- Anonymous
More than 50 percent of Americans say they are worse off now than they were two years ago when President Barack Obama took office, and two-thirds believe the country is headed in the wrong direction, a Bloomberg National Poll shows.
- Don17k
Can they point to specific ways in which they, as individuals, are worse off? Or are they just buying into a general feeling of malaise, that comes more with impatience at the length of the recession and the lack of results after 2 years?
- Anonymous
They don’t give specifics why they feel that way, as most polls don’t. It could be that there are more people on food stamps than ever or 26 million people actually unemployed. The national debt is increasing at 3 times the rate that Bush increased it, and Bush was terrible. Possibly the fact that the stimulus was a failure. Maybe because the Hopey Changey thing was nothing more than a campaign slogan and we ended up with more of the same corruption, but at an accelerated rate. It could be that people woke up to the fact that we have a government that refuses to listen to the people, as Nov 2 proved. That’s just a few of the possibilities. Maybe you could bring up more reasons why people have lost hope with President Hopey Changey running the country into the ground.Have a great day.
- Ken
Not long ago Rush was dissing Beck as kind of nutty. Now it seems, both he and Levin are coming around to the idea that things could turn violent. In Europe it will happen amongst the youth who beleive all the conspiracy and class warfare. These kids are rioting for the right to be indoctrinated at university, where they will learn hostility to free enterprise and infer they have the right to trash it. They just need someone to pay for the privilege. There certainly is an era of unrest in the making, one way or the other.
- KB
Yes, I’ve noticed that not just Levin and Rush, but some of the other more radio hosts have been sounding more like Beck lately. Rush says not to worry until he tells us to worry. His message sounds like he is near to pushing the panic button.
The youth uprising has been fueled by years of indoctrination and privilege but rest assured that there is a Community Organizer behind the scenes pushing these otherwise lazy kids out into the streets. Who is the UK’s Van Jones?
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/T6OYEMAGLEAE3MD6ZBW5P6PQ6Y Roland
Rush will tell us to worry as the wheels of his Private Jet leave the ground! It,s the FED stupid!
- Anonymous
Crazy thing about these economic downturns – they usually involve a few years of being successively worse off before things get better.
- Paulchri
This isn’t a usual downturn. Many things that are happening are unprecedented. Although most of them have happened before, they haven’t all happened at the same time at the level that they have. This is the end of American exceptionalism. What made us exceptional was the freedom we had to pursue greater things. We are now immensely indebted, and our currency has been destroyed beyond recovery. Gvnmt control and regulation is so intense, that the pursuits we used to be able to indulge in are nearing impossible to pursue. The social welfare system has grown so large, and a huge percentage of Americans are dependent upon it, that there is no salvation for the programs that feed and house people. The real estate market has just begun to dive, and is expected to completely collapse beyond recovery. Our industrial base has been disassembled and destroyed, so we have no back up recovery mechanism. Our borders have been erased, and our gvnmt has put us in a whirlwind of foreign escapades that will continue until we are reduced to financial and military ineptitude. The pentagon and homeland security are bracing, and planning, for a full societal collapse, and the executive branch is setting up for martial law.
There will be no “American” economic upturn. Only world gvnmt, and loss of sovereignty.
- Spook
And death and chaos in the streets because guys like me WILL TAKE THEIR RAGE OUT ON THE COMMUNISTS BASTARDS THAT DID THIS TO US BOTH CURRENT AND PAST!
- Paulchri
When it all goes down, you will probably find them in Switzerland, or some island somewhere. My congressman already has a home there.
- Anonymous
I hate to break it to you, but it’s definitely not the liberals that did this to you.
- Paulchri
They certainly couldn’t have done it on their own.
- Anonymous
They weren’t even the prime movers.
- Have you considered
As I do not ascribe to the “love my party, drunk or sober” mentality, I argue that it was both parties, enabled by an uninvolved and uninformed electorate. I believe that our government education system is the Intentional vector. Most people use foils (contrasts) and experience to assess the correctness of a proposed or existing position. When you are not taught the US Constitution and the legislative histories in our schools, you loose the foil, and therefore can not accurately assess How Things Currently Are verses How Things Are Supposed To be. For example, I find that most people do not know that a FLAT (direct) TAX was embodied in our Constitution, that the Enumerated Powers are called exactly that for a reason, that appropriations for a standing army are limited to a Two Year Term among other issues. So much has been lost, and again, I believe it is by design. Remember, an ignorant population is easy to control.
- Anonymous
I don’t subscribe to the “love my party, drunk or sober” mentality either. I’ve even voted for Republicans before (though not on the national level). I do, however, subscribe to the “rational thought” mentality at all points of the cognitive process.
I agree with you that not teaching civics in our school is one of the great travesties of the recent generation. My reasons for believing this, however, are vastly different than yours. Because our students are no longer taught how, for example, a bill becomes a law, a statement like “I voted for X before I voted against it” becomes a paradigm of spinelessness to be held up to the electorate, rather than a pure statement of one’s willingness to stick to one’s beliefs, even when they may be tested. It also allows the electorate to, for example, blindly overlook warrantless wiretapping while ranting and raving that their taxes (which are, incidentally, among the lowest in the civilized world) are too high.
