The Right Scoop
All I'm saying is I can't vote for Newt, Perry, or Huntsman because they are spewing this leftist claptrap.
It says more about them than about Romney.
Thank goodness Santorum has a brain.
So if you came from nothing and earned a ton of money, you wouldn't want to give your children a great start? I have an idea, why don't we confiscate all wealth once a man dies so he can't leave his money to his family. It's just unfair! Hypocrosy and covetting are such ugly sins. All you guys who are jealous of Mitt Romney really need to grow up. You really are sounding like OWS people.
Obama has a number of ACES in the hole.
- A sure-fire third party candidate via Americans Elect. They are well-funded by secret donors and are registered in EVERY state already. Chris Wallace named the 'organizer' of this 'grass roots' group on national TV after one of the GOP debates. As you know, a third party candidate guarantees Obama's re-election.
- Holder's suits against SC and any other state that wants to require voters to have Photo IDs.
- Amnesty for illegals (new Obama voters)
- Intimidation, bribes, bussing in voters, union threat tactics
- Vote count fraud
- Multi-residency voters
- OWS/Arab spring violence, mobs, anarchy, military takeover, total control of media, etc.
As Newt said, it will take faith and a miracle like Washington's crossing the Delaware and a determination and holy boldness, like Washington's password for that operation, 'Victory or Death' to offset Obama's ruthless machine and mindset.
As for Mitt, the Presidency of the USA may be as much a religious goal for Mormons (Joseph Smith, the Mormon founder, ran for POTUS in 1844, Mitt's father did in the 60s) as it has been for the Marx-o-fascist, Islamist, Homosexualist, Abortionist now in office. We have seen the tactics each of these groups will use when people 'hate' (dare to disagree, dissent, object to their ideology) them. Imagine the combination in concert.
First they propagandize (we just want to exist, we are peaceful, we just want fairness, we are Americans too), then whine and play the victim. Then they accuse, bully, ridicule, marginalize, etc. Then they intimidate, vandalize, threaten, stalk, beat up dissenters. Then, they bomb, kill, rape your children, riot, create anarchy, chaos. Then they take over your town, state, nation captive, brainwash your children, etc. Then they go to war with your neighbors and migrate posing as refugees, and start over, using the same step-by-step process.
Whether or not it is a religious thing with him, I doubt the Mormon bishop is willing to use the same kinds of tactics that the Muslim-Soldier-Martyr is quite ready and willing to employ. After all, the MSM (in more ways than one) has the collective might of the US military and the Islamic world with all its 57 states at his disposal...and they can already taste caucasian blood and sweet revenge for the years of black slavery and the crusades and they will stop at nothing.
Even Hillary was not that ruthless.
There is only One Power greater. Only a David (or an Elijah or Elisha) can take this Goliath.
Psalm 2, I Samuel 17, II Kings 6:16-17, II Chronicles 20:12, II Chronicles 7:14, II Corinthians 10:4-6
I don't know about a "religous thing" unless you mean the same religous thing George Bush felt before he ran. I think all of these candidates feel for one reason or another, God wants them running for Prez. You're not saying that is unique to Romney, are you?
i like Rick and for those who do here is a good read from KrisAnne Hall it makes a few points we need to understand.....
http://www.krisannehall.com/index.php/blog/102-can-we-legislate-morality
All those are good points about Santorum, but his record and past performances just don't back him up. I still remember when he was talking trash about the 999 plan when Cain was on top (pre-harrassment accusations). The fair tax is supremely conservative and is a REPLACEMENT tax for taxes already embedded in the price of products. Instead, along with Bachmann, Santorum involved himself in sniping. He did the same with Perry and every other person on top. It is also unfortunate that he has no real "radical" policy proposals. At least Newt and Perry have their "optional" flat tax (tax simplification, not really tax reform, but still good). Santorum has nothing we haven't seen or heard before. He also has other policy issues, as I believe he is also against right-to-work laws, and many other various sins.
Not a Santorum nut, by any means, but Santorum has proposed a 10/28 bracket simplification. That will probably be easier to pass than a flat tax.
On a side note, I do not want to hear any more on Cain. I was a big fan of his until he dropped out and became COMPLETELY irrelevant to me. It is apparent that he could have stayed in. He got almost as many votes in Iowa as Huntsman...
No, we don't need nice guys anymore. Santorum won't rock the boat. That's his weakness.
Well I personally hope Romney doesn't get the nomination.However if he is our nominee, it is good that EVERYTHING about his record is discussed now ,as believe me Obama with his huge warchest is certainly going to 'discuss' it.Obama has to run a negative campaign because of what a poor president he is. The media domestic and internationaly are talking up romney saying he will 'walk it' to the nomination, that is a tried and tested tactic to help a candidate.
You have this great piece of wisdom that romney should be voted for because he will not put off that 'crucial' independent vote because he is a moderate. I personally think Romney is being annointed by the media,like Obama.So therefore I want to know everything about him, lets test him with his negatives. because I am highly suspicious of the attitude towards his candiature, including from fox news. If there is a reason for it, I damn well want to know about it,so we don't get another wet lettuce like Mcain and hand Obama a second term.If it is unfair, and not true let the romney camp explain it, to neutralise a future dem attack. I have heard another rumor about class action lawsuit over romneys employment practices from former employees if he becomes the nominee. I want that dissected as well to see if there is truth to it.That could sink him . Romney is running on his record in business it makes sense that it will be used to attack him.
The obama camp and the elite media will go as low as they can to beat him. Look what they did to Mcain and especially sarah palin. How comes also, gingrich was told to stop 'whining' and suck it up, when essentially Romeny bought his win, and destroyed newts chances with the ads. So now Romney is getting some of it himself, apparently this is newt reverting to his 'old ways' .Please. Iam beginning to wonder if fox wants obama to have another term for whatever reason. If the repubs are left with a damp squid candiate and Obama wins by a landslide , I hope fox is sunk by it's viewers. That no one listens or buys ann coulters books.
