Mark Levin reveals who he supports for president

Wouldn’t it be nice if the field narrowed down to Cain, Bachmann, and Santorum. These 3 imo are really the ones worth voting for.

And look at what the press has manage to do. Guide us away from the very few that are true conservatives.

I hope the “machine” does not get to the delegates as well.

Wow!!! Mark and Glenn Beck are thinking on the same wavelength. Something is wrong with the Cosmos.

I agree with the Great One that it does not matter which Republican you are defending. It is your choice, no matter whether I agree or not. I will say that I am not surprised by his choices announced recently because that exactly what I expect from him: Use his on damn mind like the rest of us should do.

If you take a look back of past election cycles during primaries you will see that although earlier polling does add some value to the predictive aspect of determining a nominee, it is not, as historical records indicate, a be-all-end-all, with absolute certainty (death and unfortunately taxes, as many of you are aware). Therefore, before anyone rush to judgment and write off candidates with single digit polling results, especially before January 3 and subsequent Caucasus leading up to the GOP nomination, you might need to take a decade or two in review and analyze the obvious trends. Just a thought and suggestion!

Wow! It is amazing when you receive assistance from another concern citizen on this forum in the form of a Psalms reference. Thanks, if you are reading this. You know who you are.

Congresswoman Bachmann or Senator Santorum would be very capable, if nominated, to make President Obama reign of terror and universality, utopia, Alinski commune euphoria, statist pining, etc., etc., one term. The man must go!

Being a governor doesn’t automatically get you my vote, but it is definitely a plus in my book. One of the mistakes we made in ’08 was to elect someone who didn’t have a RECORD of LEADING people, and now he’s ruining our economy. As a governor/ex-governor, we at least know where you stand, and we know what we’ll be getting.

We need to realize the facts, If obama gets back in this country will be no more a land of liberty & freedom but a land of slavery and tyranny. If you are like me you know. My life is in major turmoil. I am in debt.I have worked hard all my life & never asked for government assistance. My car is from 2002 & has 182000 miles on it. My house taxes are 5 grand & climbing. I haven’t had a vacation in 12 years. I don’t buy what I want. I have no savings accout. This has left me with a feeling of despair and the fact that there is no way out! There are many,many more like me, people who always worked hard and played by the rules. If we don’t stick together and rid our country of this cancer called obama then I know we will all be in misery until the day we die.

I am not surprised because Bachmann’s positions, like Levin’s, are based on Constitutional principles not political expedience.

Ultimately, I would go with Bachman. Gingrich for me has integrity issues (and I just listened to the Meller clip RED posted up and felt so guilty… I was like “darn, Meller’s got my number!”); Paul thinks AlQuaeda just needs some love; Cain, as good as he is, has dithered TOO Much on issues (the abortion gaffes made me too suspicious of his stamina and his determination to stand up for real conservative causes were he to get into office at all and I’m sorry folks but he hasn’t handled this stuff with the scandals convincingly); Perry also has integrity issues for me, major ones; And Huntsman and Romney are no-goes for me (I can’t stand the idea of a president that genuinely believes Jesus was Satan’s kid brother and insists on being called a true Christian in the process, of course their policies are disagreeable as well as I do not see from them how they are true conservatives.); Santorum is great but Bachman just skims past him 4 me.

If you’ve been paying attention to any of my contributions since I began commenting on trs, you’ll see this has been a journey. I have been a Cainiac, A Gingrich lover and even considered Paul at one stage but seeing all I do as of today… Bachman might just be America’s answer to Margaret Thatcher. However, see this how you will, but I feel it is telling when a people cannot find a man credible enough to lead them and turn instead to a woman. For me, it is a sign that God wants to prove a point to that nation; A humbling point. Just ask Deborah.

The voting record and stances bachmann takes on the issues is the right direction…
However once she opens her mouth she proves she is more of a detriment to the causes than any type of help.
She is the worst thing for the conservative party.
Had she been running her campaign with out the hypocritical attacks, the lies, an the pandering slogan promises she would probably be running away with the campaign.
However, she has a serious character flaw, and the lying pandering hypocrisies are only symptoms.