As for the reasons you’ve provided, while I do agree that the government has moved to a more centralized power scheme since the country was founded, I don’t necessarily view it as a bad thing. More than anything, its grown out of necessity as we’ve moved from a localized commodities-based economic scheme to a globalized information-based economic scheme (cf Jean Francois Lyotard’s “The Postmodern Condition” if you don’t know what I mean). A return to everything that you’ve outlined might maximize the individual freedom that can be exercised on an individual level, but it would come at the expense of the individual freedoms that requires a collective to ensure (think things like freedom of movement). If nothing else, take a look at something like NASA – while it’s not in the constitution, and you can easily make the argument that there’s no space afforded for anything like it in the constitution, you’ll be hard-pressed to argue to people that, you know what, the whole moon landing thing – though it earned us much deserved prestige in the human family – was really an unconstitutional folly that we should have never started. Oh, right, no, you can ignore all of the other competing world powers trying to get into space, let them have at it. We’ll wait until individuals somehow cull enough financial capital amongst themselves and then try to invest it in something that has little to no chance of generating serious economic return, at least in their lifetimes.
(second half of this is forthcoming, but I gotta go decorate my Christmas tree)
- Paulchri
The founders were quite cognizant of the dangers of centralized government, or banking. They had more wisdom than most Americans today could muster on their best day. That wisdom wasn’t just based on the best economic structure, it was based on philosophy as well. The philosophy that they subscribed to was one that focused on human nature, and its corruptive elements, such as greed, pride, and hunger for power and control. They did not believe in the modern version of “man is basically good”. Everything they did, was to put “man” in check. Even then they knew that it could fail, because there is no human solution that will solve this problem. For over two hundred years we have been proving the founders correct in their natural assumptions about human nature. Yet they were not really assumptions, they were actually convictions. Convictions based on their beliefs and their knowledge of history, which backed up their beliefs.
It is my assertion that no man made system will ever survive, that attempts to protect individual freedoms. In all that we know about history, there is nothing to suggest otherwise. We may live in a modern world, but we also live in “man’s” world.
- Paulchri
Equal justice under the law, also means no tax that is not equal. Nor do I believe that any one part of society, or economic commerce of the country, can be singled out for taxation. Such as cigarettes or alcohol. Its just fine with a corrupt supreme court.
- Paulchri
They certainly couldn’t have done it on their own.
- Anonymous
Lots of things have been unprecedented in our history. The Internet. Television. Radio. WW2. Presidential assassination. The Civil War. The push westward. Instant telecommunications.
We’re a great nation because we’ve always believed in our ability to cope with all of it, extract benefit from the good, learn from the bad, and grow into something even greater.
I don’t know about you… but I still believe in our ability to do that. I’ve seen nothing yet that even remotely suggests we’ve lost it.
- Toele1
I don’t know why rush would think Beck is nutty. they both are bringing the same message, albeit in their own way. We need them both and we welcome Mark also.
People need to understand that all this legislation that we are told is for our good is NOT. It is to control and take away our independence to choose for ourselves. We will have to fight really hard to keep our sovereignty but it can be done if we don’t succumb to this crap the U.N. wants. We don’t need world government, no matter what the liberals tell us. - Urutu
I for one will NEVER live peacefully in a NWO and will NEVER give up my Constitution nor OUR sovereignty.
I’ll be buying a few more thousand rounds of ammo this week.
- Paulchri
For all practical purposes, the constitution has already been given up. When tyranny takes place, the courts generally uphold it. The only sovereignty that we have inherently, is ourselves. Who owns our country isn’t up to us.
- Paulchri
The problem is that it isn’t just what the UN wants, but also our top politicians. Bought and paid for, and elected for a purpose.
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/T6OYEMAGLEAE3MD6ZBW5P6PQ6Y Roland
What did Jefferson say about the “Tree Of Liberty” ?
- Anonymous
That it needs to be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Was that before, or after, he said…
“The property of this country is absolutely concentrated in a very few hands, having revenues of from half a million of guineas a year downwards… I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable. But the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right. The earth is given as a common stock for man to labor and live on.”
- http://twitter.com/CainToddBenson Cain And Todd Benson
“American Exceptionalism”. Art, image.
http://cainandtoddbensonsart.blogspot.com/2010/12/american-exceptionalism.html
Levin asks if we are really better off than we were 2, 5, or 10 years ago, which most of us aren’t, and he makes the point that these Leftist ‘Marxist bastards’ are driving us to the brink! He has a tone similar to that of Rush today, and of course what we’ve been accustomed to with Beck. It’s very serious out there and we have to keep fighting!
This is great! It’s worth a listen:
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/T6OYEMAGLEAE3MD6ZBW5P6PQ6Y
- http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/T6OYEMAGLEAE3MD6ZBW5P6PQ6Y
- http://twitter.com/CainToddBenson

The Right Scoop
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.