Red- Anonymous
So much for the “religion of peace”…..
Some threats they have brought to America:
‘Civilization Jihad’ – the Muslim Brotherhood’s Potent Weapon
http://bigpeace.com/teamb/2010/09/20/civilization-jihad-the-muslim-brotherhoods-potent-weapon/
Sharia Threat
“Horatius Wolf”: Rep. Frank Wolf takes on Grover Norquist
http://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p18846.xml?cat_id=210http://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/200/c220.xml
Glenn Beck: An Introduction to Shariah FinanceIs Treasury’s support of AIG’s Shariah-promoting subsidiaries Constitutional?
http://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p18419.xml?cat_id=220Terror-free investing making progress in Indiana and Florida
http://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/200/220/c222.xmlBlocking the funds of terrorists
http://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p17997.xml?cat_id=222 - Anonymous
Genesis 12:3
- Anonymous
Quote Red: “You would think that with the death of one of the most vile dictators in modern history, Iraq would’ve run, no, sprinted as far away from the stranglehold of tyranny as humanly possible.”
That’s only what “ignorant people” would think.
However, “informed people” know that Muslims follow the Islamic texts and the example of their Prophet Muhammad, which means that they will seek an Islamic state and the rule of Islamic law, even though that means even greater tyranny than under a dictator such as Saddam Hussein, and an even greater hostility towards unbelievers – particularly Jews (since Muhammad reserved a ‘special hatred’ for them, after all they put him through).
Just look at Libya. We deposed yet another dictator, and what sort of state do the Libyan Muslims clamour for? – An Islamic state ruled under Islamic law. It’s the SAME thing EVERY TIME.
People need to realise that we’re dealing with MUSLIMS; not your average run-of-the-mill repressed people. Muslims will choose an Islamic state ruled by Islamic law, over ANY other kind of society.
- Anonymous
“Muslims will choose an Islamic state ruled by Islamic law, over ANY other kind of society. “…
and over the dead bodies of the Infidels and other muslims as well.
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Dias/1680711668 Chris Dias
It doesn’t work that way, unfortunately. I live in Hungary and these people have been oppressed for so long they don’t know freedom, but they’re willing to go change countries, like move to the US, but not willing to change their communist ideologies and why the country is still in this szar – (Hungarian for crap).
- Anonymous
It’s not about “not knowing freedom”. Muslims who have had a taste of it in America and elsewhere have expressed their absolute disgust for it (Most famously, Sayyid Qutb spoke at length about how “depraved” and “immoral” it all is), since it creates the exact opposite kind of society to that which Islam says human beings should live in.
Once you realise that (for Muslims) Islam trumps EVERYTHING – Then maybe we can progress in this debate, specifically about how we deal with such people who are absolute in their zeal and dedication to the ideology called Islam.
In former Soviet states, the people aren’t zealously (upon threat of eternal torture in hell) following an ideology that orders them to live a certain way. Such people are intellectually free to advocate and support the formation of a free society in their countries, since they do not believe that to do so would bring them eternal torture in hell.
Sorry, but your equivalence is flawed. It would help more if you understood how Muslims think, because that’s crucial if you want to know how to deal with them. Like I said, these aren’t your average run-of-the-mill repressed people.
- Anonymous
“…renounced their Iraqi citizenship and the possibility of iI’s reinstatement.” I guess “right of return” is a one way street.
- Anonymous
The one mutual interest the red Obama has with the tawdry Maliki is the collapse of the Jewish State!
- Anonymous
Now that the US is surrendering Irag, has the effect been just to replace one dictator with another?
- Anonymous
Saddam Hussain was a secular leader. I think that they will now be able to install a true extremist dictator to complete the caliphate and attack Israel.
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA Dave
I’ve been arguing that the current form of US support for Israel is actually and has been hurting Israel for some time now.
