Mark Levin went on with Megyn Kelly today to discuss the Roberts’ decision and how detrimental it was to our Constitution:




Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

79 comments
bobemakk
bobemakk

The US has been in trouble since Obama's inauguration and our troubles get deeper and deeper every day he is in office. Mark Levin is always right.

steve1947
steve1947

Everyone's missing that which I find most logical.....let's say that you live in say, a "closet".....you have that kind of secret.....and you happen to be a Supreme Court Justice......somone peeks into said closet from let's say, Chicago and they give you a phone call, offering to "share" your secret......might you then feel compelled to vote contrary to your principals?

Just a theory.

Tom Shannon
Tom Shannon

The big lurch we all felt with Chief Justice Roberts giving the Leftists control of our medical industry was not a rogue wave, it was a fatal hit on a reef. And our freedoms were cut at least in half. Freedoms we can probably not recover, because Obama just made 30 million mostly Mexican citizens, citizens of the greatest nation in world history, America. By also giving them free medical care.

You are an American citizen, and you also get free medical care.

Where is our Republican no-brain trust?

No-guts Republicans and no morals Republicans, sat by when a 1000 page law was rammed through. Why did the Republicans not rise up and walk out protesting this robbery.

Why did Anthony Eden cut a deal with Hitler?

The man was a stupid coward, and it has happened here. The man sold us and his wonderful country out. Who cares what for?

All the wonderful men and women who built this most amazing democratic civilization defeated by some totalitarian thugs and a warped media.

Beckslee
Beckslee

My gut feeling is the CJ Roberts was influenced/threatened by the Obonzo 'administration' to change his vote. If that happened it is a near disaster. I believe Obonzo, the Traitor/

Poser/Liar/Socialist-9in-Chief will stop at nothing to insure his reelection. I hope, and I emphasize hope, that CJ Roberts knew what he was doing, and that he did it to leave an option for Obonzocare to be eliminated.

Beale Bauguess
Beale Bauguess

With Robert's ruling now the American citizen can be taxed on what they buy and now what they don't buy. So the federal government can dictate and direct the actions of it's citizens simply by a tax levy. I suspect I will be taxed for not buying one of Obama's dumb electric cars. It's conceivable that I could be taxed for not buying one of Obama's General Motors vehicles. John Roberts blew a hole in the constitution about the size of Texas, and it was done apparently so he would be better liked by the liberals.

Beale Bauguess
Beale Bauguess

It is time for common sense people that have a love for this country and respect for the great work and documents presented to us by our founding fathers to do something to pull this country back from the liberal hell-hole that is is slipping into. It has been proven that our current government from one branch to the other is too corrupt, too hungry for power, too willing to feed of each other's willingness to screw the American people to do anything about it.

jondos
jondos

NULLIFY Robertscare!

Robert Johnson
Robert Johnson

The states need to pull power back from the Federal government and tell them to pound sand and get the hell out of our lives.

aZjimbo
aZjimbo

Mark is spot on as usual.

laura blanch
laura blanch

People need to stop thimkimg of Rep and dem this country is in trouble,, and if you love it,, join a group....

Judefour
Judefour

Congressman Paul is a glaring example of the 'virtue', 'prudence', 'integrity' and so on, that Mr Levin complains about, but Mr Levin marginalized Mr Paul, and mischaracterized his positions as a matter of regular procedure. Mr Levin seems to reject anyone that doesn't appeal to his subjective preference, even when they seem to be exactly what he claims is needed in civil government.

gothicreader
gothicreader

This is what Newt wanted - term limits for Judges. I remember Meghan Kelly arguing with Newt about this - she was against this.

PVG
PVG

I agree with Mark about term limits. Today on his show he advocated for congress to have 12 years max, both houses. Repeal the 17th amendment to return power to the states and supremes have ONE 15 year term. Can you imagine 40 more years of Kagen and the wise latina??? ME EITHER!

BEA
BEA

YES!!! I agree with Mark Levin stating that this ruling is (massive) COERCION. I'm not a lawyer, but I think logically... I'm really concerned about what Roberts did to the constitution. Roberts decision certainly sets a precedent for future activist judges further from conservative persuasion to use power against the people. This is a shoe-in for leftist squeaky wheel activists AND JUDGES based on the (not so) subtleties of Sotomayer, Kagan, and Ginsberg. Here WE are arguing that the constitution is to be interpreted without changing its clear meaning. Then we get Roberts throwing his organic salt into the pot and opening a Pandora's box to dismantle its integrity. How do we back peddle from this action? It's done. Even if Romney wins and repeals, don't we still retain the history of this ruling whereby future activists can cite the Roberts Rule and screw future generations with a loosening interpretation of the law? I don't have confidence that future generations will suddenly gain more virtue, integrity, and prudence, nor become more honest or use good principles of logic. It has clearly continued to deteriorate. Look at all the denials from the left trying to spin what is suppose to be the final word from the Supreme Court. "This is not a tax..." Are these guys lame or sincere? Neither. In-your-face Deceit has become a norm in public life. And it started at the TOP with Clinton's cigar breaks. There was no shame, nor remorse decoded by the public. By continued repetition of poor conduct by our leaders, our public has had a brain wash to lower moral standards~ including the future leaders of our country. See you all in heaven...

