Skye’s Shapes of Things to Come for a glimpse of the challenge Zero’s replacement faces. (Then again, if Zero is reelected, then it’s time to abandon ship and move to Tuvalu. I’ll open a dive shop in Funafuti.)
There’s no more serious and consequential electoral choice we’ll ever make than who is our next president. Which means it’s got to be the most rational political choice we ever make. The most sober, the least stupid. The most stupid would be Newt Gingrich. Let’s hope Republican voters and especially Tea Partiers get unstuck on stupid quickly.
I posted the entire article because you have to pay $8.95 to read it. Dr. Jack Wheeler used to work for Ronald Reagan and the CIA.
- Anonymous
Yay!!! Thx for setting the record straight for the ‘stuck on stupid’ crowd!
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile VirusX
This is nothing more than further proof that Gingrich doesn’t care about, believe in, or support the Constitution. I defy Mr. Knowitall to show me where in that Constitution the federal government has the enumerated power to regulate mortgages in the buying and selling of houses. They should be completely private industries, with the banking industry providing loans as they see fit, within the law. This un-Constitutional mix of government and private industry gave birth to the sub-prime loan, and we all see what good that did for the US. This is what Gingrich was championing? He has the right to make money, but at the expense of the health of the US economy? This is the guy that says we should trust him with the US economy, and trust him to put America first? Gingrich is a RINO, and you’d best not forget that he’s always been a big spender, when his hand was in the till:
http://redstate.com/tags/tag/congress/
While he wouldn’t be holding the wallet, he’d be working with a complicit establishment GOP in Congress that still hasn’t been done away with, meaning he would start spending, just like Obama did, with his liberal cohorts and fellow travelers. I know that no candidate will ever be perfect, but Gingrich is just far too problematic, and nothing CLOSE to perfection. He would cost us more, in the long run, than we would gain. The choice between Gingrich and Romney is just worse and worser. If he was such a True Conservative, he’d be talking about things like kicking Fannie May and Freddy Mac loose, permanently, leaving them as completely unfunded private enterprises (and forcing them to pay back all remaining, unused federal funds) and removing some of these burdensome regulations on banks that helped cause this mess in the first damned place.
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
VirusX,
Very nice post. But I do have a few issues with some of your facts. There is a thing called Banking Laws and Regulations on interstate banking that the Federal Governement does have the Consitutional mandate to regulate interstate and international banking. It is in the Federalist papers and since most banks these days are in multi-states the USA governement does have the obligation to regulate and control interstate commerce. (i.e. tax it as a way to derive revenue) As to Fannie and Freddie they already are private entities like the FED and the US Government does contract with them as a way to regulate the national money supply through the department of the Treasury.
If you truely seek where the problem started then look to 1978 and the Jimmy Carter Community Reinvestment Act of 1978 before Newt Gingrich was in office and the Major revisions of 2009 that act that FORCED banks and Freddie and Fannie to give out up to 25% of all loans to low income individuals regardless of ability to repay. In 1978 it was 12% but under Barney Frank and Chris Dodd it was ramped up to 25%. Because Fannie and Freddie were forced to give out these loans they asked and received guarrantees form the Treasury that these would be fully backed by the US Governement and therefore received a AAA rating on these binded mortage bonds. The The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 was well after Newt Gingrich had left office and this really accelerated the problems with the debt problems as the US economy turned down and then collapsed.
So, your timeline on Gingrich having an impact on the governmental control side leaves him out of the process. As to Gingrich contract as a consultant with ”the Macs” exactly how you can say one man brought down the US economy by simply consulting for ”the Macs” does not make sense to me. Sure he took money for consulting on relationship building between ”the Macs” and Government but he made specifically sure that it was ethical and legal before doing anything. Therefore, sure I would contract with Freddie and Fannie today for money….that is what capitalist do…they make money and as long as it is ethical and legal you can not hold that against him.
As to Gingrich as a big spender….how can he be a big spender when during his time in office the US Government spent less and took in more revenue during his time in office?? As to him being a RINO….how can that be when Newt Gingrich as a 95 percent lifetime rating from the American Conservative Union and a rating of most conservative by the Conservative Index (CI) of the New American both well respected organizations???
