UPDATED: Campaign responds – Is Newt Gingrich a conservative sellout?

Posted by The Right Scoop on December 1st, 2011 in Politics | 159 Comments

***UPDATED***

Sure sounds like it to me. Remember when Bloomberg broke the story showing that Gingrich did work for Freddie Mac and made millions? Here’s the important part:

Former Freddie Mac officials familiar with his work in 2006 say Gingrich was asked to build bridges to Capitol Hill Republicans and develop an argument on behalf of the company’s public-private structure that would resonate with conservatives seeking to dismantle it.
He was expected to provide written material that could be circulated among free-market conservatives in Congress and in outside organizations, said two former company executives familiar with Gingrich’s role at the firm. He didn’t produce a white paper or any other document the firm could use on its behalf, they said.

Gingrich claimed he was advising Freddie that their models were wrong and would basically lead to collapse. But our good friends at Verum Serum did some digging recently and found that Newt actually made arguments for Freddie Mac in support of the GSEs (Government Sponsored Entities). Here’s a few quotes from Gingrich that Verum Serum found on Freddie Mac’s website back in 2007/2008:

I like the GSE model because it provides a more efficient, market-based alternative to taxpayer-funded government programs. It marries private enterprise to a public purpose. We obviously don’t want to use GSEs for everything, but there are times when private enterprise alone is not sufficient to achieve a public purpose.

The housing GSEs have made an important contribution to homeownership and the housing finance system. We have a much more liquid and stable housing finance system than we would have without the GSEs. And making homeownership more accessible and affordable is a policy goal I believe conservatives should embrace.

So while we need to improve the regulation of the GSEs, I would be very cautious about fundamentally changing their role or the model. itself

There’s more at Verum Serum so please go there and check it out.

Here are my questions: If Newt is the smartest man in the room and saw the collapse coming, did he do this in spite of the coming collapse just to pad his pockets? And even if he didn’t see the collapse coming, why was he willing to whore out his conservatism to try and keep Republicans from dismantling something that needed dismantling?

I’m sorry folks, but this makes me angry. If all of this is true (and Newt needs to address this) then he’s a sellout. Plain and simple.

***

UPDATE: Gingrich campaign responds to this story. Please see new post for update.

—

Digg Digg

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

Anonymous
Newt’s a politician. Of course, he’s a sell-out. It kinda/sorta goes with the territory.

Anonymous
Bye-bye Newt!! You were just a flash in the pan…. Flavor of the month, so to speak!! November is gone, so are you!!
I am gonna stick to Cain!

B-Funk
Agreed. I hope Cain stays in! I’m so sick and tired of people picking our candidates for us. This is how we got McLame. D-:<
http://profiles.google.com/ajtelles Art Telles
Hmmm – Could it be…
… Santorum’s turn?
If the 1st “non-Romney” is checkmated out, whose next?
Well…
Bachmann – was 1st… then down, not out
Perry – was 2nd… then down, not out
Cain – was 1st… then down, not out
Gingrich – is 1st… tick tick tick tick
Paul – is 6th… never 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th…
Huntsman – is 7th … never 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th…
Santorum – is 8th … never 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, down, not out
Could the first become last?
Could the last become first?
Who knows… in the mysterious ways that Yahweh works in human affairs.
Hmm.
Art

http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA Dave
Um… Paul is in first in Iowa right now. We’ll see what happens in NH.
IEUE does work in very mysterious ways – and you will see.

http://profiles.google.com/ajtelles Art Telles
IEUE…
Is “IEUE” another way to write YHWH, the transliteration of the Hebrew י-ה-ו-ה … yod-hey-waw-hey … read the Hebrew characters right to left (Exodus 3:15)…?
And, yes, Yahweh (HCSB – some prefer Yahuah or Yahowah) definitely does work in mysterious ways concerning human affairs.
After all, Yahweh, a personal name that he revealed to Moses, is not the name of the god of the Deists.
Concerning the 1 to 8 numbering -
The 1 to 8 positions are a reference to the overall national polling from various sources.
Paul has never been, as a non-romney, in the 1st to 5th position.
Hey, if he breaks out from the back of the pack… well, we’ll find out soon.
Art

http://twitter.com/hossmandu hossmandu
Honestly, I don’t care anymore. Currently I’d say that Newt and Mitt are the only two of the bunch that could overcome the Obama/MSM/$$$ machine. And even though he has his flaws as a conservative, I’d much rather have Newt running the show than Mitt. I like Newt even more if he had a GOP House & Senate. Great things could be done to reverse the past three years.

Amy
Possibly great things could be done…
Or just as likely we’d have more of the same – just done by people with (R)’s after their names.
I don’t trust anyone running right now, and I trust Newt the least…

Steven
Newt has been a sellout for sometime. Ever since he left the Speakership he’s been flirting with the Left. Newt is better than Romney, but he still stinks (Romney reeks). The problem I have with Newt is that he’s not a leader. He will try to thread the needle between the far left and the center right (GOP Establishment). That will only put us all on the center-left in the end.
No, we need bold conservative leadership that isn’t afraid to speak the truth to the American people! Herman Cain before all of these allegations against him, would go on MSNBC, the View, CNN, FOX, it didn’t matter. And he would be unabashed in his conservatism. He wasn’t afraid to say what needed to be said. Why? Because Cain is a leader, it just comes naturally for him. He’s not a politician. He knows what works and is willing to sell it to the American people. We need a problem solver, from outside of Washington, who is not a politician, to shake things up in 2012. That’s Cain! Cain is able, Cain 2012!
Anonymous
Well it is time to ask Newt about this and now.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CEIVCJOJU3JJBFIWTB7EMP7ZJE FillmoreBrown
Newt must be leading in the polls, he’s the Conservative of the moment being “crucified” by so called Conservatives websites.

Anonymous
It is called vetting and Gingrich has been given a free pass up to this point. I know plenty about Gingrich and I am absolutely astounded that this would be who the GOP would select to go up against Obama. Gingrich would be a gift to the Obama campaign. If the conservative media does not expose the truth about Gingrich then the Obama media will, and they will wait until Gingrich gets the nomination.

