Sean Hannity goes nuclear and destroys Anthony Weiner

I think someone needs to define a threshold for what bipartisan means. In the Senate Obama's never even gotten 10% of the Republicans and pelosi runs around clucking bipartisan if she even gets one. One! Hell, if you can't get snowe, collins and brown (and specter until recently) you know you're neck deep in BS.

Anthony Weiner reminds me exactly why I will never run for political office. If I had to listen to somebody who sounds like Pee Wee Herman having a playground, emotional breakdown, and get in my face to boot, I'd punch the guys lights out right there on camera! Jeez! What a whiner – woops, I mean weiner.

Anthony Weiner is the living embodiment of why politics and politicians have a bad name. Every move he makes is cold, calculated, he goes for low blows and cheap political points, he is profoundly dishonest and untrustworthy. His hallmark seems to be playing on emotions, and the way things look to people who cannot come to conclusions for themselves. His style of debate is brash, and seems to be borrowed from the third grade. It is also very evasive to forthrightness, and relies very heavily on emotional argument. In my mind he represents to a large extent, the downfall of America. All is not lost, however. We need to do all we can to make sure Anthony and people like him stay out of office.

They all need to go…deport them all…Washington DC needs new Faces!!

well, i got to hear the whole thing today listening to the show, and what drove me nuts, is Hannity asked him a simple question: “Why do you need 290 votes to pass the bill, when it only needs 218?” Now, for a simpleton like me, the answer is VERY clear, and it is the same politics as usual for dems, if you can get ONE SINGLE REPUBLICAN(RYNO) to go along with it, come November, you can blame the Republicans for ruining the boarder and going along with amnesty. I am seriously thinking, because of the ELITES of the Northeast, and Leftcoast, then they just need to form the Utopia States of America, and leave the rest of us to do business CONSTITUTIONALLY, and stop the Libtards from taking us all down with the Tytanic(and yes, meant to spell it that way, because they are all tyrants).

I agree with you both.

I can't believe even a liberal could condone Psycho Weinie's actions.

Weiner was pushing Hannity to comment on the bill and share his position.
Hannity said basically he'd gladly read the bill, if Weiner would read his bills too. There was no “demand”, Hannity only asked Weiner to do what he was asking others to do. ( and of course, Weiner is paid by the taxpayers as his JOB to read the bills]

You actually have to respect Hannity for not be being afraid to appear uniformed and admitting he hadn't read it yet. Not “voting” on something he hadn't read is something Congress could learn from.

In the back rooms, Weiner promised his cohorts he would figure a way to bring the Republicans into their game so they could later use it as fodder to beat up the Republicans during the next election. It didn't work, and the issue got so big and public that he was then caught in his own web of deceit and had to continue in his own defense.
They all need to be fired and we replace them with the first 535 names in the phonebook from a small town in Nebraska

Because it was the DEMOCRATS who have become famous for making negative declarations about SB-1070 in Arizona, a bill they've never read. Couple that with that weiner's evasiveness and basic dishonesty then its pretty understandable why the likes of a weiner has to draw flies. If King hadn't read it either then shame on him as well.

Dear Mr. Hannity,

I am a 9/11 responder and I need the health care HR847 would provide.
First, congratulations on getting this interview: it was timely. I haven't seen any news that would have explored WHY HR847 was not passed.

Now, for a comment. I wish your interview had truly explored the reasons this bill was blocked. We need to know why there are objections. Unfortunately, you turned this into a shouting match with Anthony Weiner and tried to get a cheap point across: that he (and other representatives) might not read bills they vote on in their entirety.

I submit to you that reading every bill is probably impossible, given the sheer number of words. Calling out a single member — Mr. Weiner — was, I believe, not up to the standards you ought to set for yourself.

You had a great idea: to analyze the problem. I sure wish you had stuck to this. Everyone deserves better journalism. And, frankly sir, you owe this to ME. I need to know. You had the opportunity to help me understand it. But you did not do that.

My hope is that, in future, I can count on better from you.

Mrs. T. Graves
9/11 Responder

Hahaha, Hannity didn’t read the bill? You people are buying this? Absolute fools. He is trying to change the subject bc he is embarassed about this whole thing