When J B got the speakership and was all weepy and sh!t...
I thought, "Man, you don't get it... This job means TOO MUCH to you."
Back to a simmer...
If, "IF" Romney gets the Republican wreath in the primary, Romney's "simmer" administration would be a temporary respite in an ideological struggle, marxist AND islamist, until a REAL ideological General surfaces with authentic "common sense conservative" social and economic credentials who is "up for the struggle" against the "struggles" of the neo-marxists and the incessant supremacist "jihad / struggle" of the neo-muhammadan islamists.
As someone said somewhere, "there is NO MODERATE shariah law."
Where is the leader?
Where is the Gentleman or the Lady with the servant's heart who will say "there is NO MODERATE response" to the shariah law of the islamists and "there is NO MODERATE response" to the idiocy of the "progressives" in BOTH the Republican establishment and the Democratic establishment?
Just askin', but I think it's a good question?
Salvatore Anello and sDee, I must disagree, and here's why.
I remember when Gorbachev's perestroika (freedom) and glasnost (openness) cost him his reign over the USSR in 1989.
I remember especially one very old man who said to an interviewer on television that Russia had just ended "70 years on the road to nowhere."
70 years from Lenin to Gorbachev (1917-1989).
In the primary election I will not vote for Romney.
But, if he is the Republican nominee, I will vote for him in the general election.
Because "Lenin wanna-be" Obama, with 4 more years and Cass "Nudge" Sunstein and the other marxist czars inside the Obama administration and Sunstein's wife, Samantha "Responsibility to Protect Doctrine" Powers, and George Soros and Van Jones and Andy Stern and Richard Trumka and other marxists outside the Obama administration, could solidify a 70 year "dark age" for America.
Also, "... four more years of pain under Obama" to punish the Republican Party to "wake them up" is self defeating, destructive and less than thoughtful.
I question how acurate that last sentence is. I fear Romney may be a wolf in sheeps clothing. Sheeps clothing that doesn't quite cover him up at that.
Of course, the "committed" part is only as accurate as his previous history, easily discovered by, as the saying goes, "show me your friends and I'll show you your future."
Has Romney hired overt marxists?
However, his Romney care plan for Massachusetts does show an affinity of thought with the ism that promotes the "womb to tomb" BIG Gov, BIG Nanny state.
Mr. Speaker Boehner - BINGO...
Income inequality is a good thing.
Common sense by Richard Epstein in 9 minutes -
"Does US Economic Inequality Have A Good Side?"
>> PBS 10-26-2011 - http://video.pbs.org/video/2160792049/
At 6min. 45sec.
Q - "Are you in favor of an inheritance tax?"
A - "I'm in favor of it's abolition. I've said that for years. I think the estate tax is the most mad tax imaginable."
At 7min. 13sec.
Socializing wealth compromises future wealth.
At 7min. 24se.
The following are my word, not Epstein's...
Transfer payments to poorer people by Big Gov disincentiveizes them and is a societal bad but transfer of wealth to ones own children is a societal good.
At 8min. 40sec.
Lincoln said, 'You do not make the poor richer by making the rich poorer.'
This is why I will not vote for Romney. If Obummer wins and we also keep the house we will be far better off then progressive lite. Of course, we would then absolutely need Allen West as speaker.
The ONLY reason Boehner is speaker at all is because of the people who voted in the last election- for real change and tea party values. I really can't stand this kind of crap. I hope and pray that there will be some more good tea party types who run against these jerks, and enough people who have had enough to vote them out, or we haven't got a chance.
yay mark you woke up finally now will u support RON PAUL or his he still a neo nazi. Its about time you realized rep and dem are the same and if theyre not they just get corrupted or kick backs till they go along with the flow we all know this its time to elect someone who hasn't been corrupted his 30 yrs in government and we have proof from what he voted on. I know you disagree with his foreign policy as many of you do which i would love to debate with u why i think hes right . and Im a jew just like you and lived in israel for the past 3 yrs and his policy would be best for israel especially it just to long to write because i hate writing but maybe ill call your show one day when im not in school and we will speak.
Remember in the 90s when we had a Speaker with guts? Wasn't it Boehner who moved against Gingrich? Oh, and Newt hits another one out of the park: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1244888691001/newt-gingrich-talks-education/
This is what I mean about the current crop of establishment Republicans. They are not serious about cutting tax or spending. We will need to elect a few hundred more hundred people to the House and Senate like Rubio, Allen West and Paul Ryan before we see serious commitment to fixing our country's debt crisis.