Glenn Beck’s Interview with Lord Christopher Monckton on Climate Change Treaty and One World Government

I am concerned about the environment but I am more concerned that the emotional potency of everyone that wants to so desperately protect our planet may be misused to create a one world government, the members of which are not elected by the people of the world. In Australia we are talking referendum because it is about time that our politicians started to listen to us the people instead of pretending to be our mummy and daddy telling us what is good for us their children.

Recently I began writing to our politicians and newspapers with the same message….

Are we a nation of Sheepeople or are we a nation of thinking People?
The wisdom of Benjamin Franklin in his 1722 essay was “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” may be said to mean that if we sacrifice liberty for security, we risk losing both.

To my knowledge no government anywhere has had the fortitude to ask its citizens their permission to be a subject of the emerging invasive security controls of electronic fingerprinting, scanning of the retina of the eye, and the naked body scanning of the masses – every man, woman, and child identified and numbered.

You may disagree with these treatments, however if you wish to engage in certain ‘FREEDOMS’ such as ‘travel’  than you may be granted the ‘PRIVILEGE’ provided you give up your ‘RIGHT’ to your  ‘privacy and dignity’.

Our nation began with people being transported as if all were criminals deserving of the treatments of those times, and today can be liken to the past because as free citizens our permission is not being sought for the treatments reserved for each of us.

If there is one country in the world where its citizens will demand a referendum than perhaps that country is Australia.
At the very least, we will show the world that Australians do not so easily succumb to a siege mentality without publicly debating their options.

Kind regards from Australia
Lawrence Lyons
Public Agent
www.thejoke.com.au

The only problem jmailinator you have is the question of amendments. Yes, you can't create a law that over rides the Constitution but you can create amendments to add to it....read amendments 18 &19

I don't doubt this, but Monckton is showing his ignorance of our case law. Case law well establishes that no treaty shall override the constitution, but will in fact be subject to it.