Comments on: Glenn Beck foolishly calls Geert Wilders a fascist – UPDATE: Is this a pattern at FNC? http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Great news: Geert Wilders and his PVV party may win big in today’s Dutch elections! « Cubachi http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-14748 Great news: Geert Wilders and his PVV party may win big in today’s Dutch elections! « Cubachi Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:57:00 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-14748 [...] yes, I am that Cubachi John C. Dvorak mentions on the show. Here’s the infamous article I sent to the [...] [...] yes, I am that Cubachi John C. Dvorak mentions on the show. Here’s the infamous article I sent to the [...]

]]> By: Aaron Alghawi http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-11663 Aaron Alghawi Mon, 24 May 2010 04:30:26 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-11663 If you want the truth as to why FNC is now treating Islamists with kid gloves, you need to research and expose Islam's George Soros. Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal owns 5% of NewsCorp, FNC's parent company. He is buying his way into American media and higher education to promote Islamic apologia and lay the foundations for domestic jihad. He bought his way into Harvard, Georgetown Universities Muslim-Christian engagement center or something like that, and through NewsCorp he influences FNC, the Wall Street Journal, the NY Post and HarperCollins Publishing. He bought off Glenn Beck. If you want the truth as to why FNC is now treating Islamists with kid gloves, you need to research and expose Islam's George Soros. Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal owns 5% of NewsCorp, FNC's parent company. He is buying his way into American media and higher education to promote Islamic apologia and lay the foundations for domestic jihad. He bought his way into Harvard, Georgetown Universities Muslim-Christian engagement center or something like that, and through NewsCorp he influences FNC, the Wall Street Journal, the NY Post and HarperCollins Publishing. He bought off Glenn Beck.

]]> By: billwhit http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-6174 billwhit Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:51:48 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-6174 I call it an Ideology instead of a Religion. If it has to be labeled a Religion then it is a Satan Worshiping religion. What kind of "god" would offer sex for murdering innocent people? Only Satan! Islam is a "religion" of Satan Worship! Allah is Satan! Mohammud heard the voice of Satan in the darkness of a cave. Satan loves darkness. My God, the God of Israel and Christians, is a God of Love, Light, and Laughter. The Islamic enity of Allah/Satan is one of Darkness, Death, and Destruction! Ever wonder why everywhere muslims live is a craphole? Because the love Satan! I call it an Ideology instead of a Religion. If it has to be labeled a Religion then it is a Satan Worshiping religion. What kind of “god” would offer sex for murdering innocent people? Only Satan! Islam is a “religion” of Satan Worship! Allah is Satan! Mohammud heard the voice of Satan in the darkness of a cave. Satan loves darkness. My God, the God of Israel and Christians, is a God of Love, Light, and Laughter. The Islamic enity of Allah/Satan is one of Darkness, Death, and Destruction! Ever wonder why everywhere muslims live is a craphole? Because the love Satan!

]]> By: billwhit http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-6173 billwhit Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:46:30 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-6173 I have always been a fan of Beck and of Wilders. I missed the show in question and will have to check it out. If Beck did call Wilders a Facist, then Beck will have lost a lot of respect from me. Wilders is trying to save Holland and Europe from the Insanity of these Satan Worshiping Scum, the Muslims! He is one of the few men in Europe that actually have a set of Testicles, the rest, especially the politicians of the EU, are all Enuchs! They will sell their people out just for their political gain, just as the Pontus, Obama, will do to the American People, since he is also a Muslim Satan Worshiper! I have always been a fan of Beck and of Wilders. I missed the show in question and will have to check it out. If Beck did call Wilders a Facist, then Beck will have lost a lot of respect from me. Wilders is trying to save Holland and Europe from the Insanity of these Satan Worshiping Scum, the Muslims! He is one of the few men in Europe that actually have a set of Testicles, the rest, especially the politicians of the EU, are all Enuchs! They will sell their people out just for their political gain, just as the Pontus, Obama, will do to the American People, since he is also a Muslim Satan Worshiper!

