The Right Scoop
Mark Levin is a status creep. Period.
Ron Paul is the only one, who fits the bill as a TRUE Patriot.
A status liar like Levin, who under close inspection, only differs with Paul on foreign policy.
In other words, if Paul dont kiss Israels ass, or go fight their wars in the guise of bullshit global security, nothing he does is any good or helpful.
Levin, the ding dong, should know, our DEPT is our hugest threat. Not a dirt patch in the middle east.
When we go bust, no more money to fight wars.
then what?
Clean out your ears and open your eyes people.
Sorry, a little late to this party, but, Mr. Levin is 100% correct, and as I've said previously on a different post-- "if we have to drag Romney's sorry @$$ across the finish line and to tell him how to do his job as POTUS"............ WE MUST!
Like many of you, Romney was not my first choice, but as it stands now, like Mark has mentioned-- we have "no other choice" but to tolerate our grievances with Romney and to put pin to the ballot form and mark the box ~Conservative~ "RINO"........ to stop "King Obama" and to take back the Senate and hold the House.
Yeah-- it stinks, again the establishment GOP served us up another crap sandwich. Well, we'll just have to make sure the "GOPe" eats the same crap they've served us-- but ours will be "a boot to back of their neck's" to make sure they do the job's we've elected them to do period, with no exception's!!!
Signed: in C/O the TEA PARTY........."
My neighbor is a Barry kind of guy. So i asked him if had $10,000 who would he trust more to invest it? He actually had to think about it. So, i told him he was to far gone for any kind of help.
The big take away for me is "the nay-sayers will destroy us". I couldn't agree more. They're the people that get left behind on the dung heap of history because they were too scared to stick their necks out. All I can say is, they better not get in our way because we're playing for keeps now!
Having Mark Levin and, you can be sure, Rush pushing Romney to the right and excoriating any weak-kneed compromises by him will help. What will help even more is all of US raising hell every day both in groups, as tea parties and through our senators and representatives. Supporting the latter as well as Michelle Malkin and any other right wing media or bloggers who try to stir up mass resistance, as well as Michele Bachman, Jim Demint, etc., is crucial. First we MUST elect Romney and all the senators we can as Mark states in his lovely bulldog style. My wife and I would find it so pleasant to hear much less, at least in political discussions, about Queen Michelle and more from the aforementioned Michel(l)es.
I've been reflecting all week on the SCOTUS decision and reading everyone's opinions on the motive, but at the end of the day, I know this: It is a fact that Romney's campaign and GOP campaigns around the country were infused with money and energized, the Tea Party is energized, and for some people, the fact that Romney has now been handed an urgent mission is the only reason why they're voting for him now. It doesn't matter to me now if it would've been better if Roberts ruled with the dissenting judges -- of course it would've been! But we can't change that now, so I choose to look forward with what we do have -- a very motivated silent majority.
I am off to prepare for my July 4th party today (say a prayer for me -- of my 17 guests, 8 are flaming liberals!), but I will leave everyone with this story which I copy and pasted from a comment from retire05 at Legal Insurrection. It leaves me with a lot of hope that we can kick the fascist president out of office in November, and I hope it does the same for you:
"I don’t know if my own personal experience is any indication of how the nation is reacting to the disastrous Roberts ruling but here is what happened:
I live in a town that is basically the county headquarters for the Democrat Party in a county that has, in all other areas, turned deep red. 2010 brought some real firsts: first Republican sheriff since Reconstruction; first Republican county commissioners; first Republican district judge; first Republicans on all school boards except the one in my town.
The county GOP party held its meeting the night of the SCOTUS decision. Usually there are 10-15 people there, just the few of us who are active in the party and attend every meeting held, no matter what town it is in. That night instead of the usual 10-15 attendees, there were 60. People who I have known for years, and did not know their political leanings, were there. They were angry, and wanted to know what they had to do to give Obama the boot. One even came with pocket copies of the Constitution that he was handing out to anyone who wanted one.
If the anger shown at my own little local meeting, it is an undercurrent of the temperature of the nation that leans conservative."