Anonymous
Agree totally. I feel like I’m in a bizarre universe. First we elect a President who believes in communist doctrines like spreading the wealth and then the Republicans contemplate having a nominee who was forced to resign as Speaker of the House.

http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CEIVCJOJU3JJBFIWTB7EMP7ZJE FillmoreBrown
Is Obama a homosexual, Coke whore? Larry Sinclair says so..

Anonymous
I don’t think that kind of a post is really necessary here.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Actually, what he’s getting at is we should not simply accept what someone else said at face value (ala “Larry Sinclair said Obama is a homosexual, Coke whore”…does that make it true). Again, we didn’t get the actual article, but rather, someone’s INTERPRETATION. Now is the hard part…time to do the research yourself and come up with your own conclusion. If you concur with the previous analysis, that’s fine! But at least it’s YOUR DECISION.

Anonymous
It makes me angry too, RS. Time to grab the blood pressure pills.
Anonymous
I hear ya scoop. This pissed me off. I know you and other conservatives do not want to hear this but here goes. If Obama get another 4 years he will make this country into a banana republic over night. All because Newt made a mistake. Yeah this is a big one. But look at what Obama has done. Also, keep in mind that since Obama does not have to worry about re election he will go over congress and do whatever the hell he wants. I do not want that and if Newt comes forward and says yes I did it and looking back I should have not done it would that suffice?

Anonymous
Not if he has a Conservative House and Senate who can overcome his vetos, really punish his unConstitutional moves, etc.
It’s not ALL about the President.
So do you have a Senate seat open?
Who’s your Representative?

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Except that we have at least 2 Supreme Court justices about to retire, and WHO appoints their replacements… Sure, the Senate has to approve them, but if we have a Democrat president, it will be virtually guaranteed we get Liberal Judicial appointments. So the President is VERY important in 2012.
Anonymous
We ousted a Dem last year (Blanche Lincoln) and put in a Republican Senator.
Our Blue Dog Congressman retired and we elected a Republican Congressman.
In 2014 we plan to unseat Dem. Senator Mark Pryor.
It is difficult in Arkansas in some circles and it is a small, small state….Bill Clinton still has too many friends and supporters here….some quite shady!
But we did get Lincoln and Clinton campaigned with her…..Mark Pryor’s daddy, fromer US Senator David Pryor, and Clinton are big buds.
I went to high school with David Pryor and knew him well when he was a US Congressman and Governor….Clinton got hold of him in the Senate…downhill after that.
He was everyone’s hero here when he was a young man on the way up….my daddy knew him well and worked with him here in the state for years. Daddy was a State Highway Dept. District Engineer.
Politics does strange things to people….some not so good.

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
This makes twice today that you’ve criticized people for pointing out the flaws in Gingrich. Do you not believe in vetting candidates?
My goal isn’t to tell you who to vote for or to suggest you should/shouldn’t vote for Newt. I just want you to know important information like this so you can make an informed decision.
The left was mum about Obama in 2008 while we were screaming that they’d point out his shady connections and such.
I won’t do the same just because Newt is a Republican, especially in the primaries when we have other potential candidates to vote for.

Anonymous
Thanks for this post, Scoop. I will do some research on this myself.

B-Funk
Getting us to do our homework is probably the Scoop’s goal. Unlike the Teacher’s Union, we’re actually going to do our homework for ourselves and make educated decisions. ^_^

Anonymous
To be fair Mr. Scoop I am asking people to go after Obama. I have said that Newt has flaws. We all do. The point is what do you want. More Obama? I know you don’t but what I do not want is Romney because his record is awful compared to Newt. I have more confidence in Newt Mr. Scoop.
________________________________
From: Disqus
To: johnschaffran@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 12:26 PM
Subject: [trscoop] Re: Is Newt Gingrich a conservative sellout?
Disqus generic email template
The Right Scoop wrote, in response to johnos2112:
This makes twice today that you’ve criticized people for pointing out the flaws in Gingrich. Do you not believe in vetting candidates?
My goal isn’t to tell you who to vote for or to suggest you should/shouldn’t vote for Newt. I just want you to know important information like this so you can make an informed decision.
The left was mum about Obama in 2008 while we were screaming that they’d point out his shady connections and such.
I won’t do the same just because Newt is a Republican, especially in the primaries when we have other potential candidates to vote for. Link to comment
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C63SDNFI55BI6OELTBOZABN7KA Dave
This is not entirely accurate…
“My goal isn’t to tell you who to vote for or to suggest you should/shouldn’t vote for Newt. I just want you to know important information like this so you can make an informed decision. ”
I wish it were though.
Aside from your antipathy for the Constitutional Republic Paul promotes – you seem to have mellowed a bit towards him lately – and to be fair – you don’t seem to have a problem with his supporters posting his positions.

Professor Why
I don’t think any of the GOP candidates are really worth a damn, to be honest… Kinda disappointing… But, we’ll muddle through and figure out how to make a silk purse out of these sow’s ears…
Anonymous
Help me out here. I don’t claim to be the smartest person in the room, but it seems to me that having Government assistance to help people afford to buy a home is not, in itself, a bad thing. I’m in favor of limited Federal interference, not with dismantling it altogether.
It’s a fair bet that I’m missing some nuances here. Pleading ignorance.
Off topic, but in the same vein: Newt is not in favor of summarily deporting all 11M illegals in the US. I’m hawkish on a strong border, but again, I can’t disagree with his point. We can’t very well establish prison camps on the border and start bussing millions of people to unceremoniously dump them off in Mexico. It’s a screwed-up situation, but he seems to have a practical idea that could garner bipartisan support and actually GET PASSED THROUGH CONGRESS.
But seriously. What am I missing here?

