Midday Open Thread




Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

  • Jrusha

    I don't know what to say…..lmho……..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Judy-Wick/1135571744 Judy Wick

    If it wasn't for the news reporter, I would have thought this was a skit. In all seriousness – I hope they do catch the perp.

  • katy

    This guy in the homeboy headdress is going to have his own reality show in 5,4,3…

  • http://twitter.com/artfromtex Arthur Autrey

    the only thing raped here is the English language.

  • WELFARE DOLLARS?

    I think the “guy” in the red bandanna is “straight” and to the point.

  • KeninMontana

    Looks like some potential bad news for the administration in regards to the Gulf oil disaster, a major oops. http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/30/did-the-g…

  • washington828

    Good post! From the explosion, finding out several BP execs cashed out weeks prior and the lack of action by the administration it does not pass the truth test.
    My heart goes out to loved ones lost and it is for them that the truth must be known.

  • Tyler

    Rape is no laughing matter…but the victim's brother sure is. Haha.

  • Tyler

    On a different note…I'll post an open question here.

    I know one of the biggest issues right now is the Bush Tax Cuts expiring. Lemme make sure that I'm not missing something or haven't been misinformed by the wrong sources.

    From what I understand of these cuts, they applie only to the top 3% in the tax bracket. I hear that letting these expire will cause the recession to get worse, but who are the people who are particularly going to be affected. Can I get any specifics here because from what I understand, not everyone in the top 3% are necessarily job creators therefore they're just getting tax breaks solely because they're rich.

    I'm open to some enlightenment here.

  • http://www.okiepatriot.blogspot.com/ Greywolfe

    I'm glad you asked. According to which economist you ask, between 65 and 75% of the people affected by this will be successful small business owners that file individual tax returns instead of filing as a corporation. If these people get hit, it's a direct hit to the people who hire a majority of the people in the U.S.

    In addition, if you hit the “rich” who exactly are you looking to to fund expansions in business? I've never found a poor person yet that could afford to pay me a wage. And just for the record, my boss is one of those small businessmen that will get hammered next year.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/T6OYEMAGLEAE3MD6ZBW5P6PQ6Y Roland

    Product of you taxes at work. Public schools, Providing shelter, neutrition(sp) ,healthcare,alcohol and entertainment to free up a section of society so they can devote themselves to bettering America,our culture and the social order. Preparing for a career in liberal politics.

  • Rdwilkens

    Arthur, you win 250 internets.

  • RossW

    that was me not logged in…. but yeah, you win 250 internets! lol.

  • Tyler

    Mkay. Just making sure I wasn't supporting a senseless idea.

    Although I would like to say that one of the best ways to recover A) the economy and B) the general living standards of the average American when it comes to taxes is to instead of having different percentages for different brackets simply keep it to a flat rate for everyone whether rich or poor.

    By doing this as well as getting rid of the ability to deduct ANYTHING from your taxes…it will drastically reduce the IRS which I think everyone can agree would be a good thing.

  • http://www.okiepatriot.blogspot.com/ Greywolfe

    I like the idea of a flat tax. But if truth be told, I think that until we make a few changes (getting rid of the fed and getting rid of the IRS in favor of a national sales tax) any form of payroll tax increase right now would be devastating on any chance of recovery.

    I really don't see ANYTHING helping until we get the government back under control. The laws that were passed this last year, by themselves, have put us on the fast track to insolvency. No amount of taxation is going to fix what they've done.

    It's time the states regained their sovereignty and refused to pay a dime to the feds until the unconstitutional mandates that it keeps spewing are stopped.

  • Guest

    Sorry to see someone invading the home of these folks but OMG bandana boy is absolutely priceless and I wish I were casting a movie…he is SO for real and so animated I just love him. I think his sister is in good hands.

  • Don17000

    First of all, if these successful small business owners actually have several employees and are still not incorporated… they need to seriously get a second opinion about their accountants' skills and expertise.

    This actually sounds like classic double-talk, the juxtaposition of two separate groups so that they appear to be linked. Let me show you the divide:

    1. “between 65 and 75% of the people affected by this will be successful small business owners that file individual tax returns instead of filing as a corporation. If these people get hit,”

    3. “it's a direct hit to the people who hire a majority of the people in the U.S.”

    The juxtaposition of these statements implies that the majority of people hired in the US are employed by small business people who file as individuals, not corporations. The fact is, especially if have employees, they form corporations and pay themselves a salary and have an expense account. If the business is enjoying great success, they can do things with the business to reduce the tax bite… like upgrading phones, computers and software, invest in new rolling stock, redecorating, increase the advertising budget, sponsor community activity and goodwill.

    Second, if the taxes they pay affect their hiring practices, then the obvious question is, are they paying taxes on their business's gross revenue, or the net profit after they deduct expenses such as payroll?

    The hiring practices of businesses that are struggling might be affected… if they want to hire extra salespeople, for example, they will have to pay more in payroll taxes. If a restaurateur opens a new location, it may put him over the 50-employee threshold and subject him to FMLA, but the obvious answer to that is to simply open the new location as a separate business.

  • SirJamesBond007

    Amazing mixture of creepy and funny. I agree with Katy, Antoine is going to have his own show someday.

  • williamm

    http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6800/memo…

    Memo
    TO,
    FROM:
    Alej andro N. Mayorkas, Director
    Denise A.Venison. Polic}' and Strategy
    Roxana Bacon, Office of the Chief Counsel
    Debra A. Rogers. Field Operations
    Donald Neufeld, Service Center Operations

    u.s. Citizenship

    This memorandum offers administrative relief opt ions to promote family un ity. fOSler economic
    growth, ach ieve signi (jcant process improvements and reduce the threat of removal for certain
    individuals present in the Un ited Slates without authorization. It includes recommendations
    regarding implementation timeframes and required resources.

  • Tyler

    Who said anything about an increase? I'm talking about making everyone whether rich or poor pay the same lowered percentage. Since it's based on percentage, I think that would be best. Of course I also think the national sales tax would be the best idea.

    Yeah. I agree as well that the states need to grow a backbone and quit requesting handouts.

  • Tyler

    Sad, isn't it?