For people who somehow do not know what I refer to:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/greghengler/2011/11/25/debate_flashback_when_bachmann_supported_a_non-deportation_approach_to_illegal_immigration

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/09/16/does-michele-bachmann-have-a-crony-problem-too/

Santorum is a good conservative who lost his way and lost his seat.
But if he continues sticking to his guns will one day make a good leader.
Im not sure what I think of someone who comes fresh from a defeat from their local home state.. and tries to sell himself as the person everyone else wants.

You can also add Sarah Palin to the list of those recommending that GOP primary and caucus voters take a closer look at Rick Santorum.

Governor Palin appeared on Sean Hannity’s television show Thursday evening. She sidestepped a question about whether she would endorse any particular candidate in the Republican field (to the great disappointment of our friends who have decided to back Speaker Gingrich, no doubt). She praised not just Speaker Gingrich, but ALL of the GOP Presidential hopefuls (including, sadly, the infelicitous Wrong Paul). She seemed most enthusiastic, however, in her praise for Senator Rick Santorum.

I know it’s fashionable for the punditry, and most voters, too, to dismiss Senator Santorum out of hand as a Presidential candidate. Given his poor (to this point) performance in the various polls, it’s even understandable. But the reason Senator Santorum is polling so poorly is because nobody is even looking at him. Even people who SAY they’ve looked at him and written him off haven’t REALLY looked at him.

And why is that? Because he’s being shrouded by the media.

In the glorified three-ring circuses that have been presented as “Presidential debates”, it’s not at all uncommon to see Mitt Romney asked three or four questions, and to see Speaker Gingrich, Mr. Cain, Governor Perry, Congresswoman Bachmann and even Wrong Paul asked one or two questions apiece, before Senator Santorum is asked even ONE question.

Would someone please explain to me why this is the least bit fair?

More to the point, would someone please explain to me how any primary or caucus voter can intelligently evaluate nine Presidential candidates when the media–at their discretion and their discretion alone–steer the attention to two or three candidates by allowing them to effectively monopolize the available air time?

Not surprised at all. I say again; the media is trying, and probably will succeed, in choosing our candidates for us. The frontrunners are not as conservative as we would like but they know we will vote for them anyway because they are Republican. But, as we know, a Republican does not a Conservative make. That’s why the true Conservatives are not getting the airplay or the commentary. Herman Cain rose to the top and look what happened there, deserved or not. You saw what happened to Sarah Palin. They are going to keep pushing the quasi-Conservatives on us until we are forced to choose one. The real Conservatives will continue to be minimized until we lose heart and accept their choice. It is up to you not to accept their choice. Look what happened last time. Do Not Listen To The Media!

I agree wholeheartedly with both Levin and Beck on this one. Bachmann and Santorum are the two most honorable and stready candidates. Yet, like him believe that anyone would be better then Obama. Heck, you could write “Republican” on a rock and I would rather vote for it then Obama.

Rick Santorum!

Exactly what does Levin, or anyone, think a Romney or Gingrich would do as POTUS that would jeopardize the conservative agenda? As I run through the major issues I can’t see them altering from what they have stated as their platform…which are platforms that are basically the same as a Santorum or Bachmann…the difference is a Romney or Gingrich have much broader and deeper levels of experience (hence more to find fault with); Gingrich especially has a grasp of the issues unmatched by any of them and he articulates the conservative agenda better than any. Levin is making a leap of faith based on some self imposed purity scale that can only be achieved by a novice. I don’t fear a Romney or Gingrich continuing the progressive agenda and would have much more confidence in them as POTUS than a Santorum or Bachman. And like it or not our candidate does have to win the general…Something a Santorium or Bachman would have a much more difficult time doing than R or G.

I agree with Mark that I will support the nominee.
But I do not want Bachmann or Santorum.

Santorum would have trouble carrying his home state of PA and Bachman still has hoof n mouth disease. Both would get destroyed by the media and the DNC.

I knew this about Levin all the while. I agree with him on Michele.

Should Bachmann, or for that matter, Santorum, come from behind to get the nod, it wouldn’t be the first time. I was going to just post there, but as I went for the button I saw, in the right column, “Martin Bashir says…”. Why do I care what he says? Why is what he says even visible to me, here in particular? He says Cain should resign from church? I think twisted people like Bashir should believe their own nonsense about carbon footprints and supposed overpopulation and resulting environmental damage and stop wasting perfectly good oxygen! Voluntarily – I’m not saying anyone should assist them, other than Kevorkian, perhaps.

phlpn.es/829r8s