Anonymous
Government should not engage in private enterprise especially those involved with raising capital. Public-private partnerships is just another name for this.
Fascists like this model better than socialiism because when the business inevitably fails, the politicians can blame an evil corporation instead of a government owned industry.
We are living the consequences of letting our government control the mortgage industry. TARP, deficits, unemployment, forclosures, fannie//freddie, housing prices, ballots etc.
Government assistance sounds good but means government control, power, greed and corruption.
Newt it seems was an integral part of the machine.

Anonymous
So who do we have remaining??? If we cross off Romney, Gingrich, Cain? Bachmann (who paid for her Iowa votes), Santorum (who lost his last election), Huntsman (yuck!), Perry(Mr. Immigration) and Ron Paul.
The MSM (and conservative sites) keeps hiding other viable candidates like governors Gary Johnson and Buddy Roemer by not including them in polls and debates. Both have successful records as governors (Johnson even fixed healthcare in NM!) I think Johnson said he will “Balance the Budget” a few too many times for people on both sides of the aisle to be comfortable – and the know from his record he would give it his all. So lets avoid problems up front and ignore him.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
I think a lot of people forgot to check out the actual source linked in this article. Once again, things have been taken out of context, and when you read the FULL sections where these exerpts were extracted from, you may have a different perspective. If not, that’s fine too! But THESE quotes on THIS webpage are quite misleading.
In the article, the GSE area is explained quite well, and I couldn’t do it any better than they did. Y’all should really read it.
—As an example: “I think private enterprise alone is not going to be able to help the Gulf region recover from the hurricanes, and government will not get the job done in a very effective or efficient manner. ” THAT was the VERY NEXT SENTENCE that was (oddly conveniently) forgotten to be included. Why is it important, you may ask? Well, that section was dedicated to laying out the roles of private sector/government sector, and public/private partnerships, and in which areas one is better than the others. And in this case, they were laying out a reason to have GSEs, which is that they are the best of both worlds. AND, there are multiple calls for better regulation of these GSEs!
http://www.verumserum.com/?p=34603: Read it and judge for yourself.

Anonymous
Well Brian it appears that you are the journalist here. I would just ask Newt and see what he has to say. Then move on.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
I hope you weren’t being crass (I’m pretty frazzled from my finals today). I was just relinking the same source TRS put up, and trying to explain some of the “finer” points contained in it. Hope I’m not p***ing anyone off! !

Anonymous
Not me. Keep all of us honest. If you feel something is being taken out of context, please say so.
The one thing I can’t stand is the push for groupthink.

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
He is supporting the housing GSEs and that’s what this article is about.
“Certainly there is a lot of debate today about the housing GSEs, but I think it is telling that there is strong bipartisan support for maintaining the GSE model in housing. There is not much support for the idea of removing the GSE charters from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. And I think it’s clear why.”

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
IMMEDIATELY followed by (i.e. the next sentence): “Millions of people have entered the middle class through building wealth in their homes, and there is a lot of evidence that homeownership contributes to stable families and communities. These are results I think conservatives should embrace and want to extend as widely as possible. SO WHILE WE NEED TO IMPROVE THE REGULATION OF GSEs, I would be very cautious about fundamentally changing their role or the model itself.”

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
yeah, and if you’ll notice, I posted part of that above. Still, he made an argument on behalf of the current GSE system for Freddie…apparently for millions of dollars.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
I must be blind…I can’t find where you posted my last quote anywhere on here. I’ll keep looking though !

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
Last block quote:
“So while we need to improve the regulation of the GSEs, I would be very cautious about fundamentally changing their role or the model.”

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Ahhh….I don’t know how I kept missing that! Sorry Scoop!

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
And I really do appreciate what you’re doing! I know sometimes I can be a bit McRuff with my words, but I only mean for the best! I just really want people to do their own research, and come to their own conclusions, and I find it REALLY helps when people like you bring these kinds of things to our attention! So again, thanks Scoop!

http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html Unicon
Hah!
Brown-nose alert !1!
http://www.school-clipart.com/_small/0511-0709-1811-1808.jpg

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Hahaha! That’s a big-as* apple!!!

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
I always provide links so that people CAN do their own research. So I agree with you.

Anonymous
If it is true…he’ll just say “Yep, I did and it was a mistake”….He keeps using that line and getting free pass after free pass

Anonymous
I know…this election is rigged to give Obama 4 more years.

http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html Unicon
I wrote off Newt when he slammed Paul Ryan’s budget plan. Most people did as well.
I get that Newt is one of the party’s last remaining ABM* candidate, but his gaffs always come back to haunt him. Most recently, he’s ridiculing Fox New Analysts: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/newt-zingrich-unlike-fox-news-analysts-i-have-to-know-what-im-talking-about/
I he loves to hear himself talk… but why he’d go there is beyond me.
* Anybody But Mitt(ens!)

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
hehe! Everytime someone says Mittens, I always picture a really fuzzy kitten…is that weird?!? LMAO!

http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html Unicon
I most surprised how people whine about being stuck having to wear them !1!!
http://simianuprising.com/images/mittens.png

http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
I love mittens! Not the plastic man with the bad tan mittens, the fuzzy soft and warm ones for when my hands get cold. Yes, I am a Canadian who lives in Florida and my hands still get cold. sue me

http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html Unicon
Hah !!!!
I always lost mine as a kid…it would drive my Mom nuts !!

http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
WHAT?! You didn’t have the kind with the string on them?!

http://www.scoamf.com/2011/08/hitler-realizes-obama-is-stuttering.html Unicon
Always chewed it off!!

http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
LOL! Silly!

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
I was stationed in Grand Forks, North Dakota for a few years! And as a Flightline Heavy Aircraft Crew Chief, I came to REALLY LOVE MITTENS!!!

http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
Boy, you were even more north than where I was! Yeah, I think mittens would be a necessity for sure there!

Anonymous
LOL!

