The Right ScoopComment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
Two possible side effects of laser hair removal...
[...] have been some vast improvements made to laser technology over the past ten years or so and this [...]...
Two possible side effects of laser hair removal...
[...] other and most commonly known side effect caused by laser hair removal is acne. It is a well know fact that the hair on [...]...
laser hair removal comparison light sheer duet vs alexandrite...
[...]one of our guests not long ago proposed the following website[...]...
Ride a Century...
[...] correctly. Keep a look out for loose wiring, missing bolts, loose screws, leakages, battery[...]...
[...] The Right Scoop: Janeane Garofalo on Dissent – Then And Now [...]
[...] Janeane Garafalo On Dissent Then And Now Fox & Friends — and friends — distort Axelrod’s “unhealthy” remarks [...]
Just because she can read a script in front of a camera makes her an instant expert on politics? As far as I am concerned, she has the IQ of a dirty sock. (I apologize to all the dirty socks out there).She is a NOBODY and should be treated as such. Why is she getting any press coverage at all? Stop wasting your time listening to her, because while you do, Obama is taking advantage of this distraction to raise more taxes and spend money that hasn't even been printed yet. Don't give her any attention and she will go away...
Just because she can read a script in front of a camera makes her an instant expert on politics? As far as I am concerned, she has the IQ of a dirty sock. (I apologize to all the dirty socks out there).She is a NOBODY and should be treated as such. Why is she getting any press coverage at all? Stop wasting your time listening to her, because while you do, Obama is taking advantage of this distraction to raise more taxes and spend money that hasn't even been printed yet. Don't give her any attention and she will go away...
Janeane Garofalo is a fool.
One of those people who lie for selfish political reasons and hope to stimulate their brainless twitter fans with horse feathers and verbal flatulence.
People like Garofalo are "only" entertainers and worthless in the "real" world
Janeane Garofalo is a fool.
One of those people who lie for selfish political reasons and hope to stimulate their brainless twitter fans with horse feathers and verbal flatulence.
People like Garofalo are "only" entertainers and worthless in the "real" world
Janeane Garofalo on Dissent - Then And Now - The Right Scoop...
Trackback from PunditKix.com...
So, flux, do you agree with her or not; is she right or wrong? You are weaseling out of the main point of her remarks. Defend this nitwit's right to free speech if you like, I would too, but what do you think? Is each and every one who demonstrated against bigger government a racist or not? Is Stockholm disease rampant on the right? Or is her reference to this "disease" complete nonsense?
So, flux, do you agree with her or not; is she right or wrong? You are weaseling out of the main point of her remarks. Defend this nitwit's right to free speech if you like, I would too, but what do you think? Is each and every one who demonstrated against bigger government a racist or not? Is Stockholm disease rampant on the right? Or is her reference to this "disease" complete nonsense?
That compilation was fail, in that it did nothing to mesh with the introduction.
She never said the teabaggers didn't have the right to speak out or that they should be stopped from doing so. She just said they were largely motivated by racism. That's certainly a point you could argue against, but impugning ugly motives to her political enemies in no way contradicted her 2003 remarks.
Perhaps this blog post's point was valid when looking at the full body of her remarks, but from the short snipped bits presented here the initial argument was fairly incoherent.
That compilation was fail, in that it did nothing to mesh with the introduction.
She never said the teabaggers didn't have the right to speak out or that they should be stopped from doing so. She just said they were largely motivated by racism. That's certainly a point you could argue against, but impugning ugly motives to her political enemies in no way contradicted her 2003 remarks.
Perhaps this blog post's point was valid when looking at the full body of her remarks, but from the short snipped bits presented here the initial argument was fairly incoherent.
[...] is racism straight up and is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks’.” Now, via The Right Scoop, we have a mash-up of Ms. Garofalo’s wildly inconsistent — and might I add [...]
or make sure there is enough of a positive message that people take the real intended message away from the event, and not just see the racist elements.
No way to do that when we have the media bias that exists today, not as regards John Q. Disengaged the citizen.
or make sure there is enough of a positive message that people take the real intended message away from the event, and not just see the racist elements.
No way to do that when we have the media bias that exists today, not as regards John Q. Disengaged the citizen.
From the images I have seen, there was clearly a rasict tone to the events. That theme was present in multiple locations with multiple signs that were clearly race-based commentaries on our president.
