Jason Mattera is flat out awesome

That's NOT TRUE. They're EXEMPT from it and get to KEEP THEIR awesome healthcare. Though the Congressmen who were doctors that voted on this thing in MY opinion should be FORCED BACK INTO the medical profession and have to WORK in the BS system they've just created. Now THAT would be some justice…at least for THOSE individuals.

As far as this Mattera kid…just to show how NEW I am to really paying attention to the issues…I've never heard of this kid before. I went to YouTube and went to his username “jasonmattera” and this stuff is JUST AWESOME. Yall should look it up, if you haven't already.

I'm NOT too sure that young people will ever be turned towards CONSERVATISM the way he and others would like, but I DO believe young people when EDUCATED would at least become Libertarian INSTEAD OF COMMIE-LOVERS.

Did you drink enough kool-aid there jd? The ENTIRE point is, who the hell is government to decide on what we as human beings have a right to eat or do with our lives/money? You may like mom and dad telling you what you can and cant do, but most of us want to choose for ourselves what we want to do. But, since you have the time to read the bill, maybe shed some light to us lowly peasants down here and explain the list found outlining what is in the bill, for those of us who dont speak legalese.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/230045…

So, to your last point, yes, it is AWFUL what is in this bill, and NO ONE WANTED IT, and Stewart Smalley and the rest of the lib revolutionaries, ARE trying to change this country into something it was NEVER intended on becoming. Isn't what the libs have said MORE misleading, in the fact that they are trying to force things on the majority, that ONLY the minority wanted? Isn't LYING about what is in the bill misleading? How about the convoluted speak in the bill that doesn't ban illegals from the health care, but leaves it open to them, just as misleading? I think what you missed was he was saying that jungle-gyms are a form of forced exercise for those “chubby” kids. Maybe they dont want these gyms, but they are funded in a HEALTH CARE BILL, which was to be INSURANCE not government mandated exercise(preventive care, I know). But, since you are blind to the misleading speak, and like the kool-aid, I guess I am wasting my time typing……..

ok, page 133 of the 2409 pg version, sub sec c, reads this:

13 (C) include within health insurance plan
14 networks those essential community providers,
15 where available, that serve predominately low-in
16 come, medically-underserved individuals

to most of us, the words “essential community provides”, and the wording “that serve predominately low-income”, serve as special wording by congress that mean groups like acorn and americorps, so, i found one spot, do i need to continue?

Here is something to think about. I hear alot of folks touting the “European” model of healthcare, there is an item in that policy that is always overlooked. The Europeans do not pay for a major portion of their own defense, the United States does via NATO. What do you suppose would happen if we pulled out of NATO recalled our forces stationed there and left them to deal with thier own defense? Odds are they would see a major increase in already high taxes or an increase in what they pay out of pocket, in reality probably both. At that point I believe we would see a total collapse of the EU, wouldn't that drive home the point of the unsustainability of government run healthcare? And Yes it does the heart good to see these young people coming up in defense of the constitution and our republic against these socialist usurpers.

It isnt twisting words, it is called reading into the twisted words of libs, and they do twist their crap to sound like something it isnt.Congress intentionally does things to get you to believe they arent doing something. Lets take illegals not getting this health care, to prove your lib buddies lie, here is the wording from pg 438 which reads:

13 (2) Section 605 of CHIPRA is amended by strik
14 ing ‘‘legal residents’’ and insert ‘‘lawfully residing in
15 the United States’’.

What does that mean? Well, twisted as it may be, but that sounds like it leaves it open to anyone “lawfully” residing in our country. Not sure what “lawfully residing” is to mean, other than, those who have a green card(NOT LEGAL CITIZENS) can get the health care too. So, I thought ILLEGALS(lawfully residing or not) werent going to get this? Guess that is too much twisted language for ya, but, lets remember who wrote this garbage, a WHOLE slew of libs……….what a shock it has twisted language in it.

a green card doesnt make you a citizen of the U.S., maybe you need to read yourself a bit of law, it ONLY makes them legal to WORK in the U.S.

what i am trying to get you to see, but are a blind obama-zombie about, is that Congress INTENTIONALLY took the words legal resident out, and entered the words lawful resident, which, is and of itself, a way to sneak around the residents of the U.S. Therefore, green card holders, who are allowed to work here, and live here, are covered, and are not limited to U.S. citizens. Which leads to the sanctuary cities, who, by all accounts, lawfully allow border jumpers to live in their cities, who, by all meaning, are lawful residents. So, using the twisted convoluted wording of Congress, they have added illegal aliens to the list of those who are allowed health care under this law. You have completely tried to make this bill sound wonderful, and it is horrible, and, we are NOT Canada, England, or any other Socialized nation. We dont need the benevolent Congress to grant anyone health care, as anyone can readily get it, as for insurance, that is based on your health, and odds of you getting sick. This means that what they just did, is just what Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the influential Finance Committee, said “Too often, much of late, the last couple three years, the mal-distribution of income in American is gone up way too much, the wealthy are getting way, way too wealthy and the middle income class is left behind,” he said. “Wages have not kept up with increased income of the highest income in America. This legislation will have the effect of addressing that mal-distribution of income in America.” To me, that sounds like redistribution of wealth, and not much to do with health care at all.

The same thing that happens EVERYTIME the top of the economic food chain gets taxed or forced to spend more capital for social programs and regulations Kenin, they pass it on to their consumers. Businesses will simply charge more for products and services so everyone that uses them will pay the new increased tax and those that can't pass it on will contract their spending. The overall effect is the same, less money circulating through the economy leading to less incentive to invest leading to fewer jobs and in this case prolonging and deepening the recession we're already experiencing. The Senate “Fix It” bill contributed to this effect even more by adding to the investment tax making investors even less likely to invest in the United States, so just a month after promising the American people to focus on jobs and get people back to work, Obama has once again lied to us and done the exact opposite of what he's promised and the liberal media and Obama adherents are praising him for it. By 2020 the United States will owe 90% of it GDP in debt thanks to the projected $10 TRILLION deficit spending proposed by Obama over the next ten years. To give you a little perspective that's like owing your yearly salary on a credit card. Does anyone out there NOT see a problem with this? Especially considering who holds most of our debt…

actually here is the link to the bill. there is a link to read what the bill states. http://mediamatters.org/research/201003290051 I don't know what Mattera was talking about or does he understand what the bill says?