You make a very salient point that PC types pf all stripes are afraid to point out. When the O is described as a Socialist or leaning to socialism, the left and msm squeal. However, he is indeed a fascist in ruling style by definition. He does not actually take over industries, but uses them for his purposes and favors both corporations and individuals the help him implement his control through crony capitalism. Fascism thus enables him to excoriate huge corporations, Wall Street and venture capitalists, while taking money from them and handing out our money and special treatment to them. A few examples: Solyndra, a host of other 'green' companies, GE, Buffet, GM and Chrysler along with the UAW, many banks and anyone else supporting him and his fascist regime. NO, citing this FACT dos not mean we are calling him a Nazi, you lily-livered cowards like Bill O'Reilley
Oh, and another thing. I personally have had enough of short term thinking by the conservatives. If they can't get it fixed quick, they give up. How long did it take the libs to infiltrate the news media, the universities, the unions, and the other institutions they now hold power over? Long term planning is what we need.
Not to mention, the libs have been after socialized medicine for 50 years. As Rush said, the legislation had been written for years collecting dust in Pelosi's desk, waiting for the perfect opportunity.
Only if our side would use as much determination getting rid of that POS bill, as the Left was in "pushing" it.
But like you said, we give up too soon and then turn into a circular firing squad.
Actually, socialized medicine has been a century in the making. Way, way back in the turn of the century (1900) the AMA started talking about it. They progressives are rotten but they are patient & persistent in their goals.
Guys like that caller are exactly the reason we have Obama right now.
"Oh I can't vote for McLame, he's not conservative enough"
Here we are four years later and some of these people just don't learn their lesson.
Hold your nose with one hand and pull the lever for Romney with the other.
thanks RS. This is the best argument I've seen in voting for Romney. Levin points out he's not our first pick and it doesn't mean we are doing cartwheels over voting for him. It just means we are committed to getting obama out of power. Remember this is the 1st presidential election with the Tea Party/grassroots. If Romney does not lead as a constitutional conservative, he will not get re-elected.
Many are upset because another establishment person has all but won the nomination and I am one of them. But the winds of change have been blowing and Gov. Sarah Palin has been a big factor in that for the last 4 years. She's been ridiculed, been the butt of vulgar, insulting jokes, had death threats against her and her family, forced out of office, been accused in being an accomplice in the Giffords shooting spree, had her church burnt down and yet she still is fighting to get obama out of office. Like Levin, why does she do it? For no other reason because she wants to help save this country. Palin is not running for any political office yet she endures all this BS every day, travels the country making speeches at private conservative events and has a PAC to help raise money for constitutional conservatives for congress. So if her and Levin can do it, so can we. Romney will just be a tool to get rid of Obama. The next election will be our Pièce de résistance.
I think you and I are the only ones on this board who really actually get it. We know that Romney IS NOT inevitable until the convention in Tampa.
Make no mistake there are many things happening on this front and NO ONE should be on this board brow-beating those of us who really know the score.
I listen to Mark Levin religiously, but he was out of control today and should have told the listeners that we have one option left. If the delegates are behind Mitt on the first ballot, then we know what we have to do. Until then, everyone needs to remain calm and work for the people in your state that's running and donate to them.
PEOPLE MAKE FUN OF BLOOMBERG TO WHAT HE IS DOING TO NEW YORK, THAT IS CHILD'S PLAY TO WHAT OBAMA WILL DO THIS NATION IF REELECTED. Obama will dismantle this country one piece at a time and then one day we will be ruled by the UN in this "ONE WORLD ORDER".
Fantastic! He could just as well be talking to a few people here who believe the same thing. Romney = Obama. No, he doesn't. We must defeat Obama even if we put in a monkey that throws darts.
Im voting against Obama in November.
As someone said earlier, even if we use Romney as a stop gap for 4 years while "someone" else prepares for a run in 2016, at least it gives us time to save our Republic from sliding into the sea.
I agree, but if Romney wins the election it is customary for no one to run against him in 2016. That would be a rare occurrence.
This can't be fixed overnight. I've said that till I'm blue in the face. For some reason there are some idiots out there who do. They think their strong or some hero or something. The people who wont vote for Romney cause he ain't perfect and want things changed in a blink of an eye have the thought process of liberals. They can't see two feet ahead of them. They do something and don't realize what they did hurt things in the future. Get Romney in. Obama out. Take control of the Senate. Take more control of the House of Representatives. Move from there.