Here is an article straight from an Israeli newspaper that gives an Israeli perspective on a Ron Paul presidency.
http://www.worldofjudaica.com/jewish-news/op-ed/is-ron-paul-good-for-israel/5428/61
Would love feedback on this. - KenInMontana
I would point out that in fact “World of Judaica” is not so much an “Israeli newspaper” as it a newsletter put out by an international company that specializes in Jewish themed jewelry along with religious items. It’s an opinion piece and presents the opinion of one individual’s perspective on your candidate of choice, which happens to dovetail neatly with your argument. It stands to reason there would be at least one in a country as politically diverse as Israel.
- Anonymous
I don’t think it is wise to take a neutral stand where Israel is concerned. Those nations who defend Israel will prosper. After all of the years of supporting Israel we have prospered, The loser we have now is opposing Israel and we are doomed as long as he is our voice and figurehead. George Bush failed Israel a lot as did Clinton. But Obama?
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA Dave
THANK YOU…. This is and has been my point. We are funding their enemies 7 times more than Israel! This is crazy to me. How is this protecting/defending Israel? This policy of foreign welfare goes way back before even Reagan. It’s nut’s.
Paul’s argument is sound doctrine. Nobody is better friends than the US and Canada and there is no foreign welfare going to them.
The point is – foreign welfare does not equal protecting/defending welfare. Like I’ve said many times – I strongly believe in the scripture that we should bless Israel so that we will be blessed (and not cursed) I know that the anti-Christ people we have running our state department do anything but this. It needs a catharsis. - Anonymous
worldofjudaica is NOT an official Israeli newspaper.
It sells judaica products. See here:
http://www.worldofjudaica.com/judaica - Anonymous
Think of it like this. The constant threats and hate speech aimed directly at Israel is identical to what happened to the Jews during the Holocaust. We must prevent this from happening again.
With that said, anyone who dissects the history of this small strip of land cannot say that protecting Israel is a bad decision. If you take away any religious overtones, and studied just the political ones, we owe Israel our support because they are the only democratic country in the region.
We have no business being in that region unless it is to introduce democracy or protect those who have it.
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA Dave
Why would we introduce a “democracy”? We don’t have one ourselves and our founders despised democracies.
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA Dave
I’ve been arguing that the current form of US support for Israel is actually and has been hurting Israel for some time now.
Here is an article straight from an Israeli newspaper that gives an Israeli perspective on a Ron Paul presidency.
http://www.worldofjudaica.com/jewish-news/op-ed/is-ron-paul-good-for-israel/5428/61
Would love feedback on this. - Anonymous
The US needs to make sure all Muslim Iraqis in the US exercise there “right of return” to Iraq before we leave.
- Anonymous
This religion of peace is not one of peace, they only want to kill each other. We should protect our men and women in the service in Iraq and Afghanistan but let them do what they wish in all the other theocracies.
We must protect Israel, they are our good friend. They haven’t been treated very well by the current occupant of the White House.
The same ideological pervertedness that brought suit against a private Catholic University for displaying crosses is threatening to kill anyone who supports Israel or the Zionist cause in Iraq. So much for freedom of speech. So much for liberating a people and placing them on a road to freedom and liberty. You would think that with the death of one of the most vile dictators in modern history, Iraq would’ve run, no, sprinted as far away from the stranglehold of tyranny as humanly possible. Somehow, hate for Israel has overshadowed what could be an incredible and unprecedented launching pad for Iraq. CNS News reports:
“Similar to previous Iraqi governments, the government considers Jewish Iraqi citizens who emigrated from Iraq following the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 and in the following decades as having renounced their Iraqi citizenship and the possibility of its reinstatement,” says the State Department report.
“Iraq’s criminal Code 201 stipulates that any person promoting Zionist principles, or who associates himself with Zionist organizations or who assists them by giving material or moral support, or works in any way towards the realization of Zionist objectives, is subject to punishment by death.”
In his speech at the White House on Friday, President Obama said that after Jan. 1, the United States and Iraq will have a “normal relationship between sovereign nations, an equal partnership based on mutual interests and mutual respect.”
—
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Dias/1680711668
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA
- http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.