Mark Levin accuses Ann Coulter (and BillO) of using what is a perfect opportunity to discuss Newt’s comments last night on changing the judiciary to instead trash him in favor of her candidate, calling him bombastic and minimizing him by saying that he never achieves anything anyway:

She won’t even give the man credit for what he has achieved! Taking back the House from 44 years of Democrat monopoly was never thought possible and in doing so he had to defeat the Republican establishment! You can’t even give him that?

No they can’t, because they have a hate-on. They have a hate-on. …

Do you know why I resent this? Because now we have a bunch of bullies running around. And Giuliani was 100% right. They’re trying to turn this guy into a crazy man.

And I resent it and I resist it! He’s not even my guy and I resent it and I resist it!

email



Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

  • Anonymous

    Amen Mark. We have beltways telling us that Newt sucks yet Obama is failure. We are told that a guy who says that we as a nation are overreacting to the Iranian regime and that we should not get involved. Keep it up you beltways morons and we may have another 4 years of the marxist.

    • Anonymous

      …And to elucidate further your thought on “that guy (presuming it’s Ron Paul),” allow me to provide a visual of an alarming trend that I posted on my FB page, courtesy of Atlas Shruggs:

      If you think that this infestation is not currently residing here, I suggest that you wake up before small slithers of these actions begin to pillage your local neighborhood, subversively or not. It is not just a “You” problem. Never has it been and never will it be. Because, believe it or not, there are those who refuse to co-exist within a non-repressive, free society. I do not recall anyone forcing me a gunpoint or otherwise to accept my Christian faith. Just take a look at our own university campuses and you may find a surprise or two lurking around ready to make its point, as well.

      http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/12/video-muslim-police-and-hundreds-of-students-burn-down-church-screaming-allah-akbar-and-jihad.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=734985449 Mark Wendt

    Mark Levin rules.

    • Anonymous

      No doubt.

  • http://www.facebook.com/robert.mahoney Robert Mahoney

    Coulter calling someone bombastic?

    Oh Ann, physician, heal thyself.

    • Anonymous

      You got that right!

    • Jim Botts

      Let me get this straight, Gingrich is bombastic but Christie isn’t?

    • Anonymous

      She’s not just bombastic, she’s super elastic bubble plastic.

      • Anonymous

        She’s a fanatic, dogmatic iconoclastic in an inorganic neo-plastic endowed by a problematic politography of panoramic proportions.

  • Anonymous

    Rick Perry 2012!!!! He has the most conservative record as governor. Pray for Perry!

    I dont care much for Mark Levin, he just seems to whine too much, I dont like Newt or Mitt, but if left to the 2 of them, Ill hold my nose and vote romney. Newt has a closet full that Obama is waiting to unleash on him. But if Levin is going to whine about someone trashing Newt, I have never heard him whine about people unfairly trashing romney, say what you want about romney but yes he has been unfairly trashed at times.

    • Anonymous

      Praying for Perry!

    • Anonymous

      You keep saying this. What does Romney have a closet full of? LIBERAL REPUBLICANISM.

      • Anonymous

        Romney’s closet is only half full compared to Gingrich:)

        • Anonymous

          If by closet you mean “brains”, then you are correct.

          Being a liberal Republican, Romney is nice running his business, but not the country’s.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4UX5IMCQLMMNCCKQUWML6KN6NA Mark

          Mitt Romney is perhaps the worst candidate in GOP history. A Hollywood screenwriter couldn’t come up with a more ridiculous caricature of a candidate. Radical Left-wing track record. Mormonism. Pandering. Lies about his record. Insincerity. Lust for power. Across the board flip-flopping from liberal to “conservative” on nearly every issue just so he can secure the Republican nomination. Political opportunism at its worst. The man is a danger to the future of the Republican party and the country.

          Here’s what Mitt Romney supported as Governor of Massachusetts:

          1. Pro-abortion with taxpayer funding (added it to RomneyCare, refused to line-item veto it).

          2. Pro-government mandated healthcare.

          3. Pro-government mandates in general (“I like mandates” his own words on tape).

          4. Pro-gay marriage with full state sponsorship (was first Governor to install it, had earlier broke the law in his quest to issue gay marriage licenses, then called opponents of his actions “right-wing”).

          5. Pro-transgender education to children in public schools (promoted by Governor Romney’s administration).

          6. Pro-global warming caused by human activity (his own words)

          7. Pro-environmental regulations to combat global warming (imposed massive environmental regulations in Massachusetts, according to the Wall Street Journal).

          8. Pro-taxes on businesses (closed loopholes, then raised business taxes by $300 million as Governor of Massachusetts, according to USA Today).

          9. Pro-amnesty for illegal immigrants (path to citizenship for illegals, his own words)

          10. Anti-second amendment (supported the strict gun control laws of Massachusetts).

          Romney’s track record is to the Left of most Democrats. Consider how people destroyed Mike Huckabee in ’08 over a couple of liberal blemishes in his record, but give a free pass to Mitt Romney who’s track record is even worse! Across the board liberal worse! The man is a left-wing snake and it’s the responsibility of real conservatives to expose him since the establishment GOP and other “consersative” pundits aren’t doing it. I see through the man. Can’t you? He is utterly insincere. A pathological liar. Is there a conspiracy to get this deceiver snake elected?

          • Anonymous

            You are wrong! The worst candidate in history ran last time and his name is John McCain!

        • Anonymous

          …and Obama doesn’t just have a closet he has a storage-unit.
          There’s 3 years of idiotic statements and comments by Obumbler himself.

          And then there is still the pre-presidential ammo still sitting in the McCain armory from 08 that was never fired. (McCain was afraid of hurting the democrat’s feelings).

          In short IMHO, for every bit of “baggage” that Obama might try to bring up there are easily 5 or 6 items about Obama that the repub can fire back with. (F&F, Solyndra, Boeing, Gibson etc)

          (If they bring up Gingrich’s book deal, Gingrich can bring up Obama forcing the State Dept to buy copies of his own book. Which is the bigger ethics violation? And that’s just one example)

          So when it comes time to open up on Obama and fire back, which one is more likely to fire back with full force? Romney or Gingrich?

    • http://twitter.com/doorsxp Doors Xp

      And that’s exactly what the establishment wants you to do, to vote Romney at the end of the day. A sucker is born every minute.

    • http://twitter.com/onesoldiersmom onesoldiersmom

      It’s possible that you don’t like Levin because he is intellectually honest…you might not be used to hearing an intellectually honest man. There are not too many around.

  • Anonymous

    I used to love Ann Coulter. Also, Laura Ingraham. I no longer listen to either of them, because both have played this silly game. I don’t trust Ann’s judgement on candidates anymore. This isn’t her first time behaving this way. She may be conservative on many issues, but she is also establishment GOP big time. I can’t stomach it. After a term of Obama, my tolerance for this kind of game playing is nill.

    • Anonymous

      Wait, you don’t trust Coulter but you trust Levin, who supported among other people Herman Cain………and Mitt Romney in 2008. Is that a silly game?

    • Anonymous

      I was through with Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham who cowardly ganged up on Sarah Palin and her supporters on FOX when Ingraham was filling in for the lepercon O Reilly. The two now RINO twisted sisters. They are two mean girl bullies.

    • Jim Botts

      One point I would like to add regarding Laura Ingraham. She was completely onboard with the Boehner cave in on the budget last August. Completely on board with it.

      I like her show, but its getting more and more obvious which conservative commentators have been getting too frisky with the GOP.

  • Anonymous

    “If he was a Conservative (Romney) I’d back him!!!” You did, in 2008, you said he was a Conservative. Plus who is Levin to lecture anyone about “bashing” Republican candidates when he made sport of doing that very same thing to McCain? Coulter isn’t doing anything different to Newt than he did to McCain. He’s a hypocrite.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop

      Im so sick of this argument. It lacks context and ppl who espouse it only use it to bash levin. Romney was the most conservative out of the last candidates in the race. It is not the same today!

      Ridiculous.

      • Anonymous

        Thanks Scoop, I was trying to formulate my reply……luckily you summed it up perfectly!

        Truly.

