I was hoping Santorum would have a better performance than he did. I felt that he got too technical, too defensive, and didn’t rise above the attacks like I was hoping. That said, he didn’t do a terrible job like some are suggesting and he really was attacked a lot. Overall I think he did fine, but just didn’t stand out of the crowd.

On the other hand I thought Newt did stand out of the crowd. He attacked Obama several times in a very effective way and took advantage of not being the center of attention. However, when he was the center of attention a few weeks ago, he did kinda like Santorum did tonight. So to be fair, he wasn’t attacked all that much tonight. But when he was, he was able to brush it off and make his own points.

Romney didn’t really rise above either, but I don’t think it hurt him that much. I think Newt doing well tonight, potentially taking votes away from Santorum will help him.

Ron Paul? Well, he’s just a shill for Romney at this point. He’s not attacking Romney for a reason folks. I already didn’t consider him a serious candidate, but it’s even worse now that he’s just doing Romney’s bidding.

So who do you think won?


email



Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

  • con_science

    It’s amazing how the candidates listen, often agree, and build off of Newt as long he is not a threat… this should tell us something people. Go back and watch the early debates. Fact!

  • drphibes

    Your results are always nearly the inverse of the Drudge poll.

    • Nukeman60

      That’s a compliment :)

    • TPDanbo

      That’s not surprising because Drudge lives in a parallel Universe of his own delusions!

    • falling321

      Drudge is just another media site using their polls to direct votes to the person THEY have determined the GOP candidate will be. And unfortunately, the push polls like those on Drudge are working. How on earth did the American people vote before we had hourly polling to direct our vote!?

  • http://twitter.com/bteacher99 Brenda Morton

    For once, I’d like it if “Truth, Justice, and the American Way” was the winner of a debate. We’ve taken some hard knocks in recent years, and–whether or not we find a Superman to lead us in November, I’d like America to win.

  • gothicreader

    There is something fishy with Paul not attacking Mittens. I’m not sure but Coulter was comlimentative of Paul. Also, her dislike of Newt. Unbelievable, and I wonder what he has done to her. Maybe he turned her down???? Just kidding. He has better taste.

    • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

      Ann Coulter still has a career? Huh! Imagine that.

      • FreeManWalking

        Ann Coulter, who is he?

        • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

          She’s this person who claimed to be a conservative for years, then revealed it to all be an act by supporting a liberal. Kinda sad in a way.

          • FreeManWalking

            Must be something in those Chrisy cream donuts…

            • http://twitter.com/ARTHUR_SWE ARTHUR STEINBERG

              If it have full mouth with chrisy creamy balls, then there is no much left for even mouse brains

        • http://twitter.com/ARTHUR_SWE ARTHUR STEINBERG

          It isn´t he or she , it is right in the middle, it is it !!!

          Whoaaa

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NXVHOJCQFWDDT3L5CX4DIHNOV4 Cathy

        I used to like Ann, but I think she’s really gone off the wall in many instances.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6OHPEHB4CY3X6GEGFS63DAC6MI TannerE

      Paul knows he’s not going to win over any Mittens followers… they’re opposite sides of the conservative spectrum. He attacks Santorum and Newt, because their supporters are more likely to go to someone more conservative (Paul).

      • falling321

        Paul’s goal is not to win over Romney voters…it is to pull votes from Santorum and Gingrich and to aid Romney in getting the nomination. Ron Paul understands that he has zero path to the nomination. So he has sold his supporters out and is now helping Romney. He has bet big on Romney being the GOP nominee and he has negotiated a big payout for himself and his son if their tactics succeed.

    • Sidemeat

      Ann or Calista? That’s like choosing death by alligator or crocodile.

      • xymbaline

        Since neither one will ever talk to *you*, why do you care?

  • PFFV

    Newt showed why I think he is the best candidate tonight. It will be hard for me to vote this Tuesday in our Michigan primary. Santorum has a good chance at beating Romney here in his home state and that would be huge. I just can’t rationalize voting against Newt though, he is the clear leader we need and I know it to my core. Fiddle-Stix!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      It’s a hard one, even for me, and I dislike Santorum with a passion.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1626768785 Deb Lytle V

        That’s the whole problem. Newt can’t win if you don’t vote for him! That is how Mittens has kept Newt low in the polls. He has put out that Newt was going to quit so people were afraid to vote for him. Mitten’s camp has said it isn’t about Mitten’s winning but about destroying Newt and they sure did a d*mn good job of it. The question is, who will make the best president and THAT’s who you vote for!

        • PFFV

          All well said deb :-) I am going to do some hard soul searching before Tuesday…lol.
          P.S. – I will look at the gallup tracking polls too…lol! Hee… Hee! If Gingrich doesn’t have a chance I will probably vote Santorum. But then I will be a traitor :( Boo Hoo!

        • PFFV

          All well said deb :-) I am going to do some hard soul searching before Tuesday…lol.
          P.S. – I will look at the gallup tracking polls too…lol! Hee… Hee! If Gingrich doesn’t have a chance I will probably vote Santorum. But then I will be a traitor :( Boo Hoo!

    • Sober_Thinking

      Lol… love your language! Take some time, look at all of them again, review their platforms, pray, and then go with your heart.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/K2KWQKCL33S577SI4NXYIVTCQI jose

      I don’t think Newt is going anywhere,negative ads works and they worked in Florida. Why they work? Because people would rather believe in negative ads instead of doing their own research which means lazy conservative voters. I rather take my chances and vote for Santurum rather then Mitt Romney, who is to me a livberal and not to be trusted. If he gets the nomination and then the Presidency what is there to say that he will not rule as a liberal? What is his true stripes?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Miguel-Hernandez/100002240804236 Miguel Hernandez

        Jose, Newt is going to win the nominee, he is by far the best one out there. Many Latinos/Hispanic like me are going to vote for Newt 2012. Look at the Latinos down in NY/NJ and everywhere else we latinos are leaving the DEM Plantation, we are more educated and are thinking for ourself the DEM/Machine has been brainwashing and we had enought of the B/S. If you want a winner go with Newt 2012, he will UNITE the whole party to Defeat Obama.

    • kssturgis62

      Do Not Vote Against Newt in Michigan. Santorum will probably win, but Newt is the best candidate we have, and he is the smartest man on the block. We have a chance to have our say, and I will be Voting Newt. Two strong Conservatives, they need to debate more. These issues are serious. Romney I am tired of hearing how my state is his home state. I was so little when his dad was governor, romney left at 18 and never came back. it is a joke because they said NH was his home state, and now that Romney Supports the Occupiers and wants to tax the super rich it is amazing to me how people still listen to the Obama lite.

      I get what you mean about not voting for Santorum, I like Rick S. but is he really better than Newt. No.

    • Been_There_BT

      If, in your heart. you know Newt is right, then it is an easy decision to make.
      Remember Newt needs at least 15% of the vote in Michigan to get some delegates, he doesn’t need to win there. It is a race for delegates, not states.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NXVHOJCQFWDDT3L5CX4DIHNOV4 Cathy

        We all need to rally around the Republican nominee in the end guys, America won’t survive with Dictator Obama in there four more years.

        • falling321

          I agree with you there Cathy, but we can and should fight for Newt to be that Republican nominee, because if Romney or Santorum win the nomination, Obama is going to win re-election by a landslide. Romney and Santorum are supressing the vote everywhere they campaign! Only in South Carolina, where Newt won in a landslide, have voters been motivated to come to the polls. It will be exactly the same in the general.

    • http://twitter.com/ServantCEO Anthony

      NEWT GINGRICH NEEDS TO ONLY GET TO 15% in Michigan to win vital delegates and keep momentum going to Super Tuesday. If so many Newt voters try to play a game by voting for Santorum to take out mitt, Newt will suffer on important Super Tuesday! Yes, liberal mitt does deserve a loss but in just 5 days, we could ALSO turn around the numbers to take almost all of current anti-romney votes going to Santorum, and bring them back to the person we all KNOW and can SEE would beat obama through all the 7 Lincoln Douglass style debates even if obama is allowed to have teleprompters :-) ! GO NEWT 2012! We are waiting for you here in Texas!

    • Constance

      Vote your heart and your conscience. Regardless of polls, political strategy, or what the pundits say, the primary is the time to cast your vote for who you truly believe in. If that is Gingrich, then for you, then cast your vote for Gingrich. Just my two cents.

  • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

    Anybody But Romney. If Mitt gets the nod, we lose to Obama. I refuse to support him, and hate him with a fiery passion.

    • c4pfan

      Me too! I won’t support him, period.

    • Iloveliberty71

      Wow, hate? Really?

      • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

        Yup. He’s added NOTHING to the table but his SuperPAC attack ad against Newt and Rick. And he campaigns on liberal and socialist principles. To me, Mitt is the death of the conservative movement. He MUST be stopped.

        • Ned Williams

          I disagree, and I am not a Romney supporter. Newt’s (or his allied SuperPAC’s) arguments have been more socialist/Democratic in tone and substance than have Romney’s. I think that Romney is not ideologically Conservative, but I think he would certainly be better than Obama. The question is does moderation or perceived moderation ever win presidential elections . . . I don’t think it does.

          • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

            It won’t, and it NEVER does. Mitt is a coward, a fool. And the people who support him are cowards or fools in their own right.

            • Constance

              I will make sure to wait for your words of wisdom posted here after the 2012 election, if Obama wins because people like you refused to vote for the GOP candidate. You better have some good words ready, Nathan. It’s going to take a whole bunch of intellectual hyper-speak from you and those like you to convince the rest of us that you care about our country, our country’s future, and the future of the generations to come. Start working on that post now. You will need the time.

    • Sober_Thinking

      I detest him… but I will vote for him over Maobama. I won’t like it even a little bit… but Maobama HAS TO BE DEFEATED.

      • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

        The real blame goes to the GOP establishment for attempting to throw the election. They are treating it as a farce, and WANT to lose in November. I will walk out of the Republican Party the minute Mitt gets the nomination, and never look back.

        • c4pfan

          I dare them to, because they are in for a big surprise about people going 3rd party.

          • doesnmatter

            Seriously? This is the hate the Liberals want us to foster. The only reason to detest or hate Romney is that he is beating your favorite candidate. There is nothing in his policies or rhetoric to cause that reaction. People with this “only my guy” attitude who can only denigrate another candidate instead of searching for possible reasons to support them were they the nominee are the PROBLEM with this country. They are the cause of the devisiveness. They are the collapse of the government for the “people”. They are only interested in their own agenda, rather than America as a whole.

            • M_J_S

              Conservatives are NOT coming out for Romney and that’s that. You may get some strays, or unenthusiastic “I’ll pull the lever for Romney”….that doesn’t win elections.

              The biggest message Conservatives will send is either we get a Conservative nominee, or good luck running your establishment candidate.

              Its about time for a 3rd Party in 2016 made up of Conservative Dems and Republicans on a Tea Party type platform.

              • doesnmatter

                Would definitely go 3rd party before Gingrich.

            • falling321

              Have you not been listening? It is not about “my guy”…it is “anyone but Romney”! While we all have our favorite, I hear everyone saying that they WILL rally behind anyone but Romney in the general. And yet the establishment and the media, including FOX, are determined that Romney is that GOP nominee. Which is exactly the same thing they did to McCain…until the day he actually got the nomination, they they attacked with all they had. Gingrich can stand up to those attacks, Romney will not…just as McCain did not.

              • doesnmatter

                Funny thing….he keeps winning. If EVERYONE is against him, how is that happening?

            • TPDanbo

              Spoken like a typical Romney-bot,you people are just like your leader Romney Progressives posing as Conservatives!

        • Sober_Thinking

          Yep… you’re right. 100%

          But we still need to be rid of the monster in the WH. The Tea Party will be a strong political entity (especially in 2016) and we won’t have to put up with the GOP idiots anymore. But if BO wins, America is done. This is our last, best time to save our nation. We HAVE to defeat Maobama. There is no second chance if he’s re-elected.

          • c4pfan

            I’m not supporting Mitt, period. Until he denoucnes Romneycare!

            • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

              And that won’t happen, so it’s besides the point.

              Mitt = four more years of Obama.

              • Constance

                People sitting out the 2012 election and refusing to vote = four more years of Obama

                • M_J_S

                  Continuing to support non-conservatives like Romney = 4 more years of Obama.

              • doesnmatter

                Again…ridiculous!