OregonC4P
OregonC4P

The logic used by the founders for lifetime appointments for Judges and Justices made sense, but 220 years of practice has shown us that the corruptible will find a way to abuse the system.

In this case it didn't take them long, but I grow tired of the argument that either putting term limits on these appointments, or removing activist judges will never happen. That is only true when you convince yourself it is impossible before you even try.

If you want judges to do their jobs in defending the Constitution, threaten them with the disgrace of impeachment. Then follow through with that threat if they do not get the message.

For now, Congress needs to begin impeachments. Start with The Supreme Court and then remove all of the 9th circuit.

WordsFailMe
WordsFailMe

I don't think that even those wise people who designed this nation could ever conceive that such foul, drugged up slime like Obama could ever be elected even in the blackest sewer of Chicago.

People like Obama, Holder Michelle are beneath contempt.

TIMERUNNER
TIMERUNNER

Roberts broke his oath of office, He subverted the US Constitution. That's the point.

Now others throughout the country, because of the Roberts ruling, will began to exercise this new privilege.

tea party patriot

Jerry Vernon Woodall
Jerry Vernon Woodall

I LIKE MR LEVIN BUT I THINK THIS TIME HE IS WRONG ABOUT JUSTICE ROBERTS. ROBERTS PUT THE BALL BACK IN PLAY SO ALL. REPEAT ALL THE REPUBLICANS CAN VOTE AGAINST OBAMMA CARE BY REMOVING THE DEMS FROM THE SENATE AND CONGRESS

badbadlibs
badbadlibs

Roberts is playing a chess game with the entire American population if we are to believe you and others who support Robert's decision.

How dare he take the chance that the right people will be voted in office and repeal this law?

He has put the court in chaos as well as the entire American political system and if we return to a republic all hinges on enough people voting for the right candidates. If that's the case, if you are correct then Roberts is a bigger traitor then I ever dreamed.

scrubjay
scrubjay

Roberts is a steamer who legitimized taxing inactivity. Do as we say or you pay. He could have voted with the 4 who wanted to rule that Obamacare was unconstitutional and buried it. Instead Congress can now add to the list of inactions that will ultimately lead to a total loss of liberty.

AgentRose
AgentRose

Roberts, Romney, Bolshevism and Socialism

The Roberts' decision has already gone down in history as one of the worst decisions by the Supreme Court in U.S. history. It has shredded the Constitution a little more, if that’s possible and Roberts has been unfaithful to his oath to uphold the Constitution. We live in a time when very few Americans know anything about the Constitution and what it stands for which is spelled out in very clear language—“plain English” as they say. If you defend it as originally written you will be tarred and feathered by the left’s demonization, personal vilification, and mockery as the three lions of the court: Scalia, Alito and Thomas have experienced. Cave-in to this kind of pressure from the media (and Senator Leahy) has been alluded to in comments trying to explain Roberts’ illogical decision. Maybe when Roberts, Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Kagan and Breyer were swearing to it—they substituted “living” as in “living constitution” at regular intervals in their minds or had their fingers crossed.

But the bottom line is that the law must be repealed—in its entirety. The choice in November has Obamatax on the ballot—yes. But the underlying choice is between the Bolshevism of the radical left or the soft socialism of the Republicans---until we can take the Republican establishment over.

Jerry Vernon Woodall
Jerry Vernon Woodall

I LIKE MR LEVIN BUT I THINK HE IS WRONG THIS TIME. JUSTICE ROBERTS PUT THE BALL IN PLAY WITH IT BEING DECLARED A TAX, WE NOW HAVE A BETTER CHANCE TO REPEAL THE WHOLE THING. HE ALSO LIT A FIRE UNDER A LOT OF LAID BACK REPUBLICANS,AND NOW THEY WILL GO VOTE FOR SURE AND REMOVE AS MANY DEMOCRATS AS POSSIBLE

12grace
12grace

Roberts would have made a bigger statement by voting with the others that wanted to throw out the entire piece of trash unhealthcare mandate.

kamiller42
kamiller42

I would never support any compromise of the integrity of the Constitution for political convenience, perceived or otherwise.

Sinsonta
Sinsonta

Indeed, what Chief Justice Robert did is a total fraud. Shameful & total disgrace!!

NHConservative0221
NHConservative0221

Fred Thompson filling in for Hannity talking about how he helped get Roberts through the Senate confirmation process when Bush asked him to.