      • Anonymous

        Of course you’re sick of the argument, because it’s rock solid and makes your guy look foolish. Your argument is absurd, it wasn’t derivations of being Conservative in 2008, they said he was “Conservative.” They said it. “Conservative.” They didn’t say he’s “kind of Conservative.” The qualification you give is meant to give them cover because now they’re saying he’s not. Now they’re saying the guy who was the hired gun of Freddie Mac to push back against Republicans GSE Reforms. The guy who threw Paul Ryan under the bus. The guy who said FDR was his “hero” is the “real Conservative.” Mark Levin told his listeners that Herman Cain was the real deal. So he was either lying to them or he’s not the genius you think he is.

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop

          Let Mark speak for himself. Maybe you’ll learn something this time:

          Let’s face it, none of the candidates are perfect. They never are. But McCain is the least perfect of the viable candidates. The only one left standing who can honestly be said to share most of our conservative principles is Mitt Romney. I say this as someone who has not been an active Romney supporter. If conservatives don’t unite behind Romney at this stage, and become vocal in their support for him, then they will get McCain as their Republican nominee and probably a Democrat president. And in either case, we will have a deeply flawed president.

          http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/223558/rally-romney/mark-r-levin

          • Anonymous

            Why aren’t you smart enought to realize our highlighted quote verifies my point and nullifes yours? How can the man who said what you highlighted go out and villify Nikki Haley for supporting Romney? Those two concepts are prima facie unfair and hypocritical.

            • http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop

              Because I’m not a moron. If you can’t read that quote and figure it out, I’m done arguing with you. Geez.

              • Anonymous

                Let it go, RS! Aynbland is a transplant. People will figure it out for themselves and ignore the helpless and those who are incapable of comprehending the basic evolution of commonsense. It is very difficult to master this elementary exercise when one has trouble reading between the lines and connecting the dots. Sad and pathetic, however, that’s life. Let it go!

            • PFFV

              Aynbland you have explained to us all that you are an idiot and probably a troll. Thanks for clearing up any misconceptions.

          • Anonymous

            Plus, “learn something this time”?? I’m not the one who’s adopted a professional political entertainers act as your core belief system, festooning your site with his opinions instead of your own.

            • http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop

              Oh now you criticize my site? Ok, then have fun somewhere else.

              • Anonymous

                Don’t let an ass push your buttons…

              • PFFV

                You were more than patient RS. Kick this drone (Aynbland) to the curb…lol!

              • Anonymous

                Speaking of your site, is there some program that you can install to move posts to the left when the thread gets too long? I know my windows vista does that automatically when the subheaders get to far to the right, down the list.

                I don’t know if I’m explaining it correctly, but it’s awfully hard to read a post when it’s only one or two letters per line. Thanks for the time.

        • Anonymous

          Levin never said Newt was a conservative, ever…..GENIUS!

        • Anonymous

          Why wasn’t Cain ‘the real deal’. Just because he was forced out by people, like you, who twist and spin the truth, doesn’t make him any less important in the narative.

          Just because Scoop would feel it’s beneath him, and it is, to grovel with knuckledraggers like you, doesn’t mean some of the rest of us can’t. He’s got more class than I do and certainly more sense and knowledge than you.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones

            Eh…internet fights are dumb. No one ever wins and all parties involved look ridiculous by the end. That being said…I’m rooting for you!

          • Anonymous

            Ya, you’re right. The facts should win out every time. I just see so much where it’s the other way around that I get a little steamed. sorry.

        • K-Bob

          “Sponge” solid, more like. You apparently don’t understand the concept of “comparison.” As Scoop pointed out, *compared* to the other two bozos in 2008, Romney was freaking Goldwater on steroids. That’s how bad McCain and Huckabee were.

          Now we actually have conservatives in the race, and it’s obvious how far to the left of them Romney is. That’s a *comparison* again, for those of you keeping score.

          If McCain were in the race today, Romney would still look like a conservative compared to him. Unfortunately for you, that’s not a compliment for Romney.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4UX5IMCQLMMNCCKQUWML6KN6NA Mark

            Not quite. Romney has always been far more Liberal than either McCain or Huckabee.

            Mitt Romney is perhaps the worst candidate in GOP history. A Hollywood screenwriter couldn’t come up with a more ridiculous caricature of a candidate. Radical Left-wing track record. Mormonism. Pandering. Lies about his record. Insincerity. Lust for power. Across the board flip-flopping from liberal to “conservative” on nearly every issue just so he can secure the Republican nomination. Political opportunism at its worst. The man is a danger to the future of the Republican party and the country.

            Here’s what Mitt Romney supported as Governor of Massachusetts:

            1. Pro-abortion with taxpayer funding (added it to RomneyCare, refused to line-item veto it).

            2. Pro-government mandated healthcare (RomneyCare has cost the state over 20,000 jobs and has actually increased the cost of healthcare in Massachusetts).

            3. Pro-government mandates in general (“I like mandates” his own words on tape).

            4. Pro-gay marriage with full state sponsorship (was first Governor to install it, had earlier broke the law in his zeal to issue gay marriage licenses, then called opponents of his actions “right-wing”).

            5. Pro-transgender education to children in public schools (promoted by Governor Romney’s administration).

            6. Pro-global warming caused by human activity (his own words)

            7. Pro-environmental regulations to combat global warming (imposed massive environmental regulations in Massachusetts, according to the Wall Street Journal).

            8. Pro-taxes on businesses (closed loopholes, then raised business taxes by $300 million as Governor of Massachusetts, according to USA Today).

            9. Pro-amnesty for illegal immigrants (path to citizenship for illegals, his own words)

            10. Anti-second amendment (supported the strict gun control laws of Massachusetts).

            Romney’s track record is to the Left of most Democrats! Consider how people destroyed Mike Huckabee in ’08 over a couple of liberal blemishes in his record, but give a free pass to Mitt Romney who’s track record is even worse! Across the board liberal worse! The man is a left-wing snake and it’s the responsibility of real conservatives to expose him since the establishment GOP and other “consersative” pundits aren’t doing it. I see through the man. Can’t you? He is utterly insincere. A pathological liar. Is there a conspiracy to get this deceiver snake elected?

            • K-Bob

              Oh please. Surely you’ve seen the lists like this for McCain?

              Other than being “pro life”, you can find tons of non-conservative positions that make McCain look just as bad, if not worse. In many cases, MUCH worse.

              So Romney, despite his obvious lack of fealty to Conservative philosophy, was still a better candidate than McCain. Just because he was the the most conservative of the bunch doesn’t mean he is an actual “Conservative.”

              This whole argument is stupid. The good news is that we have much better candidates this time around than we did in ’08.

              • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4UX5IMCQLMMNCCKQUWML6KN6NA Mark

                Get serious.

                Across the board, Romney is far more liberal than McCain ever was.

                Romney’s record is indistinguishable from that of a liberal Democrat.

                • K-Bob

                  Get real. You must not have been around in 2008.

                  Despite the fact that Romney is far left of at least four candidates today, he was still to the right of McAmnesty and Huck in 2008.

      • http://twitter.com/113KriEger 13Krieger

        I think it is telling that the conservatives Levin and Limbaugh have defended and even spoke well about Newt Gingrich while the more liberal republicans like Krauthammer have only attacked Newt.

        That should tell you something.

      • http://twitter.com/AjntB2Sli Sly

        I respectfully disagree with you there Righty. Duncan Hunter was the most conservative candidate in 2008. The reason not too many heard about him is because the media shunned him out. The same way they pushed McCain on us last time, is what is going on this time with Mittens and Newt. As much as I like Newt, he is not the leader America needs.

  • Anonymous

    Be careful where you use the word bombast, it’s a word that means puffed up. Or, high sounding without meaning.

    • http://twitter.com/113KriEger 13Krieger

      don’t get ”zany” on us either…………

      • Anonymous

        Would clownish be better than puffed up ? 13Krieger !

  • Anonymous

    Mark the thing I love about you is you always tell like it is. I agree with you 99.9% of the time.