I'm not so much against Romney because I don't think he can clear up the problems, instantaneously, as I am against him because of his political past, and the belief that he really isn't interested in clearing up something that he might not even view as problematic, in the first place. Past performance is a predictor of future behavior, and looking at his past performance as a debater and politician does not fill me with confidence. At this point, I'd be happy to see a Constitutional Conservative majority take Congress, and impeach a few judges out of the Supreme Court. With a super-majority, even a sitting, first term president can be marginalized. And we can start by demanding a recall of the members of Congress that are unelected, and were given their seats by fellow liberals.
... and don't forget you're against him because he's a Mormon. That's number one on your list. You said yourself that if Ronald Reagan was a Mormon you wouldn't have voted for him.
And some people don't understand that Romney is going to hurt the conservative cause long term with the setbacks.
Did the GOPe cut entitlements last time they held power?
Nope, they added to them.
Did the GOP reduce the debt last time they had power?
Nope they nearly doubled it.
Did the GOP reduce the size and scope of government last time they had power?
Nope they expanded the size and scope of government more than any since LBJ.
Stop acting like an idiot and encourage people to vote conservative for House, Senate and locals and write in whomever if they can't support Romney.
Obama has increased entitlements.
Obama has increased debt.
Obama has increased gov't.
What exactly is your point besides insulting people to make a point? Romney may not overhaul them all but I am certain he will not be spending the people's money taking frequent expensive, overseas leisure vacations and increasing the dole.
My point exactly is: Don't encourage people to stay home just because they can't pull the lever for a progressive with an (R) next to his name.
And you'll notice you're the one who started throwing out insults first by calling people "idiots" behaving like liberals.
Agreed. There are some who want the budget to be fixed immediately, certain entitlements killed immediately, certain agencies killed immediately, and not allow any more debt ceiling increases.
It has to be a trending curve to turn things around. If you turn a car 90 degrees on a dime while it's driving 100 m.p.h. there's going to be a serious wreck. The economy, the system, the people, the job markets, and etc. all have to adjust to changes over time and won't do well with instantaneous massive changes.
I'm sure people will disagree with me. :)
None of that happened under Bush's four years with the RINO lead GOPe controlling both Houses and appeasing their party's President and it ain't going to happen this time either as there are not enough ACTUAL conservatives in office yet.
"Yet" is the key word. We have a chance to get more of them in again, and the Senate should be able to be improved on much more than the last election.
We have to get enough that we don't have to worry about them supporting any RINO initiatives that Romney might ask them to pursue. Romney can't do a damn thing (legislative) without Congress and can't sign any bills he doesn't get.
On Nov 6, 2012 we vote out Obama. On Nov 7 we start vetting candidates for the next election. In Nov. 2014 we primary Senators McConnell (KY), Alexander(TN), Graham (SC). In Jan. 2015, we start uniting behind ONE conservative canidate to primary Romney for 2016.
Not going to happen. No one will run against Romney in 2016, unless maybe he's doing a terrible job. I hope he doesn't do a terrible job.
How do you go from agreeing with me when I say it the first time and turn around and say I don't know what I'm talking about?
You're right, I don't know, but I'd be willing to bet my truck on it. Ok, maybe not, lol.
Mark my words, Romney is going to deliver Hillary in 2016 as he trashes the Republican brand like Bush did.
Obama is a disciple of Saul Alinsky. Hillary wrote her senior paper at Wellesley on Saul Alinsky. They are both cut from the same mold. Getting rid of Obama and electing Hillary 4 years later would be like taking poison twice.
I'm not going to judge Romney on a job he hasn't started yet. But your prediction is noted. :)
For those that do not want Romney fine then stay home! This bastard in the WH is far worse than Romney! If you are okay with complete tyranny then stay home. If the election is razor thin close you can look in the mirror and thank yourself. I would much prefer a true conservative like Jindal or Rubio as President. This is what we have. Obama is evil and needs to be removed!
Okay then tell me who is a conservative!
________________________________
From: Disqus
To: johnschaffran@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 8:04 PM
Subject: [trscoop] Re: Mark Levin: I’ d rather fight with Mitt Romney as president than give Obama a 2nd term!
JRD1 wrote, in response to johnos2112:
Rubio is no conservative. He deserves the Academy Award for his BS. Link to comment
Are you an idiot?