                • TPDanbo

                  Again…….typical Romney-bot, ignore the facts and reason just “Zombie On”.

                • doesnmatter

                  LOL!! Haven’t had this much fun in days.

            • M_J_S

              If he finally did, it was because he was forced to at gun point with Don Corleone sitting across from him. At that point it is inauthentic.

              Its too late, the ship has passed.

        • http://twitter.com/goldilockspryor CMP

          Which is why you vote for Newt as I think he is who the establishment is the most afraid of. The jig is up if he wins the nomination.

        • TPDanbo

          They see themselves as the all important power brokers in Washington(GOP Elites),and ultimately they MUST BE BROUGHT DOWN,for they are the enemies of all true Conservatives! By the way reject our choices and promote their own agenda they show their disdain for all of us!

      • M_J_S

        That’s the point, Romney will not defeat Obama. You can have my seat on the Titanic.

        • Sober_Thinking

          Lol! Great analogy.

          I agree. But I’ll go down swinging nonetheless.

        • doesnmatter

          Look at the polls. He, at least has a chance. Who is YOUR candidate?

          • M_J_S

            Newt, before that Perry.

            No non-Conservative will defeat Obama.

            • doesnmatter

              There, we can agree. (Perry). Romney is a conservative whether you like it or not.

          • falling321

            How on earth did you vote before we had these hourly polls directing us? Ignore the polls and vote for whoever YOU believe is the best candidate! Quit allowing polls to determine who our next president will be! These polls are designed to direct our vote in the direct the elite desire…don’t fall for it!

            • doesnmatter

              I would never allow polls to tell me how to vote. I have chosen two candidates I would vote for and am not afraid to list who they are: Romney and Santorum. Either one. Romney, first and Santorum second. I am one who would not vote in the election if it were between Gingrich and Obama.

              • http://twitter.com/goldilockspryor CMP

                That absolutely makes no sense at all sorry.

      • TPDanbo

        I agree Obama MUST go down, but I don’t think enough non republicans would vote for Obama-lite Romney for him to have a chance to beat Obama!And Obama would slaughter him for his many faults and flip-flopping and Mormonism.

        • Sober_Thinking

          Sadly, I have to agree. But I’ll have the peace of mind to know I didn’t go quietly into the night without a fight. :)

          • M_J_S

            I get it, but we need to fight the GOP establishment. They are “the man” that is holding us back.

            • Sober_Thinking

              I think that’s true. And I’ll happily align against them after this vote.

        • doesnmatter

          Now we are finally getting down to the truth. You hate Romney because he is a Mormon. Really? In this country where the first ammendment guarantees freedom of religion? Now you sound like Obama.

          • M_J_S

            WAAAA! Romney is a Mormon! WAAAA!

            NO jackoff, he’s a flake, a phoney, the ultimate in spineless wonders and he is NOT A CONSERVATIVE. Get it? WAAAAA!

            Him being Mormon is weird to nearly all Christians, sorry it is. If he was a solid Conservative Mormon, we’d probably have less of a problem with him.

            • doesnmatter

              Wow, really? You show your true self. Do you support Gingrich? You surely communicate like him.

          • TPDanbo

            A typical Obama attack ……..”oh your all just……racist/anti-…./homophobes/Mormonphobes/ fill in the slander blank.

  • Cindy09

    The country would be much better with a Santorum or a Gingrich Presidency!! They both have valid points when they debate rather than rehearsed rhetorics!!

    • Sober_Thinking

      Spot on!

    • http://www.facebook.com/jaspersilvis Jasper Silvis

      Exactly, that is why if Rick is high in the polls compared to Romney in a state and Newt is far behind, vote for Rick. If the rolls are reversed, vote for Newt. Let Rick and Newt have commanding leads over Romney up until the convention. Then broker a deal that would make a Gingrich/Santorum 2012 ticket, so Santorum can learn under Newt for 8 years about the technical aspects of governing this great country, then Rick can complete the mission.

      • Cindy09

        I second that!! Either of them as second to the other one would be great!!

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1039621265 Tom Liddle

          The 89 year old next door neighbor would be a better president than the one we have… Nothing against my 89 year old neighbor, just trying to make a point…

      • c4pfan

        Exactly! Mitt needs to go!

      • http://twitter.com/ServantCEO Anthony

        I also would NEVER vote for romney, anymore than I could vote for obama with an R or John Kerry/hillary clinton or Ted Kennedy with an R next to them! Santorum showed us during the debates how weak he would be compared to romney or obama! Romney would obviously LOVE to have Santorum left so he could FOCUS on taking him out with romneychannel mock channel foxnews support of 100s of millions of dollars of FREE PR & millions of dollars of negative attack ads that Newt took from mitt in Iowa, and then Florida ! It’s time we get back the person that was beating romney and who can sustain that victory all the way to his debates against obama!

        • doesnmatter

          Getting a little fed up with the “Romney is buying the election” rhetoric. If he raised more money than your candidate, then it is his to spend. That simply shows his support is better than your candidate’s. By the way, they ALL put negative ads on the Florida airways. Most people would readily agree that anyone BUT Romney had more free PR on Fox. Do you watch it or simply listen to heresay?

          • falling321

            Romney could have had the same press on Fox as any other candidate, but he was afraid to face the questions. If he can’t answer a question with one of his memorized sound bites, he starts that stammering thing he does. Just one more thing he has in common with Obama! BTW, Romney started spending millions in attack ads in Iowa…other candidates were forced to go negative BECAUSE of Romney!

            • doesnmatter

              Check your facts…..

          • TPDanbo

            I guess you hate it when FACTS get in the way of your reality, Romney has GROSSLY outspent all his opponents combined, but what I really reject is the SLEAZY POLITICS of Romney who before the campaign even started was out there slinging MUD on his running mates and his ads are by far the NASTIEST of all,just like Obama!

            • doesnmatter

              Really didn’t see any ad of Romney’s calling Newt a “liar”, etc. Not even by the SuperPac..and the facts are that he has told a couple whoppers.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

    I can’t believe there are 12 Romneybots you actually read this site and vote.

    • teri_b

      The question was “who won the debate?” NOT “who do you support?” Romney rattled Santorum and that is what was necessary to not lose any more ground.

      Just trying to be intellectually honest.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez

        So you voted for Romney?

        • teri_b

          I caucused for Santorum, but yes I voted that Romney won tonight’s debate. I thought he had a better night than Santorum and helped himself, and I didn’t think Newt had an outstanding night (he did well though) which he needed to have.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez

            fair enough just wondering.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

            You must have been watching the debate from Planet Kolob. Mittens had a meltdown tonight. The only problem is that Romney supporters will continue to vote for Romney. Mittens could have said “I’m Mitt Romney, and I just made a poopy”, and they’d still cheer hysterically for him. Nothing much we can do about it, so any damage done to the conservatives only shifts the conservative vote. From that perspective, Mitt did well. But if we judge on who offered the best ideas and fought the media off the best… well.

            • c4pfan

              Tell me about it. Romney is not a leader and is scripted to the hilt!

              • doesnmatter

                Go to a Romney rally and THEN post your remarks. You would be very surprised!

            • doesnmatter

              Again, ridiculous. Even the debate commentators agreed that Newt and Romney were the two strongest in this debate. Did you even watch it?

              • falling321

                I watched every word of the debate. And yes, Romney and Gingrich were the two strongest in the debate… BUT, if you just compare Romney’s performance to Gingrich’s performance, Romney looked like a child having a temper tantrum!

                • doesnmatter

                  Then that would be a first for Romney compared to the many Gingrich has succumbed to.

              • TPDanbo

                Hey Romney-bot don’t you ever notice almost NOBODY AGREES WITH YOUR COMMENTS HERE? WHY NOT GO BACK TO ROMNEY-LAND where you belong!

                • doesnmatter

                  Free country? Or is it just reserved for Newt-erds

      • Sober_Thinking

        Romney wouldn’t have been able to “rattle” Santorum alone, without the help he received.

        Santorum deserves the digs because of some of his history. And to be intellectually honest, all the leaders have been gang-banged over the history of this debate.

        Romney did just enough, once again, to get by and keep his status quo. Santorum got cut by two gloves tonight.

      • TPDanbo

        How about Romney’s stuuuuuuuttteringggggg performance?

      • falling321

        Romney did rattle Santorum, but he could not have done it without Ron Paul’s help. Apparently Romney and RP DO make a good team…who knew!!! And while Romney and Paul may have rattled Santorum, Romney came off looking foolish with all his stammering, stuttering and interrupting. Only Gingrich look good.

      • TPDanbo

        Frankly these debates hardly move many peoples opinions that much at all, they are mostly for show!

  • c4pfan

    I’m hoping Sarah!:)

    I like that Santorum went after Romneycare like it should and that Mitt used Gov money to start it.

  • http://twitter.com/SuePelfrey Sue Pelfrey

    Go Newt! We need you!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez

    Santorum took some hits but he hit back, his counters were better Mitt’s attacks IMO and he got some help with Newt kicking Mitt in the shins defending Rick on a couple of issues.

    Conservatives will argue who won the debate Rick or Newt but the pundits are going to say Romney won, hopefully that’s a good thing, voters usually do the opposite.

    • Sober_Thinking

      Good points… agreed.

    • M_J_S

      I’d like it if Newt or Santorum just chuckled every time Mitt says he’s “a Conservative”.

  • http://twitter.com/ServantCEO Anthony

    PRESIDENT NEWT GINGRICH would be a powerful force for good in 2013 LORD Willing :-) !

    • doesnmatter

      Really wonder if with his track record, the Lord is on his side?

  • odin147

    newt made a profound point tonight that I hope the conservatives took notice of, that given that we are all staring at the abyss many of us wish that we were more conservative the past 25 yrs than we were…i think newt can change people’s minds and describe why conservatism is the only solution left before we fall of the clif…

    • M_J_S

      Yes! The difference between Newt and Santorum is that Newt doesn’t usually get lost in the weeds and makes people think about things differently.

      • cabensg

        Lost in the weeds describes it exactly. Romney and Santorum both tried to get in every platitude known to man in every answer instead of answering the question and maybe adding something relevant to the question. Compared to Newt its’ absolutely maddening to have to listen to either of them. I’ve tried to imagine either of them giving a state of the Union address or a press conference and I cringe at the thought.

  • stage9

    No one won tonight. No one stood out and no one separated from the others. Frankly it is all subjective.

    • PFFV

      I disagree, Newt won this hands down. I understand people have their favorite candidate that they want to be victorious but Newt was the only one ready to challenge the moderator (again), he was very clear and concise on all his solutions/responses. Newt 2012!

      • FreeManWalking

        I counted at least 3 time when Newt was interrupted by both Santorum and Romney when he was positioning a response to Jon.

        It was almost like they knew he was going to hit another one out of the park and they were jumping in front of the ball.

      • doesnmatter

        Challenging the moderator has nothing to do with the issues. That’s where he went wrong before.

    • http://twitter.com/PoeAllen Allen Poe

      Terible, isn’t it , when your man, fails?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      You must have been watching from China. I hope you realize that they censor the debate in real time over there.

  • Iloveliberty71

    The assertion that Ron Paul is a “shill” for Mitt Romney is patently absurd. They share virtually nothing other than the fact that they have both been married to their high school sweethearts forever and each have five kids. Did you hear their positions regarding Iran tonight in the debate?! They could not be more opposite. Romney wants crippling sanctions and preemptive attacks, Paul wants diplomacy and trade.

    Why can’t people see that Ron Paul’s strategy is and always has been to get the race down to between himself and Romney? That’s all there is to it, folks. Nothing more. If you look at the real delegate count, rather than the “wins” by state, you will see that it is happening exactly as he planned.

    • KenInMontana

      Current delegate count as of today:

      Current delegate count:**

      Mitt Romney: 123

      Rick Santorum:72

      Newt Gingrich:32

      Ron Paul: 19

      Jon Huntsman: 2

      Total delegates needed for nomination:1144
      http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/2012/02/21/20120221GOP-delegate-count-primary-schedule-romney-santorum-paul-gingrich.html

      Seems that “plan” isn’t quite going according to plan.

      • FreeManWalking

        There is quite a difference in individual and total count from AZCENTRAL and RCP. 248 vs 200

        http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html

        50 of Florida should end up as proportioned instead of WTA.

        37 of Santorums on the RCP site are Non-Binding Caucus and aren’t necessarily awarded to him.