Anonymous
I just have to compliment the ABM or the ABR crowd on a great ground game on ensuring a GOP loss. Your movement has fragmented the GOP and I for one will never vote for Gingrich like many other people because he is an immoral corrupt Washington Insider who only looks out for Gingrich. Good like in trying to get the Independent and moderate vote as well as the women’s vote. You guys really need to tune into other News sources besides Fox and Limbaugh.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Did you seriously just tell me I should change my vote because you disagree with me? Seems a little “lefty” to me…
And incidentally, just because I defend the man doesn’t mean he’s MY CHOICE! I do like him, and I’d be more than willing to vote for him (I’m actually pulling for him), but I also REALLY like Santorum…

Anonymous
No…What I am irritated with is the ABM campaign aligning themselves with the Obama reelection campaign to target one GOP candidate.
Mark my words, if Gingrich is the nominee,you will see the emergence of a strong third party candidate that would capture the Independent votes,Reagan Democrats,women’s votes and disenfranchised GOP voters like myself who could never vote for the Gingrich PIG!
If you don’t like Romney..fine..but GINGRICH?! WHY NOT BACHMAN? SHe is the true conservative and I could easily vote for her or Santorum because they have something Gingrich doesn’t have, a conscience and morals.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Why not! I really like Santorum, and I will NOT vote for Bachmann (mostly for her extremely abrasive personality…shallow of me, I know…). But I am constantly concerned that voting for one of them will get Mittens the nomination, and as I have previously stated, I must vote for an anti-abortion candidate. And sometimes by voting for your favorite candidate will get one of your LEAST FAVORITE candidates elected. It’s a balancing act between Best and Worst candidate, hoping to get the best compromise possible.

Anonymous
Romney is very pro-life so please stop with the propaganda. You sound like a college student who is a paid useful idiot of Obama.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Wow…

Anonymous
Many on this site say, and I agree, that our country is in trouble. Yet at every turn we trash our candidates for their imperections. Why? Everyone on this site loves Reagan, as do I, but he made many mistakes that would eliminate him from consideration today, We are the side that isn’t looking for a redeemer or messiah, like the other side. From my observation it appears like that’s exactly our intent. We will destroy ourselves even before our candidate engages the other side. So please let’s stop eating our own.

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
When did vetting = trashing?

Anonymous
When your headline asks if Newt “is conservative sellout” that to me is trashing. Like I said, by the time the primaries are over our candidate, whomever that is, will be so damaged as to not be able mount an offense.

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
So if Newt sold his conservatism to Freddie Mac to help convince Republicans not to dismantle the GSEs, what does that make him?
Sounds to me like he sold out. Sorry if you think that’s trashing, but I don’t know what else to call it.

Anonymous
I’m still trying to catch up here. Was he a member of Congress at the time and did he take money from lobbyists to pitch the idea of GSE’s?

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
No he was Speaker in the 90s. This is him as a private citizen.

Anonymous
OK, thanks. I dunno; it’s not as big of a problem to me. As I said above, I don’t have a problem with government assistance. I’m in favor of reducing the influence of the Fed, not dismantling it altogether.
I’m just getting to know Newt and his viewpoint, but he strikes me as a pragmatist more than an idealist. Sell-out may be a bit harsh…but I admit I’m still ignorant on the details here.

Amy
We have ‘unvetted’ in the White House now. It stinks. And this is our primary, so why shouldn’t we be examing everything about all of our candidates? Seriously people, stop being so afraid of the democratic machine that we sell out what we stand for just so we don’t have to fight. It’s pathetic!

http://twitter.com/torquepilot TORQUEPILOT
Newrich is not my candidate!
Anonymous
I agree. I think even Reagan couldn’t compete with Reagan at this point. We’ve ruled out every viable candidate and have no one left for whom to vote.
One caveat: doing due diligence and pointing out flaws should be a welcome vetting process. If you still like someone (Newt, in this case) after you hear about all their ugly baggage, then vote for them with both eyes open, not like an Obama fan who hopes he’s a Messiah.
Anonymous
The only candidate that I have seen consistently trashed on this sight has been Romney….so now we are suppose to get along since the ABR group has annointed Gingrich? I don’t think so. The GOP will lose the election with a flawed candidate like Gingrich. You people need to watch other news sources besides FOX news and gain some perspective as to what moderates and Independents think about Gingrich.

Anonymous
Newt was making money, period. He didn’t really think he would run for POTUS or at least to win. The only question that needs to be asked is when the Rep Senate and House sends him a bill with the Ryan or Mack budget in it, even via reconciliation, will he sign it? If they send him a bill building a fence on the border, will he sign it? If they send him a bill creating a flat tax will he sign it? If they send him a bill reforming medicare like Paul Ryan, will he sign it? If he answers yes, then he has my vote. PERIOD. We can influence who he picks for VP and set that person up to take control from him to keep this thing going. That is as important or more important. If Romney or Gingrich win, make them pick someone like Rubio or Pence, etc… We will force through our changes in 2013 via the Congress and then when Newt or Mitt is gone, our legacy and that of the Tea Party will be sitting in the White House until 2024 or 2028.
Anonymous
Uh, it might be a good idea to find out what Herman Cain said about this same stuff. Don’t forget, Gingrich and Cain have a long history together.

Anonymous
Actually, they don’t. They have known each other…but Cain is a Jack Kemp protege.

Anonymous
Gingrich introduced Cain to Kemp.

Anonymous
Nope. Kemp flew out to Omaha to meet Cain after he trashed Clinton in a townhall debate.

Anonymous
Go figure. Newt is flexible and willing to make a buck. A lot of bucks. I prefer Romney/ Believe it or not, I think is the more conservative candidate. I also think it is in Romney’s nature to be a ruthless sob when it comes to making the govt work more efficiently. As in the first person who speaks up in a big meeting and says, “Well Mr. President, that isn’t the way things work here” will be summarily dismissed. As the person is walking out of the room, Romney will ask if there are any other questions or doubts about his agenda. Newt will make speeches and be a visionary. But he will make deals and compromise in order to get his over thought ideas into play. i just think Romney will kick ass and take names.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Well there ya go! You know what to do now! At this point in the game, people should have a pretty decent idea about where their ideal candidate stands. And contrary to popular belief, there is no single “Conservative” ideology. There is an “ideal” ideology, and there is definitely an “anti-conservative” ideology, but just because you and I may vote for a different man, we are both just two different “Conservatives”!!! Either way, it’d be hard to do worse than we are now with Obama!

