Rush to Republicans: Don’t play Obama’s bipartisan games or you’ll lose

As soon as most of us heard that Obama wanted a televised ‘bipartisan debate‘, we knew what he was up to. It’s this simple: Obama is trying to game the republicans into another meeting where he can help them commit suicide. The MSM will play it however he wants because he has them in his back pocket. He can get up their and lie his ears off and the media won’t take a step in the direction of challenging his lies. In fact they let him lie all the time and get away with it and this won’t be any different.

Rush warns Republicans to not play this game or else they will lose. Instead he says they should embrace the ‘party of no’ or as Michelle Malkin has so eloquently stated before, the ‘party of hell no!’


Recent Posts:

  • Tyler
    I honestly want to beleive that the sudden Republican dissent after a year of agreeing with Obama's policy ideas isn't just another "Weapon of Mass Distraction" as I like to call these tricks used by the media.

    I guess only time will tell.

    Vigilence and the ability to think OUTSIDE the box (including Fox News) is going to allow us as a nation to keep our freedoms.
  • chambodia
    From what I saw on Hotair.com, it looks like someone heard him. I hope they stick to it!
  • Tyler
    I couldn't have said that better myself. I remember the first time they started saying the Republicans were the party of "No," and how Obama was telling these guys to worry more about governing than about keeping their jobs and the votes.

    Um...personally, if they do care about votes, then that means they're listening to us. I would much rather have someone say "No," to something that I nor the rest of their constituents want than to back down from their (and in many cases our) principles in order to get the heat off their backs.

    I think I join many other Americans when I say "He/she who will stand up to the pitbulls in D.C. and show the courage needed to keep America intact will get my vote next election." Members of Congress should be worried about job security because their job security depends on playing the proper role of "consent of the governed."
blog comments powered by Disqus