        Delegates Romney Santorum Gingrich Paul
        Total - 2,286 99 47 32 20
        Iowa Jan 3 28 6 7 0 0
        New Hampshire Jan 10 12* 7 0 0 3
        South Carolina Jan 21 25* 2 0 23 0
        Florida Jan 31 50* 50 0 0 0
        Nevada Feb 4 28 14 3 6 5
        Minnesota Feb 7 40 2 17 1 4
        Colorado Feb 7 36 9 17 2 1
        Maine Feb 11 24 9 3 0 7

        • KenInMontana

          Florida would probably explain the difference in the numbers. As I told another poster, I am aware of how the caucus system works, any count out there will likely “assign” even the delegates of a caucus state to either the candidate that won the vote or apportion them for the sake of hedging. As well as supporters of candidates will try quibbling over numbers and how they could, might, possibly be awarded to their candidate of choice. Whether or not Florida ends up being apportioned is anyone’s guess, but likely will be sorted out by the time of the convention. I suspect after Super Tuesday there will be some major changes to the “order” of candidates, I suspect (and hope) it will be a disappointing day for mittens.

      • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn

        The story doesn’t tell all the facts. Romney outspent in Florida by 65:1 ratio. Also known as ‘carpetbombing.’ Romney also got a bogus head start by being wrongly awarded Iowa out of the gate which pushed the electability meme. Had Santorum rightfully been given Iowa, Romney’s strong start might not have been so though he likely would have won Florida. Ron Paul is also throwing grenades on behalf of Romney, even in Michigan where he is nowhere to be found.

        This thing is far from over.

      • Iloveliberty71

        You forgot this part from your link:

        **Total delegates include pledged and unpledged delegates. Pledged delegates are won via primaries and caucuses. For some states that hold caucuses, AP makes projections based on how many delegates a candidate will receive at a state or congressional district convention (which choose delegates to the national convention) should a candidate maintain the same amount of support won at the local level. Unpledged delegates are Republican National Committee members who are not bound by the results of their state’s primary or caucus and are free to support any candidate. Those totals are based on AP interviews.

        The state conventions for states such as Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota and Maine are not until several months from now. The Paul campaign believes they are a close second to Romney in delegates, and CNN’s John King agreed with Paul on this after the debate last night.

        • KenInMontana

          No I didn’t forget it, I simply posted the link so people could look at it for themselves, rather than clutter up the thread with pasting the entire article, unlike many shills for particular candidates that post claims with nothing to back it up. I am fully aware how the caucuses work and how the delegates are assigned and pledged.

          So no, I did not forget or leave anything out.

      • shawn S

        Did Romney get all 50 from Florida?

        • KenInMontana

          I am aware of that as well.

  • http://twitter.com/MSREDMAMA1 MSBIGREDMAMA1

    GO DO Your research , newt is the best one out there , go to http://www.newt.org and look around there are videos of himback in the day go to his facebook page. look for get the facts there are alot of video he done back in the day of the 90′ look for the one on farly the comedian went to the senat he did an impersonation of newt was funny . but just do your research … vote for new he is the better choice, romney will be like obama no matter what he says. he really does not care about mich. all i remember is mayor colman young from mich LOl. and ted nugent LOl.. please do not listen to the media they picked romney for us to vote for , nope not going to happen stop listening to them please . that is what they want you to do just like they did with obama. we have to tell them we are the ones to chose not the media .. vote newt please :)

    • con_science

      Research. Our future depends on us understanding our candidates history.

    • doesnmatter

      Looks like a commercial to me. Speaking of hate ads, several of you are running them right here. You really should do your research on ALL candidates. Not sure you are getting an unbiased view by going to Newt.com. Paid for by New Gingrich.

  • JoelDick

    Rick Perry?

    • http://twitter.com/PoeAllen Allen Poe

      Ju know, the man with the plan that works, the history that proves his worth.

  • lambfound

    I think it’s time to take Newt off the polling question.

    • Is_Sense_Common

      ?????????

    • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn

      Adelson is considering giving Newt $100 Million dollars. Numbnutz Wrong Paul is who needs to come off the ballot.

    • Been_There_BT

      “I think”

      I disagree, since thinking is a rational process!

  • Molly Pitcher

    Newt was characterized by media commentators after the debate as:
    THE STATESMAN. In the One Word requirement, Newt described himself as “Cheerful”. He’s the man for all seasons, to get the job done in all conditions, and I believe Arizonans watching tonight would have recognized this, as well. The “politicians” revealed themselves. Newt “was himself”, and came out recognized as a true Statesman.

    • cabensg

      Everybody answered so serious then Newt said “cheerful”. I thought that was hilarious.

      He refused to go along with the moderators stupid question…again.

      • c4pfan

        Then why did he whine that there isn’t another debate?

        • falling321

          You must mean his reference to the cowards, Romney, Santorum and Paul who are afraid to debate Newt just before Super Tuesday….poor cowards don’t like looking like fools on national tv I guess.

  • Jim Botts

    I can’t believe Santorum tried to defend earmarks….. He obviously didn’t learn a darn thing from his 18 point loss in 2006. Hey Rick, a lot of good those bribes (*cough* earmarks) did in your 2006 campaign….. In fact, what did earmarks and pork spending do for the GOP as a whole after 2006? NOTHING!!! YOU LOST BIG IN 2006 AND AGAIN IN 2008. SO STOP DOING IT!

    • c4pfan

      Ask Ron Paul and Mitt Romney that question.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez

      Romney is for earmarks just not Santorum earmarks.

      • doesnmatter

        Again, ridiculous. Look at the voting record!

    • Iloveliberty71

      Earmarks are good…they show how money will be spent by Congress (rather than by the executive branch) within appropriations bills.

      Unfortunately, Santorum voted for the spending bills that contained the earmarks. That is bad.

      • doesnmatter

        Earmarks are NOT good. They are attached to a bill rather than being voted on for their own merit. Their entire future depends on the passage of the bill. The main problem with them is that they cause corruption. Look at all the earmarks attached to the 2000+ page health bill. How much of that was directly related to Health Care and how much of it was earmarks tucked in the margins? Then, the question is: how many who voted for Obama Care did so to get their own earmark passed? There lies the corruption. More and more of it comes out as ObamaCare gets put into place.

    • Sober_Thinking

      Santorum subscribes to this blog? Bonus!

  • Sober_Thinking

    One thing is clear… America lost when CNN asked the questions. Birth control again? Wow…

  • FreeManWalking

    The Common fault Romney and Santorum have is they can’t admit a mistake, unlike Paul who doesn’t make any.

    They both feel they have to defend the decisions or votes they have made no mater how bad.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez

      what are you talking about Santorum has admitted mistakes.

      • FreeManWalking

        Sorry, I must have missed them.

    • stage9

      You must have tuned in late…Santorum admitted mistakes tonight. No child left behind was just one. He said he took one for the team — for Bush.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      I was thinking the same thing for awhile now. A few people were surprised about Santorum’s earmark talk tonight, but I wasn’t. The real solution is just to admit he made a mistake and declare that he’ll veto earmarks going forward.

  • capelady

    It is pretty clear that Romney and Paul have come to some sort of agreement and Mark Levin was questioning awhile ago just what that might be.. there was some talk about Paul not attacking Romney (because clearly he never does!) if he gets speech time at the convention… doesn’t seem like much of a gain for Paul – but now they are floating the idea that perhaps Romney will select Rand Paul as his VP to give him some clout with the TEA Party, etc… interesting idea.

    I am 100% for Newt because he is uniquely qualified to lead America away from the brink and restore our Constitutional Republic. He has the knowledge, the experience making things happen in Washington (which requires political saavy) and the fearlessness we need to beat Obama and turn Washington upside down! He sees the big picture and has substantive solutions for energy policy, immigration, bringing the judiciary back under the Constitution and restoring power to the states.

    Romney would be better than Obama because he is not a Marxist, but he has no conservative convictions – he would only manage the decline – and unless is he offering a prepared speech he is a lousy communicator – he stumbles all over – its embarrassing!!!

    Newt just created a 30 minute ad to present his energy policy, etc… and he discarded the script and spoke right off the top of his head! No teleprompter folks… the man is brilliant and he can inspire Americans to believe in the future again!!!

    • Nukeman60

      :( Just great. Romney/Rand Paul ticket. It will look just like ’08 when I liked the VP a lot, but hated the top spot. Looks like I’ll have to head for the fallout shelter again. Oh, well. I’m glad I live in Illinois, where my only choice is Obama. I don’t feel so bad, then.

    • FreeManWalking

      I like Rand Paul, but I fail to see what advantage he would bring as Veep to any of the candidates.

      • c4pfan

        He would bring nothing.

        • doesnmatter

          Hater.

    • Dessic

      Ron Paul ‘never attacks’ Romney? In his second ad of the campaign season he compared via imagery Romney and Obama as two ‘smooth-talking politicians.’

      • c4pfan

        And he still didn’t win anything.

    • http://twitter.com/ServantCEO Anthony

      capelady, remember Iowa when both romney and paul joined at the hip to throw out millions of dollars of negative attack ads at our conservative leader Newt Gingrich, which ended up giving santorum a chance to come up as they killed and suppressed the GOP conservative fire of 2010! santorum is ONLY the beneficiary of those 2 attacking Newt, cause they KNOW they can take out rick easily but as Newt showed us in South Carolina, he not only can win BIG, but he will increase turnout by 35%, while romney will kill GOP turnout by up to 25% (i.e. Nevada/Florida)!

    • doesnmatter

      Hello, people! Check your facts. Ron Paul has attacked the front runner in every debate and pre-caucus agenda.

      Santorum was the front-runner “in the middle of the stage” for this debate.

      If Ron Paul was taking it easy on Romney, maybe, just maybe that is where his closest convictions lie. There would be nothing wrong with that, either.

  • Nukeman60

    At the Romney standard of $125/vote, Mitt only needs $53,125 to win this poll.

    • FreeManWalking

      Send my check to
      Sir Nobody
      123 Anystreet
      Anytown, America

      Woe Willard Woe

  • Sober_Thinking

    Santorum was kicked around a lot tonight… I guess it’s to be expected because of some of his history and because he’s rocketed to the front. He did okay but was clearly beaten up.

    But I never expected Ron Paul to go after him as bad as he did tonight… he’s always had it in for Rick but tonight he was all but pushing a knife into him. And of course, that opened the door for mittens to pile on too. No one can convince me that this wasn’t coordinated. RP didn’t even say a single thing bad about Romney – arguably the worst candidate in this race.

    Newt stood out and did the best overall. He once again said all the right things – in the right way. Respect.

    • falling321

      Ron Paul is helping Mittens do the dirty work. RP knows he isn’t going to win, but his ego will not let him sit down, so we will have to listen to his insanity for a long time toe come. I don’t know what kind of deal he made with Romney, but it has become obvious that RP sold his supporters out for some kind of payoff from Romney.

      • Iloveliberty71

        Not true at all. Ron Paul is preventing Romney from running away with the nomination. Even if you don’t like Ron Paul, if you don’t want Romney to be the nominee, Ron Paul is your friend.

        • NCHokie02

          Ron Paul is the one preventing Romney running away with the election?? I think that Santorum and Newt are splitting the vote and preventing either one to beat Romney. Paul factors in there but not to the extent that if it weren’t for Ron Paul, Romney would already have won the nomination like you suggest. And it seems that Ron Paul is in the Romney camp. He has adds in MI targeting Santorum who is beating Romney there. Paul isn’t even in contention for MI so why is he only targeting Santorum?? Especially if he doesn’t care for Romney. Where are his attacks on him? Ron Paul can stay in the race and keep his arguments at the front and in the media but he will never win the nomination. Thats just a fact. Perhaps if he let go of the “bring all the troops home and leave everyone else in the world alone” talk he would do better. There are better ways to say what he believes in for foreign policy than just “bring all the troops home”. Perhaps if he said “we need to take a serious look at where we can drawdown our military stationed throughout the world.” he would do better.

        • falling321

          I know it isn’t fun for RP’s supporters to think about, but you HAVE been betrayed. And I don’t even blame RP for wanting the GOP to give him a roll in the coming administration. I understand that he feels ignored and I understand that on many fiscal issues he has been correct over the years, but just as he puts earmarks in bills he knows will pass without his vote and then votes against them, he is now saying one thing and doing another behind the scenes. The truth is that while RP is more trustworth than most politicians, in the end he IS just another life long politician…and right now he wants some recognition for himself and/or his son.