Anonymous
if its down to him or mitty I can stomach voting for him. hes pragmatic enough to know he will under a microscope all the time.
I will NEVER vote romney.

Anonymous
and I will never vote for Gingrich……..looks like 4 more years of obama either way unless a solid 3rd party candidate enters the picture.

Anonymous
Obama can’t win. 2008 was a perfect storm. 8 years of anti-Bush, first black president, record voting from youth and blacks, and millions of independents voting for hope and change. This is along with Rep base voter fatigue and the worst Rep nominee in 100 years, led to Obama winning by less than 6 points? All we need is a swing of 3%.
Youth and minority unemployment is over 25%, will he get more or less votes?
Will he get more or less Jewish votes?
Will he get more or less white independent votes? The 2010 mid-terms showed what the independents think of him.
Not only that, Obama’s own actions will tell you that he has not only lost the indedepent vote, but it isn’t coming back. He will try to win by motivating unions, blacks, hispanics, and college youths…AND…even if he did that, the right is motivated. NO WAY OBAMA can win short of our nominee going John Edwards on us right before the election. (Which is how Obama won his first two races in Illinois). So, it doesn’t matter if it is Newt or Mitt, I would prefer Palin myself, once we get control of the Congress, we can dictate what passes and insist that it gets signed.

http://profiles.google.com/michael.andrew.alaniz Michael Alaniz
Who’s word do you believe more, Newt’s, or someone who is trying to dig up dirt on a specific candidate that they themselves may not like. Hannity and other hosts have asked him numerous times about the Freddie Mac issue and frankly I believe Gingrich is telling the truth. Andy Levy was right on Hannit’y the other night, this cult like following of certain candidates has got to stop, its horrible! Keep your mind open about other candidates, especially Newt.

Anonymous
Newt is the most corrupt politician in Washington! What a joke if the GOP picks this creep.

MichaelLee1
Newt reminds me of an old Joe Walsh song,”Take the money and run”. Face it, he’s a greedy pig like the rest of them. And just like pigs they wallow in each others shit. Sorry I was so harsh on pigs!

Anonymous
Sorry, that is the Steve Miller Band. Joe Walsh was Ordinary Average Guy.

KenInMontana
Don’t forget “Life’s been good to me (so far)”.

http://fishygov.wordpress.com FishyGov
The latest Rasmussen Poll has Gingrich leading the other candidates with 38% which is well above Perry’s and Cain’s peaks in the low 30′s.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/election_2012_republican_presidential_primary
Eleven months to go until the general election and we have turned our collective thumbs down for Pawlenty, Bachmann, Romney, Paul, Huntsman, Santorum, Perry and now front runner Gingrich.
With this latest information on Newt — provided by Verum Serum and RS — the true conservatives have proven that there is no current candidate worthy or qualified to represent constitutional conservatives.
It would appear that all of these candidates have been flawed from the start of this election process. I’m shock at their nondisclosure of this fact!
My fear is that we will not be able to field a viable candidate unless Christ descends to Mother Earth and declares his candidacy for President of the United States. Or he resurrects a pre-Alzheimer Ronald Reagan to run for his third term after he provides proof that his rebirth occurred in the United States.
Barring those two events we seem to be standing naked in a prison shower and bending at the hip to pick up our soap.

Anonymous
Yes, but keep in mind the Conservative vote is split between all the other candidates.
Bachman, Santorum will not last. Cain’s on his way out. Rhu Paul is a joke. Then it will come down to Perry, Romney and Newt. Then we’ll see the numbers.

Anonymous
Right on, Right on. Mitt’s numbers are at 25%, but about 50% of those are somewhat excited to vote, whereas, of Newt’s 38%, about 75% are excited to vote. Whatever conservative comes out of Iowa, we need to back in NH to knock Mitt out. If Mitt gets stomped in Iowa and NH, he is done.

Anonymous
I am a Republican and I along with many of my Republican friends will not vote for Gingrich in the General. We feel morals and integrity are key factors in selecting a leader…besides I have a hunch that there will be a strong 3rd party candidate that will appeal to those Republicans who value ethics as well as Independents and Reagan Democrats.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1341006813 Gary W. Haddix
I am anxious to read your posts after next week….I believe that your prediction of Cain’s demise is just parroting what the media and political elite have suggested you think. Don’t trust the media, or the polls….talk to the people who are motivated to save our country. I think you will find that most people are sick and tired of the status quo, that most people want a leader, not a slick politician. There is only one non-politician in the race….he’s been lied about, had a full on character assassination assault, and been made to look stupid. But he is not stupid, and neither are the majority of Americans who possess common sense. These attacks are coming at him because he is a strong leader who will produce results….and that scares a LOT of people who are in power. Go ahead and ask around outside of sites like these….talk to people at the grocery store.
I have been doing this…..and you know what? Cain has support…..a lot of it!

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Honestly, I don’t really mind voting for a politican. Just like lawyers, there are some good and some bad. I’m not one of those people that believes you are somehow inherently evil because you chose to represent your community in Congress and become more involved in the political process. In fact, there are many instances where being a politician can actually HELP get things done better, quicker, and easier, since they already know how things work in Washington and how to get things done.
How many people would be happy with voting for Demint, or maybe Rand Paul, or maybe Allen West, or perhaps Orrin Hatch, or who knows, maybe even John Cornyn, John Thune, Tom Coburn, Bachmann, or Rick Santorum, etc. etc. Stereotypes really don’t help us much in politics. I wouldn’t rule ANYBODY out because of their profession…I’d vote for a Hooker if she told me what I wanted to hear ! LOL! HAHAHAHAHA!
But seriously…judge people based on their ideas, ethics, and morals. Not how they choose to make their money.

Anonymous
Too bad Mike Pence didn’t run!