]]> By: The Weekly Wilders Round-Up « Defend Geert Wilders http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-5877 The Weekly Wilders Round-Up « Defend Geert Wilders Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:47:09 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-5877 [...] The Right Scoop – Glenn Beck foolishly calls Geert Wilders a fascist – UPDATE: Is this a pattern at FNC? [...] [...] The Right Scoop – Glenn Beck foolishly calls Geert Wilders a fascist – UPDATE: Is this a pattern at FNC? [...]

]]> By: rmm413 http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-5661 rmm413 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:46:47 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-5661 Mitch, what is your definition of fascist? Wilders wants to cut taxes, lessen the power of the EU over Dutch life, and return more power to the Dutch people. He's also one of the biggest supporters of Israel in Europe. It seems to me that this is the exact opposite of what true fascists support (centralized government under totalitarian leadership). In fact, it sounds to me a lot like what most Tea Party folks support.<br><br>The "many aspects of Islam" that he has said that he wants to ban are: lack of rights for women, stoning of/violence against homosexuals, attacks on Jews, honor killings, and incitements to violence (i.e., jihad). If Dutch Muslims want to practice these particular things, why not go back to North Africa or the Middle East and do so there? These things are totally inimical to everything the Netherlands stands for. Why should the Dutch be forced to accept them just so they can appear to be "tolerant"? It is their country, why should the Dutch people be forced to accept the transformation of their country into a "New Morocco"? Who in their right mind would see that as an improvement?<br><br>Some of the things that Wilders says are very un-PC. But he's the best hope for the Dutch to stop the Muslim takeover of their country (look at the demographic trends and the expressed goals of some Dutch Islamic leaders to see what I'm talking about). The Muslims have already brutally murdered Theo van Gogh on the streets of Amsterdam for showing the way women are treated under Islam. Muslims have already made hundreds of death threats against Wilders, so that he has to live under the 24-hour-a-day protection of bodyguards. How much freedom, democracy, and tolerance do you believe there will be in Holland under Muslim rule?<br><br>Tossing around malicious labels like "fascist" is a common weapon of those who want to shut down free debate. Beck should have known better than to emulate the Marxist playbook here. If he disagrees with Wilders, he should argue against his positions; he shouldn't just call him names and try to stigmatize him. Mitch, what is your definition of fascist? Wilders wants to cut taxes, lessen the power of the EU over Dutch life, and return more power to the Dutch people. He's also one of the biggest supporters of Israel in Europe. It seems to me that this is the exact opposite of what true fascists support (centralized government under totalitarian leadership). In fact, it sounds to me a lot like what most Tea Party folks support.

The “many aspects of Islam” that he has said that he wants to ban are: lack of rights for women, stoning of/violence against homosexuals, attacks on Jews, honor killings, and incitements to violence (i.e., jihad). If Dutch Muslims want to practice these particular things, why not go back to North Africa or the Middle East and do so there? These things are totally inimical to everything the Netherlands stands for. Why should the Dutch be forced to accept them just so they can appear to be “tolerant”? It is their country, why should the Dutch people be forced to accept the transformation of their country into a “New Morocco”? Who in their right mind would see that as an improvement?

Some of the things that Wilders says are very un-PC. But he's the best hope for the Dutch to stop the Muslim takeover of their country (look at the demographic trends and the expressed goals of some Dutch Islamic leaders to see what I'm talking about). The Muslims have already brutally murdered Theo van Gogh on the streets of Amsterdam for showing the way women are treated under Islam. Muslims have already made hundreds of death threats against Wilders, so that he has to live under the 24-hour-a-day protection of bodyguards. How much freedom, democracy, and tolerance do you believe there will be in Holland under Muslim rule?

Tossing around malicious labels like “fascist” is a common weapon of those who want to shut down free debate. Beck should have known better than to emulate the Marxist playbook here. If he disagrees with Wilders, he should argue against his positions; he shouldn't just call him names and try to stigmatize him.