  • Anonymous

    He is right — that was no reason to bash Newt

    But I wish everyone could read this before they vote in the primaries…

    http://conservativeblogscentral.blogspot.com/2011/12/newt-gingrich-unfaithful.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Poncy/1339730989 Jeremy Poncy

    Newt did that? All by himself too i bet? Not conservative citizens? Not the people? NEWT WON THE HOUSE BACK ALL BY HIMSELF! This is the conclusion that the conservative establishment has come too? Didn’t Newt get thrown out of office by the same revolution he supposedly led for ethics violations. The reality is Newt just happened to be the speaker when all of this happened. Who here would be willing to make the claim that Boehner is responsible for the Tea Party movement? Levin is just plain wrong here. We’re not saying were happy with the judicial system. We’re saying, and listen closely here, YOU CAN’T FIGHT PROGRESSIVISM WITH PROGRESSIVISM. Newt Gingrich is a PROGRESSIVE plain and simple. I want to undo all the progressivism that seeped into our country as well but the only way to do that is within the limits of the constitution and more importantly the only way to do it is to change the hearts and minds of the citizenry of this country. We can’t cheat. We have to do the hard work. It took generations to get here and it’s going to take generations to fix it. Anybody that believes that we can fix this problem by electing any number of presidential candidates to pass a few bills here and initiate a few executive orders there is kidding themselves. We have to reinforce the foundation of this country. That’s not the constitution. It’s the PEOPLE. It’s GOD. It’s LOVE. It’s FREEDOM. It’s INTEGRITY. It’s HONOR. It’s SACRIFICE.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Fred-Lee/100000182470888 Fred Lee

      I see you that you judge a person by their words not their actions and accomplishment . you seem to dismiss facts . just saying

    • Anonymous

      If I was an Obama troll, I would take your tact. I’m not accusing of you of that, but think about it … The point Mark was making and I agree with him: Newt, a small-state nobody, a back-bencher, had the idea to stand in front of C-Span cameras and speak to an empty House chamber, after hours, at great embarassment to the complacent, complicit, permanent-minority RINOs at the time. He was speaking to us, you and me, slumped with disillusionment in front of our TVs, who had lost hope of ever being rid of the insidious, loathsome left. Give credit where credit is due. Newt is a historical figure if only for that, and you can’t take that away from him–or us, who where there and remain deeply appreciative.

      With regards to a perfect candidate … The unicorn ride to Utopia is that-away ——————————————————————————————->

      • Anonymous

        Right on, Freempg!

        I am also a Palin supporter looking for the best of the current candidates I can support if she doesn’t jump in. Newt is the only one with the capability AND the balls to stand up for our conservative America. The others would cave at the first bit of pressure from the left, whether they are very conservative or not, or go along happily with the big government we already have.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones

      Are you saying that because Newt wasn’t THE ONLY ONE involved in those accomplishments they didn’t happen? Or that he had no part in them? Because no matter how you slice it, he was Conservative enough to AT LEAST be part of the accomplishments (even though most of us know he was the quarterback calling the plays).

    • Anonymous

      “We can’t cheat. We have to do the hard work. It took generations to get here and it’s going to take generations to fix it.” (Jeremy)

      If it’s going to take generations, why overreach? Ron Paul right?

      You also complain that Newt didn’t win the house back “all by himself”.
      But whoever your guy is can set it aright all by himself or herself?

      The word ‘progressive’ has a few different definitions. You don’t think he is at least several increments to the right of O’? Perhaps, orders of magnitude even?

      Your post is passionate but ramshackle in some ways.

      “Anybody that believes that we can fix this problem by electing any number of presidential candidates to pass a few bills here and initiate a few executive orders there is kidding themselves.”(Jeremy)

      Presidents don’t pass bills sir. They can sign, veto, or pocket veto them though. One needs both a house and a senate to pass bills first. We need conservative leadership in the Executive and Legislative branches.

      Liberals in the 90′s proclaimed Newt to be the quintessential, rightwing extremist. Satan in a suit. I like that. The first 100 days of the Republican Revolution of 1994 was extremely productive. Someone snatched defeat from the jaws of victory along the way. Newt had to die. The left “forced him out” with the help of an acquiescent bunch of republican willow branches. I’ve seen what O’ has done and lived through what Newt has done. There is no comparison that I can discern.

      How old were you in 1994, and who is your candidate?

    • Anonymous

      Newt was the Speaker of the House which is the most powerful position of influence in the House, and he did push all of those conservative reforms through. Look how powerful Pelosi was as Speaker. The conservative agenda that Newt got passed would not have been passed if the Speaker was someone like Boehner.

      Newt’s record in Congress speaks for itself, and it was NOT progressive but in fact it was very conservative. Newt had a 97% conservative rating while he was in Congress.

  • Anonymous

    Ann Coulter jumped the shark when she was in love with Christie, the RINO. I am not a Newt supporter, but I am sick of this too. The GOP establishment wants Romney, but most of us do not.

  • Dan

    i made my quota for the month watching to 8pm’er(cuss box overflowing-wall paper peeling and the dog ran out of the room) i really had to apologizes to the neighbors too…it was a flowery diatribe of gutter language being spewed at the TV that even took me by surprise…and that was just the wife…we won’t get in to what i said…………

  • Anonymous

    More proof that Mark reads The Right Scoop comments. I have been railing on Coulter about this for weeks. Boycott Ann and her books. She doesn’t deserve our money. She endorsed a RINO in the primary!

    • Anonymous

      Twice now and had to flip flop from Romney will lose to Obama to Romney is the most conservative!? She’s lost her mind.

  • PFFV

    I used to be a big Coulter supporter until she went all ga ga for Chris Cristie (RINO) and now this? Newt is far more Conservative than RomneyCare will ever be. Saying all that I am not a Newt supporter at all. I am a Bachmann fan first and foremost. My second most conservative candidate is Santorum. Third is Perry. Then we get Newt in at 4th. Romney will only get my vote if he is the lesser of two evils. I hope it doesn’t come to that though.

  • http://twitter.com/TCskywatch treasurecoast

    Guess Ill go back to spending all my time listening to Savage instead of Groucho Marx. Sorry Levin but unlike OBAMA WE HAVE TO VET OUR CANDIDATES

    • Anonymous

      There is nothing wrong with vetting. There is something wrong with Bill 0, Coulter, the Kraut, etc bashing ONLY Newt and not going after Romney with the same tenacity.

      • http://twitter.com/TCskywatch treasurecoast

        I dont listen to anything Man Coulter or the B O says anyway . still need to vet them now because the Dems will in the end .

        • Anonymous

          Yes, so we should be attacking Romney, but we are not. We are listening to the establishment endorse Romney and push him and “electability” when the base does not want him and therefore will not come out to vote for him.

          • http://twitter.com/TCskywatch treasurecoast

            Its John Mc Cain all over again

            • Anonymous

              Romney = McCain = Dole = Ford

        • Anonymous

          I can agree with that. As Romney said….they aren’t saying anything to each other that Obama isn’t going to bring up anyway. At least now we have the opportunity to get the bad out in the open so we can decide if we want to advance them or not. It’s kinda hard for Obama to bring out the surprises if we’ve already done it.

    • K-Bob

      The fake conservative, “Savage?” I’d rather be forced to watch Ed Schultz than have to listen to that guy. At least Schultz is unintentionally funny.

  • Anonymous

    Do I have this right? Mark Levin is bashing people who support Romney and complaining now about people who bash other candidates.

    He and Ann are doing the same thing.

    • Anonymous

      No he is complaining about establishment people PUSHING Romney, endorsing him and yet power bombing Newt.

    • Anonymous

      Listen to Levin’s shows – in their entirety – for 1 week, and I guarantee you will be able to answer your own question in a well informed manner!

    • Anonymous

      I think the point Levin was making is that this was an opportunity to discuss the real issue of our courts instead of bashing Newt. At least that was my takeaway from his show.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with Levin!

  • Anonymous

    Rumor has it Ann Coulter lost her mind in NJ somewhere.

  • Dan

    i would like to ask a few questions that will clear a lot up…
    1..what law was passed by congress that allowed abortion?
    2..what law was passed by congress to take prayer out of school?
    3…what law was passed by congress that allowed homosexual marriage?
    4…what law was passed by congress to allow our television, news stands ,internet to become so vile with porn and filth that even Sodom and Gomorrah would blush with shame?
    5…what law was passed by congress that allowed murders to walk free among us with little more than a slap on the wrist…and set free to do the same deed?

    i could go on and on…but do i really have to…
    just a few questions with only one answer…and you know what that answer is…..

