The Right Scoop
Now matter what Beck starts to say, "Ve-whora cuts in with, "But, but, but, but"
Do you ever them incessantly contradict and cut off Dems like that? Why do they we can't see through their agenda?
From his TV show on Thursday, June 10, 2010. Beck rambles so it's a little more difficult than usual to get the context of his remarks but I think this is a fair selection:
I will stand against you and so will millions of others. We believe in something. You in the media and most in Washington don't. The radicals that you and Washington have co-opted and brought in wearing sheep's clothing — change the pose. You will get the ends.
You've been using them? They believe in communism. They believe and have called for a revolution. You're going to have to shoot them in the head. But warning, they may shoot you.
They are dangerous because they believe. Karl Marx is their George Washington. You will never change their mind. And if they feel you have lied to them — they're revolutionaries. Nancy Pelosi, those are the people you should be worried about.
I think Beck and Ablow came off real well. Vieira wasn't that bad. She asked some fair questions which I think was good for Beck to answer on that show. Imagine how many lefties heard him speak and explain himself in normal terms that would not have ever looked to hear from him before. I think this was a good thing.
Meredith, you are a Hag. I capitalized it to show I mean that with all due respect. You never should have left The View, blurry as it may be because I never watched the show.
So its okay for the libs to smear and, name call, and do all manner of disgusting, vile, rhetoric, but if the Conservatives say ANYTHING AT ALL against their "anointed one" then it is hate-mongering! Unbelievable!!!
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
The mainstream (lame-stream) media ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS! They LIE or otherwise TWIST THE TRUTH whenever they open their mouths!
I think it's high time someone came into the political ring swinging their fists. No more nice-nice. Just calling it as they see it, and tell people the exact truth with only enough sugar coating that they don't shut down completely, like the Therapist was saying. Perhaps we have some like that already, but we need to unleash them.
I think it's high time someone came into the political ring swinging their fists. No more nice-nice. Just calling it as they see it, and tell people the exact truth with only enough sugar coating that they don't shut down completely, like the Therapist was saying. Perhaps we have some like that already, but we need to unleash them.
Yah, I think it's high time someone came into the political ring swinging their fists. No more nice-nice. Just calling it as they see it, and tell people the exact truth with only enough sugar coating that they don't shut down completely, like the Therapist was saying. Perhaps we have some like that already, but we need to unleash them.
Yah, I think it's high time someone came into the political ring swinging their fists. No more nice-nice. Just calling it as they see it, and tell people the exact truth with only enough sugar coating that they don't shut down completely, like the Therapist was saying. Perhaps we have some like that already, but we need to unleash them.
What's really irritating about this is the narrative. Vieira creates the straw man narrative in short order. Beck swallows whole. What I don't get is why Beck doesn't just tear apart at their left-wing assumptions and turn every fraudulent question and assumption back on them. They've got to do this if Conservatives are ever going to hold their heads above the arsenic laced water.
Now... as for Ablow.... this is the same Keith naive dhimmi Ablow who was on Eric Bolling's show bragging how he was a big supporter of the Ground Zero Mosque. He employed every trope and sop to the First Amendment he could to show how magnanimous and concerned he was for America's Constitutional values and Manhattan development (of all things)!
Ablow and Beck and Ablow and Ground Zero Mosque = cognitive dissonance.
Watch Ablow in action... www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV0N4iVRvJ8
Beck did a masterful job of keeping control of this interview. Of course NBC starts out trying to bait him, it's what their viewers want!
I'll be picking up the book soon, can't wait to read it
TMI on Vieira and her panty habits, dude! I nearly spewed coffee all over my monitor! :)
Ok. Let me get this straight, she has him on to discuss his NEW book, "GUIDE TO DEFEAT ANGER & FIND COMPASSION", and asks if he has regret over some ridiculous thing he said 8 years ago?
LOL!
....ah...i don't git it.
That must be why I stopped watching the TODAY show years ago -
ah jist ain't smart nuff fer the depth of it.
MEREDITH - Hello, lights on but nobodies home - elevator doesn’t go to the top floor…….
This agenda of yours is the very reason why millions of Americans don’t listen to you until you interview the Beck man….
Your liberal attack agenda is a bunch of BULL PUCKIE……
I didn't mind the interview too much. She tossed out some hard questions which is what you want to see from both sides. Beck handled it very well. I do wish she would do the same with her liberal guests though.
J-Didn't mind?. I respect your opinion. I’m just wondering if we’ve seen this typical lib bias so much that this time it didn‘t seem that bad.
Meredith - Just interview him about his book as if you don't have an agenda to make him look like a hate monger. It's interesting that they only have "Obama is a racist" statement to put Beck in their gun site.
Why not bring up the fact that he's come a long way ----- All the way to D.C. twice with over 1 million Americans gathering in D.C. .. Hello, what other average citizen has done that...... and for the purpose of building up America - founders etc. He embraces all peace loving, republic loving Americans...... Beck doesn't have some racist agenda like others who want to kill the white crackers (and I‘m not applying this to O).
Look, I agree that she is a liberal and she is showing her bias. I'm just saying that I have no problem with hosts giving hard interviews. It makes the shows much more interesting and shows you much more about the people they are interviewing. The only problem that I have is that she doesn't do the same for his liberal guests.
J- I agree but it's not only that she doesn't do the same to libs but also that the hard interview always follows the lib. politics - questions based on lies. Why in the world did she even bring up Palin.
I'm just getting a little more detailed... :)
I happened to be there on 9-12. Not because I knew about - I already had planned to be there. I learned it was going to happen only a couple days ahead….So I called the D.C. police thinking the subway etc could be an issue for us with almost a million people being there. Do you know what they said---We don’t know anything about this ---And as far as travel --the only time there would be an issue is for foreign dignitaries coming and they put more men on…..I reiterated to him you haven’t heard a thing?……1 mill…..Nope, he even checked with others----nope no special orders…..
Was there an issue with the subway- you bet and these idiots were scrambling -- on one subway we were told to stop and not descend down to the platform because it was swarming with Concerned Americans……It was the best ‘stumble upon it’ event I’ve experienced.
And we’re not going to put up with this Liberal Bull Puckie any more…..
DON’T SUPPORT THIS LIB. MEDIA BY PUTTING ANY OF YOUR MONEY IN THEIR POCKETS
ALL LIB. MEDIA - UNTIL AN ALL AMERICAN MEDIA IS LAUCHED- WITH TRUTH FIRST- THERE WILL ALWAYS BE SOME SLANT- BUT TODAYS STEEP INCLINE DEFIES GRAVITY..
OUTSTANDING!!! BALLS!!!!! BRILLIANCE!!!!
...sadly lacking COMMON SENSE, and old-fashioned AMERICAN NERVE.
I do NOT have XM. Tell that man I'll buy him a cigar AND A DRINK (mine will be coffee or sweet tea, but I remember Barcardi 151)~
CM Sackett
How in the heck was "blood libel" part of the "hateful rhetoric"? It was Sarah Palin's description of how fracking hateful the rhetoric got.
...yeah, wish I knew how to do more than simply BOLD or italicize the whole message, lol!
Monster, how do you isolate the word/phrase you're looking to enhance... WITHOUT THE DANG CODE TAKING OVER THE REST OF THE POST????? :O)
Ahh! I was trying to accomplish that by doubling up on the last "bold"... never noticed the / before, lol!
THANKS!!!
Very easy:
It was Sarah Palin's <b>description of </b>
makes:
It was Sarah Palin's description of
Note the closing </b> that "turns off" the attribute
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.