]]> By: rmm413 http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-5662 rmm413 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:07:02 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-5662 I suppose you would consider Charles Martel or any other European who fought and stopped the Muslim invasion of Europe at the Battle of Tours or the Battle of Vienna a fascist too? After all, they didn't respect the right of Muslims to take over Europe and make their religion the dominant one. How intolerant of them!<br><br>I don't agree with the idea of banning any book, but neither does Wilders. He has said that on several occasions. He has merely said that if the government insists on banning hate speech anyway, then they should ban the Koran too for inciting people to murder (he has quoted directly from the Koran in this regard). What exactly makes him like Hitler? Because he has the guts to try to save his country without accepting the lefty, idealist, multi-cult cultural relativism that unfortunately so many on the right also buy into? You insult Hitler's victims by comparing a European conservative, who happens to be un-PC, to Hitler. Wilders is part Jewish and a big supporter of Israel--I think that it is in especially bad taste to compare him to Hitler.<br><br>It is not going to be in America's interests to allow a Muslim takeover of Europe (which is exactly where demographic trends are heading). I wish more supposed "conservatives" would realize that. I suppose you would consider Charles Martel or any other European who fought and stopped the Muslim invasion of Europe at the Battle of Tours or the Battle of Vienna a fascist too? After all, they didn't respect the right of Muslims to take over Europe and make their religion the dominant one. How intolerant of them!

I don't agree with the idea of banning any book, but neither does Wilders. He has said that on several occasions. He has merely said that if the government insists on banning hate speech anyway, then they should ban the Koran too for inciting people to murder (he has quoted directly from the Koran in this regard). What exactly makes him like Hitler? Because he has the guts to try to save his country without accepting the lefty, idealist, multi-cult cultural relativism that unfortunately so many on the right also buy into? You insult Hitler's victims by comparing a European conservative, who happens to be un-PC, to Hitler. Wilders is part Jewish and a big supporter of Israel–I think that it is in especially bad taste to compare him to Hitler.

It is not going to be in America's interests to allow a Muslim takeover of Europe (which is exactly where demographic trends are heading). I wish more supposed “conservatives” would realize that.

]]> By: Startabacklash http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-5615 Startabacklash Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:54:52 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-5615 Regarding a ban on Islam, how do you pinpoint that as fascism? It wouldn't hurt the country and would actually help promote freedom of expression and end Islamic intimidation. People are rightly terrified of saying anything disparaging about Islam as doing so comes with the risk of physical harm as well as other negative consequences. Better to slay the beast and preserve the peoples' rights to free expression, right? This is a laudable thing. He wants to ban it because history and the tenets of Islam itself, and its practice even today, prove that it is a mortal danger and threat to any nation or people it comes into contact with. You don't drink poison or play with fire because they are harmful. The same can be said for Islam. It is a cancer and destroys or tries to destroy anything that stands in its way. You see my picture of Shiva? Do you think if Islam had had its way with India this symbol of Hindu culture would have survived? No it probably wouldn't have. Muslims would have wiped every trace of it from existence if they had prevailed and I wouldn't have the benefit of using it as an inspiration for me in my life today. Learn Islamic history and learn what the Koran says. To tolerate the contents of the koran is tolerate the intolerable and to accept people who believe these things in your midst is dangerous and foolhardy and a recipe for disaster. Regarding a ban on Islam, how do you pinpoint that as fascism? It wouldn't hurt the country and would actually help promote freedom of expression and end Islamic intimidation. People are rightly terrified of saying anything disparaging about Islam as doing so comes with the risk of physical harm as well as other negative consequences. Better to slay the beast and preserve the peoples' rights to free expression, right? This is a laudable thing. He wants to ban it because history and the tenets of Islam itself, and its practice even today, prove that it is a mortal danger and threat to any nation or people it comes into contact with. You don't drink poison or play with fire because they are harmful. The same can be said for Islam. It is a cancer and destroys or tries to destroy anything that stands in its way. You see my picture of Shiva? Do you think if Islam had had its way with India this symbol of Hindu culture would have survived? No it probably wouldn't have. Muslims would have wiped every trace of it from existence if they had prevailed and I wouldn't have the benefit of using it as an inspiration for me in my life today. Learn Islamic history and learn what the Koran says. To tolerate the contents of the koran is tolerate the intolerable and to accept people who believe these things in your midst is dangerous and foolhardy and a recipe for disaster.