    • http://www.kennethballard.com Kenneth

      Yes, you are attempting to demonize the Federal judiciary again.

      “2..what law was passed by congress to take prayer out of school?”

      What the Courts said is that the public schools (and the legislatures or government organizations that create them) cannot decide for you when your children should pray. Arguably the seminal case on this issue is Engle v. Vitale, which contested a law that provided for a government-authored prayer to be part of the morning procedures in school. Abington Township in Pennsylvania went further and required the recitation of the Lord’s Prayer and 10 verses of the Bible. That was struck down as well (Abington School District v. Schempp).

      What’s in common between those and all other cases involving school prayer? The government is deciding for you what prayer activity is best for your children. Isn’t that something best decided by parents rather than the government making a “one size fits all” kind of approach?

      Students can pray in a public school all they like, but the student must decide for themselves when they will pray and what prayer they will recite. The school or school district cannot make that decision for them.

      “4…what law was passed by congress to allow our television, news stands ,internet to become so vile with porn and filth that even Sodom and Gomorrah would blush with shame?”

      And you don’t have to watch or patronize that material if you do not want to. But why should it be illegal?

      “5…what law was passed by congress that allowed murders to walk free among us with little more than a slap on the wrist…and set free to do the same deed?”

      And to what in particular are you referring? If a murderer is allowed to walk free with little more than a slap on the wrist, complain to the law enforcement officers and prosecutors who didn’t do a good enough job gathering enough evidence to warrant the conviction that would have put the murderer behind bars for a long time if not the rest of their life.

      • Dan

        i take it back we do’t agree on much….you are a product of a corrupt education system and are proving my point…the Federal judiciary is so corrupt it needs to be taken down a few notches…and you really need to do some research on the Founding Fathers other than modern text books….

        “Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.” –Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 78, 1788

        “the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.”

        not so today, it is destroying the very foundations of our country……

        American Governance:
        Many governments are established by good
        people having good intentions. But, certain
        men with bad intentions or another agenda get
        into government office by some means, lawful
        or otherwise, find loopholes, revise government
        and its laws to suit their needs and agenda,
        and build an empire within government itself.
        Through deceit and lies and through the
        absence of truth, gain power and control over
        the people, extracting the people’s well earned
        money from the people’s labor to finance and
        increase the empire to such an extent that it
        would seem difficult for people to rise up
        against it.

        Reports of Committees of the House of Representatives Made During the First Session of the Thirty-Third Congress (Washington: A. O. P. Nicholson, 1854), pp. 6-9.

        “Had the people, during the Revolution, had a suspicion of any attempt to war against Christianity, that Revolution would have been strangled in its cradle… In this age, there can be no substitute for Christianity… That was the religion of the founders of the republic and they expected it to remain the religion of their descendants.”

        J. Dallas, Reports of Cases Ruled and Adjudged in the Courts of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia: P. Byrne, 1806), p. 39, Respublica v. John Roberts, Pa. Sup. Ct. 1778.

        In the case Respublica v. John Roberts,80 John Roberts was sentenced to death after a jury found him guilty of treason. Chief Justice McKean then told him:
        “You will probably have but a short time to live. Before you launch into eternity, it behooves you to improve the time that may be allowed you in this world: it behooves you most seriously to reflect upon your past conduct; to repent of your evil deeds; to be incessant in prayers to the great and merciful God to forgive your manifold transgressions and sins; to teach you to rely upon the merit and passion of a dear Redeemer, and thereby to avoid those regions of sorrow – those doleful shades where peace and rest can never dwell, where even hope cannot enter. It behooves you to seek the [fellowship], advice, and prayers of pious and good men; to be [persistent] at the Throne of Grace, and to learn the way that leadeth to happiness. May you, reflecting upon these things, and pursuing the will of the great Father of light and life, be received into [the] company and society of angels and archangels and the spirits of just men made perfect; and may you be qualified to enter into the joys of Heaven – joys unspeakable and full of glory!”

        William B. Reed, Life and Correspondence of Joseph Reed (Philadelphia: Lindsay and Blakiston, 1847), Vol. II, pp. 36-37.

        this is just a small sample of what you can find if you go back and read the writings of the Founders and their are thousands of documents out there if you just search and get away from the corrupt modern education system…
        if the Founders saw what was going on to day with our system of justice they would cry

        • http://www.kennethballard.com Kenneth

          I never had any delusion that we were even mostly in agreement politically, but that is immaterial.

          You didn’t reply to any point I made. Instead you went off on a ranting tirade in a completely different direction. That is because you have no response to give to what I said. Your entire “reply” is nothing but a red herring.

          You can copy and paste quotes… big freakin’ deal. So can everyone else moderately capable of using a web browser. But with regard to what I said, it has no applicability. Again it is just a red herring.

          • Dan

            most of the time i don’t answer irrational statements and to put it as clearly as i can “YOU MADE MY POINT, JUDGES MADE LAW…THEY CHANGED SOCIETY IN A WAY THAT HAS DESTROYED IT BY THERE DECISIONS” and since your to brain washed to see it and spew the thought of today in everything you say…were as i look at and read the founders and their thoughts and what they intended…and the Quotes (you mock) are the very people who gave us this country in most ceases…but your to rapped up in modern speak to pay any attention to that..you bring up cases that created law from their decisions then say we need to respect the judges who just slapped a LARGE Majority of the American people square in the face and spit on them and then say live with it ITS OUR OPINION…now you have to live by an OPINION

            its people like you who have so changed this country with your so called knowledge and wisdom (which is no more than double talk word twisting crap) and has no sherd of wisdom in it other that the wisdom of the world which is the need to mold society into something that the Founders wouldn’t even recognize…its people like you who have ripped away the moral compass out of the hands of the American people and set them adrift in a sea of filth and immorality and then you wonder why this country is headed right off the cliff…

            i leave you with some Noel Webster Quotes…but you won’t understand them cause your a product of a corrupt education system and are incapable of understanding or thinking out side of what was hammered into that small brain of yours…..

            Noah Webster
            REVOLUTIONARY SOLDIER; JUDGE; LEGISLATOR; EDUCATOR; “SCHOOLMASTER TO AMERICA”

            [T]he religion which has introduced civil liberty is the religion of Christ and His apostles… This is genuine Christianity and to this we owe our free constitutions of government.
            Noah Webster, History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie and Peck, 1832), p. 300, 578.

            The moral principles and precepts found in the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws.
            Noah Webster, History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie & Peck, 1832), p. 339, “Advice to the Young,” 53.

            All the… evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible.
            Noah Webster, History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie & Peck, 1832), p. 339, “Advice to the Young,” 53.

            [O]ur citizens should early understand that the genuine source of correct republican principles is the Bible, particularly the New Testament, or the Christian religion.
            Noah Webster, History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie and Peck, 1832), p. 6.

            [T]he Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children under a free government ought to be instructed. No truth is more evident than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.
            Noah Webster, A Collection of Papers on Political, Literary, and Moral Subjects (New York: Webster and Clark, 1843), p. 291, from his “Reply to a Letter of David McClure on the Subject of the Proper Course of Study in the Girard College, Philadelphia. New Haven, October 25, 1836.”

            The Bible is the chief moral cause of all that is good and the best corrector of all that is evil in human society – the best book for regulating the temporal concerns of men.
            Noah Webster, The Holy Bible . . . With Amendments of the Language (New Haven: Durrie & Peck, 1833), p. v.

            [T]he Christian religion… is the basis, or rather the source, of all genuine freedom in government… I am persuaded that no civil government of a republican form can exist and be durable in which the principles of Christianity have not a controlling influence.
            K. Alan Snyder, Defining Noah Webster: Mind and Morals in the Early Republic (New York: University Press of America, 1990), p. 253, to James Madison on October 16, 1829.

  • Anonymous

    Why wouldn’t the establishment want Newt?

    I say study his agenda very carefully and there has to be something they don’t want because they know Newt can rally a majority of Americans behind him, twist arms as President and get things done unlike Obama he knows the in and outs. There has to be something Newt wants the establishment from BOTH SIDES doesn’t. Real reform?

    • Anonymous

      Nobody running for president now is more establishment than gingrich and even the establishment dont like him!

