I’ve been waiting for a story like this from the Daily Caller. Sarah Palin wasn’t even ‘warm’ yet, but that didn’t stop the liberal ‘journalists’ on Journolist from conspiring to destroy her from the get go. Here’s a couple of snippets just to wet your appetite:
“Her decision to keep the Down’s baby is going to be a hugely emotional story that appeals to a vast swath of America, I think,” Donmoyer wrote.
Politico reporter Ben Adler, now an editor at Newsweek, replied, “but doesn’t leaving sad baby without its mother while she campaigns weaken that family values argument? Or will everyone be too afraid to make that point?”
Suzanne Nossel, chief of operations for Human Rights Watch, added a novel take: “I think it is and can be spun as a profoundly sexist pick. Women should feel umbrage at the idea that their votes can be attracted just by putting a woman, any woman, on the ticket no matter her qualifications or views.”
Mother Jones’s Stein loved the idea. “That’s excellent! If enough people – people on this list? – write that the pick is sexist, you’ll have the networks debating it for days. And that negates the SINGLE thing Palin brings to the ticket,” he wrote.
This is the liberal MSM that Rush has always been right about – how they conspire to defeat conservative opponents. This is why you can’t trust what you see from the MSM. They have an agenda and it permeates everything they do. Even this week I’ve noticed the MSM jumping all over Palin’s ‘refudiate’ tweet, yet when Obama pronounced corpsman as ‘corpse man’, twice, they completely ignored it. There are a lot more double standards than just that, but you get my point. My friends who scoff at me for suggesting liberal bias in the media should be eating their words now.
Click the photo below to read the whole story:
