911Infidel
I like this guy. Actuallly, I like anyone who speaks the truth about what is happening to our country, right before our very eyes. Is Obama a Muslim? Unless you are a total Idiot, the answer is yes.
Was he sent here to destroy this country? Unless you are a total Idiot, the answer is yes.
Did he meet the requirements of the Presidency? Unless you are a total Idiot, well I'll leave that to your own intelligence.
We have the problem, called, "Obama." Question is, what do we do with the problem?
Get rid of the problem, would be my answer.
1 Like
NEWSFLASH!!!***Why Obama needed a "taster" before he would eat at the dinner serving Main lobster: Obama is a Muslim this proves it: Muslims do not eat lobster! And he NEVER TOUCHED THE DINNER!
2 Like
I want to emphasize like I have stated on other threads.....until we see valid documentation...polls etc. of Muslim countries where a majority do not support Jihad...a holy war of terror in the name of God....I cannot and WILL NOT assume that the majority of Islamists support equality in religion, gender and race. Now if the GOP's platform states that a majority of Muslims believe in peaceful equality...then I need to leave the Republican Party because they are only deluding themselves!
@suzy000 Liberals in this country including liberal Republicans call Islam a Religion of peace. Granted some may be saying it so they don't get their head chopped off but mostly it's because their idiots.
There will never be a poll in Muslim countries asking if they support Jihad. If you are Muslim you must support the teachings of the Koran which teaches Jihad against non-believers. This is why the only Muslims you'll ever hear speak out against Jihad are former Muslims.
4 Like
i have to agree with this... the GOP and alot of republicans just dont want to hear this... they dont want people to know that they will not open their eyes to the imminent threat to the country.... the fact that the muslim brotherhood is in every branch of government....
3 Like
So Spencer didn't roll over and play dead just because of an award and not being invited to CPAC. Very well done. We'd better hope there are many more willing to join him in opposition to the treason of our governments support for our enemies.
1 Like
If they're having a conference on Islam that's supposed to pick people that CPAC didn't, why not bring ...Debbie Schlussel?
While I don't always agree with her, she's interesting, original and speaks her mind all the time, no matter who's bad side it would get on, even Spencer's.
RighteousCrow_JustCaws
It's helpful to weigh the opinions of conservatives as to who they feel like being their next pres.
RighteousCrow_JustCaws
I like ABC but CPAC's always had a straw poll. It's what they do, there's not an alternative motive to it and the boys club candidates all lost.
The grassroots may not agree on a candidate but one of our choices won it.
2 Like
Sour grapes. I think he's complained about every CPAC since 2010. It's gotten old and he needs to get over it instead of this drama queen "the uninvited" stuff.
"controversial speakers" Okay, good for no white nationalists but there's at least one Bushie globalist, the Alberto Gonzales replacement Mukasey.
Breitbart's assistant editor was at CPAC. Forgot his name but he was good.
4 Like
@Jim25 Sour grapes? Spencer makes the valid point that CPAC much like the government has been infiltrated by stealth jihadis and he is correct. Why should he align himself with an organization that purports to be conservative while enabling the enemies of the Constitution.? If one wishes to align themselves with enemies of the Constitution who wish to subsume the Bill of Rights under Sharia...that individual or individuals is either ignorant bu choice or is doing it on purpose...in which case that individual is no longer either a patriot or a conservative. That is the salient point of the arguement that Spencer is making. Sour grapes> Hardly. He already has the #1 conservative blog on the net. So the award is a who-cares accolade anyways.
Sour grapes. I think he's complained about every CPAC since 2010. It's gotten old and he needs to get over it instead of this drama queen "the uninvited" stuff.
"controversial speakers" Okay, good for no white nationalists but there's at least one Bushie globalist, the Alberto Gonzales replacement Mukasey.
AmericanborninCanada white531 I missed out on the topsy turvy first day because I was with my grandbaby all day long. I'm still trying to catch up.
10 Like
Breitbart would be proud. I hope more Conservatives join them in this for next year if they do it again. Noticed the straw poll at CPAC and seems as if the same choices are being made for folks again already. I know- I'm going to get a lot of flack for that comment.
Good for the "uninvited'!
2 Like
@AmericanborninCanada Ted Cruz and Rand Paul are likely just being used by the establishment. Either that, or they are on their way to being promoted for higher office, or to take a fall in a sham 2016 election. Rubio, Christie, Ryan, and many more have been promoted for a reason, then they fall out of the scene. The GOP establishment, and the media promote whoever they choose, and we seem to follow along every time. We get worked up by some good speeches, but ultimately, they disappoint. I am at the point now that I just see their media stars as insignificant to any real change in D.C.. I like Rand and Cruz, but until they actually accomplish something real, it's all just talk or showmanship.