As to kicking Fannie May and Freddy Mac loose, permanently, leaving them as completely unfunded private enterprises…That one cannot be done because the US Government under Chris Dodd and Barney Frank made guarrantees that bind the US Government to this problem. Even if you cut them off….you would still saddle the Governement with some form of a Resolution Trust organization that would be a disaster because the Government cannot handle anything fiscal without it costing the taxpayer 10X as much.
The solution will have to be a quazi Private-Government form like it is now where the marketplace will beable to retire the debt with the best efficiency. It may not be the cleanest but it will be the most efficient as the free market is best at handling debt and debt issues.
As to your last sentence ”removing some of these burdensome regulations on banks that helped cause this mess in the first damned place” I believe Newt Gingrich did address alot of these issues on the best way to de-regulate and untangle alot of the problems the Obamanator is causing now.
- Anonymous
You are wasting ur time trying to convince the folks here…. idealogues rarely change their minds
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
Thanks and that is very true.
However, it just bothers me when people make such bad statements that are not based in the facts or worse take half truths that really distort it.
Criticizing the facts are fair game and I have no complaint when it is the truth. When it is not and I know the whole story; I am forced to speak up.
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile VirusX
Before you run your own mouth and say I’m not basing my statements on facts, maybe you should actually read about the man’s history.
- Craig Locke
I agree with you Allen, I like Newt more than Romney, Cain as much as I like him is done. I don’t get the hate people have for Newt. Newt is arrogant, and stubborn, But I really believe he loves his country. I believe he believes in the founding of our country. I also believe he can and will help set the boat on the right course. I believe he found god, and deserves some forgiveness from a lifetime in the public arena. Let’s put it this way, How many of you can stand in the light of public politics and come out perfect, say everything the right way, make everyone happy. None of you could. But you’re all so fast not to look at Newt and the Mac’s as a private person making a living. When he was speaker, he did good work. Not perfect work, good work. Course I look at the conservative movement as a long game, not a next election game. First and foremost, get Obama out of office. Get someone in that CAN get rid of/stop some of this crap we have been fed. Then build on and strengthen the conservative/Libertarian idea’s, get new fresh people in government, kick out old die hard politicians.
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile VirusX
And you are a moron that doesn’t know how to spell. You can cry like a baby with a soiled diaper to your heart’s content, but that crying will not make me back down off my position to think like you want me to think. If you want that, then you can start thinking like someone else.
- Anonymous
Like I said a waste of time
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile VirusX
I didn’t go into a history lesson; I was only concentrating on Gingrich. You can delve into the history, but I’ve done that already, and didn’t see any need to do that, here. You can do all the gymnastics you want, but you’re completely ignoring the fact that there is NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY for subsidies of private enterprise. Regardless of Dodd Frank, it can be severed, because you cannot write a law that contradicts the Constitution; you would have to amend the Constitution. We are under no obligation to remain in a contracted arrangement, considering we have no authority to either enter or fulfill that contract.
Furthermore, as for being a RINO, yes, he is. This is the same guy that says on the Sean Hannity Show that he doesn’t read the Conservative handbook to see what’s acceptable. The Conservative Handbook is called the Constitution, by the way. Furthermore, the man has not repudiated global warming; he’s only said that appearing in the commercial with a notorious liberal in endorsing that false concept was a “mistake”. Furthermore, he has a history of backing leftist RINOs, over Conservatives, the latest example of which was in NY. Though the Conservative is saying ‘dont’ hold it against him’, that’s precisely what I’m doing. On Gingrich’s own website:
Whether it was helping to build the Republican Party of Georgia back when Democrats controlled the entire state or leading the nationwide effort in 1994 to break 40 years of Democratic rule in the House, Newt has always tried to advance the cause of a truly conservative Republican party. This has always meant supporting the most conservative nominee possible as selected by Republican primary voters.
Therefore, Newt will almost always back the nominee of the Republican party and not back an independent candidate in a race against a Democratic candidate.