      • Sober_Thinking

        There’s no hard evidence of this (yet)… but circumstantially, he looks guilty as sin.

        If I were an RP supporter, I’d be livid.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Paul-Michetti/100000502847737 Paul Michetti

    RON PAUL

  • http://twitter.com/Professor_Why Professor Why

    My personal ranking of the candidates at this moment (NOTE: all rankings are personal choices):

    1. Newt Gingrich
    2. Rick Santorum
    3. Zombie Reagan
    4. Abe Lincoln, Vampire Killer
    5. Mickey Mouse
    6. Ron Paul
    7. The stuff on the bottom of a rock
    8. Willard “Mitt” Romney

    Your mileage may vary… ;)

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez

      lol funny ranking after the first two.

      • http://twitter.com/Professor_Why Professor Why

        Well, I would’ve put Zombie Reagan higher, because his economic policy would’ve been great… But there’s that little problem with him constantly wanting to eat people’s brains, and that would’ve been a bit upsetting to the general voting public… so, 3rd place it was! ;)

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Valdez/1806887704 Steven Valdez

          The stuff on the bottom of a rock before Romney made me chuckle. ;)

          • doesnmatter

            Your own attack ad. You should be ashamed…and I’ll bet you call yourself a Christian.

    • stage9

      Who’s Ron Paul?

      • http://twitter.com/Professor_Why Professor Why

        I heard he might be running for President… Might be a rumor, though… ;)

        • stage9

          OHHHHHH the Iranian guy! Oh ok, I got it now. lol.

        • falling321

          I’m thinking he is just a sick joke the GOP is playing on the rest of us! Why on earth has he been allowed to be in the debates in the first place?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Drew/1272002736 Tim Drew

            Because he is the only one that can beat Obama, go look at the state polls that have them two against each other, Ron Paul wins. Ron Paul has stolen a ton of Obama supporters, he is the only GOP candidate that democrats will vote for and the republicans will vote for him just so Obama dosent win. Another reason Ron Paul is the only one that can beat Obama is that even if he dosent win the nomination his supporters will not vote for Newt/Mitt/Rick no matter what, they will write him in. So if the republicans do not want 4 more years of Obama, they will vote Ron Paul.

            • falling321

              Apparently you haven’t noticed, but Ron Paul cannot beat ANYONE, not even in the primaries! He has run three times and has yet to win a single state. If his supporters think a write in vote will even be noticed they are just foolish! Most states do not even look at write in votes as they are not allowed in either the primary or the general election, unless the candidate has gone through the proper channels and declared a write in candidacy, which RP has not done in any of the primary states. And he won’t do it in the general or he will lose all negotiating power he has gained with his primary delegates.
              So go ahead and give Obama an unopposed vote by wasting yours…but it won’t endear your candidate to anyone. This attempt at blackmail is one very good reason your candidate has not won even a single state!

    • cabensg

      Good one! Another good laugh for the evening. Thanks!!!!!!!

      • http://twitter.com/Professor_Why Professor Why

        Thank you! I’ll be here all week… Remember to tip your waitress, and remember to try the veal!

  • http://www.facebook.com/JeffBowman.NC Jeff Bowman

    SERIOUSLY?! You have a poll of a debate with 4 men, and you only include three of them on your poll! YOU are the loser here!! Your bias is unfathomable! RIDICULOUS!!

    • stage9

      Who was the fourth? There was Rick Santorum. Newt Gingrich. Obamney and some old guy on Geritol sitting at the end who wouldn’t wake up.

      • FreeManWalking

        Rick Perry, didn’t you see the camera pan on him. But since he didn’t say anything of substance SCOOP left him off the ballot.

        • stage9

          Rick Perry….Rick Perry…hmmm name sounds familiar…..

        • cabensg

          That reminds me of when they were talking about the fence on the border and the moderator told Newt that Perry had commented he didn’t think a 35 ft fence would help because all they needed was a 35 ft ladder. Newt said he agreed but wanted a double fence so they’d need two 35 foot ladders. The camera panned to Perry and he was laughing his head off.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      It’s because Paulbots from all across the internet spam the poll here, even when they don’t spend any significant time on the site. I agree with it.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6OHPEHB4CY3X6GEGFS63DAC6MI TannerE

        I’m a semi-regular to the site… used to be a regular-regular back when he had episodes of Stossel and Beck. Unfortunately, now the site is quickly becoming a pep-rally for progressive republicans.

  • JudyPaulette

    Was it my imagintion or did Ron Paul shake hands with Rick and Mitt, but not
    with Newt during the intros? I was expecting him to bypass Rick and shake the
    other two’s.

    Not that important and perhaps it has happened before and I just didn’t notice.

    • c4pfan

      I don’t know. Paul is a big dissapointment.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steve-Angell/100001860262545 Steve Angell

    This is such a game.

    Sure Newt attacked the moderator with cause. But that only works once to bring you up in the polls. From then on it is figured into the equation. His Moon Colony idea was so loony tunes that he will never get over that. That is what Democrats do not Conservatives. Kennedy did that to get funding for liberal ideas and it worked. It is not what we need these days. A prize for the most human robot perhaps but not a space shot. We know about space now. A colony would accomplish nothing but spending money.

    But as always he did well.

    Mitt lost this big time though. He was shot down and even ended up admitting that contrary to his earlier debate statement Catholics had to shut down their adoption services because of Gay Right issues Mitt promised to obtain and did obtain. He also admitted he raised fees and taxes and that balancing the budget did not count as he was required to do so by the Mass Constitution. He also admitted his 800 vetoes were meaningless as they were all overridden. Mitts record is just what he ran on “Liberal Moderate” all of it is every day in office he governed that way. He appointed the Board that did Abortion thus he is responsible.

    • FreeManWalking

      I missed a few minutes so I missed his attack on the Moderator tonight.

      I did catch him attack 0b0 on favoring infanticide and the media for not pointing it out or questioning him on it in 2008.

      This is how he will turn some of the gotcha question back on 0b0 in the general.

    • http://twitter.com/strngernfiction strangernfiction

      He also admitted he raised fees and taxes and that balancing the budget did not count as he was required to do so by the Mass Constitution.

      ——————————–

      The line about Dukakis was nice. I’m surprised this point was not made in an earlier debate, maybe I missed it.

    • doesnmatter

      Everything you said here is totally skewed. THINK before you talk.

  • c4pfan

    A VP is not going to change anything for Mitt Romney! I don’t care who it is, unless we end up wishing someone would die in order for someone to take over.

    VPs don’t matter as much as people make them out to be anymore. People have moved so much in their lives that where a VP is from means diddley.

    Romney is going to throw out every Tea Party/Conservative name out there is pathetic.

  • c4pfan

    Don’t agree at all. Who do you think created the taking Soc Sec off the budget?

    • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn

      Who is the only one on the stage that has ever been responsible for balancing a federal budget at a particularly tumultuous time in history?

      • c4pfan

        By taking Social Security off the budget and created the earmark trend.

        Worked with Peolsi and created a Contract With The Earth?

  • c4pfan

    Newt HAD his chance! He focused on Bain Capital and Bain Capital and Bain Captial for like 3 debates straight.

    • Been_There_BT

      Fact Check – There you go again.

  • Jim Gilman

    I think a deal has been made. Ron paul to the Fed, Rand Paul for VP. Top story on the Daily Caller.

    • c4pfan

      Then they will really loose.

    • falling321

      I won’t go so far as to say a deal has actuallly been made, but RP has no path to the nomination and is just staying in hoping to buy some kind of power with his delegates…and he obviously thinks Romney is the guy to bribe.

  • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn

    NewsMax documented that Romney and his RomneyPac spent $55 Million in negative ads this election so far… most of it aimed at Newt.
    http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/romney-negative-ads-santorum/2012/02/22/id/430193

    • http://twitter.com/ServantCEO Anthony

      the most underreported story in the news has been how much romney has killed the GOP voter turnout and the TEA party conservative revolution that helped us grow our wins across the nation in 2010! NEWT on the other hand increased voter turnout by 35% when lying romney’s attack ads failed to fool the GOP voters like in South Carolina! It’s time we kick the rinos out of the GOP and let romney go into bed with obama like santorum’s guy arlen specter did when he passed obamacare!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1039621265 Tom Liddle

      and the reason for Newt being the target? Even Mittens knows Newt’s the strongest of the four to win a race against BHO…

  • Sheya

    Scoop, your post read my mind. Newt won, Santorum could have done a better job but he was put on the defensive to much so he didn’t really have any good moments to shine. Romney leaves as he came in. Newt will get a bump out of this which means he slices votes off Santorum which by default helps Romney.

    Newt needed to saw up Georgia tonight I think he did it. Romney needed to move Michigan back to his column I think he accomplished that. Santorum needed to keep his momentum going I think he failed to do that. Paul? Well he needed to be Paul and he did just that.

    By not doing what he needed to do Santorum loses this round, Newt obviously won, Romney doesn’t care whether he won or lost as long as it wasn’t Santorum who did.

    All in all a great night for Newt a good night for Romney and a should have been better for Santorum.

    • GraceKnows

      “Newt will get a bump out of this which means he slices votes off Santorum which by default helps Romney.”

      I’m not so sure that Rick’s poor performance would send more votes to Romney. You have to factor Newt’s really great performance into winning more votes for Newt. I don’t think Newt is undercutting Santorum so much as Santorum is undercutting his own votes. And… for a lot of Rick supporters, Newt would be the alternative choice, anyway. What do you think?

  • http://twitter.com/CharlieZangelQQ DaMz

    Gotta give it to Newt, he looked the best from what I watched. (about half)

    But I’m still a Santorum girl . Debates dont make POTUS, just part of it.

    = )

    • c4pfan

      When is Mitt going to be gone after?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JT6RK4NQME54FA3FVYTTHLTRTQ Southnsoul

    This was not a good debate for Santorum. And I was actually hoping he would do well. I’m afraid it may cost him a win in Michigan. He was floundering and stammering too much and didn’t appear presidential in the least. Newt was clearly the best in his answers and how he answered them. He was once again the adult in the room. I’ll still take either of these men over Romney.

    • c4pfan

      I don’t agree. Compared to Newt after his win in SC?

  • 1861now

    What’s the name of the asshole that wrote this POS?

    • KenInMontana

      Bye troll.

  • http://www.facebook.com/russrevoir Russ Nelson

    Oh revoke my privileges this site is chickenshit head games, who won the you don’t even list the winner as a choice. Same bullshit I have come to expect, please dome a favor and revoke me from this site.As if I ever want to come back here.

    • FreeManWalking

      Sometimes you just have to agree with the RP supporters. By Russ

      • Nukeman60

        Don’t you find it ironic that he is here, on this site, screaming that he wants to be taken off this site. Perhaps we need to pass a government mandate for him, to force him to stop typing. Or give him an entitlement that automatically shuts his keyboard down when he’s had enough. Make it do it for him. Yeah, that’s it. $6 billion subsidy.

        • FreeManWalking

          Just like Ron Paul, put the Pork in the bill and vote against, this guy rails on and dares the moderator to ban him. I say good reddens.

          • Nukeman60

            Either way, he loses. If the moderators ban him, he can’t respond. If they don’t, he’s stuck here listening to us. Seems like he’s created his own pergatory :) Of course, if you look at his activity, he only had one comment. So, it was a drive-by anyway.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      I didn’t even see Ron Paul at this debate. How could he have won it?

    • falling321

      This is why people discount RP supporters. Clearly RP was barely involved in this debate, he offered nothing new, he appeared to be asleep most of the debate and yet his supporters are angry that everyone won’t admit their guy “won”. So far RP has not won ANYTHING! Not a debate, not a primary. He has zero path to the nomination, he is just gathering delegates, hoping for a brokered convention where he will trade his delegates for some recognition for himself and/or Rand.

  • grimjesse

    I haven’t watched the debate yet, but I checked Drudge. Look at the lead story and picture. It is very clear to me that Matt Drudge wants to make Man-Love with Mittens. It’s really laughable at this point, he finds the ugliest or weirdest pics of Newt and now Santorum. Basically he gives every Romney opponent the ‘Hillary treatment’. Then Drudge gives Romney the Obama style Adoration treatment. Scroll down to see the Coulter story and you see another Romney pic, from a low angle, backed against the sky, very Obama-ish.
    Not to mention the garbage story about ‘Palin aides lash out’. Drudge is miffed at Sarah for failing to endorse Mitt.
    After this primary, I’ll never look at Drudge the same way. There’s a lot of that going around.