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
This’ll probably sound bad, but for the life of me I can’t figure out who Mike Pence is. Can you refresh my memory? I’m sure I’ve heard of him, but I’m blanking right now. I’m gonna go take a nap before I start studying for me Chem Lab Final tomorrow.

Anonymous
He was Congressman from Indiana. Solid conservative, fiscal and social. Will be running for Gov of Indiana. He also hosted a radio show and was very well spoken and passionate…without a teleprompter.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Hahaha! “without a teleprompter”! Ya know, I have to admit, before taking Communications class, I never realized just how hard it was to speak in public. I can argue and debate with the best of them when I’m around my friends. But put me in a more formal setting, and no matter how well I know what I’m talking about, I have a tendency to ramble on and on and on and on and o…oh, sorry! !

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
You are right though. Cain’s character HAS been assassinated, and it humiliates me to no end to see OUR side doing it. Criticize his policies, statements, etc. But people shouldn’t be saying he (or ANY MAN for that matter) is assaulting women without CLEAR, CONCISE evidence.
Anonymous
Fair enough. I like Cain, but he does not have a command of the issues and this UNFAIR character assassination has hurt him.

Anonymous
Cain’s inability to speak to national security issues shows me that he didn’t really believe he was going to catch on and he wasn’t prepared. One reason I was so disappointed that Palin didn’t run. This process would have validated her, as she has been giving speeches and interviews on the economy, national security, etc… for the last 2 years and would have been ready to roll. (The opposite of Perry.) While people say her negatives were too high, so were Hillary’s until she actually proved that she put in her time on the campaign trail. I feel we missed an opportunity with Palin and/or Pence. Rick Santorum has many of the same positions, but they come across as polished instead of whiney. Anybody but Romney. If he wins, then we support him, try to win 60 seats in the Senate and force him to sign whatever it is we want.

Anonymous
I will not vote for Romney. It is a violation of my conscience.

Anonymous
Even vs Obama?

Anonymous
Even against obama.
If we can’t get ANYONE but Romney by that point, forget it. Bring on the riots. I’m not supporting phony, spineless BS Re-PUBIC-icans. All it does is prolong the problem.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
That’s true…might as well get the riots out of the way now. Honestly, I’ve never really considered that option, even though I’ve been preparing for it for a while now! Excellent point!

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
“Barring those two events we seem to be standing naked in a prison shower and bending at the hip to pick up our soap”
Awwwwkkkwwwwwaaaaaaaaaarrrrrddddd! !

http://fishygov.wordpress.com FishyGov
Depends on whether you like being in that situation or not. It would appear that the voters like bending over at the hip for our government and its policies.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Hahah! ‘Tis true, ’tis true!

Anonymous
Oh yeah, let’s nominate Mitt, he’s been running for 6 years and has never broken above 28%, yeah he’s the man….
2008 all over again…. GOP idiots…

Anonymous
Right on!
Pick Newt, pick Perry either will destroy obama.

Anonymous
If Perry could muster come confidence in the next few debates and not just, “well, at least he didn’t suck”. If he could show that he can take on Obama, he could find his way back. Until then, even though I am the most comfortable with his policies compared to Newt, Mitt, and Herm, I can’t vote for him because he will pee down his bowed legs in his debate with Obama. Can you imagine him trying to attack Obama the same way that he did Mitt? If he can’t get Mitt, who has supported every position except for reverse cowboy, how can he get Obama? Everyone can see what is happening here. As soon as a candidate who is more conservative than Romney steps up, we back them until they prove otherwise. Once we leave Iowa, conservatives need to be on the same page into NH, SC, and FL. If we do, Romney will be done and mission accomplished.

Anonymous
Your last statement,”and Romney will be done and mission accomplished”, is precisely why the GOP will lose the election in 2012. Your group, the ABR or the ABM group and your efforts have fragmented the party. Many of your people threatened to never vote for Romney, if he was the nominee and you only focused your rath on Romney, no other GOP candidate. Gingrich, the most corrupt BIG government politician in the GOP field got a pass for everything.
I will guarantee you that if the GOP selects Gingrich,one of the most polarizing figures in politics that the GOP will lose because people like me will refuse to vote for the immoral pig. Gingrich’s GOP nomination would provide the perfect opportunity for a strong 3rd party challenger to come in and take the votes of the Reagan Democrats and Independents as well as conservative Republican’s like myself.

Anonymous
Gingrich is the career politician and life long insider like John McCain and they both are married to bleached blonds. It will be 2008 all over again. Gingrich is too polarizing and is too corrupt. The LSM will wait to expose all of his baggage until after the nomination. A year would not be enough time to expose Gingrich’s garbage. A polarizing GOP candidate like Gingrich will most likely result in a 3rd party run and I actually think the right Independent candidate could win the race. After the LSM destroys GIngrich, the GOP will be begging for another option and they will flock to the Independent.

Anonymous
“I’m sorry folks, but this makes me angry. If all of this is true (and Newt needs to address this) then he’s a sellout. Plain and simple.”
Good grief, Scoop. When you make comments like this, it sounds like you’re already condemning the man. This is just the sort of thing about conservative bloggers that Rush complains about. Get some solid footing! Stand your ground until the facts are made plain and Newt has a chance to respond. Only then should you pontificate on what makes you angry about him. You did this with Cain, too.

http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop
If this were Cain, I’d say the exact same thing about him. We DO have facts in this case, and I quoted them.
Also, I left room for him to refute it. How is that a full condemnation?

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
Very true, and I will COMPLETELY agree with you that Newt DOES need to address this!
Anonymous
I wrote that it *sounds* like you’re condemning him. To many people, that comes out the same as if you were actually doing it.
The MSM does this all the time. “Mr. Cain, if these allegations turn out to be true, wouldn’t everyone be justified in being outraged at what a horrible, despicable awful thing you did?” Technically, they’re talking about a possible outcome that hasn’t yet happened, but the effort and passion that goes into the “what if” part of the comment still resonates with many as if it really did happen. The MSM knows this and they make use of it all the time.
I’m saying we should all withhold any scathing language about what *might* be, until it actually *is*.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
There’s actually a term for that…I forget what it is though. Kinda like repeating something you know to be false, as often as possible, knowing that eventually people will subconsciously shift to your side. For example, after Liberals maligned President Bush for so long, many people will INSTANTLY get angry just by hearing his name. It’s all psychology.