Newt still believes in this principle, however, he has admitted it was a mistake to back Dede Scozzafava, the Republican nominee in the 2009 NY-23 special election. Although she was the Republican nominee, the problem was that Republican primary voters did not pick her, the local party leaders did, otherwise her liberal views would have prevented her from becoming the nominee. The Conservative Party candidate whom Scozzafava was running against, Doug Hoffman, recently remarked about Newt’s endorsement of his rival, “I would advise other conservative republicans: Don’t hold this against him.”
http://www.newt.org/answers#DedeSo to him, its all just a party game. He wanted to maximize the number of people with “R” behind their name in office, as opposed to real Conservatives. This is the hallmark, signature move of the establishment Republican, also known as a RINO, and a sure sign that he has no problem with the status quo. Conservative ideas will save America, not the Republican Party. Face it: he has a terrible history, including being the only speaker to be forced out BY HIS OWN PARTY:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2813565/posts
His word is not something that can be trusted. He is soft on illegal immigration, and seems far too interested in showing how smart he thinks he is, quite frankly.
- Anonymous
“Mr. Gingrich replied that there are times ‘when you need government to help spur private enterprise and economic development.’ ”
“Mr. DeSantis said that Mr. Gingrich now advocates a more aggressive overhaul of Fannie and Freddie.”
That’s not conservative in my book.
It grieves me, because I think Newt is the smartest candidate by far. But that means he’d be far more dangerous if elected. Just as Sherlock Holmes said: “…when a clever man turns his brain to crime, it’s the worst of all.”
- Anonymous
Visions of Richard M. Nixon come to mind when I think of Newt Gingrich as president.
- Anonymous
Back then I wasn’t paying much attention to politics. But I do remember that was about the time I started to hear things that made me lose confidence in our government. Watergate was just the beginning.
Newt’s campaign responded to this quickly, basically saying that he was arguing for improved regulation and not trying to stop reforms. I don’t buy that completely and neither does Verum Serum. While he did mention needing improved regulations, that wasn’t his main argument.
They go on to say that the housing collapse caused him to look at it with a “fresh set of eyes”. Yeah, no kidding. That still, if true and I’m skeptical, doesn’t excuse him selling out for the purpose of “stopping reforms” to Freddie. Many other Republicans knew that the housing collapse was coming which is why they wanted to reform it. If he’s so smart, he should have been on their side of this and not trying to convince them to stop reforms.
WSJ – The “Policy Talk” interview was featured on Freddie Mac’s website for several months in 2007 at a time the company was struggling to address mounting problems in the mortgage market. The interview is accessible on an archived version of Freddie Mac’s website.
RelatedAt the time, critics were complaining that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae benefited from an unfair competitive advantage because of the perception that they had an implicit government guarantee as government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs). That allowed the mortgage-finance companies to pay lower interest rates on borrowed funds than non-GSE competitors.
In the interview, Mr. Gingrich said that “while we need to improve the regulation of the GSEs, I would be very cautious about fundamentally changing their role or the model itself.”
Pressed in the interview about how that was not “a point of view one normally associates with conservatives,” Mr. Gingrich replied that there are times “when you need government to help spur private enterprise and economic development.” He cited electricity and telephone network expansion as similarly effective private-public purposes.
“It’s not a point of view libertarians would embrace, but I am more in the Alexander Hamilton-Teddy Roosevelt tradition of conservatism,” he said.
A spokesman for Mr. Gingrich, Joe DeSantis, said the interview showed Mr. Gingrich arguing for improved regulation of Freddie Mac and its larger cousin, Fannie Mae. He said the interview “directly contradicts the erroneous reports” that Mr. Gingrich was trying to stop reforms to Fannie and Freddie.
Mr. DeSantis said that Mr. Gingrich now advocates a more aggressive overhaul of Fannie and Freddie. “The total collapse of the global financial system has a tendency to make one look at a situation with a fresh set of eyes,” he said.
Freddie and Fannie are deeply unpopular with some conservatives and tea-party supporters. Mr. Gingrich has joined fellow Republicans in singling them out as causes of the financial crisis. He has said that lobbyists and members of Congress are also to blame.
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WVUHZKSQJ4WMHDGZYTFIKICHKI
- http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/
- http://punditpawn.wordpress.com
- http://twitter.com/torquepilot
- http://twitter.com/torquepilot
- http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html
- http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://twitter.com/rmccorkle
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://punditpawn.wordpress.com
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Poncy/1339730989
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://twitter.com/113KriEger
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile
- http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile

The Right Scoop
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.