      • Anonymous

        It wasn’t the minority or the anti establishment that ran him out. So I would have to agree.

      • Anonymous

        Yeah, because he got sh*t done. Newt and bold change is the only way to go

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4UX5IMCQLMMNCCKQUWML6KN6NA Mark

        Let’s put it this way.

        Newt bucked the establishment, so the establishment hates him to this day.

        • Anonymous

          That is not what actually happened.

    • B-Funk

      Yep, talk is cheap. Newt’s not my guy, but let’s look at records. His is pretty good. Not perfect, but good.

    • Jim Botts

      I think they are scared of what Gingrich might force them (congressional Republicans) into as President. And I’m not talking about any sort of leftward proposals either.

      I think they are scared to death he might actually want to balance the budget. And I’m growing more and more suspicious that the GOP has no intention of doing so.

      I think they are afraid of anything they can’t control. I believe they have doubts they could control Newt. Romney, oh they speak his language just fine. They aren’t worried about managing him.

      As for the DEM party, they like Romney because he is not likely to roll back any of their power grabs under Obama.

      • ApplePie101

        You’ve got it right. The congressional Republicans know that Gingrich is a strong personality who can’t be controlled by them. It’s clear that they don’t intend to stop spending or balance the budget, and they fear him.

  • Anonymous

    How can Ann Coulter can call Newt BOMBASTIC, the chubby chaser Coulter was chasing The real BOMBASTIC wiseguy Chris Christie. Ann Coulter is revealing herself to be a fake, phony, and a fraud. Romney is a RINO, you get it Ann. Coulter said herself in Febuary at C-PAC when she was pushing Christie, if Christie doesnt run Romney will win, and we will lose to Obama, funny how she changes her tune 8 months later!

    • Anonymous

      She did explain why she changed her mind, but that’s neither here nor there. She advocates for hardcore conservatism, so it’s quite shocking that she’s backing a candidate that she has railed against forever. She’s only worth listening to for funny rhetoric, but not political advice.

  • http://twitter.com/doorsxp Doors Xp

    Fun fact:

    “Ann Coulter’s sage opinions” is an anagram for “Oops, one’s ranting lunacies”.

    So, I wouldn’t put much stock in those.

  • http://twitter.com/Rushlimbang Brian Skinner

    The only reason some people are called Rino’s right now is because the Overton Window has moved. I have 20 hours of Ronald Reagan speeches that I downloaded from audible.com for $3 . A lot of you people that are calling some of these candidates Rino’s need to listen to those speeches because you would call Ronald Reagan a Rino if you listened to them. He was open to raising taxes and did raise them. He quoted FDR Teddy Roosevelt and others that Newt Gingrich would be roasted by Glenn Beck for quoting. He was against abortion but he did not feel the need to talk about it EVERY day in EVERY speech like Rick Santorum and Michelle Bachmann do. He talked about having compassion to illegal immigrants. No politician is perfect and we should stop expecting them to be.

    • Anonymous

      Yes, Ronald Reagan would be unacceptable to most ‘conservatives’ today I guess. They build up a myth about the man and hold him up as thier hero, but it’s not real. I admire the REAL Reagan because he lived in the real world, and was as conservativeas he could be and still accomplish things.
      Can you imagine the attack ads they’d make today? (from conservatives mind you) “Reagan, he voted to fund the Department of Education… Reagan, no friend to Israel… Reagan a man with zany ideas about the Soviet union…. Reagan, a tax raiser, period. Reagan, FDR loving progressive… Reagan, claims he’s a Christian but he doesn’t piously grand stand like a REAL conservative… Reagan, claims he’s pro life but won’t just sign an exective order to ban it. Reagan… can you trust a man named Ronald WILSON Reagan???? (as in Woodrow WILSON!) Reagan, claims he’s for small government, but support the bloated govt agency called NASA… Reagan, a self proclaimed conservative, but why did he name a progressive big government new world order politician named G.H. Bush as his VP??
      Forget the phoney modrate RINO progressive Ronald Reagan, we need a REAL conservative , like Glenn Beck. :-|

  • Dan

    Hey, every body listen up….

    For situation like this and places like this I’m thinking of starting my own line of cuss boxes… called

    “CUSS A MINUTE CUSS BOX” WE CARE IF YOU SWEAR…NOW PAY UP

    Just enter the promo code “the bamster made me do it” and get a free over the top cuss box extender that allows an extra 637 cuss words..also at no extra cost we throw in a power intake funnel to receive your coinage at 3 times the volume—gets you back cussing in a third the time…….

    Just call 1-800-I-CUSTOO

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones

      But is there “anytime rollover cusses”? LOL!
      “We swear because we care”!!!

      • Dan

        i will work on it but with the extender what more could you ask for…..also i may have to use you motto…lol

  • Anonymous

    So this is Levin’s new thing, huh…

    • Anonymous

      Calling out BS, no, that is always his thing.

      Calling out phony Tea Party people is a new thing.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve never listened to Ann Coulter on a serious level. It’s funny listening to her go after the Democrats, but she’s hardly someone to listen to for political advice. She’s a rhetoric hot box.

    I don’t know how legislation from the bench can be addressed because I’m not a legal or constitutional scholar, but something needs to be done.

  • Anonymous

    Levin is going a bit over the top. he has become somewhat radioactive. Both he and beck have become the avenging angels, going after anybody who has different views than theirs big guns. I like Newt, but cannot see him as a successful and reliable CEO. Does this make me a Nazi, or a lefty? I agree with most of Newts ideas, I also agree with Romney, if I cast for Romney in California, where my vote does not count, because it all goes automatically for Osamba, what would Levin call me?

    • http://twitter.com/doorsxp Doors Xp

      “I also agree with Romney”

      Since Romney’s taken all sides of so many issues over the years, I guess we’ve all agreed with him at one time or another.

      • P.F. Undit

        Sort of along the lines of a broken clock is correct twice a day?

      • ApplePie101

        Isn’t Romney trying to agree with everyone?

      • Anonymous

        ________________________________
        From: Disqus
        To: aramy964228@yahoo.com
        Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 4:20 PM
        Subject: [trscoop] Re: Mark Levin calls out Ann Coulter for unfairly trashing Newt Gingrich

        Disqus generic email template

        Doors Xp wrote, in response to redwood509:
        “I also agree with Romney”

        Since Romney’s taken all sides of so many issues over the years, I guess we’ve all agreed with him from time-to-time. Link to comment

  • Anonymous

    Thank you Mark Levin. I’m trying very hard to stick to the 11th commandment, but what I’m seeing against Newt is really making my blood boil. It is NOT making the idea of voting for Romney any more palateable the way these bullies are acting.
    I don’t care what pundit, Krauthammer and Coulter, whom I like or Talk show host , Glenn Beck, whom I no longer respect or trust, or any politician’s endorsement , SC Gov, etc etc, I will make up my own mind. I will not tolerate ‘hate-on’s’ as Mark put it, where it’s ok to throw out all the good of a guy’s record, and take only the bad, and use a little snippet of audio from speeches spanning 20+++ years, with no context and no persepctive.
    Newt Gingrich has p*ssed me off more than once over the years, but he is sure as hell not an enemy or a progressive or a socialist or a facist or the devil. I am only MORE inclined to support him to see the ESTABLISHMENT lining up to take him down.
    I have seen an improved Newt Gingrich, a man with graciousness, focused, maturity and a welcome defiance of the media’s bias against conservatism.
    Newt is “zany”??? but Ron Paul?”" Newt is bombastic?? but not Chris Christie?? Newt is progressive??? but NOT Mitt Romney???? Newt is an ‘insider’ but not Mitt?. Every speech Newt gives, he rails against Washington and Big Government, but he’s the insider, ok. Newt is a ‘rich guy, therefor evil, ok. Mitt’s work’in class hero I guess. Newt is a terrible cheater/divorcee, oh ok, disqualified, so sayeth Glenn beck. (anybody know the details of Alcaholic Beck’s first marriage break up? did he cheat? did he hit her? did he hurt the kids? Let’s find out? And last but not least, Newt’s a phony Christian, his Catholic conversion is a joke, right?. But Glenn’s conversion to Mormon is super cool, and it washed away all his sins. Pious hypocrites everywhere.