    • FreeManWalking

      Your description makes me want to go look at drudge, NOT.

    • Dessic

      Rather like the photoshopped pictures of Ron Paul here. Disagreeing with a candidate’s policies is fine, but they should all be treated with the same amount of respect.

    • nibblesyble

      man-love lol!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000476346024 Kevan Webb

    So why cannot I vote for Ron Paul

    • Dessic

      Personal bias. Ron Paul could be the GOP nominee and presidential polls on this site would only allow you to select Obama.

      • Nukeman60

        That’s right. It doesn’t change the reason. So why don’t you state the real reason. TRS has stated it many times.

    • c4pfan

      Because, he hasn’t won anything but spammed polls.

    • Nukeman60

      Look at the Drudge poll. Do you really think a majority of people want Paul, like the poll shows? If so, why is he not winning any states primaries?

      • FreeManWalking

        who’s Drudge?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      Because Ron Paul sucks, and Ron Paul supporters from all across the internet will spam the counter, even though they might not have even watched the debate or even heard of this website before.

  • c4pfan

    I want a person to go after Romney for Romneycare and only Santorum does it.

    Even Newt is for mandates.

    • Been_There_BT

      No he isn’t and cheap shots at Newt won’t change the outcome of the debate.

  • c4pfan

    Yeah, I would put in an ad that Mitt admitted that it was in the state’s constitution to balance the budget.

    • xymbaline

      I don’t think anyone particularly cares what you’d do.

  • falling321

    Romney and Santorum talk and talk and talk and when they are done all you know is that they don’t support what they voted for or said in the past. Gingrich talks and you get an education! If you haven’t seen his new video describing his energy plans, take the time to watch…it is excellent.

    • Dessic

      I’m curious how Newt can expect to balance the federal budget while invading Iran and setting up colonies on the moon so we can make it the 51st state.

      • Been_There_BT

        Check out his energy policy and his plans to reduce government spending, then you’ll figure it out.

        • Rightstuff1

          Dessic isn’t interested in debate just lobbing missiles….am I right Dessic…ated ???

      • FreeManWalking

        If you listened to Newt or did some research, you would know he proposes 80-90 percent private enterprise space program.

        • c4pfan

          Sounds just like those Environmental wackos and Green Energy.

      • falling321

        First, if we had a strong president who understood America’s role as the world’s super power, we will not have to invade Iran. I know the issue is very complex and your comment shows that you probably don’t understand how the world really works, but at least you are trying.

        BTW, did you know that almost every one of our modern technological advances sprang from our space program? And did you know that the moon is rich in Helium-3, which sits right on top of the moon’s surface and would be easy for a colony of workers to load onto a space shuttle and send back to earth? And did you know that He-3 contains so much energy that it would require only 20 tons to supply all the current electrical needs of the United States for a year? And did you know that there is a theory (all workable new ideas begin with theory) that giant mirrors could be used to focus the sun’s rays and direct them back to collection points here on earth, again suppling much of the world’s energy forever? And did you know that China is now working on projects using both? Today we waste our money purchasing oil from nations that hate us when we could simply use our own…do you really want to rely on China or Russia to supply us with the energy of the future? An active space program is vital for the future of our country and our children.

      • Rightstuff1

        Oh my Dessic. Wow! Those are big questions indeed. Wow, you’re right and I stand corrected those two alone defeat any proposition of balancing the federal budget. Who said he wanted to invade Iran? Oh wait you just did but Newt didn’t. Strike 1. Now the space colony idea….that will be financed partly by private money…but wait we could always wait for the Chinese to do it first – Strike 2.

        Are you a Paul-bot by any chance? Just wondering…..

        By the way he successfully balanced the budget for 4 years. That is an historical fact. Let’s see who else has done that in the last 50 years??? Can I have some names from you?

        Go Newt !!

    • c4pfan

      LMBO. THEY ALL took these ideas from Sarah anyway. Geez.

      • xymbaline

        Look, we love Sarah, too, but please use your brain.

        The US Space Program was well underway before Sarah was even born.

        When we landed on the Moon, she was 5 years old.

    • doesnmatter

      Gingrich talks and you feel like you are slapped in the face. This last debate was a good one for him, but his volatility still remains. He attacks the person, not their policies whenever he gets irritated. Is this really the person you want in charge of the United States’ relations with other countries?

      • falling321

        Absolutely this is the person I want in charge of the US relations with other countries! No one else in the race, including Obama, has the ability to stand up to our enemies and work with our friends. As for personal attacks…have you seen any of Obama’s ads from 2008 against Hillary during the primary or McCain during the general? Did you see Romney’s attack ads in Iowa, NH, SC, FL and now Michigan? Millions in attack ads and not one dime spent defending his policies! Even RP has been making personal attacks in ads and every during the debate. Gingrich has some serious plans and he is definitely the smartest man in the room, no matter which room that might be, so once again…YES I want him in the White House!

        • doesnmatter

          Absolutely untrue. Not all Romney’s money was spent on attack ads. Super Pac ads from all candidates are mostly attack ads. If you saw the ads, you know this.

  • http://twitter.com/goldilockspryor CMP

    I make no secret that I was a Perry person and switched to Newt and tonight reaffirmed why. He was the only one who kept focus on Obama and kept bringing back the other nominees to the correct focus. His responses to the pettiness that was Romney and Santorum was like a breath of fresh Conservative air. I thought Romney did okay, like he usually does, manages to deflect and dodge. But Santorum was really not good. I kind of felt sorry for him and had that sinking feeling like I had watching Newt in Florida. I am glad Newt did well and take no joy in Santorum’s struggles.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AA76CAC5DPQNUEARQKUNYUHCJM Benjamin A

    This is an absolute joke. Ron Paul all the way!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Jones/100001374595021 Richard Jones

    I feel the same as I always have felt.

    Newt is head and shoulders above the other 3, PERIOD !

    All things being equal (money and looks), and media not trying to destroy him including some conservatives, it would be no contest, even against OBUMMER.

    Thanks to “people” like GENNY BECKSTER (and Anne C) workinig with the LAME STREAM MEDIA, NEWT is still hanging in there, thank you very miuck you POSs’ (HUCKSTER AND ANNE).

    Mitt is just a rich guy whose turn it is who can only won by trashing every challenger,
    Rick is at best a VP possible, but I would make him a cabinet member, and Ron Paul is
    just a crackpot.

    If we could go back in time and change a hundred things differently, we could stay out of things, but we would already be dead. or red, or German.

    I am sure George Washington and Abe Liincoln would do some things different too, but they were just too damn busy trying top save our country instead of looking back and and blaming the USA.

    • c4pfan

      Don’t agree.

      • xymbaline

        Doesn’t matter.

    • FreeManWalking

      Here here Richard!!!

  • nibblesyble

    I called it! I knew Newt was in the mood to kick a little butt! He rocked tonight! Go Newt!

  • c4pfan

    Newt is for individual mandates and for giving amnesty. No different than any other politcian.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      That’s a lie, straight out.

    • Been_There_BT

      Fact check in isle three. I also suggest you do more homework on Rick. Politijim has the real score on Rick.

    • xymbaline

      You’d be a lot better off if you’d actually do some research and listen to what the man says instead of believing what you’ve heard from ill-informed posters on blogs or on the MSM.

      Try this … if I wanted to claim that Sarah Palin supported a certain position, should I listen to what CNN says or should I actually listen to her own speeches and read her books?

      What you’ve said about Newt is no more accurate than what CNN talking heads say about Sarah.

      Got it?

  • RockArtAlan

    Ron Paul was the clear winner. What are you all so afraid of to not even include him in the poll?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      Because all 5,000 Ron Paul supporters in the country would find this poll and vote on it, even though they’ve never heard of the website before.

      • falling321

        LOL My sisters son is one of the RP fanatics. He has a basement full of old computers and uses each one just to vote for RP in online polls! If they are all doing this, I’d be surprised if RP had even 5,000 supporters! The Dems are making a joke of him, by crossing party lines and voting for him, fully intending to vote for Obama in the fall. The poor man is desperately looking to buy some final recognition with his delegates at the GOP convention. The more I see of him, the more I feel sorry for him!

      • ratkodjakovic225

        Apparently Ricardo here is glued to CNN and FOX… if Ricardo were educated and actually researched he would see that every Ron Paul rally/assembly is packed and overflowing with supporters… Newt and Santorum dont even come close…in fact Newt had to cancel some rallies because of “no-shows”…

    • rjcylon

      Online Ron Paul surveys are always artificially skewed. Regular members of this site (and other sites) can’t compete with swarms of Paulbots who swarm in out of nowhere to vote for him, then never return. It’s not a fair poll, and the reason he is not there is not because of him, it’s because his supporters don’t play fair. Therefore they don’t get to play at all.

  • Ariadnea

    Gingrich won this debate. He is the only candidate who refused to be enclosed in a box. Case in point is when he defined himself as cheerful, instead of the self promoting words the others used.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001816461136 Nate Black

    Good for you, deciding that Ron Paul should not be included in the survey. Way to be impartial!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • AsleepNoMore

    Not making Ron Paul supporters feel very welcome. Big mistake. Without us, Obama wins.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

      No, without Paul, you guys would just vote for Obama again.

      • AsleepNoMore

        Never did, never will.

    • falling321

      Your blackmail does not make your candidate look good! But then most of what RP supporters say and do does not make RP look good! I suspect you lose him far more votes than you realize!

      • AsleepNoMore

        It’s not blackmail. Most of us simply cannot vote for another puppet who will continue the status quo. He is also the only Republican who can bring in the votes across party lines to beat Obama.

  • Ariadnea

    Observing Romney; if he would like to win against Obama in a debate, rushing to answer a question will not do. He needs to relax and be thoughtful when giving his opinion to prevent from stuttering. As I observed, when Romney gets excited and gets rushed, he stutters too much, which is destructing from the ideas he wanted to convey. Whoever his debating tutor is, should coach him how to relax (breath in and out) when answering. Should he win the conservative nomination (as he is being pushed and well protected by the Republican elites), his stuttering debating performance will not do against Obama.

  • http://www.soopermexican.com Soopermexican

    HOW DARE YOU NOT PUT RON PAUL IN THE SURVEY?!?!? JUST BECAUSE THEY SWARM LIKE OCCUPYING LOCUSTS FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT AND RUIN ANY POLL DOESN’T MEAN THAT.. well ok. #GoNoot!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LLRDMSWVW5VUHEBSBMIIWIQJTU Jack Dempsey

    You don’t even have Ron Paul as a choice? Makes all of us with a brain want him that much more! thanks for being so transparent in your mockery of the democratic process

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/P2DCZJPKM2JVNYRPQ3QYHWIRIU Wayne

    The person who won the debate was the candidate you “mysteriously” forgot to list RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL!

    • Ariadnea

      Ron Paul has a lot to offer to the conservative party, but it’s you and your kind who loves spamming, braying, and hounding are the reason why Ron Paul does not rise that much where it matters. Had he had more civilized and rational supporters, he would have greater chances as nominee. In short, those Ron Paul supporters behaving and aping the Occupy crowd are a liability to Ron Paul. If you want Ron Paul to rise in the poll, stop dragging him down with your loudness and abrasiveness. If that is not clear enough, BEHAVE and help lighten up Ron Paul’s burden on his journey to nomination.

    • rjcylon

      Mystery solved!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Galvan/100001729378103 Ricardo Galvan

    You must have been medicating tonight to come up with that conclusion.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Drew/1272002736 Tim Drew

    • Trust1TG

      In this video, Ron Paul claims he has the second highest number of delegates?

      Is this true?

      What is the latest committed Delegate Count?

      • AsleepNoMore

        It is true, but the counts are murky. You can go to 6 political sites and get 6 (sometimes VERY) different counts.

        Many delegates are unbound, meaning they do not have to vote for the candidate who won their caucus or primary. If the convention is brokered, the bound delegates are only bound for one vote. If there is no clear winner, then they are unbound – and many of them support Ron Paul. This could get interesting.

  • hanamaui

    Someone doesn’t know how to count. Ron Paul was left out of the equation. Only ignorants would have the notion that a wrong equation will give a correct answer.

  • Been_There_BT

    There is Peat and there is Repeat. Newt is Peat.

    There is Tread and there is Retread. Newt is Tread.