Good for Santorum for not taking the low road. Shame on the other candidates for so transparently and unfairly going after Romney in such an anti-capitalistic way. They are so desperate. Newt, you blew it. Sucks to be you, eh? I knew he'd wind up eating those conceited, arrogant words when he said it looks like he'll be the nominee.
They have nothing on Romney. This is the best they can do? The biggest hit against Romney is that he's a centrist. That's it. That's all. Unlike the others, the guy actually sleeps with his own wife and has a lovely family. Can you imagine that!!! Unlike the others, he actually made money in the private sector! Oh, the horror! The man has experience in government AND in business. Gee, imagine that. Why would America want a successful man with solid values to be POTUS?
Romney would not be my first choice to be the nominee, and there are certainly things I don't like about him, but these types of despicable attacks make me sympathetic to him. The guy has good family values and has made a lot of money off of capitalism. Gee, I thought those were things the GOP supported? He is far from the perfect candidate. I know. I know. Wake up folks - none of them are perfect. There is no "dream candidate". Romney is not a "real conservative" to many. Fine. I agree. But he's a smart, good man. A leader. A take-charge guy. HE won't play golf for half of his presidency. He'll get things done. He will turn the country around. ***He is a fixer!*** Doesn't that count for anything? He's MUCH better than Obama. Don't know if he can beat him, but he's definitely a superior candidate vs. that tired old DCer JohnMcCain. I'm tired of hearing all the whining on the right about Romney. The key thing is to get rid of Obama.
So Romney should apologize for creating all those jobs and making a bunch of money? He should say... "YOU CAN DO IT TOO!'
Jealousy is a green-eyed monster.
Santorum for Prez.
The more I hear him, the more I love him. Santorum is a gracious guy, who has common sense and knows foriegn threats. I've said this about others, but I do think this country would be blessed by Santorum being in the White House. He loves God, he loves family and he loves America. He did a great interview here. As for the sweater vests, I'm not a fan of them, but I'd go buy one ;-)
Something Levin pointed out tonight that really shocked me. Did any of you know that the New Hampshire Primary is an 'Open' Primary? Meaning that any party affiliation can cast a vote in the Republican Primary on Tuesday to determine whom the winner is. I find this outrageous and inexcusable! A democrat, independent, or just any schmoe should not be determining our candidate. This is just preposterous! How can New Hampshire be allowed to be an early Primary state with this stupid strategy? Especially with the early Primaries determining who will drop out early. Look for New Hampshire to be the next rigged election tomorrow.
Too bad Levin and all the other voters in Virginia couldn't go up to New Hampshire to vote, seeing as there are so many in Virginia who won't pick mittens or paul.
Because the New Hampshire Primary is an 'Open' Primary' it should really make it clear why Donna Brazile laided it out pretty clear last night after the debate. ''Mitt Romney is the candidate the DemocRATs want to run against Obama'' because they see him as the one that can put Obama back in the White House.
I am surprised no one has caught that and TheRightScoop did not pick that line up as a discussion topic thread. That was a pretty important and revealing statement she made because it shows why Romney is doing so well. The DemocRATs are stacking the deck to get a weak GOP candidate so the Obamination can have a soft landing into his second term.
COME ON PEOPLE WAKE UP!
He's above the fray, and thus, worthy of my vote! Way to stand out above the crowd Mr. Santorum!!! Keep it up!
Each one of the candidates have tried to use the 'above the frey' tactic. Huntsman tried it at the last debate when he looked scathingly at the other candidates and berated them, and it bombed.
Romney's brand of raw, calculator-driven 'lion eat wounded lamb' capitalism is like Walmart coming to town. The old downtown business infrastructure, independent grocers, department stores always die out. Walmart kills and guts communities. The best these towns can do is set up cute boutique businesses, restaurants, but these go bust during recessions, while Walmart does not.
I can accept this, but do not approve of Walmart being bullied by Islamists in Michigan who insisted that Walmart set its prices so that it would *not* undercut MUSLIM businesses and dhimmi Walmart backed down and complied. This is letting the worst bullies on earth take control. No telling what kind of threats these beasts used, however...since they showed they will stop at NOTHING. There is no unspeakable inhumane act beneath a dedicated muslim...or an abortion-minded liberal, or porn movie producer.
Their bottom line is power and money.
As for Romney, the FBI is vetting him, checking out his off-shore accounts and all the Bain dealings...probably at the Obama administration's direction. We can be sure that no stone is left unturned.
But who among the GOP and right wing has the guts and grit and intel resources to vet Obama? One group comes to mind, but it's also 'off-shore'.... (starts with an M and ends with a D.) They know what's what and who's who and US politics matters to them. That 'Regime change' term that has been repeated in the debates, is well within their capabilities, even here.
-If this is indeed an "above the frey" tactic, as you say it is, then it is a mistake. Right now none of the candidates have good numbers against Romney, and jumping on the "Bash Bain Capital" bandwagon would be a good move for Santorum. He is also risking intense scrutiny from other candidates by speaking against them; so this shows he at least he has a spine.
-Walmart is responsible for killing and gutting communities because it has better prices? That is like saying ATM's put people out of jobs because a person it could be someone's job (as Obama once claimed), or saying that cars are bad because it replaced the stagecoach.
"Why would a country that has the richest supplies of Oil and Natural Gas build a Nuclear Power Plant?"
That should crash the Paulbots.
Yeah, Iran is sitting on top of one of the worlds largest dinosaur mausoleum and they want nuclear energy so they can be green.
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.