You're making me sick here Fred!!

Fred then went on to say what a disappointing decision it was... you think??

marketcomp
marketcomp

The problem is that Roberts characterized himself as a Constitutional Conservative and then completely did an about face with pressure from the media and Obama's threats. This is ridiculous and perhaps many of the Senators wont say it now Robert's really needs to be called out on this because he is toying with the future of the country and 301+million Americans. I am so proud that Mark is fighting for the Constitution because without him, Rush, Sean and a few others we would already be a socialist.

I think the Senators should drag Justice Robert's ass back from that little Island where he is said to be vacationing and ridicule him in the public square and then force him to resign. This is outrageous!

keyesforpres
keyesforpres

We don't want him to resign while Obambam is still squatting in the WH.

marketcomp
marketcomp

I hear ya, NH! But, I just hate sitting back and having the feeling of doing nothing.

12grace
12grace

Yea, Roberts is in Malta right now.

NHConservative0221
NHConservative0221

What's the difference?

He already ruled like a filthy lib on one of the biggest issues in history!

Roberts should be the most hated pos in this country!!

marketcomp
marketcomp

Yes, you are right about that. Robert's probably won't return until the next session of Supreme Court and the election will be decided by then.

Laurel
Laurel

I didn't think it possible to be this disgusted.

mike3e4r7
mike3e4r7

Yes, we need to show Robert's that his attempt at establishing a great

and historic legacy for himself have utterly backfired. Justice Roberts,

put your mind at ease. You need not concern yourself with your legacy

anymore. It has been written and can be summed up with one word - "disgrace"

T4Ut
T4Ut

"Justice Roberts, put your mind at ease. You need not concern yourself with your legacy anymore. It has been written and can be summed up with one word - "disgrace""

Justice Roberts is the Benedict Arnold of our generation!

M_J_S
M_J_S

Roberts should resign if he had any self-respect.

PapaLouie
PapaLouie

No, Roberts should be impeached for violating his oath to uphold the Constitution. Congress didn't make Obamacare a tax, Roberts did. Nowhere in the bill does it refer to the mandate as a tax, only as a penalty. Roberts rewrote the bill from the bench to make it a tax. By doing so he violated the Constitution which says that all taxes must originate in the House. The Supreme Court cannot impose a tax. Therefore Roberts, and those who joined him in his opinion, should be impeached for violating the Constitution.

12grace
12grace

Yes, Roberts was writing legislation from the bench.

M_J_S
M_J_S

I agree with you, I said if he had any self-respect. If he proves he doesn't, we should go your route.

Captain_Maynard
Captain_Maynard

Dude, the shill informs me you are now a Romney man and that you said so last week. True? Not looking for a name-calling session like he so often enjoys. Just wanted to know.

CainShouldBePotus
CainShouldBePotus

i can't go to the polls with the enthusiasm you have. It's not "Romney 2012!" for me but it's at least Romney the ABO candidate. I swore after the last election i would never plug nose again and here we are having to do it again bc not enough ppl would plug their nose the last time.And some ppl thought voting Obama would be historic. It was historic all right.

CainShouldBePotus
CainShouldBePotus

i would vote a cockroach over Obama(still support Herman Cain but you know the GOP let him get shoved out).So i will vote Romney and not just because of Obamacare but bc of Obama PERIOD. Obamacare just made it more urgent.I will always wish i could vote my first choice-Herman Cain-but i'll be darned if we let Obama totally destroy the republic(warts and all). We have to vote in huge no this time. We cannot afford to stay home this time. Plug nose if necessary. The stench from Obama is lethal.

Rshill7
Rshill7

Booyah! Don't ever question my truthfulness again.

M_J_S
M_J_S

We'll agree to disagree, but we're now on the same page.

ROMNEY 2012!

NHConservative0221
NHConservative0221

I disagree about Romney being able to win if Scotus had done the right thing. I think almost anyone could beat Maobama. ROmney had done a decent job of taking it to Maobama (look at the Solyndra thing which was very well done).

I do agree that ROmney will have to repeal this, which means we need to take the Senate too.

THe last thing I wanted was Romney to get the nomination, but even he is a million times better than Maobama!

M_J_S
M_J_S

I have no choice after the ruling, and it puts Romney in the spot (as opposed to before) where if he cares about his legacy, he will have to push repeal.

Secondly, Romney wouldn't have won before this ruling.

As you can tell, I'm not happy about supporting Romney, but I will.

M_J_S
M_J_S

I am, after this SCOUS's ruling. I anticipated a 5-4 striking down the whole damn thing. You can gloat if you wish.

Now there is no choice and I think it will rally straggling or non-committal Conservatives out there.

I still despise Romney, but after this, OBAMA MUST GO!