Anonymous
Gingrich is a Washington insider who has made his living selling lobbyists and companies access to lawmakers in Washington. What do you think his 37 million dollar think tank does with all of the Healthcare companies that pay Gingrich 100s of thousands of dollars for access to Gingrich?? Wake up people. I can not believe that the Tea Party people would get on board with this corrupt big government crony!

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
That was really funny! That dog looked so sad!
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
PREACH!
Anonymous
“I’m sorry folks, but this makes me angry. If all of this is true (and Newt needs to address this) then he’s a sellout. Plain and simple.”
Scoop, when you make comments like this, it sounds like you’re already condemning the man. Stand your ground and wait for Newt to respond before committing things like this to type. This is just the sort of thing about conservative bloggers that Rush was bemoaning–you’re so quick to throw your own representatives under the bus. You did this to Cain, too.
Anonymous
KEEP VETTING RS. I have no candidate right now…I’m searching…and your searching is of G R E A T value to me. I got off the merry-go-round of thinking I had found “the one”. Instead, I recently have been scrutinizing all candidates and skeptically waiting for shoes to drop and waiting for more to play out in coming months.
I’m a “homeless, tent dweller” when it comes to firming up a solid commitment to any given candidate. Thanks so much for your enduring pursuit of information to assist me in my quest for a candidate of whom I can feel a lasting commitment to….even if that particular individual posseses human inferfectionss.
Anonymous
If you don’t like Newt, Romney is your man. But, beware, Mitt cannot even handle Baier’s interview. How can you expect Mitt to handle $1 Billion of evil money tearing him down for 6 months?

Anonymous
I thought Mitt handled the interview fine…personally I think Romney is getting irritated with the gotcha questions especially since Gingrich is the King of Flip floppers and he gets away with, “oh, I changed my mind”. By the way, why is it Okay for Gingrich to be condescending and negative towards the media in the debates and Romney has one interview where he is irritated with the journalist and it turns into a federal case?
http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
The problem with Romney is he flips and flops so much you will never know where you stand with him. He throws rocks at others then gets his underwear in a twist when others question his motives or ask him to explain his flips after he flops.
Romney is a closet liberal just look at his record….I believe you could call him a Rockerfeller Republican which is definitely the wrong way to take the country. He also has a glass jaw and Obama will make mince meat of him in a debate because the Democrats already have a warehouse full of ammo on him.
Since all the Democrats really want the contest to be a Romney versis Obama race that should tell you something.

Anonymous
LOL First $640,000 for a mortgage training conference and then this.
If it is true that:
“… Freddie Mac officials familiar with his work in 2006 say Gingrich was asked to build bridges to Capitol Hill Republicans and develop an argument on behalf of the company’s public-private structure that would resonate with conservatives seeking to dismantle it.”
and Gingrich got paid for saying:
…”We obviously don’t want to use GSEs for everything, but there are times when private enterprise alone is not sufficient to achieve a public purpose.”
and
…”making homeownership more accessible and affordable is a policy goal I believe conservatives should embrace.”
then Freddie and Fannie are stupider than we thought. In stead of building a bridge to capitol Hill Republicans, it looks more like old Next sold these bastards an Alaskan bridge to nowhere!
Have you ever left a job and later been hired as a consultant for a former competitor? This is about the strongest advice you can give without bursting into laughter. When they ask for something, you must respond of lose your retainer.
And, ecause you generally pre-date everyone at that company and when they brought you on, you were introduced as “the guru of whatever,” the company will report everything you say, JUST IN CASE someone in the company understands it.
He got Paid! Surgeons and pharmacists get PAID to endorse laxatives!
Now, let’s start talking about vetting the VP candidates.
Anonymous
I’m confused because this doesn’t square with the following video he made in 2008…. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uCRKm28cWw

http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
Very good point C_Hippie. Doesn’t seem to add up… hmmm.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
That was really nice! Thanks for that!

Anonymous
You’re welcome!

http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
Great video posting!!!!! Thanks for the post!

http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada
The thing is with Newt, is that he’s smart- like a walking encyclopedia. He’s a brilliant speaker and he has great ideas. BUT he is also a globalist kind of politician, he may be conservative in some ways, but he’s more like a GW Bush conservative. This is news, which doesn’t really surprise me, although I have to say it makes me angry as well. Either way, he knew or didn’t know, it’s not a good thing, and it shows lack of a ethical and fiscal leadership which is what this country needs right now.

Anonymous
I personally think he is much worse than Bush because of his arrogance. Gingrich will be a little Hitler.

Anonymous
As soon as you bring out Hitler, every thing you just said is nullified.
http://twitter.com/cfallon57 Cheryl Fallon
That is ridiculous-Hitler hated -I don’t think NG is talking about doing away with certain groups of people and calling one race superior than another.

http://twitter.com/conservative__ Anonymous.
Swear. To. God. I thought the title read: “Is Newt Gingrich a conservative slut?”
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JT6RK4NQME54FA3FVYTTHLTRTQ Southnsoul
There is only one way a RINO (Republican In Name Only) Gingrich or Romney, can win the nomination, and that is by conservatives casting aside their principles and voting for them. I won’t. With Obama’s miserable record and abysmal poll numbers, there will probably never be a greater opportunity in our lifetime to put a real conservative in the White House and yet, once again, we see Republicans, gravitating toward a big-government, walk-across-the-aisle, compromising, globalist RINO. It is utterly maddening. As Rush as said, either one of these candidates could beat Obama, so if you claim to be a conservative, then for the sake of this country, vote conservative!!