She called it like she saw it, and there seems to be enough visual evidence to back up her assesment.
It is unfortunate that the movement appeals to people like that, but it appears to be a place where they are welcomed and can voice their opinions, which of course are legal (up to the point of inciting violence of course).
Obviously this will be a challenge for any continued momentum for this movement, how to not attract that element, or make sure there is enough of a positive message that people take the real intended message away from the event, and not just see the racist elements.
I dont think whatever the intended message was made it through the bigotry, neither does she, and neither do a lot of other Americans. People have seen the extremist elements and now the movement is probably permanently tarnished by those carrying that message.
From the images I have seen, there was clearly a rasict tone to the events. That theme was present in multiple locations with multiple signs that were clearly race-based commentaries on our president.
She called it like she saw it, and there seems to be enough visual evidence to back up her assesment.
It is unfortunate that the movement appeals to people like that, but it appears to be a place where they are welcomed and can voice their opinions, which of course are legal (up to the point of inciting violence of course).
Obviously this will be a challenge for any continued momentum for this movement, how to not attract that element, or make sure there is enough of a positive message that people take the real intended message away from the event, and not just see the racist elements.
I dont think whatever the intended message was made it through the bigotry, neither does she, and neither do a lot of other Americans. People have seen the extremist elements and now the movement is probably permanently tarnished by those carrying that message.
OhIGetIt: Your first sign... What the heck does that have to do with race? People of ALL races are out of work. Are you insinuating that only minorties don't work? YOU seem to be trying to be trying to paint everyone with the same brush, just like Janeane does.
Your second sign... Maybe that PERSON is a racist. It doesn't mean that everybody at that rally was now does it?
OhIGetIt: Your first sign... What the heck does that have to do with race? People of ALL races are out of work. Are you insinuating that only minorties don't work? YOU seem to be trying to be trying to paint everyone with the same brush, just like Janeane does.
Your second sign... Maybe that PERSON is a racist. It doesn't mean that everybody at that rally was now does it?
Could somebody see to it that there is a microphone nearby this woman at all times? She's about the best booster for Republicans and conservatism that I've heard lately. What better spokesMAN for the left could there be?
Could somebody see to it that there is a microphone nearby this woman at all times? She's about the best booster for Republicans and conservatism that I've heard lately. What better spokesMAN for the left could there be?
OhIGetIt says:
April 20, 2009 at 4:40 pm (Edit)
so wait, how does this work?
People go to a rally with overtly racist signs, and someone who observes the signs and says “wow, thats, uh kinda a racist sign you have there my fellow American” that person, the observer, is somehow a racist?
wha?
You know signs like -
this one and this one…
Look, you seem to be ignoring the idea that she didn't just speak of those people who had signs, but she painted the entire movement with one big racist brush. Go watch the entire video and see for yourself.
Also, it isn't credible anyone to paint an entire movement based a on a few people or signs. Any black person there has Stockholm syndrome and any white person there is a racist. That's what she said. Quit trying to spin this to defend her. Either you agree with her or you don't.
OhIGetIt says:
April 20, 2009 at 4:40 pm (Edit)
so wait, how does this work?
People go to a rally with overtly racist signs, and someone who observes the signs and says “wow, thats, uh kinda a racist sign you have there my fellow American” that person, the observer, is somehow a racist?
wha?
You know signs like -
this one and this one…
Look, you seem to be ignoring the idea that she didn't just speak of those people who had signs, but she painted the entire movement with one big racist brush. Go watch the entire video and see for yourself.
Also, it isn't credible anyone to paint an entire movement based a on a few people or signs. Any black person there has Stockholm syndrome and any white person there is a racist. That's what she said. Quit trying to spin this to defend her. Either you agree with her or you don't.
[...] Here’s a note from Transterrestrial Musings about it. Here’s a introspective note to his readers by Dana Milbank at the Washington Post. And finally, yeah, Janeane Garofalo is still flipping out. [...]
[...] the right scoop placed an interesting blog post on Janeane Garofalo on Dissent – Then And Now – The Right ScoopHere’s a brief overviewHere is a compilation video from 2 different occasions when Janeane Garofalo was on Countdown with Keith Olbercrackhead. Also, for other responses to Garofalo recent comments, go to Hotair.com. … [...]