    After the past few years, I don’t want to be Spired, I want to be Inspired. Newt Inspires.

    For every time in history, there is a man who is the right man for that time. Newt is that man.

  • ryanomaniac

    Ugggh Santorum. I was just getting really warmed up too you. He blew this debate in my opinion. He just can’t hold up. If this is the best he can offer in a debate with his peers then he will get killed in the general. He is so defensive and when he does go on offense it looks so petty a lot of times. This debate is going to seriously hurt him. He will not be able to inspire the country. Therefore I’m done with the Guy. I tried. He seems to be a really good man in his personal life. Very important.

    I have made it a habit of never voting for someone who has ne

    • ryanomaniac

      I ran out of room on my phone from my post above. Sorry. What I was getting at is I have made it a point to never vote for someone who has never run anything. I was for newt but learned a lot on this site and others that changed my mind. He started doing well and the opinions changed for a lot of people despite their previous analysis. He sounds the best. Rick has never come close to running anything at all. As he always says, he proposed legislation or whatever. I now have to go back too my prior convictions. Romney has ran something. He has switched positions but for the better.

    • BMinPA

      It is amazing how shallow our support is for these candidates. One little misstep and we want out. I am including myself in that group, by the way. We know so little about them. The fact that we are learning new stuff this late in the game is telling.

  • destroyer_of_moonbats

    rightscoop… are you developing msm tendencies by omitting factual events? i do belive ron paul was part of the debate.

    • rjcylon

      it’s “believe”.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BHU5KKC55GMNVGBVIMBKFCRINI Thien

    I’d agree with TRS that ” he didn’t do a terrible job”.
    1) Santorum was entering the Romney’s supporters land at the debate. He was attacked more often than previous debates b/c the attention has been shifted from Mitt vs Newt to Mitt vs Rick.
    2) He could have done a better job with more preparation… then again, it’s Ash Wednesday, a day of “penance” for devout Catholics. Perhaps his mind is not fully on the political thinking/attacking mode.

  • NCHokie02

    Agree with RS. I would have liked to have seen Santorum do a better job. Although he didn’t do horrible he didn’t have that moment to stand above the rest. Paul took every chance he could to include Santorum in whatever slam against Congress he could. He didn’t even mention any of the other candidates up there. I agree with RS that Paul is in the Romney camp for whatever reason. There were obviously a lot of Paul/Romney people there are you could tell by the crowd. Won’t be surprised to see his poll numbers drop some hopefully it’s not enough to let Romney win MI.

    • AsleepNoMore

      Paul people will never be Romney people. Their policies are too diametrically opposed. And Paul does not sell out – he can’t be bought.

      • NCHokie02

        thats what I thought, Romney is a liberal. Yet Paul doesn’t attack him on any issues, why? Then you have Rand Paul saying it would be an honor to be considered for a VP ticket with Romney…which I think being considered for VP for anyone would be an honor, but aren’t his views too opposing to support Romney as well? (I know he didn’t say he would take it but just a bit of a coincidence you think?)

        Why didn’t Paul attack Romney at the debate? Why isn’t he running ads against Romney as well in MI and other places?

        For Paul to attack Santorum and not the most liberal of all the candidates doesn’t make sense to me for something not be up.

        • AsleepNoMore

          Paul does attack Romney regularly in his ads. Santorum just got paranoid now that he’s in the hot seat. The attacks from both Paul and Romney are similar because they are truthful. Yes, Romney is a liberal. Santorum talks a good deficit-cutting game, but is a big spender when the rubber meets the road.

          Study: Candidates’ plans lead to huge deficits http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GOP_CANDIDATES_BUDGET?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-02-24-04-16-40 Only Ron Paul nearly eliminates the deficit with his plans.

          • NCHokie02

            I agree that Paul has a great domestic plan. I love that he ardently supports getting rid of several agencies. Love it. I don’t agree on his foreign policy. Not that I’m all about going to take everyone in the world out, but we are in global economy now and have interests across the world. Those interests need to be protected for the sake of our country, wether its security related or economically related. He doesn’t appear to take Iran and others as credible threats. He goes about his FP the wrong way and turns people away.

            Romney attacked Santorum on the Arlen Spector deal but Romney put up liberal judges while he was governor. So if he was so conservative why didn’t he nominate conservative judges?

            Santorum has one of the most conservative voting records during his tenure in the senate. Of course it’s not perfect but it’s pretty high for when he was there. No one is going to be perfect.

            • AsleepNoMore

              He hasn’t mentioned it in debates (not enough time for his style of speaking), but Paul has said in interviews that we should keep some aircraft carriers and support ships in strategic places so we have our bases covered without actually having bases in other countries. Some of them really hate our having bases in their countries. The Japanese people have been trying to kick us out for a long time. When the Iraq war ended, not one Iraqi attended our closing ceremonies. Instead, they held their own “ceremonies”, burning our flags. Our leaving is now a national holiday in Iraq, celebrating the “end of the occupation”. We put the Muslim Brotherhood, which is mostly al Qaida, in power in Egypt and now Egypt has genocide against Christians and Blacks, and is no ally to Israel. We put them in in Libya and we’re trying to get them into Syria.

              Paul takes the threats seriously, but he pays close attention to a lot of details most of us don’t hear about. After all this time in Congress, he has excellent contacts and sources for factual intelligence, not the propaganda they make public. The only difference is that, up until the point of imminent threat or direct attack, he wants to continue to try to avoid war if at all possible, preferably by keeping communications open. But once it hits that point, he’s on it, we win and it’s over. By the time he’s ready to strike, he knows with clarity who he is going after, the best strategies and what will be accomplished. Oh, and he has the consent of The People because Congress will have voted for a Declaration of War.

              Humor me. Take a look at this map http://www.indymedia.org.uk/images/2010/02/445940.jpg , showing Iran in blue in the middle. All the stars represent US military bases. They’re not really threatening us. They know it will be suicide if they attack. While they may get a nuke in a year or two, Israel has between 200 and 800 (they won’t specify, they like keeping it vague). But we have put these financially crippling sanctions on Iran, their economy is being hit hard, their people are upset, and their leaders have to appear to be doing something about it. So they rattle their swords and threaten. If you hear of them attacking, look very carefully – it is far more likely we staged it to get the war off the ground.

              • NCHokie02

                There are also people in Iraq that are greatful for us. That doesnt make headlines though. Germany wanted us out for a while until we actually started closing a couple bases and they realized the economic impact the American soldiers had in that area and they said we could then keep some of the bases there. I completely argee with you about Libya, Egypt and Syria. I don’t think we should have done anything in any of those countries. People now see how we treat our allies (egypt).

                I agree with Paul on the declaration of war. That is how is how the Constitution says it is to be (not too many people up in DC care about that document though, unless it can help them achieve their objective or block someone elses. thats about it). He sounds like he would keep ROE pretty loose which would help us win quicker. I’ve been to Iraq once and Afghanistan twice and the ROE gets more ridiculous every time. My question though is why doen’t Paul say something to the tune of “We need to take a serious look at where are forces are arrayed around the world. There are some areas that we can close and bring those people home. I intend to take a serious look at those bases and close the ones that are unnecessary for us to protect our interests in the global economy.” I bet he could accomplish the things he still intends to but doesn’t put so many people off with his “close everything everywhere and bring them home”. Or if he stuck to his message of ending five federal departments to save money instead of everytime saving money in spending he talks of “bringing all our troops in the world home” he would do a lot better.

                As far as Iran goes no ones thinks that they are going to launch an invasion and land on the beaches of the east coast. They are a threat to our interests worldwide. And how are you so sure that Iran wouldn’t use a nuke? The Ayotollah and Ahmenienjad (spelling) are both 12′vers. They believe the destruction of Isreal will usher in the 12th Imam. Now maybe they won’t do it when they have one but if we say thats ok for them to have one then once they do have it do you think they will stop with one bomb? Or will they produce more? The hard part is getting a bomb. Once they have it it won’t be too difficult to produce more. So lets say in 10 years they now have a number to match Isreal in nuclear capability and the means to deliver those weapons. If the leadership believes that the destruction of Isreal will usher in the 12th Imam what says they won’t use one? Plus then everyone else in the region will attempt to accquire nuclear weapons because they won’t like Iran being the only country with one and being able to threaten the rest of the middle east. In an area that is so volitile I think it is very dangerous to have them have nucluear weapons. I’m not sold into the “we attack ourselves so we can conduct war” idea either. Iranians have been arrested crossing our borders. They have already been conducting war against us. They were, and most likely still are, conducting operations in Iraq. We have captured Iranian military in Iraq. Iranians have killed our servicemen in Iraq. Where do you think all the IED’s in Iraq came from? They were all military grade charges from Iran. All the shape charges came from Iran. They gave safe harbor to Sadr. I’m sure they are active in western afghanistan as well. I don’t think they have as big of an interest in Afghanistan as they do Iraq so they aren’t as involved as they were in Iraq but they occupy our time there.

                As far as sanctions go from what Paul says he would end sanctions because he doesn’t believe they work. He points to Cuba. Yes Castro is still there but without sanctions all the money that would come from the US to Cuba would support the government there, not the people or the economy. The governement in Cuba owns everything, to include restaurants. If Cuba was so great why is half of their country now living in Miami-Dade county in southern florida? And it’s not a bad place because they are poor its bad because of Castros rule. Again, if there were no sanctions in place all the money would go support the government whether it was intended to or not.

                • AsleepNoMore

                  But did we have a legitimate reason to be in Iraq in the first place, or were we lied (wmd’s) into war? War is covered so differently now by the media. We saw every detail of Vietnam plastered across our televisions every evening. It is part of why there were so many protests against that war. So they market war to us differently to minimize our objections. Now we never see footage of the collateral damage, and aren’t shown our soldiers’ coffins returning. We are told that we are making progress in Afghanistan, but that’s not true. We are losing ground and it’s even worse now with the Koran incident.

                  Does it make sense for us to help Germany’s economy, and save them the expense of maintaining their own military instead of using ours, instead of having our troops spend their money here to help our economy? Ron Paul has said he would leave bases and troops in countries where we have treaties to do so. Treaties would be clear indicators that our presence is welcomed. Bringing our troops home would keep more of our bases open here, and help our economy. And he wants to put troops on our own border, which would help keep the war killing more people than Iraq and Afghanistan below our southern border.

                  It’s becoming critical that we start filling DC with people who honor their oaths to the Constitution. If we lose it completely, we are no longer who we are meant to be. It’s the only thing we ask our “representatives” to swear to do because it is so critically important.

                  There are a few areas where Ron Paul could present his message in a more marketable way to voters. And his campaign staff try to get him to adjust his delivery on these aspects, with varying degrees of success. For example, I would love it if the words “business cycle” never left his lips again in public. He’s right, of course, but it doesn’t mean much to the average American and we’re all so sound bite oriented now. In addition to running, he is trying to educate us all about some of the tenets of Austrian economics since we’re so entrenched in failed Keynesian policies. He wants people to understand why he holds the policy positions that he does. It’s a shame he feels he has to spend time educating us rather than just expanding on and explaining his proposals, but he’s probably right that it’s necessary. His ideas sound so foreign compared to what we usually hear, until you understand how he arrived at them. It’s a big shift in our approach, but would yield much more positive results.

                  Several of Iran’s neighbors have nukes. Israel, Pakistan, likely Syria, India, and Turkey via NATO. With nuclear Israel allegedly chomping at the bit to attack them, it is understandable that Iran wants nukes. And they will get them at some point. Iran hasn’t initiated hostilities with anyone in over 100 years. We held off the USSR with 30,000 nukes without war. We need to pursue ways to deal with Iran that will make it in their best interests not to employ nukes. The CIA and FBI reported a few years ago that an average of 5,000 people of Middle Eastern descent enter via our southern border illegally each year. If we were really concerned, wouldn’t we secure the border?

                  We can’t predict how Iran would behave once it gets nukes, but can we really justify attacking anyone “just in case”? We have gone to war via false flags in the past. We were prepared to stage one to start hostilities with Iran a few years back, but it was stopped. And we have already been attacking Iran as well. We have assassinated their scientists and taken out some facilities, as well as putting drones over Iran.

