Glenn Beck exposes how Debra Medina is mischaracterizing his interview

Why is Glenn on the defensive about this? He's just starting to sound like he's hysterically backpedalling.

And Glenn continues to spin. She DID laugh it off to begin with but he has conveniently picked up the audio in a later spot when she realized he was serious about the question.

There is great disagreement on what a 9/11 truther even is – - – and who the heck sits around discussing it in the first place?? What is more likely —that she felt 9/11 truthers had doubts about the official government story OR that she believed Bush and Cheney chartered some jets to fly into the towers?

As a huge fan of Beck for years, this has been a real eye-opener for me.

As I said before, I DO believe BECK was ALSO A VICTIM in this. Thousands of people emailed them? Still don't know WHO sent these emails.

The truth of the matter is that the people who set this all up WON. That's what's bad about this.

There's STILL a question that's YET to be answered. HOW is being a TRUTHER DANGEROUS?

I'm a truther, but am not a threat to anyone nor would I be if I ran for public office. I ALMOST wanna say “Let her lie now to get into power,” and I would ONLY say that BECAUSE of the false label that “truther” has.

It's kind of a falsity to counter another falsity even though I never believed in 2 wrongs making a right. I think she should've taken MY approach to the whole “truther” thing which is to SEPARATE “truther” from conspiracy theorist wack jobs and she DIDN'T. It was really more of a MISTAKE on her part.

I'm no longer angry at Beck for doin this because he's a man and fallible like the rest of mankind, but still wish more people would decipher whether it's more important to get someone who will HELP YOUR STATE even if they do ask questions “unbecoming” or if her “crazy cooky logic” is just too much.

I'm not from Texas, but if I was…I'd STILL vote for her DESPITE this.

Beck asks a question and Medina tells her truth. Don't blame Beck because she spoke her truth on his show.

Why is the Ron Paul 9/11 truth brigade blaming Beck for this?

I guess now that Medina has disavowed Ron Paul's 9/11 Truther Movement, that the posters on this forum (and all over the Internet) will now be attacking Medina for not being one of them.

What is the difference between the leftist loons truther movement and Ron Paul truther movement? Nothing, both groups are idiots.

Now run along and attack Medina for her comments this morning.

Might I add that Ron Paul did not create the conspiracy theories and was not even close to the first person to ask questions about 9/11.

I personally think it's past because the questions weren't answered back in 2001 when they were FIRST asked and they won't be answered now.

I think a more pertinent question which more people seem to agree with me all the time and IS one that Ron Paul DID really kind of bring into the light media-wise is “Why don't we audit the Federal Reserve?”

With our without the Truther question, I was not impressed with Medina. To me she seemed somewhat arrogant and cold. For instance, Beck's first question was who are you and she immediately started rattling off her stump speech instead of talking about herself as a person. She offered no small talk, no humor…..no “personable personality” if you will. Some may argue that isn't important in a politician, but I would argue that a politician 1. needs to have keen listening comprehension skills and 2. know how to communicate effectively without putting people off.

Sounded defensive to me also; he is getting a lot of heat for this. His employer, Clear Channel, has donated to Perry over the past few years. I tried to listen to his program this morning and actually heard the beginning of this passage and had to turn it off; it made me so angry. I wish he would have stuck with his investigative work.

Sarah Palin & Glenn Beck have 9/11 questions
Too many Wall Street connections
Too many Israeli connections
Question with Boldness!

Neocon Rick Perry
David Horowitz
French Kiss

Well…at least you're not calling her “evil” over this. You're just essentially placing a more honest and thought out opinion of her. I just hope you do the same when you look at the other candidates.

Of course, if you don't live in Texas…you're not voting for any of them as I'm not either.

I only comment so regularly on this myself because of the distortion of information and seeking to clear up the muck.

I wouldn't say that your problem was following Glenn, bro. He DOES TELL THE TRUTH. It's as you said…you BLINDLY followed him.

He's got an honest opinion about her that he's got off of an honest ASSUMPTION (remember what we say about people who ASSUME things) about “truthers.” So…I don't think he's FULLY to blame. Just give him PART of the blame for either not seeing or refusing to fix the distortion of info with the word “truther.”

I would consider myself a 9/11 truther. If asked do I think our government had anything to do with the attack, well yes. I believe that there are some unanswered questions and some government missteps that could have led to the attack but I don't think Bush was flying the planes. I do believe that my government is capable of not telling the truth. Maybe this whole matter between Beck and Medina is a matter of opinion. I am not a whack job conspiracy nut but I think there was some government complicity if not just the incompetency that allowed the attacks on 9/11 and now at Fort Hood. I think Glenn Beck should apologize to Medina for laughing at her and clarify his position on the whole truther issue. I believe that Glenn Beck, Debra Medina, and I are on the same page concerning the 9/11 attacks we just need to stop being so divisive.

Glenn has crossed the line here, risking his reputation, trying to discredit her as a liar who did not laugh it off when she later said she did in another interview…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9sT9j8Vgyg

What's going on here, stinks of McCarthy type persecution. She says she's still got questions, can't definitively say the govt had nothing to do with 9/11. Who can? Who has seen all the evidence to proclaim any such thing about who knew what and when? Is that the same as proclaiming Bush killed 3000+ people and that you are now to be condemned as a nut case dangerous wacko?!?

What's wrong with Glenn that he keeps hammering her, who most embraces the ideals he espouses daily and instead supports Perry, a RINO if ever there was one? And, now to the point of desperation, shrilly risking his own reputation manufacturing lies about her?!? What is going on here?

Could it be that Beck's employer is Clear Channel CEO and Chairman Lowry
Mays who has donated almost $300,000 to Perry over the last 10 years
and Beck is paid $10 million by a Clear Channel subsidiary for his radio show?
(Sources: Texas Ethics Commission, Forbes)

I don't know, but seems Glenn's initial task may have been a simple job of
knocking Medina off her game, before national donations started coming in
like they had for Brown in Mass. The backlash unintended consequences,
messing with a Texan candidate we like opposing the RINO Gov Perry, have
Beck now risking even his reputation in these last days before the primary
to finish the job, even to the point of blatant lying. Whatever is motivating
him now to do so he must fear it more than tarnishing his own reputation.
He could blow-up over this web he's been weaving himself into here and
even french kissing Perry still won't make his boss happy if Perry loses!

If the above is true, that his going after Medina, day-after-day, has less to
do with over zealous witch-hunting of Truthers and more to do with Boss's
orders, that's a tragic shame, both in damaging Medina and himself, too.
This is the sort of stuff that caps, or is later seen to have been the apex of,
meteoric careers.