[...] about their political beliefs would have responded during the Bush Administration
[...] Janeane Garofalo on Dissent – Then And Now – The Right Scoop Here’s a video of this hideous woman – dissent was just fine when the left were doing it – when the right does it, it’s racism. God, she’s butt-ugly – inside and out. [+] Rate this post positively [...]
[...] Hypocrisy alert! Garafalo then, and now Ah, Jeneane Garafalo, you morally and intellectual INCONSISTENT Marxist! [...]
[...] expository video called "Janeane Garofalo on Dissent: Then & Now" put together by therightscoop. It shows Garofalo on Countdown with Keith Olbermann in both 2003 and 2009 completely contradicting [...]
[...] expository video called "Janeane Garofalo on Dissent: Then & Now" put together by therightscoop. It shows Garofalo on Countdown with Keith Olbermann in both 2003 and 2009 completely contradicting [...]
[...] is beyond me. But, alot of people do. Here’s a perfect example of far left celebrity hypcocricy. Janeane Garofalo on Dissent – Then And Now – The Right Scoop __________________ I don’t need an [...]
[...] I first viewed The Right Scoop [dot] com Garofalo hypocrisy montage, I immediately sang to myself: “She never gives out, She never [...]
[...] Dissent is the highest form of patriotism racism. [...]
[...] Sunday links By Shane Hypocrite of the week: Jeneane Garafolololol. [...]
[...] Janeane Garofalo on Dissent, Then and Now. Yeah, the contradiction’s obvious. But mostly, I notice how much better she looked, and [...]
[...] Right Scoop: Janeane Garofalo on Dissent – Then And Now — Here is a compilation video from 2 different occasions when Janeane Garofalo [...]
[...] unseen – apparently, The Right Scoop’s server’s getting hammered right now – I’m going to guess that “What happened to [...]
[...] expository video called "Janeane Garofalo on Dissent: Then & Now" put together by therightscoop. It shows Garofalo on Countdown with Keith Olbermann in both 2003 and 2009 completely contradicting [...]
[...] expository video called "Janeane Garofalo on Dissent: Then & Now" put together by therightscoop. It shows Garofalo on Countdown with Keith Olbermann in both 2003 and 2009 completely contradicting [...]
[...] TheRightScoop via NewsBusters Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Janeane Garofalo…is dissent good or not? [...]
[...] and don’t miss the Garofalo of then versus the Garofalo of now and her comments on dissent. Remember, this is solely about “if we do it it’s [...]
[...] and by the way…liberal politicians aren’t the only ones who “flip-flop” when it suits their purpose. Share and [...]
[...] Hypocrite of the week: Jeneane Garafolololol. [...]
[...] Here’s a note from Transterrestrial Musings about it. Here’s a introspective note to his readers by Dana Milbank at the Washington Post. And finally, yeah, Janeane Garofalo is still flipping out. [...]
[...] to The Right Scoop for the [...]
[...] is racism straight up and is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks’.” Now, via The Right Scoop, we have a mash-up of Ms. Garofalo’s wildly inconsistent — and might I add [...]
Janeane Garofalo on Dissent – Then And Now – The Right Scoop…
Trackback from PunditKix.com…
[...] Janeane Garafalo On Dissent Then And Now Fox & Friends — and friends — distort Axelrod’s “unhealthy” remarks [...]
[...] The Right Scoop: Janeane Garofalo on Dissent – Then And Now [...]
Ride a Century…
[...] correctly. Keep a look out for loose wiring, missing bolts, loose screws, leakages, battery[...]…
Booblebog…
I found this really curious post today…
Watch desperate scousewives…
I found this really curious post today…
Hypnosis Sunnyvale…
I found this really good post today…
Watch desperate scousewives…
I found this really amazing post today…
maid services…
I found this really brilliant post today…
Beauty Products…
I found this really good post today…
North Carolina and Charlotte Politics…
I found this really good post today…
iphone repairs…
I found this really interesting post today…
thrush treatment…
I found this really curious post today…
network marketing…
I found this really informative post today…
buy traffic…
I found this really good post today…
Brilliant!…
I found this really good post today…
laser hair removal comparison light sheer duet vs alexandrite…
[...]one of our guests not long ago proposed the following website[...]…
Two possible side effects of laser hair removal…
[...] other and most commonly known side effect caused by laser hair removal is acne. It is a well know fact that the hair on [...]…
Two possible side effects of laser hair removal…
[...] have been some vast improvements made to laser technology over the past ten years or so and this [...]…