                  If we lifted the sanctions on Cuba and opened up trade, their people would have more opportunities to find ways to skim off and control some of the wealth and assets, as well as escape if they choose to. Part of the surge in the Cuban population in Florida started when I lived there in the very early 80s. Castro release the Marielitos (sp?) – criminals and the insane – to save Cuba the costs of maintaining them. It was really nuts when they first arrived. I wouldn’t go to Miami because they were shooting people stopped at red lights for no reason at all – they weren’t even stealing from them, just shooting strangers for sport. That was at the same time we had the Haitian boat people arriving in Florida. But if the US continues the way we’re going, people won’t be coming here because we won’t be any freer than in Cuba. Yes, the Cuban government would profit from getting rid of the sanctions, but look at all the foreign aid we give other countries. It rarely benefits the people intended and instead benefits corrupt leaders. Ron Paul wants to stop foreign aid too. We need the money here and we desperately need to stop borrowing money to wage wars and give foreign aid.

                • NCHokie02

                  Do you honestly believe that WMD was made up to go to war? Honestly. Just because we did not find a bunker full of them doesn’t mean that they weren’t there. If I was Saddam I would have gotten rid of them too. Lord knows he had enough time. Bush went through the sanctions portions and Iraq did not cooperate. Bush also asked congress for a declaration of war, which they granted. War is not something people who don’t fight get to sit back at home and watch and say man that looks like it sucks. You don’t need to see the coffins of our returning dead. If they were your family the military has it set up so you can attend the dignified transfer at Dover AFB when the bodies return from theatre. There is no need for others to see the coffins. They aren’t exhibits at some museum. The people don’t need to see “collateral damage”. Plus all that it is used for is to prosecute some tactical level leader for a decision he made during combat while trying to keep his men alive. As Orson Wells said “People sleep peacefully in their beds because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.”

                  Not saying that we shouldn’t close some bases and put those troops back here. Just pointing out that Germany was all about our troops leaving until they realized the economic impact they had on their economy. Suddenly it was ok to have US troops in Germany. Not everyone wants us out of their countries is my point. Are there bases that could be closed, sure.

                  One of the areas that RP could better articulate his plan is his foreign policy. If you say he says he would keep bases open with countries we have treaties with he hasn’t said it on a National stage, which has greatly hurt his nomination chances. Why hasn’t he said that when asked during the debates? All he says about foreign policy is that Iran isn’t a threat and we should bring ALL our soldiers home. He has never said, “We’ll leave some bases open, in countries that we have treaties with but others we’ll close.” That then asks the question, which country do we have bases in currently that we do not have an agreement with their government??? If any government asks us to leave and remove our troops we have to. So if we are going to leave bases open in countries we have treaties with isn’t that all of them?? I’ll give you Iraq and Afghanistan but what about the rest??

                  I’m not saying the first option is drop bombs over Tehran. Of course other means are exhausted first. But do you believe that if the Ayotollah and Ahmeninijad (spelling) truly believe that the destruction of Isreal will usher in the 12th Imam (which they do) that they believe they will be destroyed in return? They believe it will bring about the end times and they will be victorious. It may not seem rational to you or I but to them it is completely rational. In their minds they (Iran and the Muslim world) will not be destroyed. So it doesn’t matter how many nukes other countries around them have. Then how many other 12′vers are in the governments of other Muslim nations and have the same beliefs?? Would they move to stop Iran?? As far as assassinating scientists I’m more likely to believe thats on the side of Isreal than us. Especially with this administration. Haven’t heard of any facilities being destroyed by us either. And having a drone overhead of you is hardly the same as actively targeting your soldiers in combat. They have done way more harm to us than we have to them.

                  Interesting how if we lifted sanctions that we’re hoping that the people find ways to “skim off the top” of the government, which would certainly put their lives and probably their families lives in jeopardy, to improve the standard of living in Cuba. Do you actually think that some people “skimming off the top” is going to push that country into prosperity? Plus what message do we show the Cuban government for the way it treats “political prisoners” and it’s people if we just go on as if everything is grand? I know libertarians have the view that it’s not our business and it may not be, but that doesn’t mean we have to do business with them and countries that treat their people in such a manner. If there is nothing saying “What you’re doing to your people and the way you act is not acceptable.” then whats to stop them from continuing on in their ways? Plus if they don’t support us and aren’t an ally why should we deal with them at all? Castro and Guvera killed thousands of people. They hate capitalism. They don’t use capitalism so any trading or business with them again would go solely to the government. I don’t think that hoping “some people will skim off the top” is a good foreign policy attitude with Cuba.

                  I do agree with stopping all foreign aid. I hope whomever is president does that but since Perry is out that hasn’t had too much traction. I would at least like RP to bring that back up in discussions. I think we should stop it all and if we were to give someone aid we should ask, no matter who it is, what are you doing for us? What do we get out of this besides patting ourselves on the back.

                • AsleepNoMore

                  I started writing a response and was well into it when my pc blew up from a broadcast I was running in the background. Oy! Here goes again.

                  I do believe the WMDs were lied about. I recognize he could have moved them. But have heard government whistleblowers say it was bad intel, plus we had plans drawn up for the war against Iraq long before we even got close to sanctions. We had a list of five countries and we’re now working our way through them. I don’t want people gawking at the horrors of war just for kicks or to look for errors in combat decisions, but when it is removed from our awareness, people forget who and what is being sacrificed. Since they started throwing around numbers in the trillions and quadrillions, numbers have become meaningless to most Americans. Our attention spans have shrunken and I think people need the visuals to be reminded of the costs and price we are paying, so they can reevaluate whether what we are doing is worth it. I support (and regularly pray for) our troops, but not the missions. I’m grateful we have people like you who are ready and willing to do whatever needs to be done. But I resent those sending you into harm’s way for dubious purposes.

                  I agree 100% on Ron Paul needing to get his message out better. He does not function at his best in the time limited debates. But if you watch one of his untimed speeches, you’d swear you were listening to one of our founding fathers. He has only spoken about leaving bases where we have treaties, and strategically placing naval assets, in televised interviews. I can only guess the debate format didn’t leave him time or he thought he needed to simplify the message.

                  Can’t list which other nations don’t want us there, but I know Japan is among them. There have been a lot of rapes alleged against our troops there. Not sure why we don’t leave when they want us to, but I suspect there is something UN related authorizing it.

                  If we’re worried about 12vers, why are we installing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Libya and Syria?

                  I’m not sure what the right answer on Cuba is, but sanctions appear to have had no desired effect. We only make people angry at us when we curtail their ability to trade freely. I’m sure Cuba’s propaganda doesn’t make us look good to their people either. I try to get news from other countries, but never thought to look for any Cuban sources. Will have to look to see if there are any.

                  Thank you for some good conversation.

                • NCHokie02

                  Can’t say I agree with you on the Iraq WMD’s. Perhaps somewhere in the intel scene someone may have skewed it but I don’t think Bush knowingly lied to the American people. Saddam had WMD’s before and he had used them before. I understand your concern for people to not forget the price that is paid in war. I suppose it’s the media that screws us on this one. I heard a story where a reporter had asked a general why he was limited in what he could tape and who he could talk to and said that in WWII the press had freedom on the front lines. The general replied with “In WWII you were on our side.” I agree with you on the numbers piece too. Tons are spent over there. It can be very rewarding at times and yet at the same time be very frustrating over there.

                  I suppose with the bases, in some places the people don’t want us there but the government is content. Probably because they are receiving aid as well as the economic boost from American troops in that area.

                  Good question as to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Libya and Syria. I completely agree with you. We had an ally in Egypt and we supported his opposition and ouster only to have radical islamists take over. Laura Logan was privy to the peaceful religion that now controls that state and the actors that do (it did before but not in such a radical manner). Don’t know why we got involved in Libya either. Even our own Sec of Def said we have no national interests over there. It has to be very frustrating for some of the cabinet members of the Obama administration as it doesn’t seem that is willing to listen to anyone. I think we should be concerned about 12vers in control of Muslim countries especially with nuclear capabilities. Why we are supporting radical islam in moving people out is beyond me. Egypt, Libya and Syrias’ leaders may not have been great guys but sometimes the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t. To me that is the biggest knock on us in Iraq is that Saddam was the only counter weight to Iran in the region. Iran wouldn’t act up because Iraq kept them in check. Without Saddam there as that counter-balance they are now the big kid on the block in that area.

                  I’m sure Cuban propaganda doesn’t show us in a good light but I think the people know better because so many of them are over here and can let their relatives know. They still come here as well. I’m not sure what the desired effect on Cuba the sanctions were supposed to have but they do keep us from supporting a murderous regime. Once the Castros are finally gone and someone new steps up hopefully they will be open to change and see that their way isn’t working. Although I’m sure the Castros don’t live in squalor.

                  Thank you as well for the conversation. Enjoyed it.

  • NCHokie02

    For all the Paul fans on the site today questioning where he is in the poll obviously your new to the site. Which proves RS correct in keeping RP off the poll because all of you come to flood the poll and give him the win. Most of you don’t regularly participate on the site here but when someone else says there’s a poll somewhere for RP you all run and vote for RP skewing the results. If these internet polls with RP in them were accurate wouldn’t RP have won at least one state so far?? Wouldn’t he be doing better in the national polls?? C’mon.

    • AsleepNoMore

      He polls better than all the others against Obama in several states. He is the GOP’s ONLY shot at beating Obama.

      • NCHokie02

        Again, they why isn’t he winning any states….so he polls better than Obama but not any of the other Republican candidates?

        Why is his polling data so low?

        • AsleepNoMore

          We are not so sure (any surer than Santorum was that Romney won Iowa) that Paul hasn’t won any states. http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/maine-vote-fraud-official

          When they poll Republicans only about Republican candidates, they use land lines. Many of Paul’s supporters don’t use land lines and don’t get polled. Plus, much of his support comes from Independents, Libertarians and Democrats, who don’t get polled on Republicans.

  • Barney_Paul_Fife

    Everyone knows that Paul is the “online” President. However, he is nothing more than entertainment and a distraction in the real world. He hasn’t won one primary or caucus and was correct in his answer to the one word that describes him-consistent. He is consistently out of touch with reality.

    • AsleepNoMore

      Santorum supporters can tell you about the fraud in Iowa. Nevada was a complete joke. GOP heads quit right after their caucuses. We’re waiting for the Maine GOP to do the same since they STILL haven’t counted all the votes. We have no idea whether Ron Paul won any of the caucuses, but the GOP has made it crystal clear they will go to any lengths – even in public view – to prevent his being declared a winner.

      Meanwhile, there are the delegates. :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001370317817 Frank Nemethvargo III

    Ron Paul won……why are you dis-including him in this pole? way to be biased….cant wait for Ron to win so you can look likes fools…..oh wait you already do.

    • rjcylon

      You can’t wait? Well that’s going to be a problem. You think Ron Paul can win the nomination? Ha ha.

  • http://twitter.com/TruthSociety TruthSociety

    I don’t know if anyone else saw it but after one of Pathetic Paul’s last attacks on Rick Santorum he looked at Romney and winked. What a guy..

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=657336658 Jenifer Ramirez

    BULL! Where is Ron Paul on here?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jarrod-Lowery/100001750172306 Jarrod Lowery

    Whys RON PAUL not on this poll? Is that the only way you can make him lose ? LOL

  • c4pfan

    Let’s see. Mitt Romney’s people helped create Obamacare AND the Mortgage bribe for votes , left office after one term due to being not popular enough to be re-elected and what happened to the party after he left? Then he LOST to John McCain.

    He admits in the debate that he had to balance the budget, he had no choice. He admits to using Gov money to prop up Romneycare, and his tax plan calls on raising taxes on the ‘rich’.

    I don’t see one program he’d cut.

    His election will end the GOP once and for all.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000679899592 John Bohler

    lol all the Paulbots are complaining YET AGAIN about Ron Paul not being in there. Thanks again TRS!

  • Anthony Blair

    What I think is that it’s childish rubbish to remove Ron Paul as an option. There were four seats last night not three. This is absurd.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=25306459 Ginny Cardoza

    WHERES RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • rjcylon

      It’s “where’s” and there’s a question mark at the end.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=611162937 Intelius Bites

    The American people won last night. Now lets focus on removing Obama and recapturing the Senate in November!

  • Ryan Van Wagoner

    Wow, not even listing Ron Paul as an option? You’re worse than the mainstream media. I am now deleting The Right Scoop from my bookmarks and spreading the word.

    • rjcylon

      Who is there to spread the word to? Everyone who is a regular to this site already knows about this.

  • rjcylon

    I’m not a Ron Paul fan but I don’t see him as a sell-out to Romney either.