@libertifirst @AmericanborninCanada
On what planet are Rand Paul and Cruz part of the establishment exemplified by McCain and Graham who panicked over the filibuster and used the word showmanship to describe it because people are learning to value their freedoms because they put drone strikes on trial for the nation to see, turning Obama from "cool guy who cares for you" to a cold-blooded tyrant, as I heard one person I forget the name of phrase it? They made it pretty clear, they're not working with these guys.
That IS an accomplishment just like Rand's father, who also won CPAC twice and has been praised by some anti-freedom media figures like Jon Stewart, not passing any major legislation but getting his message out to people was an accomplishment. In contrast, Rubio hasn't accomplished anything conservative, only palling with McCain and Graham on an illegal war in Libya and an immigration bill because he's not making waves.
I don't see anything wrong with them getting rewarded for that by conservatives. We should congratulate when someone defends the Constitution as cabensg said, it's very rare to see folks up there use their position like that. We're not hipsters. It's what they all should be doing but aren't.
You also say actions speak louder than words, so that means actions taken are more important than semantics.
@libertifirst @Jim25 @AmericanborninCanada
It's called manners or decorum. I don't think we've ever had a non-liberal who broke decorum and professionalism like that. For instance, Ron Paul would try to be concillatory towards many liberals, he worked on a bill with Barney Frank instead of attacking him personally. He reached out to Obama's establishment backer Jon Stewart and although it shocked me looking it up, Obama's Communist sycophantic surrogate Jon Huntsman and didn't call people murderers. He's polite. His son is more aggressive in attacking Obama himself. But policy is more important than semantics.
I will say you got some of what you wanted with Bachmann. She said we should investigate disloyalty to the US in Congress and attacked the loyalty of Hillary's chief of staff. Allen West called certain members of Congress Communists.
How can you say you like them but then compare them to Boehner and Ryan? Boehner and Ryan have records of backing the establishment's stuff, I think the support for these two is more organic and natural.
@Jim25 @libertifirst @AmericanborninCanada Sure, it is nice to hear some good words, and even see some gridlock in congress, but what will be the end result? What we need to hear from these guys is that their colleagues are corrupt and are purposefully destroying this country. Of course, if they did that, they would not get the interviews, or be on any committees, etc. Even Rand and Cruz serve a purpose to the establishment when they are speaking against it.
They need to start calling out McCain and the rest as being tyrants, plain and simple. They need to start calling people who vote to kill civilians with drones "murderers". The same goes for those who support abortion. Why not just call them murderers? What good has "getting along" done this country. We need people who get into office to risk their political standing and careers speaking the truth. Otherwise, we will just simply continue to slowly decline until we are done for.
A few years ago, you would be listening to Boehner give the same kind of "great" speeches. The media gave him the coverage, and he became speaker of the house. Then he goes against everything he supposedly stood for, and the tough guy attitude is gone. People on this site were all worked up and supporting Boehner.
The same goes for Paul Ryan, and many more. Allen West talked a good game, but many, including myself, were quite disappointed with many of his votes. I've been watching this game play out for a couple of decades now, and it never changes, and everything just gets worse and worse.
We don't have enough time left to hope for something that will never come, and expect that to save us. Talk is cheap. Rand most certainly is not his father. He turned off a lot of people when he endorsed Romney. What good did that do him? Well, Romney lost, and Rand lost credibility as a principled conservative.
I like Rand and Cruz, but they are being used to keep people on the republican hook, and to keep the establishment republicans in power by being the "liberty" wing of the republican party, which is a very small part of it. Now that they have made some progress and notoriety in the main stream, they need to leave the party and run third party. At very least, they need to quit supporting the tyrants like Romney and the rest.
1 Like
@libertifirst @AmericanborninCanada libertifirst, I believe you have come pretty close to the problem we are facing. It is action, not words, that will restore us to the right path.
@white531 @libertifirst @AmericanborninCanada
A filibuster is action. More than has been taken in a very long time.
1 Like
@white531 @libertifirst @AmericanborninCanada Thanks white. I would love to see some of our conservative alternative media outlets start hammering on the election process, rather than keeping busy with the daily rhetoric. We need an anti-electronic election movement. Maybe then we could get rid of McLame, Boehner, and the rest.