]]> By: Startabacklash http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-5616 Startabacklash Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:44:15 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-5616 Hi Tyler. First of all I think you need a clearer understanding as to what constitutes fascism. It was a political philosophy devised by Benito Mussolini and related specifically to Italy and his ambitions to overthrow the status quo and gain power. Here's a definition I found:<br>n Fascism [ˈfӕʃizəm]<br>a nationalistic and anti-Communist system of government like that of Italy 1922-43, where all aspects of society are controlled by the state and all criticism or opposition is suppressed (<a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fascism" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fascism</a>). <br>From <a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Fascism_def_char_hx.html:" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Fasci...</a> While socialism (particularly Marxism) came into existence as a clearly formulated theory or program based on a specific interpretation of history, fascism introduced no systematic exposition of its ideology or purpose other than a negative reaction against socialist and democratic egalitarianism. <br>You can also go to this site: <a href="http://www.anesi.com/Fascism-TheUltimateDefinition.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.anesi.com/Fascism-TheUltimateDefinit...</a>. It gives very concise and clear definitions.<br><br>Can you please tell me if this is what Geert Wilders believes in and is proposing for his country- The Netherlands?<br>I would argue that the term fascism should be applied very carefully and should respect its origins and for me it really applies to Mussolini's political philosophy (although there are similiarities with Nazism and Franco's Spain). Using these terms so loosely does a disservice to the real definition and also to the victims of this virulent political philosophy and system.<br>Also it is an insult to freedom fighters like Mr Wilders who cannot be compared to trash such as Mussolini. Until his policies and actions and statements mirror or are similar to what Mussolini stood for and agitated for, you shouldn't use this word to describe Wilders. That's just my feeling. Hi Tyler. First of all I think you need a clearer understanding as to what constitutes fascism. It was a political philosophy devised by Benito Mussolini and related specifically to Italy and his ambitions to overthrow the status quo and gain power. Here's a definition I found:
n Fascism [ˈfӕʃizəm]
a nationalistic and anti-Communist system of government like that of Italy 1922-43, where all aspects of society are controlled by the state and all criticism or opposition is suppressed (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fascism).
From http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Fasci… While socialism (particularly Marxism) came into existence as a clearly formulated theory or program based on a specific interpretation of history, fascism introduced no systematic exposition of its ideology or purpose other than a negative reaction against socialist and democratic egalitarianism.
You can also go to this site: http://www.anesi.com/Fascism-TheUltimateDefinit…. It gives very concise and clear definitions.

Can you please tell me if this is what Geert Wilders believes in and is proposing for his country- The Netherlands?
I would argue that the term fascism should be applied very carefully and should respect its origins and for me it really applies to Mussolini's political philosophy (although there are similiarities with Nazism and Franco's Spain). Using these terms so loosely does a disservice to the real definition and also to the victims of this virulent political philosophy and system.
Also it is an insult to freedom fighters like Mr Wilders who cannot be compared to trash such as Mussolini. Until his policies and actions and statements mirror or are similar to what Mussolini stood for and agitated for, you shouldn't use this word to describe Wilders. That's just my feeling.

]]> By: keninmontana http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-foolishly-calls-geert-wilders-a-fascist/#comment-5553 keninmontana Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:45:46 +0000 http://www.therightscoop.com/?p=6499#comment-5553 Thats quite a stretch, in Islam, Jesus is considered a prophet which is considerably different from the Mormon's view of Christ. Thats quite a stretch, in Islam, Jesus is considered a prophet which is considerably different from the Mormon's view of Christ.

]]>