  • http://twitter.com/LibertyRoll Liberty Roll

    Where is RON PAUL? Your poll stinks bc you say he doesn’t deserve mention. There was a time when people said Santorum was a Romney supporter bc he never attacked him. If Ron Paul is not a serious contender then tell me why is in second place with the current delegates now?

  • puma_for_life

    Why are you so willing to believe any spin the msm puts on Paul? You wouldn’t believe it if they said it about your candidate. Today, Karl Rove basically said your theory about collusion between Paul and Romney is bs. Strange alliances during elections, He said Newt pulled back in Mich. for Rick to embarrass Mitt, and he commented on Newt and Rick teaming up on Mitt,

    he said Paul and Mitt both need to keep Rick down,. Paul because of VA>

    so there ya go stop freaking out

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/EGQEUAPE4AZLBAWGTOVWXRI37Q MichelleS

    How can you not even include Ron Paul in this? You are the main stream media! How dare you! Devil’s advocate!! Ron Paul clearly was better than Newt for damn sure! You are disgusting!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1241491147 Amanda Newman

    Just because you close your eyes and leave Ron Paul off the list, doesn’t mean he’s going to disappear.

    So you’ve got the right scoop alright, just remember to shop at Petco for the bags you place your material in. ;)

  • Daniel Richmond

    Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul…Republic: Join or die.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=715251609 Pete Gardner

    Hi Scoop!

    I’m trying to read through the legitimate comments here. Any chance of cleaning out the Paulbot spam?

    Thanks for a great site, btw!

  • CGpatriot

    The real poll is: to see how many of RP supporters can “insult this site” in one sentence, So far there are to many count, the result’s will be posted tomorrow.


    Down thread someone posted: if RS doesn’t get behind Ron Paul “big mistake”, we will “vote for Obama” anyways……there’s your answer RP supporters.

    • RosiesSeeingRed

      I wonder how they feel about his alliance with Romney, of all people — the big spender, big government guy from Massachusetts! Must be a real disappointment for them.

      • Paulbot12

        yea a true alliance, because he doesn’t lambaste him like he does “the fake”. whats the goal of this alliance?

    • Paulbot12

      its an insult to leave him out of the poll. These candidates are an insult to conservatism. Wake up patriot!

      • CGpatriot

        You don’t need to tell me to wake-up, stop whining. I don’t control RS and in-fact, don’t pit me against your silly grievances with this site. You on the other hand, IMHO: are simply over reacting, it’s just a poll. Ron Paul is responsible for he’s own record, and he doesn’t appeal to me. It’s obvious we differ on what Conservatism is.

        I’ll agree, to disagree.

        • Paulbot12

          yea..your conservatism means big government spending!

          • Conservative_Hippie

            Becuase CG will not vote for Paul means he is for big government spending?! What rock are you living under?

            • AsleepNoMore

              Yes, since all the candidates but Ron Paul will worsen the debt and deficits. http://www.pottsmerc.com/article/20120224/NEWS06/120229658/-1/traffic/study-candidates-plans-lead-to-huge-deficits

              Huge tax cuts in the budget plans of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum would produce the kinds of trillion-dollar-plus deficits that the GOP candidates are blaming on President Barack Obama.

              That’s the finding by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a Washington-based budget watchdog group.

              The study also says the more modest tax and spending plans of Mitt Romney wouldn’t make a dent in deficits that are on track to average $800 billion or so a year over the coming decade under current trends and policies — and could add to them considerably.

              Only Ron Paul, who calls for wrenching budget cuts that dwarf anything proposed by his three rivals, would reduce the flow of red ink. …

        • AsleepNoMore

          If your candidate were ignored, misrepresented and lied about by the media the way Ron Paul has, you’d be upset too. For a good laugh, you should check out Jon Stewart’s bit on how the media ignores Ron Paul, it’s on youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb5aGgQXhXo

    • AsleepNoMore

      Nope. Didn’t say we’d vote for Obama. I never have and never will. Only pointed out that without Paul and Paul supporters, GOP can’t beat Obama. He’s the only one who draws voters across all party lines in sufficient quantities to beat Obama.

  • ratkodjakovic225

    Ron Paul won hands down but its the “sold your soul to the devil” journalists like you that have completely robbed the American people of the truth… If a Revolution does come about the demonized media will be the first to suffer… I am sure of that…

  • ratkodjakovic225

    Wow…its “sold my soul to the devil” journalists like you that have robbed this country of truth… You dont even include Ron Paul? Seriously? I am a vet and I promise this…When a revolution breaks out I am sure the demonized media will be the first to suffer the consequences… Absolute disgust in the elite bought media…

  • http://www.facebook.com/MaxStreet1 Jaed Deaj

    Last time I checked, there were FOUR candidates in the debate. Nice “objectivism” /end sarcasm

  • TPDanbo

    Did you also notice now that Newt isn’t considered a threat to Romney,(lol) the Mainstream Media and other candidates are all friendly and respectful towards him last night? Suddenly all the nastiness is gone they even complimented Newt!

  • TPDanbo

    ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha………………….clearly you’re on drugs!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1039621265 Tom Liddle

      if they are (on drugs) they’ll vote for Mr. Rogers, er I mean, Paul…

    • doesnmatter

      Nope, he’s not on drugs. That would more likely be you as a Mormon hater. After much research, you would find that Mormon’s don’t even drink coffee.

      • TPDanbo

        No I’m NOT a HATER of Morons,oops Mormons, I’m a REAL christian siding with the majority of REAL Christians who believe Mormonism is nothing but a sham cult! Wow you don’t drink coffee,how ludicrously fanatical of you, perhaps you haven’t noticed all similarities between Mormons and Islam…..I mean your not totally the same obviously but fascinating, never mind that you both think yours is the only True religion.

        • doesnmatter

          You obviously do not know any more about Mormonism than you know about politics. The Mormon church is “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints”. They consider Jesus Christ in everything they teach. To say that you are not a hater of Mormons while you call them Morons, and a sham cult and compare them to Islam tells the true tale.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/TMH7XPUP2DG4HJMMUASWB2JGCA Colten Tuescher

    The title of this poll should say “who got second place in the debate tonight?” Why else would they leave Ron Paul out of the poll. This is exactly the type of idiotic polling that people say O look ron paul got zero votes. You are a disgrace!

  • Conservative_Hippie

    Newt, as usual. Though I’m not sure whether I will vote for him or Rick.

  • Constance

    Santorum was attacked relentlessly by the Romney/Paul team. I am in agreement with Mark Levin that Paul is helping Romney behind the scenes. It seems obvious to me. Santorum didn’t hold up as well as I had hoped, but Romney came off as even more phony baloney plastic banana than usual. Suddenly, he is the conservative? Spare me. The more I see him and hear him, the less I like him. He may have hit Santorum hard, but he didn’t change my views. Newt did well. Paul? I never even listen to him. :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Jones/100001374595021 Richard Jones

    Who are the bigger crack pots?

    Ron or his supporters?

    As Paul fades they are getting more mlilitant.

    Ron finishes a DISTANT 4th, and his supporters think they can FORCE all the web sites to and polls (online polls have pushed supporters out because you are SO unreasonable) declare him the winner because they are the most unethical activists.

    JUST get a life and grow up, and count your delegates (to buy influence) to come RON has promised you for all those $million$ you should have spent on GAS, milk and bread.

    Can we report them ALL to Homeland security to protect the REAL republican candidates, the one RS list in thier polls?

    For a few months now they have had to drop out Ron voters because they Are truly NUTTY, IGNORANT, and are getting very dangerous. AND IT IS FUNNY !

    They don’t even seem to notice Ron Paul has sold them out for a speech or whatever.

    His actions are quite unethical and dangerous for a man who says he follows the constitution.

    He is not a liberertarian, he is a KOOKertarian.

    I think he is a closet racist based on his own words and works, and can never clean up his act nor get elected ANYTHING in the republican party. I don’t count his current seat, he is not thought of well in TEXAS, I am from there.

    He could run third party and become bigger JOKE, and take out a (THE) non-Romney winner (that must be the deal too), but if Romney wins, Ron Paul gets some “goodies” I assutre you.

    Speech (big deal)
    Position (IS a BIG deal and I think illegal)
    Certain actions like take apart the FED (I can go for)
    Maybe payback legal campaign funds
    AND MANY goodies like approved projects and EAR MARKS FOR HIS DISTRICT !!!!!!!!

    All for a promise not to run against him and do ANYTHING in debates and spend his nutty supporters money TO SUPPORT ROMNEY.

    What a bunch of SUCKERS the RP supporters have been.
    Are you going to revolt and join OCCUPOTTY ?

    If this all pans out, Ron Paul and his supporters will go down in history as the goofiest political movement EVER !!!!!

    I ALREADY feel very embarressed for you all (some did not deserve this and are just some younsters who do not know better and Granpa used you) to have been used and suckered so badly.

    It will STINK on the WORLD WIDE WEB forever.

    GEEZ ! GET A LIFE , PLEASE, POLLIES !!!!!!

    Your IP address can be tracked very easy by Homeland, so don’t threaten people because the Ron Paul campaign ripped you off and lied to you.

    Some of you already are already under investigation I bet for threats and vile language.

    If you want to hate me for telling you the truth, give it our best shot.
    It will just approve I was correct.

  • Happyface2

    When Newt speaks he never pauses to think about the next point.It is a shame that he will not win because he would wipe the floor with Nobama,but unfortunately he’s not liked and that is just a shame.His head is so filled with ideas he could throw twenty of them against the wall and if ten stick that would ten more then Nobama ever thought about in three years.

  • Trust1TG

    Two things re: Ron Paul and Romney collusion in campaign:

    1. Rand Paul – on Romney ticket – http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/212241-sen-rand-paul-it-would-be-an-honor-to-be-considered-for-vp-on-a-romney-ticket

    2. Ron Paul claims he’s in second place in number of committed delegates and could beat Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhzAyLIJqBo

  • 36Free

    Newt won, but Santorum did not do as poorly as it is being described. He is at the top of the perch and his time to be ganged up on. All in all, he did better than when Romney and even Newt when they were in that position. The Ron Paul factor with Romney is shameless and needs to be exposed. I think that even the Paulbots in the audience were told to be enthusiastic for Romney. For anyone to get that jacked up for this plastic politician is suspect.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1039621265 Tom Liddle

    Does anyone ‘else’ find this ‘funny’ or suprising?

    Back in 2008 when gas went above $3.00 – it was all GW’s fault.. there again, if it rained outside, it was GW’s fault (so said the liberal media)…

    When ‘the great one’ took office, gas prices averaged $1.85.
    Today gas is nearly twice that (I paid 3.55 at lunch today) and it’s NOT BHO’s fault?

    Uh, how’s THAT work?

  • Cybercorrespondent

    The more a candidate criticizes another candidate, the more that candidate turns me off. Instead of criticizing Santorum, Romney should look in the mirror and having Ron Paul doo his dirty work makes them both look bad. http://youtu.be/8qHmXMMCrlI

  • DebbyX

    Rick really needs to STOP taking notes like he’s in High School. If he can’t retain a thought while still listening, he’s in the wrong job market.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sj.hollist.org Sj Hollist

    Ron Paul!!!

  • falling321

    You are right…he isn’t in it for the money…he is in it for the power, which is far worse! He was a horrible governor and while Bain had a lot of success, Romney has not yet told us how HE contributed to that success other than being part of Bain when the money started rolling in. And without federal dollars, he would never have been able to turn the Olympics around (I agree that the federal $ were a good thing BTW). So instead of just producing millions in attack ads, why doesn’t he start producing some ads telling voters exactly HOW he will solve our countries problems…that is what Newt is doing!

  • doesnmatter

    He offered nothing new because he doesn’t repeatedly change his mind. You have to give him that. He is consistent. Why do you reserve all the negative traits for your candidate’s opponents? They always have (according to you) an agenda that is self-serving, while apparently your candidate only serves his country. Seriously?

    • AsleepNoMore

      Yes, seriously. He is that rare. That’s why we are so passionate about his candidacy.

      • doesnmatter

        Sorry, AsleepNoMore. You are definitely snoozing (and dreaming) on this one.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/William-Costa/1168342252 William Costa

    Ron Paul …. Newt was his typical pompous self . Rick had nothing of substance to say, just more self right-us bauble. Mitt still fails to show he understands the role of the Federal Government.