1 Like
@libertifirst @AmericanborninCanada I have to disagree with the part about showmanship. We've been starved for someone, anyone to step forward and argue against Obama and liberals. Rand and Cruz are doing their job. This is why they were sent there. It's just so odd to have anyone take their job as Senator serious it seems like grandstanding, but this is what all of our Senators should be doing. We're so use to hearing nothing substantial from any of them it does seem strange that finally someone takes their job seriously. I also see nothing wrong with receiving approval for doing your job.
@libertifirst @cabensg @AmericanborninCanada
They'll try to fleece them out of winning, but they can only go so far.
Ryan, Christie and Rubio didn't put their money where their mouth was. These two are and the approval they're getting from it shows the public is waking up to it.
How can you say they're grandstanding working with McCain and Christie and still say you like them though?
1 Like
@libertifirst @cabensg @AmericanborninCanada Again, libertifirst, your words are like fine music, with a glass of Chardonnay. What you just stated, is exactly what is happening.
1 Like
@cabensg @libertifirst @AmericanborninCanada I understand where you are coming from. My view is simply based on the fact that this is a reciprocation of past events. There is a pattern to how these things are done. The establishment knows who can gain the support of conservatives, so they put them up for us to cheer for them. The reality of the situation is that people like Boehner, McCain, Graham, McConnel, etc. retain the power positions and control the whole cabal. In the end, guys like Cruz and Paul are only put on the stage to keep us hooked into the supposed only party that we can support. They would love for us to think that people like Rand, Cruz, West, etc. have growing influence to give us hope for the next election. The problem is that fraud picks the power brokers, so they never loose their strangle hold on the process, and retain their dictatorial grip on the overall agenda, and the election process.
It's a sham. I like to hear Cruz and Paul give those speeches, but I am not fooled into thinking that what they are being allowed to do is going somewhere significant. It never happens, which made me try to figure out why. There has to be a reason, and what I came up with is simply the fact that the establishment in D.C. and the MSM (including Fox) coordinate this effort to deceive us, and it works most of the time. Otherwise, there would be a mass exodus of support for these fake media heads and their dribble that is designed to keep our eyes off of the ball.
Maybe so, but AbiC is right: let them all stand on their own, and we will make our choice.
@911infidel @RighteousCrow_JustCaws Ahaaa! A little confusing but good, too. Probably rounds out the conversation better.
Really appreciate all the effort behind the RS 'curtain.'
@RighteousCrow_JustCaws @911infidel Yeah. If a converstaion is started and several reply to one commenter, all the responders are CC'd.
@911infidel@RighteousCrow_JustCaws
Okay, thanks - I'm trying to figure out the new comment vehicle.
=;>
1 Like
@911infidel@Jim25@RighteousCrow_JustCaws
It's right and
wrong and leadership. Of course it is but how many truly understand that. There would be no Obama presidency if people actually cared about leadership and who should be doing it.
1 Like
@Jim25 @RighteousCrow_JustCaws In my opinon it's because the younger voters have gone all libertarian about getting drugs without adult supervision which is what drug laws are all about. The laws may need some tweaking but we don't need a country of druggies going to the drug station for their fix. What we need is a war on Psych drugs which are sanctioned and encouraged by our government because a lobotomized populace is even easier to control.
3 Like
@Jim25 @RighteousCrow_JustCaws Polls? Lets see. Harry Truman said something about polls which I posted the other day. Perhaps you missed it? "
How far would Moses have gone if he had taken a poll in Egypt? What would Jesus Christ have preached if he had taken a poll in the land of Israel? What would have happened to the Reformation if Martin Luther had taken a poll? It isn't polls or public opinion of the moment that counts. It's right and wrong and leadership."
@RighteousCrow_JustCaws
It's helpful to weigh the opinions of conservatives as to who they feel like being their next pres.
The old guard is still bleeding from Rand's filibuster of Brennan so badly they're in the emergency ward. He's not collaborating with Christie and Bush.
I like ABC but CPAC's always had a straw poll. It's what they do, there's not an alternative motive to it and that's evidenced that the old guard candidates all lost.
The grassroots may not agree on a candidate but one of our choices won it.
We can make our choice, but that's what those polls are for. It's always been their point and Rand has the momentum in our movement, which the poll reflects.
It was a grassroots showing and Rubio didn't get first. And although Rand might be the favorite of most, some might pick Santorum. That's fine, a free country and it's everyone's choice to make.
white531 Hi Whitefriend. This format isn't quite as good as it used to be, but trust me- it's way better than what disqus was trying to force Scoop to use.
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.