Anonymous
Gingrich is too polarizing to win the election. I will give you an example,my aunt is a nun who voted for Obama in the last election. She told me today that she does not want to vote for Obama but she will not vote for Gingrich. She would,however vote for Romney. She like myself believes that a strong moral compass is an absolute must for all good leaders. Gingrich reminds me of Richard Nixon.
If the GOP nominates Gingrich they will lose.

Anonymous
But how can she speak of a moral compass and vote Obama? He spoke in direct opposition to the Bible, calling children a punishment instead of a blessing. He mocked Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, saying not to take it too literally. He voted in favor of partial birth abortion.
Not to single out your aunt, but she should seriously consider this. I wish everyone of strong moral fiber who considers Obama a viable candidate would.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1396855720 Brian Jones
I never understood that. I’m Catholic, and the sheer number of Catholics that support Liberals is astounding, compounded on top of the number that support abortion! Very sad! So I’m really not surprised we have nuns that do the same, especially considering we have priests supporting liberals as well.

http://twitter.com/cfallon57 Cheryl Fallon
Because many Catholics unfortunately are Catholic in name only! But shame on the priests and nuns that are liberal-they have indeed lost their way!

Anonymous
Our nation’s survival is on the line. We need the person who will be the best President not the best person to debate Obama. If we don’t get serious about reinstituting limited Constitutional Government we are finished no matter who wins. Vote for a real conservative like Perry or Bachman, not someone who changes positions whenever it’s politically expedient. I prefer Perry based on his strong belief in Federalism.
Anonymous
HE’S STILL BETTER THAN OBAMA!!!

Anonymous
Agreed!
deo heerai
So is Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden thats the people he should be compared to his fellow PROGRESSIVES

http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
So let me get this straight. Newt Gingrich as a private citizen does work for a private organizaition….That’s right Freddie and Fannie are private just like the FED…. signs a contract to do work for an agreed amount that the Client thought was a fair amount to pay…. Newt’s firm makes sure with many lawyers that there is no conflict of interest or illlegality…..Now people are getting their underwear in a twist because he made money????
I do not see the relevance of this and there is no issue here. Are we saying that people who serve in government are now no longer afforded Constitutional rights and are free to pursue happiness (i.e. make money) thoough legal means???
This sould like hypocracy to me. I do not see the problem. I know TheRightStuff’s opinion is different but from what I have read this is above board open and legal.
I say….nothing to see here….lets get on to more important issues and stop this petty crap. Obama should be the target and this just takes the aim off the real problems of the USA and that is DEFEAT the OBAMA monster!!!!

Anonymous
Agree 100%!

http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Poncy/1339730989 Jeremy Poncy
Gingrich is a snake. Politics has changed him over the last decade. He can’t be trusted.
B-Funk
Way to go Verum Serum! God bless the new/only media!
Anonymous
Being realistic, this is the situation we are faced with.
Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, or Barack Obama.
Pick 1 (one).

http://www.facebook.com/salvatore.anello Salvatore Anello
Newt likes to line his pockets but I don’t think he is for fundemental transformation like the other TWO.

Anonymous
Always knew he was a sellout; couldn’t believe people would even THINK of voting for him. Only one person has stayed consistent with the same message and never changed. Tried to warn us about the housing collapse. Everyone makes fun of him! Guess who?
deo heerai
Can you not see Newt and Mahmood ahmadinajad sitting on a couch calling for the destruction of Isreal how about Newt and putin on a Couch or maybe even Newt and Hugo Chavez.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Liz-Theiss/100001295886095 Liz Theiss
Total globalist amnesty scheming scum. will vote further down the ballot.
Anonymous
That is how sleek and brilliant Newt is, he could make insider trading, unprincipled lobbying, and working for big government and businesses as usual look ethical. The debating brilliance he impressed many of us with, could be turned against you too – once he is elected into office. You are nothing but pesky necessary tools in getting to where he wants. If he could twist everything now, what makes you think he won’t do the same thing once he is in office? Who will stop him then? So while you still have the chance, vet him and his past works really, really well.

http://twitter.com/113KriEger Allen
Newt has been vetted….for many many years his life is public knowledge. Really tell me what is or was wrong with Contract with America?? What is or was wrong with a Speaker that gave us years of surplus budgets??? What is or was wrong with is work as an ardent conservatives who still today holds a 95% Conservative rating by the Democratic Conservative Union and has a high conservative indey rating by the New American both well respected Conservative Ratings firms. (kinda like the Moodys of Conservative Politics)
Does Newt have baggage?? Yes. What National politician does not?? Answer none.
Is Newt’s 21st Century Contract with America a good plan?? From what I have read its a great plan!
Since he fullfilled his promise as Speaker on Contract with America in the 1990′s, what makes you think he would not do it again?
My opinion is that he will. Newt has been on the national stage, he does know the process, he does have a plan to bring the USA back and he has been a man who has made good on his promise.
Yes he has an huge ego…name me a politician that is running for President that does not?? Answer there are none… they all are full of themselves. The point is which one can best destroy the Obama monster in a debate win the election, repeal the disasterous Obama monster policies and bring the USA back to its former glory??
Since Newt promises that within 2 hours of his Presidency to resend 40% of Obama MOnsters orders and all by the end of January 2013 and institute a comprehensive plan to bring the USA back again. Newt appears to me more and more appealing everyday.
To just sit there and call names and not objectively look at the facts is crazy emotion. Look at the different plans of each and then compare and ask yourself which plan is the most acceptble to the nation and will actually work? I think you will find the 21st Century Contract with America is the best one of the bunch.
REMEMEBER…the objective is REMOVE OBAMA!!! Undo all the damage the OBAMA monster has done. That is the primary objective and never let us be detracted from that fact.

Anonymous
What part of Unethical is hard to understand? He was fined by the House of Ethics committee in the past for unethical lapses. Do your research!

UPDATED: Campaign responds – Is Newt Gingrich a conservative sellout?

get updates on twitter

trs awesome meter

subscribe to us

Places of Interest

Admin

archives