    • Anonymous

      YES! This comment is EXACTLY what I think!!!!!!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/david.masiwchuk David Scott Masiwchuk

      Dead on

    • http://twitter.com/doorsxp Doors Xp

      Well said.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4UX5IMCQLMMNCCKQUWML6KN6NA Mark

    Mitt Romney is perhaps the worst candidate in GOP history. A Hollywood screenwriter couldn’t come up with a more ridiculous caricature of a candidate. Radical Left-wing track record. Mormonism. Pandering. Lies about his record. Insincerity. Lust for power. Across the board flip-flopping from liberal to “conservative” on nearly every issue just so he can secure the Republican nomination. Political opportunism at its worst. The man is a danger to the future of the Republican party and the country.

    Here’s what Mitt Romney supported as Governor of Massachusetts:

    1. Pro-abortion with taxpayer funding (added it to RomneyCare, refused to line-item veto it).

    2. Pro-government mandated healthcare.

    3. Pro-government mandates in general (“I like mandates” his own words on tape).

    4. Pro-gay marriage with full state sponsorship (was first Governor to install it, had earlier broke the law in his quest to issue gay marriage licenses, then called opponents of his actions “right-wing”).

    5. Pro-transgender education to children in public schools (promoted by Governor Romney’s administration).

    6. Pro-global warming caused by human activity (his own words)

    7. Pro-environmental regulations to combat global warming (imposed massive environmental regulations in Massachusetts, according to the Wall Street Journal).

    8. Pro-taxes on businesses (closed loopholes, then raised business taxes by $300 million as Governor of Massachusetts, according to USA Today).

    9. Pro-amnesty for illegal immigrants (path to citizenship for illegals, his own words)

    10. Anti-second amendment (supported the strict gun control laws of Massachusetts).

    Romney’s track record is to the Left of most Democrats. Consider how people destroyed Mike Huckabee in ’08 over a couple of liberal blemishes in his record, but give a free pass to Mitt Romney who’s track record is even worse! Across the board liberal worse! The man is a left-wing snake and it’s the responsibility of real conservatives to expose him since the establishment GOP and other “consersative” pundits aren’t doing it. I see through the man. Can’t you? He is utterly insincere. A pathological liar. Is there a conspiracy to get this deceiver snake elected?

    • http://www.facebook.com/genevieve.marie3 Genevieve Marie

      Mark, Bravo, I could not have said it better. If there was anyone closer to Obama it is Mitt Romney, They could be twins, Allow me to add somethings that requires mentioning, I will get to that in just a few.
      Tim Scott is conducting an town hall with Mitt Romney, They asked me along with others, to send questions that we might have to ask Mitt,
      Mine went like this.
      What is your relationship with John Holdren, What business do you (Mitt Romney) have With John Holdren?. ‘Who is,( know as an Marxist and Obama Science “CZAR” Romney shows the same charisma that Obama did,”This is an warning”, Please beware looks are Deceiving and Romney wears that word well. No one good person should be considering this person, (Mitt Romney) for anything that has to do with this Country Or our Citizens.

  • wodiej

    My Mom likes O’Reilly but she also likes Gingrich and I don’t know how she can continue to watch this arrogant elitist.

  • Anonymous

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/285668/romney-2002-my-views-are-progressive-katrina-trinko
    Romney in 2002: ‘My Views Are Progressive’ (Video – 1 min, 5 sec)

    http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/14/romney-flashback-im-not-running-as-the-republican-view-or-a-continuation-of-republican-values/
    Romney flashback: “I’m not running as the Republican view or a continuation of Republican values” (Video – 52 sec)

    Mitt Romney: ‘progressive’ to ‘conservative’ in 27 months…
    http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/mitt-%E2%80%98progressive%E2%80%99-%E2%80%98conservative%E2%8
    0%99-27-months/254051

    Mitt Romney is not a conservative. He’s a PROGRESSIVE.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Dias/1680711668 Chris Dias

    Absolutes like “NEVER does “anything”. It’s bad grammar and an idiotic way to present an argument because you can almost always be proven wrong – IMMEDIATELY!! The question is, do we want the country to burn slowly or quickly (Obama). Newt may be Ok if he does most of what he says and doesn’t do more socializing, but I’m trying to decide whether I should vote or not. You guys don’t seem to care much about your country. Come to Hungary and I’ll show you your new future. This surreal reality show is something else.

  • Anonymous

    Agree with Levin even though I am not devoted to Gingrich (Perry is still my man).

  • http://black-avenger-1.livejournal.com/profile VirusX

    Yeah, I heard it and concurred. However, he needs to say it TO Coulter. Coulter is not a Conservative, and hasn’t been one for years. She speaks at gay conventions, backs political liberals, and has really done much to advance the cause of Conservatism (perhaps NOTHING in recent years). Instead, she’s apparently more interested in sabotaging the road to recovery we’re trying to get on by supporting politicians that really are the worst of the worst, such as Krispy Kream Christy and Little Lord Fauntleroy, both of whom are arch-typical RINOs (not to mention seminal cowards). I really try not to listen to her shrillness, anymore, but I try to take the higher road and resist running her down, like she would me as a political enemy. O’Reilly (as Levin calls him: “the 8PMer”): never a Conservative. I stopped listening to and watching him, YEARS ago, and will not go back. Why people still listen to him is beyond me, but he’s very hit or miss (mostly miss), nowadays. I’ve made my disdain for Gingrich very plain, and on more than one occasion, but fair is fair, and they don’t seem to know what that is.

    • Anonymous

      BOR always interrupts his guests, shut up Bill!

  • http://www.facebook.com/david.masiwchuk David Scott Masiwchuk

    Ann Coulter like most lawyers hate the idea that judges are not the end all in the power structure. Mostly cause they are hypocrites.

  • Anonymous

    If anyone is BOMBASTIC, that would be Ann Coulter herself. That seems to be her favorite word lately, maybe because she identifies so closely herself with its meaning!

  • reliapundit the astute blogger

    WHICH GINGRICH DID COULTER TRASH, THE ONE WHO THREW RYAN UNDER THE BUS OR THE ONE WHO PRAISED RYAN?

    • sean lytle

      Stop shouting, dude. Especially in a double post.

      The point is one guy has a 90% acu rating and led the 2nd conservative revolution. The other guy was a right of center one-term governor whose signature achievement is Romneycare.

      It’s just not even close. Say he’s more electable. Say he’s more Presidential. Just don’t say he’s more conservative.

      That’s the point.

  • reliapundit the astute blogger

    WHICH GINGRICH DID COULTER “TRASH”, THE ONE WHO THREW RYAN UNDER THE BUS, OR THE ONE WHO PRAISED RYAN? THE ONE WHO TOOK MILLIONS FROM FREDDIE MAC, OR THE ONE WHO BLAMES THEM AND FREDDIE FOR THE COLLAPSE?

    SHEESH.

    REMEMBER: GETTING THE NOMINATION IS JUST A BATTLE. THE WAR IS IN NOVEMBER OF 2012.

    KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE PRIZE.

    NEWT CAN’T BEAT BARRY HUSSEIN OBAMA SOETORO.

  • Anonymous

    Mann Coulter & Bildo=Ann Curry & Matt Lauer.

  • Anonymous

    Ann Coulter has lost my support. Why is she – the one who claims to be the the queen of conservatism – supporting a politician who has done more flip – flops that a pancake chef. If Romney is a conservative, then Obama is center – right. If she has a problem with his personal life, thats alright. She is allowed to. It is a legit concern But hammer home your concern, don’t lie about a guy’s outstanding conservative track record.

  • Persephone

    Ann Coulter is a lawyer, right?
    And Romney has a Harvard Law degree.

    So if Romney gets forced on us…then it will be HarvardLawDegreeObama vs HarvardLawDegreeRomney.
    Oh boy.
    Millions of people will stay home.
    They’ll look upon this as a no-win scenario, and just stay home.

    Low voter turnout will hurt us…badly…in the general.
    We will lose seats in Congress, if people stay home.

    Lots of people are sick of the way that Lawyers [and unions] have added layers of extra cost to everything that we have to buy.

    I want a candidate who is for us little guys, and actually cares about our Military.
    Like Perry.

