More information (truth) has come out about Benghazi today in the form of an e-book titled, "Benghazi: The Definitive Report." It is just $2.99 on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Benghazi-The-Definitive-Report-ebook/dp/B00AHCRRJS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360612906&sr=8-1&keywords=benghazi+the+definitive+report
I first read about it yesterday here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2276139/David-Petraeus-CIA-directors-bodyguards-exposed-affair-Paula-Broadwell-claims-Benghazi-The-Definitive-Report.html#axzz2JlB4lUwF
I ordered it yesterday, and the e-book was downloaded to my Kindle this morning. Going to read it now.
This must be the invasion of the body snatchers episode 123. This is NOT the Lindsey Graham that we have all grown so un-fond of over the last 20 years.
So, all this is all basically talk, because I heard Sen Levin is going on with the vote?
The problem is that asking the White House thugocracy to come clean on the
truth about Bengahzi is laughable. That's not going to happen...ever.
I am afraid someone is going to have to come out of the woodwork with the
facts. Or, they should keep on holding hearings, listening for the little
mistakes that are made when these creeps are made to answer tough questions.
Like Panetta stating that Obama was not in communication with them after the
5:00 PM briefing....not that night, not middle of the night, etc. etc.
We all know that was either a mistake or a comment made to cover up something that could get all of them or Obama himself in bigger trouble.
"CIA Nominee John Brennan’s “Secret War” And What Really Happened In Benghazii" http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/11/cia-nominee-john-brennans-secret-war-and-what-really-happened-in-benghazi/
Well it's about time somebody stood up against Obama in the Senate! Nice to see that they actually have a pulse. The Republicans have such bad press right now with the mainstream media, they really have nothing to lose. And don't forget what the Democrats did to John Bolton, which was inexcusable. Stopping Hagle would certainly be payback for that.
Payback has its satisfaction but the more important thing is the survival of our country as we know it and the confirmation of either of these two would hasten its demise.
There is even more to come out about activities directed by Brennan (for Obama) in North Africa before the Benghazi attack...much more to be learned.
Hang in there Senator Graham.
You are redeeming yourself for past RINOisms!
Come on Graham, don't back down like you usually do. This is bigger that Watergate. Get rid of this loon and sink Hilda-beast!
I appreciate all this bravado... and I hope it works to dump these losers out in the street.
My questions are... Where was this resistence to John Kerry (Sec Def)? Why did Hillary, who took full responsibility right before the last presidential debate, get off essentially scott-free?
Good questions! Some silly answers - or, perhaps not so silly.
1. They were more afraid of John Kerry in the senate than in the job of Sec. of Defense. Besides, I think Sec. of Defense just does what they are told to do. They don't really have any say. Obama's thug regime runs
that department. Notice that the old photo of Kerry and Jane Fonda
protesting the VietNam war didn't come front and center. The repubs
caved in very soon. I believe there were sound reasons because lately
I have been trusting Rand Paul and he didn't make a great fuss.
2. Hillary fell and hit her head, her brain went dead; besides, she is
busy running for 2016.
Both valid points.
1. John Kerry does have more direct power to hurt America as a Senator. As Sec of State, he has more opportunity to embarrass the U.S. - maybe that's Obama's plan? Or maybe he needed a patsy who is expendable?
2. Hillary has been brain dead since I've known her.
And sadly, you are right about 2016. I can't wait to see her fat round face every day making speeches made up of more lies and mud-slinging. Think she'll get the women's vote? Kidding... of course she will... and anyone that attacks her will be a sexist or something... just like attacking Obama was racist.
Grahmnesty is not going to do anything, if I had a nickel everytime I've seen him on TV spouting empty threats.
Good start, but both picks are a disaster for our Troops and our country. They need to vote no on both anyway! VOTE NO no matter what happens at the #Benghazi hearings!
My fear is that the regime is using the nominations to marginalize the Benghazi atrocity. "We will walk away from Hagel and Brennan if you walk away, slowly and silently, from Benghazi" This would be typical Chicago style thinking.
The general public wouldn't know anything because the MSM would spin it for them, not that 47% of the people would care anyway as long as they get their hush money.
My skepticism has been fully earned and paid for.
I wouldn't put it past them NY. That's why we have to keep all of this stuff out there, so hopefully people who didn't know will know. :-( It makes me cry for our country that this stuff can get this far.
Finally some interest in the Senate that might lead to more questions leading to the incompetence of our pathetic leader. Keep on pressing. Keep on asking. Never give up.
I will be sending him an encouraging email for defending our freedom
I hope you do the same
Hero of the Day!
Damn right. Whether we've been disappointed in the past or will be disappointed in the future has no bearing on being active when we get the chance. Who knows it could help.
Here's a question for Sen. Graham. If the Hagel and Brennan nominations are pulled, will you still go after the truths in the Benghazi affair?
Issa's Oversight Committee, which includes Trey Gowdy and Jason Chaffetz are also investigating Benghazi. They should double team!
Great Question!
If the nominations are pulled will that answer in part?
Keep Digging!
More typical Democr*p:
"The Real Menendez Scandal Emerging" http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/02/the-real-robert-menendez-scandal-emerging/
The Democra* party just can't help itself.
Hagel is an Islamic terrorist sympathizer, Brennan is a closet Muslim and both, by actions and words, are traitors to our country. How is it possible that these two are being considered for such positions? Of course this is a rhetorical question, we all know the answer, the Criminally Negligent Media.
“I don’t trust this president to make the right appointment, I don’t think that Hagel is the right appointment,” Inhofe added.
IT'S ABOUT TIME YOU REPUBLICANS GREW A PAIR - now you have my attention and support provided you are serious.
Neither nominee, Brennan nor Hagel, is acceptable.
Brennan lied under oath.
Hagel is just not competent enough for the job.
This is typical of Obama's administration, however.
Head of Small Business Administration is also stepping down. Another woman leaving this administration. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/11/obama-karen-mills-small-business-administration/1909407/
And Another One Bites The Dust http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krfEcvBfUY4

The Right Scoop






Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.