no - they will file an expedited appeal - not an appeal
this can only be construed as a victory for the doj by those that do not understand the ruling - which you don't
glad you are done with the replies because you are wrong about what happened and just love wallowing in 'poor me' and 'everything sucks'
i hope you don't have a spouse - no one could live with all your negativity
what vinson did
Therefore, the defendants’ motion to clarify (doc. 156) is GRANTED, as set
forth above. To the extent that motion is construed as a motion to stay, it is also
GRANTED, and the summary declaratory judgment entered in this case is STAYED
pending appeal, conditioned upon the defendants filing their notice of appeal within
seven (7) calendar days of this order and seeking an expedited appellate review.
"conditioned upon"
your way - it drags out - doj files with 11 circuit and gets its stay
vinson's way - stay for SEVEN DAYS
expedited appeal
no expidited appeal filed after 7 days - no stay
this is a victory and the best possible outcome - your snit fit would do exactly what you do not want to see happen - dragging it out for years
drop the negativity long enough to enjoy a score for our side - we don't have this chance often
I read the paper, and although it was filled with things I never hope to understand, it concluded with plain and simple statement. Obama has no respect for American Law or the Constitution.
i wish i had a unicorn that crapped skittles
the judge is forcing the doj to ask for an expedited appeal - which should move this case faster than the others (the doj does not want THIS case before the scotus) - in your wish, the appeal would be filed today - it would not be expedited - they would get a stay - and your scenario of a 5 year delay would be true
read the ruling - the judge called the doj on their games - he did everything possible to move this case along on the fastest track possible
If you are stating that SCOTUS will uphold the individual mandate, I would urge you to read this before breaking out any of that Japanese Champagne. http://www.scribd.com/doc/47905937/Health-Care-Ruling-by-Judge-Vinson
Judge Vinson, I think-
Here is a link to the pdf:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/health/20110303-vinson-health-order.pdf
A rare bit of light in the tunnel. It sure gets old watching the media twist every decision for the last two years somehow into an Obama victory or that every ebb and flow magically benefits Obama.
the motion from the doj was the functional equivalent of a motion to stay
the ruling of the judge was the functional equivalent of a bish slap

The Right Scoop






Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.