  • bobemakk

    I think Ann Coulter is losing it. She trashes Newt Gingrich, the best republican in the race. I think Ann Coulter has turned into a RINO.

  • Anonymous

    Islam is the number one outside/inside danger to this country. Newt is the candidate who understands this best and he understands with a passion. We need a foreign affairs President who will be strong for America and who won’t lie to the unattentive people about the threat of Islam (calling it peaceful). This may send a message to Europe as well and give them the backbone to elect conservtives who are against the takeover of their continent through the enabling of leftist wimps.

    • Anonymous

      He won’t be doing any bowing, either.

  • Anonymous

    Oh yeah, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, Jim Demint, Nikki Haley, Krauthammer, George Will, Bill Oreilly, Sununu, National Review are all establishment RINOs! Only a few handful of people, Mark Levin, know the truth that Newt Gringrich is a conservative!

    I mean what’s not conservative about sitting on a couch with Nancy Pelosi, ramming cap and trade down our throats? What’s not conservative about cheating on two of your wives while they were deathly ill and leaving them for that cold hearted woman from a horror movie, Callista? What’s not conservative about taking 1.6 million from Fannie and Freddie?

    Sorry Mark, but the guy you have a hard on for, Newt Gringrich, is not going to be the nominee. Iowans are waking up just in time. Thank God.

    • Anonymous

      Read it again please, he did say that Gingrich was NOT his guy. He’s not mine either. Levin is speaking for a lot of us when he points out that he is just tired of the in-crowd playing Madison Ave on us; trying to convince us of how conservative they are as they sell their soul to the “only guy who can win” theory. Truth: If Romney is the only guy who can beat Obama then we do not live in a center-right country as we are being told. Either that or the electorate is content w/ American Idol Politics.

  • Anonymous

    This man is a legend.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4UX5IMCQLMMNCCKQUWML6KN6NA Mark

    Mitt Romney is perhaps the worst candidate in GOP history. A Hollywood screenwriter couldn’t come up with a more ridiculous caricature of a candidate. Radical Left-wing track record. Mormonism. Pandering. Lies about his record. Insincerity. Lust for power. Across the board flip-flopping from liberal to “conservative” on practically every issue just so he can secure the Republican nomination. Political opportunism at its worst. The man is a danger to the future of the Republican party and the entire country.

    Here’s what Mitt Romney supported as Governor of Massachusetts:

    1. Pro-abortion with taxpayer funding (added it to RomneyCare, kept it, refused to line-item veto it).

    2. Pro-government mandated healthcare (RomneyCare has cost the state over 20,000 jobs and has actually increased the cost of healthcare in Massachusetts).

    3. Pro-government mandates in general (“I like mandates” his own words on tape).

    4. Pro-gay marriage with full state sponsorship (was first Governor to install it, Mitt earlier broke the law in his zeal to issue gay marriage licenses, then called opponents of his actions “right-wing”).

    5. Pro-transgender education to elementary school children (promoted by Governor Romney’s administration).

    6. Pro-global warming caused by human activity (his own words)

    7. Pro-environmental regulations to combat global warming (imposed massive environmental regulations in Massachusetts, according to the Wall Street Journal).

    8. Pro-taxes on businesses (closed loopholes, then raised business taxes by $300 million as Governor of Massachusetts, according to USA Today).

    9. Pro-amnesty for illegal immigrants (path to citizenship for illegals, his own words)

    10. Anti-second amendment (supported the strict gun control laws of Massachusetts and personally signed legislation to extend the ban).

    Romney’s actual track record is to the Left of most Democrats! Consider how people destroyed Mike Huckabee in ’08 over a couple of liberal blemishes in his record, but give a free pass to Mitt Romney who’s track record is even worse. Across the board liberal worse! The man is a left-wing snake and it’s the responsibility of real conservatives to expose him since the establishment GOP and other “consersative” pundits aren’t doing it. I see through the man. Can’t you? He is utterly insincere and a deceiver. A pathological liar. Is there a conspiracy to get this snake elected?

  • Anonymous

    (Ref Ann Coulter on FOX, Morning News, 12-17-11)

    If she were younger, this hair-and-head-tossing would perhaps still have charm but as it is, Ann Coulter merely reveals the common-ness of her actual roots with each flick of her mane.

    The rolling of the eyes, which, due to their extreme proximity, give the girl a positively cyclopean appearance.

    Like an innocent fourteen-year-old, having newly discovered the power of her gender, Ann attempts to manipulate the conservative movement as if it were a sixteen year old, neighbor boy.

    Trith is, she is a 40-yea old plus girl who splashes into the bar about midnight and, though the ‘pickins are slim, slinks to the bar like Cleopatra.

    “Really,” she coos to the lizard faced salesman buying her drink, “It comes down to the only true conservatives left in the race– Romney and Bachmann.”

    Oh Thank you Ann for not abandoning us. We know you are so busy and so important.

    • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn

      You have to dance with what God gave you. We all do.

      • Anonymous

        LOL. I agree but when you dance you go home with the one that brought you. This girl needs to write the guy’s name on her hand before she gets to the dance.

    • Anonymous

      She is actually more like 50ish, and it is way past time to cut that hair and keep it out of her eyes.

      • http://unseenmoon.wordpress.com/ Felipe Zapata

        Coulter turned 50 on the 8th of this month.

  • Anonymous

    I do not like Newt Gingrich at all. There is absolutely no way I will vote for him in the primary, but I don’t understand how Coulter could overlook the liberalism of Romney and Christie and still attack Newt. She has lost all credibility as far as I am concerned. Then again, I never liked her to start with.

    • Anonymous

      Well I did like her…but you are absolutely correct…She has sold out and has lost any credibility she had, at least w/ me.

      • Anonymous

        Agreed. I love Ann and nobody ridicules liberals better than she does but she’s lost it. She’s obviously spent too much time with Joy Behar.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000509514371 Barbara Gardner

    Ann Coulter just appeared on FOX and described the Tea Party as wrong, and that they are not looking for substance, but were looking for who is going around bombastically demanding to see Obama’s birth certificate and calling him a Kenyan. Basically saying the Tea Party consisted of birthers and name callers….She is obviously Ga Ga for Chris Christie and because he, a moderate, is backing Romney, like the good little puppy she is, and looking for her idols approval decided to go wagging her tail behind him, even going so far as to call Romney a Conservative! Now who does she really think she is kidding? Maybe her own Conservatism is not as strong as she has always claimed…”Or’ there is something in it for her! Which?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ashley-King/1845863629 Ashley King

      Coulter is right about steering clear of birtherism (Trump) and the Kenya comments by Newt were either ill-explained or dumb. I think the latter. The Tea Party is better than that. Levin’s point, however, is right: Gingrich has many heresies but reforming the judiciary is not one of them.

  • Anonymous

    What appalls me the most about these attacks on Newt is that these same people treat Ron Paul as if he deserves respect.

    Huh? Ron Paul is a madman who could ensure Obama a second term and all these so-called conservatives are attacking Newt?

    Just wait until Iowa and New Hampshire. I have a feeling that Ron Paul will win both and THEN we’ll see how these Newt Bashers behave.

  • Anonymous

    I stopped watching O’Reilly a couple of years ago, and she obviously thinks she’s the smartest person in the room. She reminds me of that Spongebob episode where Squidward tells Plankton people talk loud, when they want to act smart.

    And as far as him being born here? Where’s the proof, big mouth, Coulter? I don’t rely on you for the truth, simply because you’re loud and obnoxious. I don’t rely on you because someone shoved a camera in your big mouth, and O’Reilly’s big mouth. I have a God given ability to reason, which I trust more than you.

    Could it be you think your imagined superior intelligence, won’t allow you to be conned? You were conned my dear, and I’m one person who is going to pour salt in your big mouth when it comes out.

    They have sour grapes because what they view as the peasants out here, don’t just realize they have superior intelligence compared to the rest of us. Quit watching O’Reilly. I’d love to see his show collapse.

    • Dan

      SPONGEBOB!!!! REALLY!!!! i love him…makes the bamster look like he is 2 years old and Spongbob is way smarter than the bamster…even Patrick is smarter than most of the regime…and Invader Zim with his side kick Girr would make a better leader than the Bamster and Joe Biteme

  • Anonymous

    What did Jim DeMint say?