Don't encourage people to stay home if they won't vote for Romney. They will still vote conservative in other races like House and Senate. Please stop being an idiot.
Yes, he is an idiot. Like the typical leftist, he believes its his way, or the highway, and you have no right to think, believe or act for yourself, if he doesn't approve it. Don't feed this intellectually bankrupt troll, and continue to think for yourself. Your vote is a product of your conscience and decisionmaking, and you don't have to vote for someone you distrust, just to satisfy someone else, just as you don't have to genuflect to any politician or pundit, just to make someone else happy. Wodiej will never understand or accept that.
I won't be voting for Romney any time soon. I don't vote for progressives PERIOD. Never did and never will.
It is always wonderful when someone can call someone else an idiot over the internet. Boy aren't you tough! With Obama in the WH nothing will get done accept a man issuing exec order after exec order. That was the purpose of this blog kind friend!
________________________________
From: Disqus
To: johnschaffran@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 2:17 AM
Subject: [trscoop] Re: Mark Levin: I’ d rather fight with Mitt Romney as president than give Obama a 2nd term!
Guest1776rcp wrote, in response to johnos2112:
Are you an idiot?
Don't encourage people to stay home if they won't vote for Romney. They will still vote conservative in other races like House and Senate. Please stop being an idiot. Link to comment
I never said he did! And what does that have to do with anything in regards to defeating the marxist Obama?
________________________________
From: Disqus
To: johnschaffran@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 1:16 PM
Subject: [trscoop] Re: Mark Levin: I’ d rather fight with Mitt Romney as president than give Obama a 2nd term!
VirusX wrote, in response to johnos2112:
Romney's a mormon. He has nothing to do with the Christian God.
Link to comment
Like I said you are real tough. How about I just pray for you because you seem to have some bent up hostility over the fact that Romney is not a great candidate. I agree he is not. The man occupying will destroy everyone's life including yours. If that makes me an idiot then I take that with a badge of honor! Romney is not perfect only the LORD GOD is. With some more true conservatives in the house and senate we can rebuild the republic. We can be on the same team and not respect each other BUT respect the republic. GOD BLESS YOU!
________________________________
From: Disqus
To: johnschaffran@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 9:59 AM
Subject: [trscoop] Re: Mark Levin: I’ d rather fight with Mitt Romney as president than give Obama a 2nd term!
VirusX wrote, in response to johnos2112:
I've never had any bones about saying anything I say in any other media to someone's face. I've posted my address, more than once, to someone that sought to challenge me on that, and offered to buy him train tickets to come to my home for the priviledge of hearing and seeing me repeat what I may've said on the Internet. I quite critically doubt Guest1776rcp is any more afraid of the idiot he was addressing, than I am afraid of the idiot I'm addressing, now. Instead of beating your chest about how brave you are, why don't you ask him why he doesn't support WILLARD, and see if you can clear up any possible misconceptions he has, regarding that.
Oh, wait.
You can't do that.
You're an idiot, too.
Link to comment
I've never had any bones about saying anything I say in any other media to someone's face. I've posted my address, more than once, to someone that sought to challenge me on that, and offered to buy him train tickets to come to my home for the priviledge of hearing and seeing me repeat what I may've said on the Internet. I quite critically doubt Guest1776rcp is any more afraid of the idiot he was addressing, than I am afraid of the idiot I'm addressing, now. Instead of beating your chest about how brave you are, why don't you ask him why he doesn't support WILLARD, and see if you can clear up any possible misconceptions he has, regarding that.
Oh, wait.
You can't do that.
You're an idiot, too.
You use the word "idiot" a lot but I don't think you know what it means.
"An idiot, dolt, or dullard is a mentally deficient person, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. "
We cannot be assured we will win the Senate. We at least need a Republican in the WH. A democrat senate w obama in the wh will be worse than the last 4 years.
I know exactly what the word means and people telling others to stay home just because they won't vote for a progressive with an (R) next to his name is idiotic. We need the Senate and House votes too so when you see these idiots posting idiotic things like "just stay home then" call them out on how idiotic and counterproductive that is.
![[VIDEOS] Rand Paul slams Senate for bringing Apple in for questioning over legal tax practices & vilifying them](http://www.therightscoop.com/wp-content/plugins/special-recent-posts/cache/MTI1MTAwbm9yYW5kcGF1bA==.jpg)
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.