    By the way, Krauthammer, Will, Sununu, and NR are all establishment Republicans. A RINO is a liberal who masquerades as a Republican. Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham are conservative pundits who have a soft spot for the establishment and want to be liked by the Ruling Class.

    Glenn Beck and Michael Savage are out to make a buck.

    Jim DeMint is the only real conservative on your list so I’m curious why you included him.

  • Anonymous

    Not a Newt fan but will be much more comfortable if he is standing where McCain was in 2008.

  • Anonymous

    Well, I’m glad they keep bashing Newt, because normal people – like you and me are going to take a disliking to these folks and stop watching or listening to them. Little by little they will start to lose their credibility, as they are doing now.

    However, I will say that I don’t think BOR is against Newt – I think he agrees with Newt, but maybe not the method. On the other hand, Ann is all in it for Mittens and she will say anything. She’s the Bill Maher of the right. I think we all agree how much we dislike him.

    On a positive note, I’m was happy to see BOR discredit Beck – actually he made Beck look like a fool for saying that Newt was a progressive.

    Finally – it looks like the republican establishment are trying to break the tea party and discredit us. Look at Haley and Ayotte.

    I can’t wait until Sarah Palin and see who she is going to support.

    • http://twitter.com/doorsxp Doors Xp

      The more they bash Newt, the less I watch/listen to them, and the more likely I am to vote for Newt.

    • Anonymous

      I think Palin will be endorsing herself.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1668858553 Faith M Martin

    Not only getting the House turned GOP, but reforming Welfare and place time limits on it, making it tougher for illegals to get it, lowering taxes, creating a surplus, balancing the budget four times, Anne Coulter has gone around the proverbial bend into LaLa Land, and seems to have no intention to return.

  • Anonymous

    O’Reilly has half his head up his butt most of the time and the queen of bomb throwing (batting only 500) sniveled that Gingrich was a bomb thrower – Pot Meet Kettle!

  • Anonymous

    Ya; we have conservatives attacking conservatives all over the place. The Republican Party is going through a war and I wonder “who/what” it will be when it is all said and done. I have said time and time again Who ever the candidate is (Besides Huntsman Jr.) I will support and back 100 percent. I don’t usually give money to candidates, yet I am this time around because I want to support what I believe. I have yet to hear so many of you that you would support the same. In some of your remarks I can almost tell that if your candidate of choice is not up for election than you will just not vote (Which is a vote for Obama) or even worse and vote for Obama. We need to “Declare” to one another and our self’s. Even if the worst possible candidate gets their chance, against Obama. We will need to support. We really do live in a day and age where our hearts are hardened. We all believe in Freedom and the Ten Commandments, Bill of Rights and the Constitution. At least I hope you do. So whatever candidate makes it we need to stand behind him. Another thing we “must” do is make sure we take the house and the senate at least by 2/3′s vote. We hold “Whoever” the President is. Hold his feet to the fire; Make sure we all still have the freedoms we enjoy today. Make sure that the laws cannot be changed, so our children and our grandchildren will still have this lovely country and be able to vote in a free society as we do.

    • http://www.facebook.com/david.masiwchuk David Scott Masiwchuk

      excellent point.

  • Anonymous

    Romney , Perry , & Noot all anti gunners . Thanks to Newt who rammed through Congress ,the last amnesty fiasco ,we are paying today . So only weeks ago he proposes Amnesty again .The guys a flake same as all long term career politicians , like the others ,agrees with everything & does nothing or nothing common sense conservative , their objective is not to save the Nation , Their mission is to be King . Newts more articulate , but still talkin out of both sides of his mouth. They all want to ride the Fire Truck , but none want to fight any fire. None of these three have a burning desire risk anything to save the US , Or make any unpopular decisions , they’re not even focused on the the real issues today, thats why the conversation at these so called debates always never gets around to the unpleasant but critical danger we face right here & now.

    • Anonymous

      The conversation at the so-called debates is determined by the moderators, who are mostly leftists. No, of course they won’t ask the right questions, and therefore, the candidates cannot give us the right answers in the debates…they are required to answer the questions asked.

      Newt has done more for the conservative cause than any other Speaker of the House has ever done. He returned control of congress to the GOP and fought successfully against Clinton’s agenda. He balanced the budget for the first time in decades, pushed through welfare reform, and has a 97% conservative rating. His Contract with America was thoroughly conservative, and he made it his work to pass that agenda, mostly successfully. His reforms were not popular with either Democrats or Republicans…he has a very heavy anti-establishment record. He is NOT anti-gun or pro-amnesty.

      If you want to know what his stands are, you can find them here:
      http://www.newt.org/answers

      If you want to bash Newt, at least quit posting lies.

  • Anonymous

    Moved

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000829771072 John Q. Jones

    How’s that lack of spine holding out for you, Ann? Against Mitt Romney before you were for him flip floppin’. Golly.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carl-R-Gottstein-Jr/507404060 Carl R Gottstein Jr

    To bad you did not resent and resist what they did to Herman Cain. Now you can eat the results. They have a free hand to rip the rest of the gop field to pieces. Cainiacs feel your pain. Write in Herman Cain.

    • Anonymous

      iirc he did. ironically so did coulter.

  • http://twitter.com/AjntB2Sli Sly

    I don’t know Mark Levin, but I know Ann Coulter. Her shtick IS to cause controversy. And she does it so well!

  • bobemakk

    Ann, shut the hell up. Is Romney a true conservative like you preach you are? Romney is center left and not a true conservative like Newt Gingrich.

    Great writeup Mark, and Merry Christmas.

  • Philo Beddoe

    I thought that the voters voted for more republicRATS than demunists which swayed the house. I did not know Gingrich had everything to do with it.

  • Anonymous

    I love Ann Coulter but I just can not figure out her kiss ass attitude towards Romney and Christie. Maybe she is a closet liberal? The “great one” is the great one by far.

    • Dan

      me thinks it might be a change of life thinie….

      • Anonymous

        Could be maybe she is getting soft as she is in love.

        ________________________________
        From: Disqus
        To: hike110@yahoo.com
        Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 6:38 PM
        Subject: [trscoop] Re: Mark Levin calls out Ann Coulter for unfairly trashing Newt Gingrich

        Disqus generic email template

        Dan wrote, in response to aZjimbo:
        me thinks it might be a change of life thinie….
        Link to comment

  • Anonymous

    Mark had a really good show Friday. He had Louie Gomert on, and he read a letter from,Thomas Jefferson, before the signing of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson said that he felt when Congress wanted to submit legislation, there should be a 12 month delay between submission and voting. He also said that no wording should be changed before the vote.

    He did not want what John Boehner did to happen. He called it evil. John Boehner pressured the House to vote on the Omnibus Spending Bill even though it hadn’t been read, and the people didn’t have a chance to know about it. He viewed this as evil, and dishonest to the American people.

    I didn’t know much about Boehner prior to the impostor usurping the White House, but I think he puts on a phony facade now. The tears, the phony acts of bravado, and then he sneaks around the people by negotiating things behind the backs of the people. I believe he is really sleazy and he needs to be removed.

    To those in Ohio. We need to rid the House of this man. He’s complicit in all that Zero is doing. He’s aided and abetted him all along. When you vote for this sleazy career politician, you’re hurting the rest of the country. I’m tired of being dragged down by people who keep electing these careerists.

    Boehner is not trustworthy. He’s also participated in insider trading. He’s one of them. He’s a total sleaze.

  • Anonymous

    Ann Coulter is now officially off the Christmas Card list.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EQ6G3DWPU66ORUYYT3IEX4ZZPQ ryan

    gingrich is a slackjob. thank you south carolina for making the republican party look like a joke. obama will destroy gingrich. if newt continues to win florida and beyond, you better get used to another 4 years of president obama. i am a conservative, and i will never vote for newt gingrich. looks like i’ll be voting for gary johnson.

    • http://www.facebook.com/david.masiwchuk David Scott Masiwchuk

      Guess South Carolina just said no to legal drugs and yes to conservative principles.

  • http://twitter.com/janemiami Jane Walker

    Wait, did Ann Coulter call Gingrich bombastic?